Advertisement

Globalization, Posts, and the Universal Postal Union

a Functional Critique
  • Tim Walsh
Chapter
Part of the Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series book series (TREP, volume 35)

Abstract

The Universal Postal Union was established 125 years ago. One of several public international unions created towards the end of the nineteenth century, the UPU brings together representatives of states to oversee the effective development of international postal services, the good governance of which would otherwise be affected by state boundaries.1 Since the Union’s creation in 1874 the political, market and technological environments in which postal services are provided have changed enormously and the governance regime for the sector at both national and international levels has been under intense scrutiny.

Keywords

Service Failure Postal Service Postal Network Electronic Data Interchange Private Operator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Archer, C. (1992). International Organizations, Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murphy, C. N. (1994) International Organization and Industrial Change: Global Governance Since 1850, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Walsh, T. J. (1997). The Governance of International Postal Networks in a Changing Market Place, in Towards a Regulatory Framework for Cross-Border Mail Stampf U. & Plum M (eds), No 6 WIK.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Menon, M. A. K. (1965), Universal Postal Union, International Conciliation, No 552 March, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, pp 6.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    John, R. R. (1995). Spreading the News: The American Postal System From Franklin to Morse, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mark W. Zacher with Brent A. Sutton (1996) Governing Global Networks, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Groom, A. J. R. and Taylor, P. (eds) (1990) Frameworks for International Co-Operation, Pinter: London, highlight two distinct roles of inter-governmental bodies: “service organization” performing functions and “forum organizations” in which norms, principles and policies are discussed.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Quoted in Codding, G. A. (1964: 20) The Universal Postal Union: Co-ordinator of International Mails, New York University Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Menon ibid, pp11.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Claude, I. L. (1964) Swords into Ploughshares, Random House, New York, pp 40.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Since 1996 European road-based parcels have traveled outside the UPU standards and regulations through the IPC-brokered European Parcels Group. The failure of the UPU network to meet the standards and needs of customers (and resulting loss of market share, Figure 2, above) encouraged European posts to develop an alternative multilateral agreement covering exchange of parcel items, track and trace standards, delivery (not limited to the public postal operator) and customer service standards. Penalties are incurred for failure to deliver within the specified delivery times.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Walsh, T. J. (1998) Globalization, Competition and the World Postal Market: How Commonwealth Post Offices Can Respond, Conference of Commonwealth Postal Administrations, Kuala Lumpur, September. See also Kofman, E. & Youngs, G. (1996) Globalization: Theory and Practice Pinter: London.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McGrew T. (1992). A. Global Society, in S. Hall, D. Held & T. McGrew (eds), Modernity and its Futures, Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dunning J. H. (1997) Governments, Globalization & International Business, OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Williams, M. (1992) Rethinking Sovereignty, in Globalization: Theory and Practice. Kofman, E. and Youngs, G. Pinter: LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mitrany, D. (1946). A Working Peace System: An Argument for the Functional Development of International Organization, 4th Edition, National Peace Council: LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Imber, M. F. (1989) The USA, ILO, UNESCO and IAEA: Politicization and Withdrawal in the Specialized Agencies. Macmillan: London. See also Ghebali, V. Y. (1986): The Politicization of the UN Specialized Agencies: The UNESCO Syndrome, in Pitt, D. & Weiss, T. G. (1986) The Nature of UN Bureaucracies Croom Helm: LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    As UPS have argued: “Government should not participate in the competitive free market process unless there is a breakdown of that process. Government intervention should then be kept to a minimum necessary to remedy the breakdown or to restore a healthy competitive climate”, quoted in USPS Five Year Strategy Plan. 1998–2002. See also Radwanski, G. (1996) The Future of Canada Post Corporation. Canada Post Mandate Review, Ministry of Public Works and Government Service which recommended Canada Post cease all activities on competitive markets such as courier, electronic and admail services and confine itself to basic monopoly letter services. The report conclusions were not accepted by the Canadian government.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    United States General Accounting Office, (1996) Postal Service Reform: Issues Relevant to Changing Restrictions on Private Letter Delivery, Volumes I & II report concludes: “As the Service prepares to compete more effectively and pushes for greater freedom to compete, and as private capacity to deliver letters grows, the Statutes are likely to become more controversial. Calls for Congress to consider whether to modify the Statutes, or eventually eliminate them altogether or make other changes in the 1970 Act are likely to become more intense”. (pp 30, Vol. I).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    United States General Accounting Office (1998) US Postal Service: Postal & Telecommunications Sector Representation in International Organizations.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Walsh, T. J. and Taylor, A. (1999) Posting Economic Success, Post Europ: Brussels.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    International Chamber of Commerce, (1999). Policy Statement to the Beijing Congress of the Universal Postal Union, pp 1Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    This is a powerful example of states using their political power within the context of a ‘one member, one vote’ UPU to develop payment arrangements which ignore market realities. To make matters worse, some of the same Post Offices conclude deals with private cross-border mailers (such as Mail Africa and MMC) for delivery services at rates below terminal dues in return for up-front payment in hard currency.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Center europeen de Normalization. CEN is also developing standards on letter boxes, address characteristics, address management and size of delivery letter boxes (with postal operators, suppliers and manufacturers) and a harmonization of postal vocabulary (with UPU involvement). CEN standards may lead to global standards through the International Standard Organization structures.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    The British Post Office, May 1998. Reforming the Governance of International Posts: A Discussion Document and Call To Action, Paper to Second Strategic Planning Forum of the UPU, May.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Geneva Strategy Conference (1997). UPU 2005, October.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Air Courier Conference of America (1998) Petition Before US Department of State to Develop US Policy Toward the UPU, November. See also Fedex (1999) Draft Proposals to Amend the Acts of the UPU at the Congress in Beijing, January.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A D Little (1998) Review of the Organization of the UPU, Berne.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Air Courier Conference of America (1999) ibid accuses the UPU of the “co-mingling of governmental and commercial functions” (pp 6) and calls for a “separate secretariat for the Council of Administration primarily of experts in matters of international law and trade policy” (pp8).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Claude, I. L. (1964: 174) ibid. Groom and Taylor (1990) ibid underline the point that effective implementation of decisions, accountable leadership and robust performance review mechanisms are essential elements in all effective international organizations. See also Jacobson, H. K. ITU: A Potpourri of Bureaucrats and Industrialists in The Anatomy of Influence: Decision-Making in International Organizations (eds) Cox, R. W. and Jacobson, H. K. Yale University Press: New Haven.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mitrany, D. (1946: 36), ibid. Such principles are effective in other international network industries. For example, international shipping conventions stipulate that, in order for a convention to enter into force, states accounting for between one half and two-thirds of the world’s dead-weight tonnage have to accept it. And in the international frequency registration board of the ITU non-technical issues are decided by two-thirds vote, while on technical issues a consensus is sought but failing this, a two-thirds vote of members present will suffice.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hamelink, C. J. (1994). The Politics of World Communications Sage: London. Hamelink examines the policies of the various communications inter-governmental organizations (UPU, ITU, WIPO) and assesses their contribution to the protection and promotion of the dignity of people.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tim Walsh
    • 1
  1. 1.International Affairs & Business StrategyThe UK Post Office International ServicesUK

Personalised recommendations