Advertisement

Vegetation Functional Classification Systems as Approaches to Predicting and Quantifying Global Vegetation Change

  • J. P. Grime

Abstract

Correlations between plant form and climate are evident even to the most casual observer of vegetation. There have been several attempts to formalize these relationships by developing a system in which morphological attributes of the dominant plants in various parts of the world are predicted from selected climatic variables and then tested against field reality (Holdridge 1947; Box 1981). Further refinements of this correlative approach are being made, and with the application of modern analytical methods (e.g., Givnish 1986), it is probable that eventually the predictive models will be allied to a thorough mechanistic understanding of the way in which climate determines plant morphology and vegetation structure.

Keywords

Seed Bank Regenerative Strategy Vegetation Response Moisture Supply Phenological Difference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Al-Mashhadani, Y.D. (1980). Experimental investigations of competition and allelopathy in herbaceous plants. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, M.D. (1971). The duration of meiosis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 178B, 277–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, M.D. (1976). DNA amount, latitude and crop plant distribution. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 16, 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, M.D. and Smith, J.P. (1976). Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B274, 221–1A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Box, E.O.(1981). Macroclimate and Plant Forms: An Introduction to Predictive Modeling in Phytogeography. The Hague: Junk Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Gill, D.E. (1978). On selection at high population density. Ecology, 59, 1289–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Givnish, T.J. ed. (1986). On the Economy of Plant Form and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Grime, J.P. (1974). Vegetation classification by reference to strategies. Nature, 250, 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grime, J.P. (1977). Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. American Naturalist, 111, 1169–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grime, J.P. (1979). Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Grime, J.P. (1983). Prediction of weed and crop response to climate based upon measurements of nuclear DNA content. Aspects of Applied Biology, 4, 87–98.Google Scholar
  12. Grime, J.P. (1986). The circumstances and characteristics of spoil colonization within a local flora. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B314, 637–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grime, J.P. (1988). The C-S-R model of primary plant strategies—Origins, implications and tests. In Evolutionary Plant Biology, ed. L.D. Gottlieb and S. Jain, pp. 371–93. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grime, J. P. and Callaghan, T.V. (1988). Direct and indirect effects of climate change on plant species, ecosystems and processes of conservation and amenity interest. Contract Report to the Department of the Environment. Ref. T07020b1. London: Department of the Environment.Google Scholar
  15. Grime, J.P., Hodgson, J.G. and Hunt, R. (1988). Comparative Plant Ecology. A Functional Approach to Common British Species. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  16. Grime, J.P. and Mowforth, M.A.G. (1982). Variation in genome size—An ecological interpretation. Nature, 299, 151–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grime, J.P., Shacklock, J.M.L. and Band, S.R. (1985). Nuclear DNA contents, shoot phenology and species coexistence in a limestone grassland community. New Phytologist, 100, 435–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grubb, P.J. (1977). The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: The importance of the regeneration niche. Biological Reviews, 52, 107–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hartsema, A.M. (1961). Influence of temperature on flower formation and flowering of bulbous and tuberous plants. In Handbuch der Pflanzenphysiologie. 16: Ansenfaktoren in Wachstum und Entwicklung, ed. W. Ruhland, pp. 123–67. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Hodgson, J.G. (1986). Commonness and rarity in plants with special reference to the Sheffield flora. Part II. The relative importance of climate, soils and land use. Biological Conservation, 36, 253–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holdridge, L.R. (1947). Determination of world plant formations from simple climatic data. Science, 105, 367–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hutchinson, G.E. (1959). Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals? American Naturalist, 93, 145–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Law, R. (1974). Features of the biology and ecology of Bromus erectus and Brachypodium pinnatum in the Sheffield region. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
  24. Levin, D.A. and Funderburg, S.W. (1979). Genome size in angiosperms; temperate versus tropical species. American Naturalist, 114, 784–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Macleod, J. (1894). Over de beruchting der bloemen in het Kempisch gedeelte van Vlaanderen. Deel 11. Botanische Jaarboek, 6, 119–511.Google Scholar
  26. Ramenskii, G.L. (1938). Introduction to the Geobotanical Study of Complex Vegetations. Moscow: Selkhozgiz.Google Scholar
  27. Ridley, H.N. (1930). The Dispersal of Plants Throughout the World. Ashford: Reeve.Google Scholar
  28. Salisbury, E.J. (1942). The Reproductive Capacity of Plants. London: Bell.Google Scholar
  29. Salisbury, E.J. (1953). A changing flora as shown in the study of weeds or arable land and waste places. In The Changing Flora of Britain, ed. J.E. Lousley, pp. 130–9. Arbroath: Buncle.Google Scholar
  30. Salter, P.J. and Goode, J.E. (1967). Crop responses to water at different stages of growth. Research Review 2. East Mailing, Kent: Commonwealth Bureau of Horticulture and Plantation Crops.Google Scholar
  31. South wood, T.R.E. (1977). Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies? Journal of Animal Ecology, 46, 337–65.Google Scholar
  32. Stebbins, G.L. (1951). Natural selection and the differentiation of angiosperm families. Evolution, 5, 299–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stebbins, G.L. (1956). Cytogenetics and evolution of the grass family. American Journal of Botany, 43, 890–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stebbins, G.L. (1971). Adaptive radiation of reproductive characters of angiosperms. II. Seeds and seedlings. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2, 237–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stebbins, G.L. (1974). Flowering Plants: Evolution Above the Species Level. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  36. van der Pijl, L. (1972). Principles of Dispersal in Higher Plants. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. P. Grime

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations