Advertisement

Hertz’s Special Relativity and Physical Reality

  • Constantin I. Mocanu

Abstract

Einstein’s Special Relativity (ESR), in its original formulation1, is limited to inertial motions only, while an insight into real - world shows that the motions are non - inertial. It is hard to accept that the launching of a rocket implies a succession of inertial motions. Similalry, during the re - entry of a satellite in the Earth’s atmosphere, its continuously decaying angular momentum and the violations of the Lorentz - Poincaré symmetries, are then evident. From the view - point of kinematics, defined as the science of pure motion, apart from causes, the motion may be either inertial or non - inertial. Since a motion cannot be, at the same time, either a uniform translation or a non - uniform motion, then they form a pair of complementary kinematic concepts, mutually exclusive. If the gravitational effects are neglected, ESR assumes uniform translations, while under similar circumstances (regarding the neglecting of the space curvature) to the best of our knowledge, nothing is known in the literature to take into consideration non - inertial motions. As a consequence, we shall denote by Special Relativity that branch of physics where by neglecting the gravitational effects, the motion may be either inertial or noninertial, called in this paper permissible motions. As a consequence, the following chart of complementarities:

Keywords

Reference Frame Gravitational Effect Uniform Motion Inertial Reference Frame Inertial Motion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Einstein “Zur Electrodynamik bewegter Körper,” Ann. der Phys. 17, 810–921 (1905).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. H. Thomas, “The kinematics of an electron with an axis,” Phil. Mag. 3, 1–22 (1927).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. I. Mocanu, “The paradox of Thomas rotation,” Galilean Electrodynamics, 2, 67–74 (1991).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. I. Mocanu, “The relativistic kinematic and electromagnetic problems of Thomas rotation,” Physics Essays, 4, 238–243 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. I. Mocanu, “On the relativistic velocity composition paradox and the Thomas rotation, Found. Phys. Lett. 5, 443–456 (1992).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. I. Mocanu, “Kinematic confirmation of Thomas paradox,” Galilean Electrodynamics, 4, 23–28 (1993).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. I. Mocanu, “Is Thomas rotation a paradox?”, Apeyron, 16, 1–8 (1993).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. R. Hertz, “Über die Grundleichungen der Electrodynamik für bewegten Körper,” Ann. der Phys. 41, 369 (1981).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. I. Mocanu, “Hertzian alternative to the special theory of relativity,” Hadronic J. A series of five papers, I. Qualitative analysis of Maxwell’s equations for motionless media, 10, 61–74 (1987). II. Qualitative analysis of axwell-Hertz and Einstein Minkowski equations, 10, 153-166 (1987). III. Iterative system of equations and transformation formulae for electromagnetic quantities, 10, 231-247 (1987).IV. Kinematic analysis of the iterative process, 11, 35-53 (1988). V. Elements of Hertzian mechanics, 11, 55-69 (1988).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. I. Mocanu, “Hertzian Relativistic Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies,” Publ. House of Roum. Acad. Bucharest-Romania (1985)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. I. Mocanu, “Hertzian Relativistic Electrodynamics and its Associated Mechanics,” Hadronic Press, Palm Harbour Fl. (1991)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. G. V. Rosser, “Electromagnetism via Relativity. An Alternative Approach to Maxwell’s Equations,“ Butterworths, London (1968).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. Hammond, “Applied Electromagnetism,” Library of Sci. Techn. London (1971).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. D. Jackson, “Classical Electrodynamics,” J. Wiley, NY (1975).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    F. Selleri, “Quantum Paradoxes and Physical Reality,” Kluver Acad. Pub. Dordrecht (1989).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Constantin I. Mocanu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringPolytechnica University of BucharestBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations