Advertisement

Social Policy and Community Psychology

  • Deborah A. Phillips

Abstract

Policy applications are a natural, albeit underexplored, extension of community psychology, as illustrated by these opening quotes. This is the guiding premise of this chapter. Preceding chapters have examined the traditions, theories, methods, and empirical repertoire of community psychology. Here, we examine policy as an arena in which community psychology applies its expertise to the goal of social change

Keywords

Public Policy Social Policy Child Care Domestic Violence American Psychologist 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albee, G. W. (1980). A competency model to replace the deficit model. In M. Gibbs, J. Lachenmeyer, & J. Sigal (Eds.), Community psychology: Theoretical and empirical approaches New York: GardnerGoogle Scholar
  2. Alkin, M. L., Daillak, R., & White, P. (1979). Using evaluations: Does evaluation make a difference? Beverly Hills: SageGoogle Scholar
  3. American Psychological Association. (1984). Task Force on Psychology and Public Policy Final Report Washington, D.C.: AuthorGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson, R. C. (1977). Reflections on psychology’s past and concerns about its future. American Psychologist, 32, 205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baltes, P. N. B., Lindenberger, U., & Staudinger, U. M. (1998). Life-span theory in developmental psychology. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed, pp. 1029–1144). New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauer, R. A. (1966). Social psychology and the study of policy formation. American Psychologist, 933–942Google Scholar
  7. Bazelon, D. (1982). Veils, values, and social responsibility. American Psychologist, 37, 115–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett, C. C., Anderson, L. S., Cooper, S.,Hassol, L.,Klein, D. C., & Rosenblum, G. (1966). Community psychology: A report of the Boston conference on the education of psychologists for community mental health Boston: Department of Psychology, Boston UniversityGoogle Scholar
  9. Berger, P. I., & Neuhaus, R. J. (1977). To empower people: The role of mediating structures in public policy. Washington, D.C.: The American Enterprise InstituteGoogle Scholar
  10. Bevan, W. (1976). The sound of the wind that’s blowing. American Psychologist, 31,481–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bevan, W. (1982). A sermon of sorts in three parts. American Psychologist, 37,1303–1322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bevan, W., & Kessel, F. (1994). Plain truths and home cooking: Thoughts on the making and remaking of psychology. American Psychologist, 49,505–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boulding, K. E. (1976). The boundaries of social policy. In J. E. Tropman, M. Bluhy, R. Lind, W. Vasey, & R. A. Croxton (Eds.), Strategic perspectives on social policy (pp. 11–21). New York: PergamonGoogle Scholar
  14. Brim, O. G., & Phillips, D. A. (1988). The life-span intervention cube. In E. M. Hetherington, R. M. Lerner, & M. Perlmutter (Eds.), Child development in life-span perspective (pp. 277–298). New York: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
  15. Brody, J. G. (1985). New roles for psychologists in environmental impact assessment. American Psychologist, 40, 1057–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brody, J. G. (1986). Community psychology in the eighties: A celebration of survival. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 139–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brody, J. G., Fleishman, J., & Galavotti, C. (1986). Community responses presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., AugustGoogle Scholar
  18. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1974). Developmental research, public policy, and the ecology of childhood. Child Development, 45, 1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., pp. 993–1028). New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  22. Cairns, R. B., & Cairns, B. D. (1986). On social values and social development: Gender and aggression. In L. Friedrich-Cofer (Ed.), Human nature and public policy: Scientific views of women, children, and families (pp. 177–201). New York: PraegerGoogle Scholar
  23. Campbell, D. (1969). Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 24,409–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Caplan, N., Morrison, A., & Stambaugh, R. J. (1975). The use of social science knowledge in policy decisions at the national level. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  25. Caplan, N., & Nelson, S. D. (1973). On being useful: The nature and consequences of psychological research in social problems. American Psychologist, 28,199–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cohen, D. K., & Garet, N. S. (1975). Reforming educational policy with applied social research. Harvard Educational Review, 45, 17–43Google Scholar
  27. Coleman, J. S. (1978). The use of social science research in the development of public policy. Urban Review, 10, 197–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Connell, J. P., Kubisch, A. C., Schorr, L. B., & Weiss, C. H. (Eds.). (1995). New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods,and contexts New York: The Aspen InstituteGoogle Scholar
  29. Cowen, E. G. (1977). Baby steps toward primary prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 5, 1–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Deitchman, S. (1976). The best-laid schemes: A tale of social research and bureaucracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  31. DeLeon, R H. (1986). Increasing the societal contribution of organized psychology. American Psychologist, 41, 466–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. DeLeon, R. H., O’Keefe, A. M., Vandenbos, G. R., & Kraut, A. G. (1982). How to influence public policy. A blueprint for action. American Psychologist, 37, 476–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Doyle, J. B., Wilcox, B. L., & Reppucci, N. D. (1983). Training for social and community change. In E. Seidman (Ed.), Handbook of social intervention (pp. 615–638). Beverly Hills: SageGoogle Scholar
  34. Elder, G. H. (1998). The life course and human development. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., pp. 939–992). New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  35. Elmore, R. (1980). Backward mapping: Implementation research and policy decisions. Political Science Quarterly, 94, 601–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Elmore, R. F. (1983). Social policymaking as strategic intervention. In E. Seidman (Ed.), Handbook of social intervention (pp. 212–236). Beverly Hills: SageGoogle Scholar
  37. Fawcett, S. B., Seekins, R., Shang, P. W., Muiu, C., & Suarez de Balcazar, Y. (1984). Creating and using technologies for community empowerment. Prevention in Human Services, 13,145–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Friedrich-Cofer, L. (Ed.) (1986). Human nature and Public Policy: Scientific views of women,children, and families New York: PraegerGoogle Scholar
  39. Garbarino, J. (1982). Children and families in the social environment New York: AldineGoogle Scholar
  40. Garner, W. R. (1972). The acquisition and appliation of knowledge: A symbiotic relation. American Psychologist, 27, 941–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Glaser, E. M., & Taylor, S. H. (1973). Factors influencing the success of applied research. American Psychologist, 28, 140–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Goodstein, L. D., & Sander, I. (1978). Using psychology to promote human welfare: A conceptual analysis of the role of community psychology. American Psychologist, 33, 882–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Goodwin, L. (1973). Bridging the gap between social research and public policy. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 9,85–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Goodwin, L. (1975). Can social science help resolve national problems? New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
  45. Greenberger, E. (1983). A researcher in the policy arena: The case of child labor. American Psychologist, 38,104–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Greenberger, E., & Steinberg, L. (1986). When teenagers work: The psychological and social costs of adolescent employment New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  47. Grubb, W. N., & Lazerson, M. (1982). Broken promises: How Americans fail their children New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  48. Hayes, C. (1982). Making policies for children: A study of the federal process. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of SciencesGoogle Scholar
  49. Heclo, H. (1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment. In A. King (Ed.). The new American apolitical system (pp. 87–124). Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise InstituteGoogle Scholar
  50. Horowitz, I. L. (Ed.). (1971). The use and abuse of social science New Brunswick, NJ: TransactionbooksGoogle Scholar
  51. Iscoe, I. (1974). Community psychology and the competent community. American Psychologist, 29, 607–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kelly, J. G. (1968). Toward an ecological conception of preventive intervention. In J. Carter (Ed.), Research contributions from psychology to community mental health (pp. 76–100). New York: Behavioral PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  53. Kelly, J. G. (1984). Interpersonal and organizational resources for the continued development of community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 12, 313–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kelly, J. G. (1986). Context and process: An ecological view of the interdependence of practice and research. American Journal of Community Psychology,14, 581–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kelly, J. G., & Hess, R. (Eds.). (1986). The ecology of prevention: Illustrating mental health consultation New York: HaworthGoogle Scholar
  56. Ketterer, R., Price, R., & Politser, P. (1980). The action research paradigm. In R. Price, & P. Politser (Eds.), Evaluation and action in the social environment New York: AcademicGoogle Scholar
  57. Kiesler, C. (1980). Psychology and public policy. In L. Bickman (Ed.), Applied Social Psychology Annual, Vol. 1. Beverly Hills, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
  58. Kimble, G. A. (1982). The limits of advocacy Unpublished manuscriptGoogle Scholar
  59. Knorr, K. D. (1977). Policymakers’ use of social science knowledge: Symbolic or instrumental? In C. Weiss (Ed.), Using social research in public policymaking (pp. 165–182). Lexington, KY: D.C. HeathGoogle Scholar
  60. Koretz, D. (1982). Developing useful evaluations: A case history and some practical guidelines. In L. Saxe & D. Koretz (Eds.), New directions for program evaluation: Making evaluation research useful to Congress (No. 14, pp. 25–50), San Francisco: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
  61. Korten, E E, Cook, S. W., & Lacey, J. I. (1970). Psychology and the problems of society. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological AssociationCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Levine, A. G. (1982). Love Canal: Science politics, people. Lexington, MA: Lexington BooksGoogle Scholar
  63. Levine, M., & Perkins, D. V. (1987). Principles of community psychology New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  64. Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19,79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lindblom, C. E., & Cohen, D. (1979). Usable knowledge: Social science and social problem solving. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
  66. Lorion, R. P., Iscoe, I., DeLeon, P. H., & VandenBos, G. R. (Eds.). (1996). Psychology and public policy: Balancing public service and professional need Washington, D.C.: American Psychological AssociationGoogle Scholar
  67. Lynn, L. E. (1978). The question of relevance. In L. E. Lynn (Ed.), Knowledge and policy: The uncertain connection (pp. 12–22). Washington, D.C.: National Academy of SciencesGoogle Scholar
  68. Maccoby, E. E., Kahn, A. J., & Everett, B. A. (1983). The role of psychological research in the formation of policies affecting children. American Psychologist, 38, 80–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. MacRae, D. (1976). The social function of social science New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
  70. March, J. G. (1979). Science, politics, and Mrs. Gruenberg. In The National Research Council in 1979 (pp. 27–36). Washington, D.C.: National Academy of SciencesGoogle Scholar
  71. Marmor, T. R. (1983). Competing perspectives on social policy. In E. Zigler, S. L. Kagan, & E. Klugman (Eds.), Children, government and families: Perspectives on American social policy (pp. 35–56). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  72. McCall, G., & Weber, G. (1984). Social science and public policy: The roles of academic disciplines in policy analysis. Washington, NY: Associated Faculty PressGoogle Scholar
  73. McCall, R. B. (1996). The concept and practice of education, research, and public service in university psychology departments. American Psychologist, 51, 379–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Melton, G. B. (1987a). Bringing psychology to the legal system. American Psychologist, 42, 488–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Melton, G. B. (1987b). Adolescent abortion: Psychological perspectives on public policy. American Psychologist, 42, 69–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Miller, G. A. (1969). Psychology as a means of promoting human welfare. American Psychologist, 24, 1063–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. National Research Council (1998). Violence in families: Assessing prevention and treatment programs R. Chalk & P. A. King (Eds.). Washington, D.C.: National Academy PressGoogle Scholar
  78. Nelson, R. (1977). The moon and the ghetto New York: W.W. NortonGoogle Scholar
  79. Phillips, D. (1983). Improving the connections between child development and social policy Invited presentation before the Conference on Training and Research in Child Development and Social Policy, Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies, Nashville, TNGoogle Scholar
  80. Phillips, D. (1986). The federal model child care standards act of 1985: Step in the right direction or hollow gesture? American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 56, 56–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Phillips, D. (1991). With a little help: Children in poverty and child care. In A. Huston (Ed.), Children in poverty: Child develoment and public policy (pp. 158–189). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  82. Phillips, D., & Zigler, E. (1987). The checkered history of federal child care regulation. In E. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of reserach in education, Vol. 14 (pp. 3–41). Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research AssociationGoogle Scholar
  83. Prewitt, K. (1983). Subverting policy premises. In D. Callahan & B. Jennings (Eds.), Ethics, the social sciences and policy analyses New York: PlenumGoogle Scholar
  84. Price, R. (1989). Bearing witness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 151–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Rappaport, J. (1977). Community psychology: Values,research and action. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & WinstonGoogle Scholar
  86. Rappaport, J. (1981). In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 1–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology,15, 121–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Rein, M., & White, S. H. (1977). Policy research: Belief and doubt. Policy Analysis, 3,239–272Google Scholar
  89. Reppucci, N. D. (1985). Psychology in the public interest. In A. M. Rogers & C. J. Scheier (Eds.), The G. Stanley Hall Lectures Series, Vol. 5. (Pp. 125–126). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological AssociationGoogle Scholar
  90. Reppucci, N. D. (1987). Prevention and ecology: Teen-age pregnancy, child sexual abuse, and organized youth sports. American Journal of Community Psychology,15, 1–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Reppucci, N. D., & Kirk, R. (1984). Psychology and public policy. In G. McCall & G. Weyer (Eds.), Social science and public policy: The roles of academic disciplines in policy analysis (pp. 129–158). Port Washington, NY: Associated Faculty PressGoogle Scholar
  92. Rich, R. F. (1977). Use of social science information by federal bureaucrats: Knowledge for action versus knowledge for understanding. In C. Weiss (Ed.), Using social science research in public policy making (pp. 199–212). Lexington, MA: D.C. HeathGoogle Scholar
  93. Robinson, D.N. (1984). Ethics and advocacy. American Psychologist, 39,787–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Ruble, N. D., & Thompson, E. P. (1992). The implications of research on social development for mental health: An internal socialization perspective. In D. N. Ruble, P. R. Costanzo, & M. E. Oliveri (Eds.), The social psychology of mental health: Basic mechanisms and applications (pp. 81–125). New York: GuilfordGoogle Scholar
