Preparing Mammary Gland Whole Mounts from Mice

  • Susan B. Rasmussen
  • Lawrence J. T. Young
  • Gilbert H. Smith
Chapter

Abstract

We present methods, fixation schedules, and stains for preparing whole mounts of murine mammary glands. We have included references to papers published 60 years ago as well as those in current journals. The use of this method has undergone a renaissance with the advent of transgenic and knock-in—knockout genetic mouse models relevant to the study of mammary growth, development, and neoplasia.

Keywords

Methylene Blue Mammary Gland Mouse Mammary Gland Carminic Acid Hematoxylin Solution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    W. U. Gardner and L. C. Strong (1935). The normal development of the mammary glands of virgin female mice of ten strains varying in susceptibility to spontaneous neoplasms. Am. J. Cancer 25: 282–290.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. C. Taylor and C. A. Waltman (1940). Hyperplasias of the mammary gland in the human being and in the mouse. Morphologic and etiologic contrasts. Arch. Surgery 40: 733–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. A. Huseby and J. J. Bittner (1946). A comparative morphological study of the mammary glands with reference to the known factors influencing the development of mammary carcinoma in mice. Cancer Res. 6: 240–255.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. J. Dalton (1945). Histogenesis of the Mammary Gland of the Mouse, The Science Press Printing Company, Lancaster, PA.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. B. DeOme, L. J. Faulkin, H. A. Bern, and P. B. Blair (1959). Development of mammary tumors from hyperplastic alveolar nodules transplanted into gland-free mammary fat pads of female C3H mice. Cancer Res. 19: 515–520.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. V. Nie and A. Dux (1971). Biological and morphological characteristics of mammary tumors in GR mice. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 46 (4): 885–897.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. W Daniel, K. B. DeOme, J. T. Young, P. B. Blair, and L. J. Faulkin, Jr. (1968). The in vivo life span of normal and preneoplastic mouse mammary glands: a serial transplantation study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 61 (1): 53–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. M. Rivera (1971). Mammary Gland Culture, Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. R. Banerjee, B. G. Wood, E K. Lin, and L. R. Crump (1976). Organ culture of the whole mammary glands of the mouse. Tissue Culture Associ. Manual 2 (4): 457–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Medina (1973). Preneoplastic lesions in mouse mammary tumorigenesis. Metho. Cancer Res. 7: 3–53.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Nagasawa and R. Yanai (1978). Normal and Abnormal Growth of the Mammary Gland, Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. H. Smith, D. Gallahan, E Diella, C. Jhappan, G. Merlino, and R. Callahan (1995). Constitutive expression of a truncated INT3 gene in mouse mammary epithelium impairs differentiation and functional development. Cell Growth Differentiation 6: 563–577.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Gallahan, C. Jhappan, G. Robinson, L. Hennighausen, R. Sharp, E. Kordon, R. Callahan, G. Merlin, and G. H. Smith (1996). Expression of a truncated Int3 gene in developing secretory mammary epithelium specifically retards lobular differentiation resulting in tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 56: 1775–1785.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. K. Presnell and M. P. Schreibman (1997). Humason’s Animal Tissue Techniques, The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. C. Clayden (1971). Practical Section Cutting and Staining, Churchill and Livingstone, London.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. A. Davenport (1960). Histological and Histochemical Technics, W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    L. G. Lima (ed.) (1968). Manual of Histologic Staining Methods of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. B. Carnoy (1887). Cellule 3: 247–324.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. M. Strum (1979). A mammary gland whole mount technique that preserves cell fine structure for electron microscopy. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 27 (9): 1271–1274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Heidenhain (1892). Ueber Kern and Protoplasma, Wilhelm Englemann, Leipsig.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    E Mayer (1899). Üeber haematoxylin, carmin, and verwandte materien. Z. WIss. Mikrosk. 16: 196–220.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. A. Hayat (1993). Stains and Cytochemical Methods, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    K. P. Hummel, E L. Richardson, and E. Fekete (1966). Anatomy. In E. L. Green (ed.), Biology of the Laboratory Mouse, McGraw Hill, New York, p. 267.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan B. Rasmussen
    • 1
  • Lawrence J. T. Young
    • 2
  • Gilbert H. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, National Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaUSA
  2. 2.Center for Comparative MedicineUniversity of California-DavisDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations