Environmental Micropaleontology pp 7-37 | Cite as
When Does Environmental Variability Become Environmental Change?
Abstract
The aim of ecological studies is to establish the relationship between the biota (e.g., community structure of populations of living organisms including standing crop, species abundance, and species diversity) and the attributes of the environment (physical, chemical, and biological). Such studies may be spatial involving a suite of samples collected over a geographic area during a very short time interval (days), or temporal, where samples are collected from one (or more) sites over an extended period of time (ideally several decades). Spatial studies give a snapshot over a broad area, whereas temporal studies give a near-continuous record of a very small area.
Keywords
Standing Crop Benthic Foraminifera Agglutinate Test Faunal Change Sill DepthPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Altenbach, A. V., 1992, Short term processes and patterns in the foraminiferal response to organic flux rates, Mar. Micropaleontol. 19:119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Alve, E., 1991, Foraminifera, climatic change, and pollution: A study of late Holocene sediments in Drammensfjord, southeast Norway, Holocene 1:243–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Alve, E., 1994, Opportunistic features of the foraminifer Stainforthia fusiformis (Williamson): evidence from Frierfjord, Norway. J. Micropalaeontol. 13:24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Alve, E., 1995a, Benthic foraminiferal responses to estuarine pollution: A review, J. Foram. Res. 25:190–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Alve, E., 1995b, Benthic foraminiferal distribution and recolonization of formerly anoxic environments in Drammensfjord, southern Norway, Mar. Micropaleontol. 25:169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Alve, E., 1996, Benthic foraminiferal evidence of environmental change in the Skagerrak over the past six decades, Bull. Norges Geol. Unders. 430:85–93.Google Scholar
- Alve, E., 1999, Colonization of new habitats by benthic foraminifera, Earth-Sci. Rev. 46:167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Alve, E., and Bernhard, M., 1995, Vertical migratory response of benthic foraminifera to controlled oxygen concentrations in an experimental mesocosm, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 116:137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Alve, E., and Murray, J. W., 1995, Benthic foraminiferal distribution and abundance changes in Skagerrak surface sediments: 1937 (Höglund) and 1992/1993 data compared, Mar. Micropaleontol. 25:269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Alve, E., and Murray, J. W., 1997, High benthic fertility and taphonomy of foraminifera: A case study of the Skagerrak, North Sea, Mar. Micropaleontol. 32:157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Basson, P. W., and Murray, J. W., 1995, Temporal variations in four species of intertidal foraminifera, Bahrain, Arabian Gulf, Micropaleontology 41:69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bartlett, G. A., 1966, Distribution and abundance of foraminifera and thecamoebina in Miramichi River and Bay, Bedford Inst Oceanogr. Rep. 66(2):l–107.Google Scholar
- Bernhard, J. M., and Reimers, C. E., 1991, Benthic foraminiferal population fluctuations related to anoxia: Santa Barbara Basin, Biogeochemistry 15:127–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bernhard, J. M., Sen Gupta, B. K., and Borne, P. F., 1997, Benthic foraminiferal proxy to estimate dysoxic bottom-water oxygen concentrations: Santa Barbara Basin, U.S. Pacific continental margin, J. Foram. Res. 27:301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Boltovskoy, E., 1964, Seasonal occurrence of some living foraminifera in Puerto Deseado (Patagonia, Argentina), J. Cons. Int. l’Expl. Mer 29:136–145.Google Scholar
- Boltovskoy, E., and Lena, H., 1969a, Seasonal occurrences, standing crop and production in benthic foraminifera of Puerto Deseado, Contr. Cushman Found. Foram. Res. 20:87–95.Google Scholar
- Boltovskoy, E., and Lena, H., 1969b, Microdistribution des foraminifères benthoniques vivants, Rev. Micropaléontol.12:177–185.Google Scholar