  95. Ruopp, R., Travers, J., Glantz, F., & Coelen, C. (1979). Children at the center: Final report of the National Day Care Study Boston: Abt AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  96. Ryan, R. (1971). Blaming the victim New York: Random HouseGoogle Scholar
  97. Sarason, S. B. (1978). The nature of problem-solving in social action. American Psychologist, 33, 370–380. Sarason, S. B. (1981). Psychology misdirected New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
  98. Sarason, S. B. (1983). Psychology and public policy: Missed opportunity. In R. Feiner, L. A. Jason, J. N. Moritsugu, & S. S. Farber (Eds.), Preventive psychology: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 245–250). New York: PergamonGoogle Scholar
  99. Saunders, J. T., & Reppucci, N. D. (1977). Learning networks among administrators of human service institutions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 5, 269–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Scan, S. (1985). Constructing psychology: Facts and fables for our time. American Psychologist, 40, 499–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Seidman, E. (1981). The route from the successful experiment to policy formation. In R. Roesch & R. Corrado (Eds.), Evaluation and criminal justice policy (pp. 81–102). Beverly Hills: SageGoogle Scholar
  102. Seidman, E. (1991). Social regularities and prevention research: A transactional model. In P. Muehrer (Ed.), Conceptuai research models for preventing mental disorders (pp. 145–164). Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental HealthGoogle Scholar
  103. Sigel, I. E. (1998). Practice and research: A problem in developing communication and cooperation. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology,(5th ed., pp. 1113–1132). New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  104. Steiner, G. Y. (1981). The futility of family policy. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings InstitutionGoogle Scholar
  105. Sundquist, J. L. (1978). Research brokerage: The weak link. In L. E. Lynn (Ed.), Knowledge and policy: The uncertain connection (pp. 126–144). Washington, D.C.: National Academy of SciencesGoogle Scholar
  106. Takanishi, R., & Melton, G. B. (1987). Child development research and the legislative process. In G. S. Melton (Ed.), Reforming the law: Impact of child development research (pp. 86–101). New York: GuilfordGoogle Scholar
  107. Task Force on Psychology and Public Policy, American Psychological Association (1986). Psychology and public policy. American Psychologist, 41,914–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Thomas, N. (1997, March). A review of SRCD’s Congressional Science and Executive Branch Fellowship Program: Interviews with past fellows Unpublished document prepared for the SRCD Committee on Social Policy, University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  109. Trickett, E. J. (1984). Toward a distinctive community psychology: An ecological metaphor for the conduct of community research and the nature of training. American Journal of Community Psychology,12, 261–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Trickett, E. J., Kelly, J. G., & Vincent, T. (1985). The spirit of ecological inquiry in community research. In E. Susskind & D. E. Klein (Eds.), Community research: Methods, paradigms,and applications (pp. 283–333). New York: PraegerGoogle Scholar
  111. Weiss, C. (1977). Research for policy’s sake: The enlightenment function of social research. Policy Analysis, 3, 531–545Google Scholar
  112. Weiss, C. (1978). Improving the linkage between social research and public policy. In L. Lynn (Ed.), Knowledge and policy; the uncertain connection (pp. 23–81). Washington, D.C.: National Academy of SciencesGoogle Scholar
  113. Weiss, C. (1983). Ideology, interests, and information. The basis of policy positions. In D. Callahan and B. Jennings (Eds.), Ethics,the social sciences and policy analysis (pp. 213–245). New York: PlenumGoogle Scholar
  114. Weiss, C. (1984). Increasing the likelihood of influencing decisions. In L. Rutman (Ed.), Evaluation research methods: A basic guide (pp. 159–190). Beverly Hills, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
  115. Weiss, C. (1987). The circuitry of enlightenment. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, and Utilization, 8, 274–281Google Scholar
  116. Weiss, C. H. (1995). Nothing as practical as good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In J. P. Connell, A. C. Kubisch, L. B. Schorr, & C. H. Weiss (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods, and contexts New York: The Aspen InstituteGoogle Scholar
  117. Weiss, C., & Bucuvalas, M. J. (1977). The challenge of social research to decision making. In C. Weiss (Ed.), Using social research in public policy-making (pp. 213–234). Lexington, MA: HeathGoogle Scholar
  118. Whitebook, M., Howes, C., & Phillips, D. (1998). Worthy work, unlivable wages: The national child care staffing study, 1988–1997. Washington, D.C.: Center for the Child Care WorkforceGoogle Scholar
  119. Zigler, E. (1980). Welcoming a new journal. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 1, 1–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Zigler, E., Kagan, S. L., & Hall, N. W. (Eds.). (1996). Children, families, and government: Preparing for the 21st century New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah A. Phillips
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of MedicineNational Research CouncilWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations