Energy Correlation of Mass Transfer in Decaying Annular Swirl Flow

  • S. Yapici
  • M. A. Patrick
  • A. A. Wragg

Abstract

Mass transfer measurements at both the inner and outer walls in decaying swirl flow in an annular duct have been carried out using the electrochemical limiting diffusion current technique. Swirl was generated using axial guide-vanes with vane angles between 15–67° to the duct axis. Pressure measurements at the outer wall were also made to enable estimation of the energy cost of mass transfer enhancement. Overall correlation of mass transfer at the outer wall for a representative length of test section in terms of the energy required to impart swirl to the flow can be expressed as Sh Sc -1/3 = 0.0251 (1 + tan θ w )-0.18 X 0.316 for the Reynolds number range 3000– 50000, where θ w is the vane angle at the wall and X is an energy dissipation parameter.

Keywords

Friction Factor Outer Wall Enhancement Ratio Swirl Flow Annular Flow 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R.F. Lopina and A.E. Bergles, J. Heat Transfer 91:434 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    F.C. Walsh and G. Wilson, Trans. IMF 64:55 (1986).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    N.Ibl, Convective mass transport., in: “Comprehensive Treatise of Electrochemistry, Vol.6,” Plenum Press, New-York (1983).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. Midoux and A. Storck, Electrochemical reactors, in: “Fluid Transport in Electrochemical Reactor Systems,” M.I. Ismail ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam (1989).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Yapici, “Electrochemical Mass Transfer in Annular Swirl Flow,” PhD Thesis, University of Exeter, Exeter, U.K. (1992).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Yapici, M.A. Patrick and A.A. Wragg, Int. Comm. Heat Mass Transfer 21:41 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Yapici, M.A. Patrick and A.A. Wragg, Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Electrodiffusion Diagnostics of Flows, Dourdan, France, 275 (1993).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.J. Ward-Smith, Internal fluid flow, in: “The Fluid Dynamics of Flow in Pipes and Ducts,” Clarendon Press, Oxford (1980).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. Rehme, J. Fluid Mech. 64:263 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.A. Brighton and J.B. Jones, J. Basic Engng. 86:835 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.M. Beer and N.A. Chigier, “Combustion Aerodynamics,” Applied Science Publishers Ltd., London (1972).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Ivanova, Procs. Second All-Soviet Union Conf. on Heat and Mass Transfer, Minsk, Vol.1, 243–250 (1964).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A.F. Koval’nogov and K. Shchukin, J. Engineering Physics 14:239 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    C.S. Lin, R.W. Moulton and G.L. Putnam, Ind. Eng. Chem. 45:636 (1933).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D.A. Dawson and O. Trass, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 15:1317 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    K.F. Loughlin, A.A. Hayamel and L.C. Thomas, AIChE J. 31:1614 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Yapici
    • 1
  • M. A. Patrick
    • 2
  • A. A. Wragg
    • 2
  1. 1.Atatürk UniversitesiMüh. Fak. Kimya Müh. Böl.ErzerumTÜrkiye
  2. 2.School of EngineeringUniversity of ExeterExeterUK

Personalised recommendations