- Buzas, M. A., and Culver, S. J., 1994, Species pool and dynamics of marine paleocommunities, Science 264:1439–1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Castignetti, P., 1996, A time-series study of foraminiferal assemblages of the Plym estuary, south-west England, J. Mar. Biol. Assoc, U.K. 76:569–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clarke, K. R., and Warwick, R. M., 1994, Changes in marine communities: An approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, Natural Environment Research Council, UK, 144 pp.Google Scholar
- Culver, S. J., and Buzas, M. A., 1995, The effects of anthropogenic habitat disturbance, habitat destruction, and global warming on shallow marine benthic foraminifera, J. Foram. Res. 25:204–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cushing, D. H., and Dickson, R. R., 1976, The biological response in the sea to climatic changes, Adv. Mar. Biol. 14:1–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Daniels, C. H. von, 1970, Quantitative ökologische Analyse der zeitlichen und rämlichen Verteilung rezenter Foraminiferen im Limski kanal bei Rovinj, Göttinger Arb. Geol. Paläontol 8:1–109.Google Scholar
- Earland, A., 1934, The Falklands sector of the Antarctic (excluding South Georgia), Discov. Rep. 10:1–208.Google Scholar
- Finger, K. L., and Lipps, J. H., 1981, Foraminiiferal decimation and repopulation in an active volcanic caldera, Deception Island, Antarctica, Micropaleontology 27:111–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gooday, A. J., 1993, Deep-sea benthic foraminiferal species which exploit phytodetritus: Characteristic features and controls on distribution, Mar. Micropaleontol. 22:187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gooday, A. J., and Lambshead, P. J. D., 1989, Influence of seasonally deposited phytodetritus on benthic foraminiferal populations in the bathyal northeast Atlantic: The species response, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 58:53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gooday, A. J., and Turley, C. M., 1990, Responses by benthic organisms to inputs of organic material to the ocean floor: A review, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A331:119–138.Google Scholar
- Grimm, V., 1996, A down-to-earth assessment of stability concepts in ecology: dreams, demands and the real problems, Senckenb. Marit. 27:215–226.Google Scholar
- Haas, H. C., 1997, Recent and subrecent agglutinated foraminifers in four box cores from the Skagerrak (NE North Sea), in: Contributions to the Micropaleontology and Paleoceanography of the Northern Atlantic (H. C. Haas and M. A. Kaminski, eds.), Grzybowski Foundation Special Publication 5:217–226.Google Scholar
- Hannah, F., and Rogerson, A., 1997, The temporal and spatial distribution of foraminiferans in marine benthic sediments of the Clyde Sea area, Scotland, Est. Coast. Shelf Sci., 44:377–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hess, S., and Kuhnt, W., 1996, Deep-sea benthic foraminiferal recolonization of the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo ash layer in the South China Sea, Mar. Micropaleontol. 28:171–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Höglund, H., 1947, Foraminifera in the Gullmar Fjord and the Skagerak, Zool. Bidr. Uppsala 26:1–328.Google Scholar
- Josefson, A. B., 1990, Increase in benthic biomass in the Skagerrak-Kattegat during the 1970s and 1980s—effects of organic enrichment? Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 66:119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kaminski, M. A., 1985, Evidence for control of abyssal agglutinated foraminiferal community structure by substrate disturbance: Results from the Hebble area, Mar. Geol. 66:113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kaminski, M. A., Grassle, J. F., and Whitlatch, R. B., 1988, Life history and recolonization among agglutinated foraminifera in the Panama Basin, Abh. Geol. Bund., Wien 41:229–243.Google Scholar
- Kröncke, I., 1995, Long-term changes in North Sea benthos, Senckenb. Marit. 26:73–80.Google Scholar
- Lutze, G. F., 1965, Zur Foraminiferen-Fauna der Ostsee, Meyniana 15:17–142.Google Scholar
- Lutze, G. F., 1968, Jahresgang der Foraminiferen-Fauna in der Bottsand-Lagune (westliche Ostsee), Meyniana 18:13–30.Google Scholar
- Magnusson, J., 1995, The invisible present, in: Ecological Time Series (T. M. Powell and J. H. Steele, eds.) Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 448–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Matsushita, S., and Kitazato, H., 1990, Seasonality in the benthic foraminiferal community and the life history of Trochammina hadai Uchio in Hamana Lake, Japan, in: Paleoecology, Biostratigraphy, Paleoceanography and Taxonomy of Agglutinated Foraminifera (C. Hemleben, M. A. Kaminski, W. Kuhnt, and D. B. Scott, eds.), Kluwer, Dordrecht, 695–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maul, G. A., 1993, Climatic Change in the Intra-Americas Sea, Arnold, London.Google Scholar
- McGann, M., and Sloan, D., 1996, Recent introduction of the foraminifer Trochammina hadai Uchio into San Francisco Bay, California, USA, Mar. Micropaleontol. 28:1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moodley, L., and Hess, C, 1992, Tolerance of infaunal benthic foraminifera for low and high oxygen concentrations, Biol. Bull. 183:94–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moodley, L., Troelstra, S. R., and van Weering, C. E., 1993, Benthic foraminiferal response to environmental change in the Skagerrak, northeastern North Sea, Sarsia 78:129–139.Google Scholar
- Moodley, L., van der Zwaan, G. J., Herman, P. M. J., Kempers, L., van Breugel, P., 1997, Differential response of benthic meiofauna to anoxia with special reference to foraminifera (Protista: Sarcodina), Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 158:151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Murray, J. W., 1970a, The Foraminiferida of the Persian Gulf 6: Living forms in the Abu Dhabi area, J. Nat. Hist. 4:55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Murray, J. W., 1970b, The foraminifera of the hypersaline Abu Dhabi lagoon, Persian Gulf, Lethaia 3:51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Murray, J. W., 1983, Population dynamics of benthic foraminifera: Results from the Exe estuary, England, J. Foram. Res. 13:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Murray, J. W., 1991, Ecology and Palaeoecology of Benthic Foraminifera, Longman, Harlow. Google Scholar
- Ohga, T., and Kitazato, H., 1997, Seasonal changes in bathyal foraminiferal populations in response to the flux of organic matter (Sagami Bay, Japan), Terra Nova 9:33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Reinhardt, E. G., Patterson, R. T., and Schröder-Adams, C. J., 1994, Geoarchaeology of the ancient harbor site of Caesarea Maritima, Israel: evidence from the sedimentology and palaeoecology of benthic foraminifera, J. Foram. Res. 24:37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rosenberg, R., Gray, J. S., Josefson, A B., and Pearson, T. H., 1987, Petersen’s Benthic stations revisited: II. Is the Oslofjord and eastern Skagerrak enriched? J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 105:219–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rosenberg, R., Hellman, B., and Lundberg, A., 1996, Benthic macrofaunal community structure in the Norwegian Trench, deep Skagerrak, J. Sea Res. 35:181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schröder, C. J., Scott, D. B., and Medioli, F. S., 1987, Can smaller benthic foraminifera be ignored in paleoenvironmental analyses? J. Foram. Res. 17:101–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Scott, D. B., Medioli, F. S., and Schafer, C. T., 1977, Temporal changes in foraminiferal distributions in Miramichi River estuary, New Brunswick, Canadian J. Earth Sci. 14:1566–1587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Silva, K. A., Corliss, B. H., Rathburn, A. E., and Thunell, R. C, 1996, Seasonally of living benthic foraminifera from the San Pedro Basin, California borderland, J. Foram. Res. 26:71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stanley, D. J., and Warne, A. G., 1997, Holocene sea-level changes and early human utilization of deltas, GSA Today 7(12):l–7.Google Scholar
- Tapley, S., 1969, Foraminiferal analysis of the Miramichi estuary, Marit. Sed. 5:20–29.Google Scholar
- Vénec-Peyré, M. T., and Le Calvez, Y., 1986, Foraminifères benthiques et phénomènes de transfert: Importance des études comparatives de la biocènose et de la thanatocènose, Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat, Paris, ser. 4 8:171–184.Google Scholar
- Wefer, G., 1976, Umwelt, Produktion und Sedimentation benthischer Foraminiferen in der Westlichen Ostee, Rept. Sondersforschungsbereich 95, Kiel 14:1–103.Google Scholar
- Williams, D. E., Hailock, P., Talge, H. K., Harney, J. N., and McRae, G., 1997, Response of Amphistegina gibbosa populations in the Florida Keys (USA) to a multi-year stress event (1991-1996), J. Foram. Res. 27:264–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar