Advances in Speech Coding pp 267-276 | Cite as
Vector Trellis Quantization for Noisy Channels
Abstract
The channel coding theorem of information theory indicates that if the rate of a binary sequence is less than the capacity of the channel over which the binary sequence is to be transmitted, then the source can be reproduced at the channel output with arbitrarily small error probability [1], [2]. Based on this, one can isolate the problem of channel coding from that of source coding. In other words, channel encoder, channel, and channel decoder may be considered as a noiseless link between the output of the source encoder and the input of source decoder, as long as source encoder’s output has a rate less than the capacity of the channel [3]. However, this separation is optimal only asymptotically, i.e., in the limit of arbitrarily complex overall encoders and decoders involving arbitrarily long blocklengths. In practice, where we encounter the curse of complexity and are forced to deal with finite blocklengths, such a separation results in a certain degree of sub-optimality.
Keywords
Vector Quantizer Viterbi Algorithm Noisy Channel Encoder State Distortion MeasurePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]CE. Shannon, “A mathematical theory of communication,” Bell Syst. Tech. J., vol. 27, pp. 379–423 and 623-656, 1948.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- [2]R. G. Galleger, Information theory and reliable communication, John Wiley & Sons, N.Y. 1968.Google Scholar
- [3]A. J. Viterbi and J. K. Omura, Principles of Digital Communication and Coding, McGraw Hill, N.Y. 1979.Google Scholar
- [4]N. Farvardin and V. Vaishampayan, “Optimal Quantizer Design for Noisy Channels: An Approach to Combined Source-Channel Coding,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, pp. 827–888, Nov. 1987.Google Scholar
- [5]N. Farvardin and V. Vaishampayan, “Some Issues of Vector Quantizers for Noisy Channels,” IEEE Symp. on Information Theory, Kobe, Japan, June 19–24, 1988.Google Scholar
- [6]K. Zeger, and A. Gersho, “Theory and Design of Optimal Noisy Channel Vector Quantizers,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory.Google Scholar
- [7]E. Ayanoğlu and R. M. Gray, “The Design of Joint Source and Channel Trellis Waveform Coders,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-33, pp. 855–865, Nov. 1987.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [8]J. G. Dunham and R. G. Gray, “Joint Source and Noisy Channel Trellis Encoding,” IEEE Trans. Inform., vol. IT-27, pp. 516–519, July 1981.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [9]B. H. Juang, “Design of Trellis Vector Quantizers for Speech Signals,” IEEE Trans. Acousitcs, Speech, and Signal Processing, Vol. 36, pp. 1423–1431, Sept. 1988.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [10]C. D. Bei and R. M. Gray, “Simulation of Vector Trellis Encoding Systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COM-34, pp. 214–218, Mar. 1986.Google Scholar
- [11]G. D. Forney, JR. “The Viterbi Algorithm,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 61, pp. 268–178, Mar. 1973.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [12]F. Jelinek and J. B. Anderson, “Instrumentable tree encoding of information sources,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-17, pp. 118–119, Jan. 1971.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [13]Y. Linde, A. Buzo and R. M. Gray, “An Algorithm for Vector Quantizer Design,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COM-28, pp. 84–95, Jan. 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [14]L. C. Stewart, R. M. Gray and Y. Linde “The Design of Trellis Waveform Coders,” IEEE Trans. Commun. vol. COM-30, pp. 702–710, April 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar