Low Noise Dc Squids for the 1990S
Abstract
In the 1980s we have seen the successful introduction of planar coupling schemes for dc SQUIDs, the achievement of coupled energy sensitivity near the quantum limit, significant advances in integrated SQUID detectors, and a shift from Pb-alloy to all-refractory technology. The discovery of high-Tc superconductivity in 1986 was soon followed by the demonstration of high-Tc SQUIDs, with bulk and thin-film versions now operating at or above 77K. The 1990s will bring practical low-Tc dc SQUIDs, 0.05mm2 or less in area, with tightly coupled 2/iH input coils, smooth, well-behaved voltage-flux characteristics, very small flux creep related hysteresis, and coupled energy sensitivity at or near the quantum limit at 4.2K. There will be an increased emphasis on the design and development of application specific integrated detectors. All-refractory Nb-based technology will dominate the low-Tc arena and direct coupling to semiconductor capability should quicken the pace and lower the cost of SQUID development and production. High-Tc SQUIDs will follow suit with a significant time delay as our understanding of high-Tc materials and our ability to work with them advances.
Keywords
Tunnel Junction Noise Performance Input Coil Energy Sensitivity Flux NoisePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.R.C. Jaklevic, J. Lambe, A.H. Silver, and J.E. Mercereau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 159 (1964).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.B.D. Josephson, Phys. Lett. 1, 251 (1962); Adv. Physics 14, 419 (1965).ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.V. Radhakrishnan and V.L. Newhouse, J. Appl. Phys. 42, 129 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.J.H. Claassen, J. Appl. Phys. 46, 2268 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.CD. Tesche and J. Clarke, J. Low Temp. Phys. 29, 301 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.M.B. Ketchen, IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG-17, 387 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.W.C. Stewart, Appl. Phys. Lett 12, 277 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.D.E. McCumber, J. Appl. Phys. 39, 3113 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.R.P. Giffard, R.A. Webb, and J.C. Wheatley, J. Low Temp. Phys. 6, 533 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.J. Clarke, W.J. Goubau, and M.B. Ketchen, J. Low Temp. Phys. 25, 99 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.J.M. Jaycox and M.B. Ketchen, IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG-17. 400 (1981); M.B. Ketchen and J.M. Jaycox, Appl. Phys Lett. 40, 736 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.M.B. Ketchen, W.M. Goubau, J. Clarke, and G.B. Donaldson, J. Appl. Phys. 44, 4111 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.M.B. Ketchen, T. Kopley, and H. Ling. Appl. Phys. Lett. 44, 1008 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.M. Gurvitch, M.A. Washington and H.A. Huggins, Appl. Phys. Lett. 42, 472 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.J.E. Zimmermann, J.A. Beall, M.W. Cromar, and R.H. Ono, Appl. Phys. lett. 51, 617 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.R.H. Koch, W.J. Gallagher, B. Bumble, and W.Y. Lee, Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 951 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.B. Oh, R.H. Koch, W.J. Gallagher, V. Foglietti, G. Koren, and A. Gupta, Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 2575 (1990).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.F.C. Wellstood, J.J. Kingston, and J. Clarke, Appl. Phys. Lett., 56, 2336 (1990).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.D.J. Van Harlingen, R.H. Koch, and J. Clarke, Appl. Phys. Lett. 41, 197 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.CD. Tesche, K.H. Brown, A.C. Callegari, M.-M. Chen, J.H. Greiner H.C. Jones, M.B. Ketchen, K.K. Kim, A.W. Kleinsasser, H.A. Notarys, G. Proto, R.H. Wang, and T. Yogi, IEEE Trans. Magn. MAQ-21. 1032 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.V. Foglietti, W.J. Gallagher, M.B. Ketchen, A.W. Kleinsasser R.H. Koch, S.I. Raider and R.L. Sandstrom, Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 1393, (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.D.D. Awschalom, J.R. Rozen, M.B. Ketchen, W.J. Gallagher, A.W. Kleinsasser, R.L. Sandstrom, and B. Bumble, Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 2108 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.M.B. Ketchen, M. Bhushan, S.B. Kaplan, and W.J. Gallagher, “Low Noise dc SQUIDs Fabricated in Nb-Al203-Nb Trilayer Technology”, to be published in the proceedings of the 1990 Applied Superconductivity Conference.Google Scholar
- 24.C.T. Rogers and R.A. Buhrman, W.J. Gallagher, S.I. Raider, A.W. Kleinsasser, and R.L. Sandstrom, IEEE Trans Magn. MAG-23, 1658 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.V. Foglietti, W.J. Gallagher, M.B. Ketchen, A.W. Kleinsasser, R.H. Koch, and R.L. Sandstrom, Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 1451 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.W.H. Chang, J. Appl. Phys. 50, 8129 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.M.B. Ketchen, W.J. Gallagher, A.W. Kleinsasser, S. Murphy and J.R. Clem in SQUID ′85. edited by H.D. Hahlbohm and H. Lubbig (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 1985), 865.Google Scholar
- 28.M.B. Ketchen, “Design Considerations for dc SQUIDs Fabricated in Deep Sub-μm Technology”, to be published in the proceedings of the 1990 Applied Superconductivity Conference.Google Scholar
- 29.R.P. Huebener, R.T. Kampwirth, and J.R. Clem, J. Low Temp. Phys. 6, 275 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.M.B. Ketchen, J. Appl. Physics 58, 4322 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.M.B. Ketchen, D.D. Awschalom, W.J. Gallagher, A.W. Kleinsasser, R.L. Sandstrom, J.R. Rozen, and B. Bumble, IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG-25, 1212 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.D.D. Awschalom, J. Warnock, and S. vonMolnar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 812 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.H. Kroger, L.N. Smith and D.W. Jillie, Appl. Phys. Lett. 39, 280 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.S. Nagasawa, H. Tsuge and Y. Wada, IEEE El. Dev. Lett. 9, 414 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.R. Gross, P. Chaudhari, M. Kawasaki, M.B. Ketchen, and A. Gupta, Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 727 (1990).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Commercial SQUID data shows representative performance for S.H.E./B.T.I. rf and dc SQUIDs, Biomagnetic Technologies, Inc., 4174 Sorrento Valley Blvd., P.O. Box 210079, San Diego, CA 92121.Google Scholar