The Long Way to the Statistical Bootstrap Model

  • Rolf Hagedorn
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSB, volume 346)

Abstract

The statistical bootstrap model (SBM) is a statistical model of strong interactions based on the observation that hadrons not only form bound and resonance states but also decay statistically into such states if they are heavy enough. This leads to the concept of a possibly unlimited sequence of heavier and heavier bound and resonance states, each being a possible constituent of a still heavier resonance, while at the same time being itself composed of lighter ones. We call these states clusters (in the older literature heavier clusters are called fireballs; the pion is the lightest “one-particle-cluster”) and label them by their masses. Let ρ(m)dm be the number of such states in the mass interval {m, dm}; we call ρ(m) the “SBM mass spectrum”. Bound and resonance states are due to strong interactions; if introduced as new, independent particles in a statistical model, they also simulate the strong interactions to which they owe their existence. To simulate all attractive strong interactions we need all of them (including the not yet discovered ones), that is: we need the complete mass spectrum ρ(m). To simulate repulsive forces we may use proper cluster volumes à la Van der Waals. In order to obtain the full mass spectrum, we require that the above picture, namely that a cluster is composed of clusters, be self-consistent. This leads to the “bootstrap condition and/or bootstrap equation” for the mass spectrum ρ(m). The bootstrap equation (BE) is an integral equation embracing all hadrons of all masses. It can be solved analytically with the result that the mass spectrum ρ(m) has to grow exponentially. Consequently any thermodynamics employing this mass spectrum has a singular temperature T 0 generated by the asymptotic mass spectrum: ρ(m) ∼ exp(m/T 0). Today this singular temperature is interpreted as the temperature where (for baryon chemical potential zero) the phase transition (hadron gas) ⇔ (quark-gluon plasma) occurs.

Keywords

Partition Function Transverse Momentum Compound Nucleus Fermi Model Scatter Phase Shift 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Laurence Sterne, “The life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy Gentleman” (London, 1760), Book II, Ch. 19.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Hagedorn, in “Quark Matter ’84”, Helsinki Symposium, ed. K. Kajantie, published in “Lecture Notes in Physics” 221 (Springer, Heidelberg, 1985).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E.L. Feinberg, Physics Reports 5 (1972) 237.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Yukawa, Proc.Phys.Math.Soc.Japan 17 (1935) 48.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. Heitler, Proc.Cambr.Phil.Soc. 37 (1941) 291.MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. Heitler and H.W. Peng, Proc.Cambr.Phil.Soc. 38 (1942) 296.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Janossy, Phys.Rev. 64 (1943) 345.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. Heisenberg, Z.Phys. 101 (1936) 533.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N.M. Dulles and W.D. Walker, Phys.Rev. 93 (1954) 215.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Nishimura, Soryushiron Kenkyu 12 (1956) 24.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Cocconi, Phys.Rev. 111 (1958) 1699.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    F.W. Büsser et al. (CERN-Columbia-Rockefeller Coll.), Phys.Lett. 46B (1973) 471, and a wealth of further papers in conference reports and review articles.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Takagi, Progr.Theor.Phys. 7 (1952) 123.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Ciok, T. Coghen, J. Gierula, R. Holyński, A. Jurak, M. Miesowicz, T. Saniewska, O. Stanisz and J. Pernegr, Nuovo Cimento 8 (1958) 166 and 10 (1958) 741 [the second without O. Stanisz].Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Gierula, Fortschr.d.Physik 11 (1963) 109.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    N. Bohr, Nature 137 (1936) 344.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    V.F. Weisskopf, Phys.Rev. 52 (1937) 295.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    I. Frenkel, Soviet Phys. 9 (1936) 533.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Koppe, Phys.Rev. 76 (1949) 688.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    H. Koppe, Zs.f.Naturforschung 3a (1948) 251.ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. Fermi, Progr.Theor.Phys. 5 (1950) 570.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    E. Fermi, Phys.Rev. 81 (1951) 683.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    W. Heisenberg, Naturwissenschaften 39 (1952) 69.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    E. Beth and C.E. Uhlenbeck, Physica 4 (1937) 915.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, “Statistical Physics” (MIR, Moscow, 1967).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    R. Hagedorn, in Cargèse Lectures, Vol. 6 (1973), p. 643, ed. E. Schatzmann (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1973).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    K. Huang, “Statistical Mechanics” (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1963).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    J. Bernstein, R. Dashen and S. Ma, Phys.Rev. 187 (1969) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    S.Z. Belenkij, Nucl.Phys. 2 (1956) 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    L. Sertorio, Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 2 (1979) No 2.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    E Cerulus and R. Hagedorn, Suppl.Nuovo Cimento 9 (1958) 646, 659.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    F. Cerulus, Nuovo Cimento 19 (1961) 528.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    F. Cerulus, Nuovo Cimento 22 (1961) 958.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    R. Hagedorn, Nuovo Cimento 15 (1960) 434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.a)
    S.Z. Belenkij, V.M. Maksimenko, A.I. Nikisov and I.L. Rozental, Usp.Fiz.Nauk 62 (1957) 1, in Russian.Google Scholar
  36. b).
    S.Z. Belenkij, V.M. Maksimenko, A.I. Nikisov and I.L. Rozental Fortschr.d.Physik 6 (1958) 524, same in German.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 36.
    G. Cocconi, Nuovo Cimento 33 (1964) 643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 37.
    J. Orear, Phys.Lett. 13 (1964) 190.ADSGoogle Scholar
  39. 38.
    G. Fast, R. Hagedorn and L.W. Jones, Nuovo Cimento 27 (1963) 856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. G. Fast and R. Hagedorn, Nuovo Cimento 27 (1963) 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 39.
    T.E.O. Ericson, Phys.Lett. 4 (1963) 258.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 40.
    A. Bialas and V.F. Weisskopf, Nuovo Cimento 35 (1965) 1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 41.
    G. Auberson and B. Escoubès, Nuovo Cimento 36 (1965) 628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 42.
    H. Satz, Nuovo Cimento 37 (1965) 1407.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 43.
    J. Vandermeulen, Bull.Soc.Roy.Sci.Liège (Belgium) 34 (1965) Nos 1–2.Google Scholar
  46. 44.
    I. Pomeranchuk, Dokl.Akad.Nauk SSSR 78 (1951) 889.Google Scholar
  47. 45.
    R. Hagedorn, Suppl. Nuovo Cimento 3 (1965) 147.Google Scholar
  48. 46.
    R. Carreras, “Picked up for you this week”, No 26 (CERN, Geneva, 1993).Google Scholar
  49. 47.
    Particle Data Group, Phys.Rev. D50 (1994) No 3, Part I.Google Scholar
  50. 48.
    W. Nahm, Nucl.Phys. B45 (1972) 525.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 49.
    S. Frautschi, Phys.Rev. D3 (1971) 2821.ADSGoogle Scholar
  52. 50.
    R. Hagedorn and J. Ranft, Suppl. Nuovo Cimento 6 (1968) 169.Google Scholar
  53. H. Grote, R. Hagedorn and J. Ranft, “Particle Spectra” (CERN, Geneva, 1970).Google Scholar
  54. 51.
    J. Yellin, Nucl.Phys. B52 (1973) 583.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 52.
    E. Schröder, Z.Math.Phys. 15 (1870) 361.MATHGoogle Scholar
  56. 53.
    G.J.H. Burgers, C. Fuglesang, R. Hagedorn and V. Kuvshinov, ZPhys. C46 (1990) 465.Google Scholar
  57. 54.
    H. Satz, Phys.Rev. D20 (1979) 582.ADSGoogle Scholar
  58. 55.
    K. Redlich and L. Turko, Z.Phys. C5 (1980) 201.MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  59. 56.
    R. Hagedorn, I. Montvay and J. Rafelski, Proc. Workshop on Hadronic Matter at Extreme Energy Density, Erice, 1978, p. 49 eds. N. Cabibbo and L. Sertorio (Springer Science+Business Media New York, 1980).Google Scholar
  60. 57.
    R. Hagedorn and J. Rafelski, Phys.Lett. 97B (1980) 136.ADSGoogle Scholar
  61. 58.
    B. Touschek, Nuovo Cimento B58 (1968) 295.ADSGoogle Scholar
  62. 59.
    A. Chodos, R.L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, C.B. Thorn and V.F. Weisskopf, Phys.Rev. D19 (1974) 3471.MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  63. 60.
    J.I. Kapusta, Nucl.Phys. B196 (1982) 1.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 61.
    K. Redlich, Z.Phys. C21 (1983) 69.ADSGoogle Scholar
  65. 62.
    N. Cabibbo and G. Parisi, Phys.Lett. 59B (1975) 67.ADSGoogle Scholar
  66. 63.
    R. Hagedorn and J. Rafelski, Bielefeld Symposium on “Statistical Mechanics of Quarks and Hadrons”, p. 237, ed. H. Satz (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1981).Google Scholar
  67. 64.
    J. Rafelski and R. Hagedorn, as in Ref. (63), p. 253.Google Scholar
  68. 65.
    M.I. Gorenstein, Yad.Fiz. 31 (1980) 1630.Google Scholar
  69. 66.
    M.I. Gorenstein, V.K. Petrov and G.M. Zinovjev, Phys.Lett. 106B (1981) 327.ADSGoogle Scholar
  70. 67.
    M.I. Gorenstein, G.M. Zinovjev, V.K. Petrov and V.P. Shelest, Teor.Mat.Fiz. 52 (1982) 346.Google Scholar
  71. 68.
    R. Hagedorn, Z.Phys. C17 (1983) 265.ADSGoogle Scholar
  72. 69.
    M.I. Gorenstein, S.I. Lipskikh and G.M. Zinovjev, Z.Phys. C22 (1984) 189.ADSGoogle Scholar
  73. 70.
    E.A. Guggenheim, J.Chem.Phys. 7 (1939) 103.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 71.
    J. Baacke, Acta Phys.Pol. B8 (1977) 625.Google Scholar
  75. 72.
    J. Letessier and A. Tounsi, Nuovo Cimento 99A (1988) 521.ADSGoogle Scholar
  76. 73.
    J. Letessier and A. Tounsi, Phys.Rev. D40 (1989) 2914.ADSGoogle Scholar
  77. 74.
    J. Letessier and A. Tounsi, Preprint PAR/LPTHE 90-17, Univ. Paris VII (1990) presented at IInd Internat. Bodrum Physics School, 1989, University of Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
  78. 75.
    K. Fabricius and U. Wambach, Nucl.Phys. B62 (1973) 212.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 76.
    M. Chaichian, R. Hagedorn and M. Hayashi, Nucl.Phys. B92 (1975) 445.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 77.
    J. Engels, K. Fabricius and K. Schilling, Phys.Lett. 59B (1975) 477.ADSGoogle Scholar
  81. 78.
    J. Kripfganz, Nucl.Phys. B100 (1975) 302.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 79.
    M. Chaichian and M. Hayashi, Phys.Rev. D15 (1977) 402.ADSGoogle Scholar
  83. 80.
    M. Levinson, Kgl.Danske Vid.Selsk.Mat.Fys.Med. 25 (1949) No 9.Google Scholar
  84. 81.
    R. Hagedorn and I. Montvay, Nucl.Phys. B59 (1973) 45.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 82.
    GJ. Hamer and S. Frautschi, Phys.Rev. D4 (1971) 2125.ADSGoogle Scholar
  86. 83.
    F. Karsch, in “QCD 20 Years Later”, Aachen Symposium, 1992, Vol. 2, p. 717, eds. P.M. Zerwas and H.A. Kastrup, (World Scientific, Singapore, 1993).Google Scholar
  87. 84.
    J. Fingberg, U. Heller and F. Karsch, Nucl.Phys. B392 (1993) 493.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 85.
    R. Hagedorn and J. Ranft, Nucl.Phys. B48 (1972) 157.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 86.
    J. Letessier and A. Tounsi, Nuovo Cimento 13A (1973) 557.ADSGoogle Scholar
  90. 87.
    R. Hagedorn, Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 6 (1983) No 10.Google Scholar
  91. 88.
    A.T. Laasanen, C. Ezell, L.J. Gutay, W.N. Schreiner, P. Schublin, L. von Lindern and F. Tlirkot, Phys.Rev.Lett. 38 (1977) 1.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 89.
    A. Bussière et al., Nucl.Phys. B174 (1980) 1.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 90.
    J. Letessier and A. Tounsi, Nuovo Cimento 99A (1988) 521.ADSGoogle Scholar
  94. 91.
    R. Hagedorn and J. Rafelski, Phys.Lett. 97B (1980) 136.ADSGoogle Scholar
  95. 92.
    L.D. Landau, “Collected Papers”, ed. D. Ter Haar (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1965).Google Scholar
  96. 93.
    Yu.B. Rumer, Soviet Phys. (JETP) 11 (1960) 1365 [Translation from original: JETP 38 (1960) 1899].MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  97. 94.
    G.F. Chew, Science 161 (1968) 762.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 95.
    G.F. Chew, Physics Today 23 (1970) 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 96.
    G.F. Chew and S. Mandelstam, Nuovo Cimento 19 (1961) 752.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 97.
    F. Zachariasen, Phys.Rev.Lett. 7 (1961) 112.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 98.
    Laurence Sterne, “The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy Gentleman” (London, 1761), Book IV, Ch. 27.Google Scholar
  102. 99.
    E.L. Feinberg, Sov. Phys. Usp 18 (1976) 624 [Translation from original: Usp. Fiz. Nauk 116 (1975) 709].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rolf Hagedorn
    • 1
  1. 1.Theoretical Physics DivisionCERNGeneva 23Switzerland

Personalised recommendations