A New Electromagnetic Instrument for Thickness Gauging of Conductive Materials
Abstract
Eddy current techniques are widely used to measure the thickness of electrically conducting materials[1–3]. The approach, however, requires an extensive set of calibration standards and can be quite time consuming to set up and perform. Recently, an electromagnetic sensor was developed which eliminates the need for impedance measurements [4–8]. The ability to monitor the magnitude of a voltage output independent of the phase enables the use of extremely simple instrumentation. Using this new sensor a portable hand-held instrument was developed (Fig. 1). The device makes single point measurements of the thickness of nonferromagnetic conductive materials. The technique utilized by this instrument requires calibration with two samples of known thicknesses that are representative of the upper and lower thickness values to be measured. The accuracy of the instrument depends upon the calibration range, with a larger range giving a larger error. The measured thicknesses are typically within 2–3% of the calibration range (the difference between the thin and thick sample) of their actual values. In this paper the design, operational and performance characteristics of the instrument along with a detailed description of the thickness gauging algorithm used in the device are presented.
Keywords
Eddy Current Calibration Range Probe Output Pickup Coil Drive FrequencyPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.S. Mitra, P.S. Urali, E. Uzal, J.H. Rose and J.C. Moulder, “Eddy-Current Measurements of Corrosion-Related Thinning in Aluminum Lap Splices,” Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, Vol. 12B, edited by D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti (Plenum Press, New York, 1993), pp. 2003–2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.J.G. Thompson, “Subsurface Corrosion Detection in Aircraft Lap Splices Using a Dual Frequency Eddy Current Inspection Technique,” Materials Evaluation, Vol. 51/Number 12 (December 1993).Google Scholar
- 3.D.J. Hagemaier, “Eddy Current Impedance Plane Analysis,” Proceedings of the 1982 Air Transport Association Non-Destructive Testing Forum, Atlanta, Georgia, September 14–16, 1982.Google Scholar
- 4.B. Wincheski, J.P. Fulton, S. Nath, M. Namkung and J.W. Simpson, “Self Nulling Eddy Current Probe for Surface and Subsurface Flaw Detection,” Materials Evaluation, vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 22–26, January 1994.Google Scholar
- 5.B. Wincheski, M. Namkung, J.P. Fulton, J. Simpson and S. Nath, “Characteristics of Ferromagnetic Flux Focusing Lens in The Development of Surface/Subsurface Flaw Detector”, Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, Vol. 13B, edited by D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti (Plenum Press, New York, 1994), pp. 1785–1792.Google Scholar
- 6.B. Wincheski, M. Namkung, J.P. Fulton and S. Nath, “New Eddy Current Probe for Thickness Gauging of Conductive Materials”, Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, Vol. 13B, edited by D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti (Plenum Press, New York, 1994), pp. 1939–1946.Google Scholar
- 7.J.P. Fulton, B. Wincheski, S. Nath and M. Namkung, “Corrosion Detection of Air-frames Using a New Flux-Focussing Eddy Current Probe”, Presented at the 1994 Spring conference of the American Society of Nondestructive Testing, New Orleans, LA., March 21–25, 1994.Google Scholar
- 8.M. Namkung, C.G. Clendenin, J.P. Fulton, and B. Wincheski, “An Application of a New Electromagnetic Sensor to Real-Time Monitoring of Fatigue Crack Growth in Thin Metal Plates, Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, Vol. 13B, edited by D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti (Plenum Press, New York, 1994), pp. 1633–1640.Google Scholar