Controlling Reaction-Diffusion Pattern with Gradients: Lessons from Drosophila, and Trajectories Through Parameter Space

  • Thurston C. Lacalli
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 259)

Abstract

Since it was first reported by Hafen et al.(1984), the beautifully simple periodic pattern of pair-rule stripes in Drosophila embryos has intrigued theoretical and experimental biologists alike. A primary concern among theoreticians has been the question of whether pairrule stripes are, to any extent, Turing structures, sustained by far-from-equilibrium kinetic processes. Current opinion among experimentalists tends to the view that they are not. It is instead proposed that the precise boundaries of all seven pair-rule stripes are each independently specified by the underlying expression patterns of gap genes in a concentration-dependent fashion, in the same manner that the gap genes are themselves activated by the broader maternal gradients. This means the iterative operation of a process of gradient reading. The problems with this view have already been discussed at this meeting at some length by Axel Hunding. His message is that it is difficult if not impossible to test either view critically on the basis of currently available data. Models that depend solely on iterative gradient reading require, in their extreme form, many untested suppositions. A Turing mechanism avoids some of the apparent problems, but there is as yet little direct evidence to support the idea that a Turing mechanism is operating, or if it is, what the key components, i. e. the morphogens, might be.

Keywords

Parameter Space Hopf Bifurcation Turing Instability Turing Mechanism Iterative Operation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berg, H. C, & Purcell, E. M. 1977. Physics of chemoreception. Biophys. J., 20, 193–219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hafen, E., Kuriowa, A., & Gehring, W. J. 1984. Spatial distribution of transcripts from the segmentation genefushi tarazu during Drosophila embryonic development. Cell, 37, 833–841.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ko, M. S. H. 1991. A stochastic model for gene induction. J. Theor. Biol., 153, 181–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ko, M. S. H. 1992. Induction mechanism of a single gene molecule: stochastic or deterministic? Bioessays, 14, 341–346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lacalli, T. C, & Harrison, L. G. 1979. Turing’s conditions and the analysis of morphogenetic models. J. Theor. Biol., 76, 419–436.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lacalli, T. C, & Harrison, L. G. 1987. Turing’s model and branching tip growth: relation of time and spatial scales in morphogenesis, with application to Micrasterias. Can. J. Bot., 65, 1308–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lacalli, T. C, & Harrison, L. G. 1991. From gradient to segments: models for pattern formation in early Drosophila embryogenesis. Seminars in Devel. Biol., 2, 107–117.Google Scholar
  8. Lamb, P., & McKnight, S. L. 1991. Diversity and specificity in transcriptional regulation: the benefits of heterotypic dimerization. Trends Biochem. Sci., 16, 417–422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lyons, M. J., & Harrison, L. G. 1993. Stripe selection: an intrinsic property of some pattern-forming models with nonlinear dynamics. Developmental Dynamics. (In press).Google Scholar
  10. Meinhardt, H. 1982. Models of biological pattern formation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Murray, J. D. 1982. Parameter space for Turing instability in reaction-diffusion mechanisms: a comparison of models. J. Theor. Biol., 98, 143–163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ouyang, Q., & Swinney, H. L. 1991. Transition from a uniform state to hexagonal and striped Turing patterns. Nature, 352, 610–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ptashne, M. 1988. How embryonic transcriptional activators work. Nature, 335, 683–689.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thurston C. Lacalli
    • 1
  1. 1.Biology DepartmentUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoon, SaskCanada

Personalised recommendations