EMF Stimulates Cartilage Differentiation in Endochondral Ossification Coincident with an Increase in TGFβ Expression

  • Deborah McK. Ciombor
  • Roy K. Aaron

Abstract

Stimulation of bone and cartilage with appropriately configured low-frequency EMF have generally resulted in an increase in repair in fracture non-unions, osteotomies, spinal fusions, and osteonecrosis. The mechanism by which these fields produce their effects is not known. This can be approached at the cell membrane level - examining signal transduction, or at physiological level - examining cell behavior, notably protein synthesis. This review addresses the second issue. Current information suggests that regardless of signal transduction mechanisms, EMFs have their ultimate effect on cells by altering transcription of extracellular matrix proteins, notably collagen and proteoglycan. Recent information from several laboratories indicate that transcription of growth factors important to bone formation, including IGF-II and BMP 2, 4, and 7, can be increased as well, providing a physiological amplification mechanism by which EMFs act1.2.3.4.

Keywords

Bone Morphogenetic Protein Chondrogenic Differentiation Endochondral Ossification Endochondral Bone Formation Sulfate Incorporation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Nagai, M. Ota Pulsating electromagnetic field stimulates mRNA expression of bone morphogenetic protein -2 and -4. J. Dent. Res. 73, 1601–1605, (1994).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. Sahinoglu, B. Bhatt, L. Gullett et al., Pulsed electromagnetic fields induce osteogenesis and upregulate bone morphogenetic protein -2 and -4 mRNA in rat osteoblasts in vitro, Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc.,21, 204–234, (1996).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Yajima, M. Ochi, Y. Hirose et al., Abstract: Effects of pulsing electromagnetic fields on gene expression of bone morphogenetic proteins in human osteoblastic cell line in vitro, JBMR. 11(Suppl 1), S381, (1996).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Fitzsimmons, J. Ryaby, F. Magee et al., IGF-II receptor numaber is increased in TE-85 osteosarcoma cells by combined magnetic fields, J. Bone Mins. Res., 10, 812–819, (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. K. Aaron and D. McK. Ciombor, Acceleration of experimental endochondral ossification by biophysical stimulation of the progenitor cell pool, J. Ortho. Res., 14, 582, (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. K. Aaron, D. McK. Ciombor and G. Jolly, Stimulation of experimental endochondral ossification by low energy pulsing electromagnetic fields, J. Bone Mins. Res, 4, 227, (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. K. Aaron and D. McK. Ciombor, Electrical stimulation of bone induction and bone grafting, in: Bone grafts and bone substitutes, Ed.: M. Habal and A. H. Reddi, p. 182, W.B. Saunders Inc, Philadelphia, PA.(1992).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah McK. Ciombor
    • 1
  • Roy K. Aaron
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OrthopaedicsBrown University School of MedicineProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations