Laser Interaction and Related Plasma Phenomena pp 137-149 | Cite as
X-Ray Lasing in a Muon Catalyzed Fusion System
Abstract
When an energetic negative muon enters a dense DT target it initiates the chain of reactions: (a) stopping and capture of p into atomic levels of deuterium and tritium. (b)μ transfer from the duterium to the tritium which can occur both from excited and from the ground state of dμ. (d) Nuclear fusion of dt (the capital letters D and T denote the deuterium and tritium atoms while the small letters denote the nuclei). The muon is either released or captured by the nuclear fusion products (sticking).
The possibility of an X-ray laser with photon energy of 370 e V induced by the deexcitation of dμ is suggested in this paper. A rod of dense deuteriumtritium mixture is irradiated by a muon beam. The stuck populations of the excited states during the cascade of dμ and tp are used for lasing.
Keywords
Population Inversion Auger Transition Muon Beam Tritium Atom Negative MuonPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.F.C. Frank, Nature 160, 525 (1947).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.A.D. Sakharov and P.N. Lebedev, Report of the Physics Institute Academy of Sciences of USSR (1948).Google Scholar
- 3.Ya. B. Zeldovich, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 95, 493 (1954).Google Scholar
- 4.J.D. Jackson, Phys. Rev. 106, 330 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.L.W. Alvarez et al., Phys. Rev. 105, 1127 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.L.W. Alvarez. 1968 Nobel prize acceptance lecture.Google Scholar
- 7.A. Ashmore et al., Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 71, 161 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.S.S. Gershtein and Ya. B. Zeldovich, Sov. Phys. Usp. 3, 593 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.V.P. Dzhelepov et. al, Zh. Eksper. Teor. Fiz. 50, 1235 (1966) [Sov. Phys. JETP 23, 820 (1966)].Google Scholar
- 10.E.A. Vesman, Zh. Eksper. Teor. Fiz. Pisma 5, 113 (1967) [JETP Letters 5, 91 (1967)].Google Scholar
- 11.S.S. Gershtein and L.I. Ponomarev, Muon Physics Vol III, Eds. V.W. Hughes and C.S. Wu, Academic Press, N.Y. p141 (1975).Google Scholar
- 12.L. Bracci and G. Fiorentini, Phys. Rep. 86, 169 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.W.H. Breunlich et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1137 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.S.E. Jones et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1757 (1983); ibid. 56, 588 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.L.N. Bogdanova, V.E. Markushin and V.S. Melezhik, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 81, 829 (1981) [Sov. Phys. JETP 54, 442 (1981)].Google Scholar
- 16.S.S. Gershtein et. al., Sov. Phys. JETP 53, 782 (1981).Google Scholar
- 17.V. Markushin, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 80, 35 (1981) [Sov. Phys. JETP 53, 16 (1981)].Google Scholar
- 18.M. Leon and H.A. Bethe, Phys. Rev. 127, 637 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.M. Leon, Phys. Lett B 35, 413 (1971).Google Scholar
- 20.T.B. Day, G.A. Snow and J. Sucker, Phys. Rev. 118, 864 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Z. Henis and S. Eliezer, Phys. Lett. A, 152 472 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.L.I. Menshikov and L.I. Ponomarev, J. Phys. D2, 1 (1986).Google Scholar
- 23.L.I. Menshikov and L.I. Ponomarev, JETP Lett. 39, 663 (1984).Google Scholar
- 24.B. Müller et. al., Muon-catalyzed Fusion, Eds. S.E. Jones, J. Rafelski, G. Hendrik and J. Monkhorst (A.I.P. New York) p.105 (1989).Google Scholar
- 25.K. Nagamine, Proc. Japan Acad. 65B, 225 (1989).Google Scholar