Purine and Pyrimidine Metabolism in Man VIII pp 185-188 | Cite as
The Antitumour Activity of ZD9331, a Non-Polyglutamatable Quinazoline Thymidylate Synthase Inhibitor
Abstract
Thymidylate synthase (TS) is regarded as a good target for the development of quinazoline (folate-based) anticancer agents. The quinazoline-based TS inhibitor, D1694 or Tomudex (trade mark of Zeneca PLC) demonstrated exciting activity against colorectal tumours in the worldwide Phase II1 clinical studies and is currently in Phase III study for this tumour type. Tomudex is an excellent substrate for folylpolyglutamate synthetase (FPGS) and is almost completely metabolised to polyglutamate forms (mainly tetra and pentaglutamates) that are not readily effluxed from the cell2. Prolonged intracellular drug retention is thus a feature of this drug. This has the advantage of showing antitumour activity by bolus administration and the current clinical protocol is a 15min infusion once every 3 weeks. The polyglutamates of Tomudex are ~ 60-fold more active than the parent drug as TS inhibitors2. Polyglutamation is thus a requirement for antitumour activity and may offer some tumour selectivity. However a mechanism of acquired and possibly intrinsic resistance to Tomudex is the failure of cells to polyglutamate the drug3. In order to broaden the spectrum of tumours responsive to TS inhibition by antifolates we synthesised and evaluated compounds unable to undergo such metabolism. As drug retention is not a general feature of this class of compound, infusion protocols were employed to evaluate their activity in mice4. Since TS inhibition is only achieved during drug administration this offers a high degree of control over the length of time that DNA synthesis is inhibited. Prevention of polyglutamation is possible through modification of the quinazoline ring (7-methylation)5 or the glutamate residue. Compound design also focused on developing TS inhibitors with potency at least equal to the polyglutamates of Tomudex (Ki tetraglu = 1nM). Acid-containing (water-soluble) and highly lipophilic analogues were synthesised but we concentrated on those that had high water-solubility and used the reduced-folate/MTX carrier (RFC) for cell entry. One such compound, ZD9331, was chosen as the most promising compound with activity against a number of experimental tumours (murine and human xenografts) in mice6, 7, 8. The in vitro activity of ZD9331 is summarised below and, where appropriate, is compared with other TS inhibitors of known biochemical profile. Thus N10-propargyl-5,8-dideazafolic acid (CB3717), the prototype quinazoline TS inhibitor9, uses the RFC poorly and is slowly polyglutamated when compared with ICI 19858310 or Tomudex2. AG337, represents a newer class of lipophilic quinazolines discovered by Agouron Pharmaceuticals that neither uses the RFC nor is a substrate for FPGS11.
Keywords
Trade Mark Antitumour Activity Quinazoline Ring Folylpolyglutamate Synthetase Lipophilic AnaloguePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.J. Zalcberg, D. Cunningham, E. Van Cutsem, E. Francois, J.H. Schornagel, A. Adenis, M. Green, H. Starkhammer, and M. Azab, Annals of Oncology, 5: supl 5, (1994).Google Scholar
- 2.A.L Jackman, G.A. Taylor, W. Gibson, R. Kimbell, M. Brown, A.H. Calvert, I.R. Judson, and L.R. Hughes, Cancer Res 51: 5579–5586(1991).PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.A.L. Jackman, LR. Kelland, M. Brown, W. Gibson, R. Kimbell, W. Aherne, and I.R. Judson, Proc Amer Assoc Cancer Res 33: 406 (1992).Google Scholar
- 4.T.C. Stephens, M.N. Smith, S.E. Waterman, M.L McCloskey, A.L. Jackman, and FT. Boyle, in: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, Vol. 338 (Ed. Ayling J) pp 589–592, Plenum Press, New York (1993).Google Scholar
- 5.P.C. Sanghani, A.L. Jackman, V.R. Evans, T. Thornton, L Hughes, A.H. Calvert, and R.G. Moran, Mol Pharmacol, 45: 341–351 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.T.C. Stephens, M.N. Smith, M.L. McCloskey, S.E. Waterman, A.J. Gwyne, B.E. Valcaccia, A.L. Jackman, J.M. Wardleworth, FT. Boyle, Proc Amer Assoc Cancer Res. 35: 305 (1994).Google Scholar
- 7.J.M. Wardleworth, F.T. Boyle, R.J. Barker, L.F. Hennequin, S.J. Pegg, T.C. Stephens, R. Kimbell, M. Brown and A.L. Jackman, Annals of Oncology, 5: suppl 6 (1994).Google Scholar
- 8.A.L Jackman, G.W. Aherne, R. Kimbell, L Brunton, A. Hardcastle, J.M. Wardleworth, T.C. Stephens and F.T. Boyle, Proc Amer Assoc Cancer Res. 35: 301 (1994).Google Scholar
- 9.T.R. Jones, A.H. Calvert, A.L Jackman, S.J. Brown, M. Jones, and K.R. Harrap, Eur J Cancer, 17: 11–19(1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.A.L. Jackman, D.R. Newell, W. Gibson, D.I. Jodrell, G.A. Taylor, J.A. Bishop, L.R. Hughes, and A.H. Calvert, Biochem Pharmacol 42: 1885–1895 (1991).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.S.E. Webber, T.M. Bleckman, J. Attard and 18 other authors, J Med Chem 36:733–746 (1993).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar