Hot Hadronic Matter pp 13-46 | Cite as
The Long Way to the Statistical Bootstrap Model
Abstract
The statistical bootstrap model (SBM) is a statistical model of strong interactions based on the observation that hadrons not only form bound and resonance states but also decay statistically into such states if they are heavy enough. This leads to the concept of a possibly unlimited sequence of heavier and heavier bound and resonance states, each being a possible constituent of a still heavier resonance, while at the same time being itself composed of lighter ones. We call these states clusters (in the older literature heavier clusters are called fireballs; the pion is the lightest “one-particle-cluster”) and label them by their masses. Let ρ(m)dm be the number of such states in the mass interval {m, dm}; we call ρ(m) the “SBM mass spectrum”. Bound and resonance states are due to strong interactions; if introduced as new, independent particles in a statistical model, they also simulate the strong interactions to which they owe their existence. To simulate all attractive strong interactions we need all of them (including the not yet discovered ones), that is: we need the complete mass spectrum ρ(m). To simulate repulsive forces we may use proper cluster volumes à la Van der Waals. In order to obtain the full mass spectrum, we require that the above picture, namely that a cluster is composed of clusters, be self-consistent. This leads to the “bootstrap condition and/or bootstrap equation” for the mass spectrum ρ(m). The bootstrap equation (BE) is an integral equation embracing all hadrons of all masses. It can be solved analytically with the result that the mass spectrum ρ(m) has to grow exponentially. Consequently any thermodynamics employing this mass spectrum has a singular temperature T 0 generated by the asymptotic mass spectrum: ρ(m) ∼ exp(m/T 0). Today this singular temperature is interpreted as the temperature where (for baryon chemical potential zero) the phase transition (hadron gas) ⇔ (quark-gluon plasma) occurs.
Keywords
Partition Function Transverse Momentum Compound Nucleus Fermi Model Scatter Phase ShiftPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Laurence Sterne, “The life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy Gentleman” (London, 1760), Book II, Ch. 19.Google Scholar
- 2.R. Hagedorn, in “Quark Matter ’84”, Helsinki Symposium, ed. K. Kajantie, published in “Lecture Notes in Physics” 221 (Springer, Heidelberg, 1985).Google Scholar
- 3.E.L. Feinberg, Physics Reports 5 (1972) 237.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.H. Yukawa, Proc.Phys.Math.Soc.Japan 17 (1935) 48.Google Scholar
- 5.W. Heitler, Proc.Cambr.Phil.Soc. 37 (1941) 291.MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.W. Heitler and H.W. Peng, Proc.Cambr.Phil.Soc. 38 (1942) 296.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.L. Janossy, Phys.Rev. 64 (1943) 345.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.W. Heisenberg, Z.Phys. 101 (1936) 533.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.N.M. Dulles and W.D. Walker, Phys.Rev. 93 (1954) 215.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.J. Nishimura, Soryushiron Kenkyu 12 (1956) 24.Google Scholar
- 11.G. Cocconi, Phys.Rev. 111 (1958) 1699.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.F.W. Büsser et al. (CERN-Columbia-Rockefeller Coll.), Phys.Lett. 46B (1973) 471, and a wealth of further papers in conference reports and review articles.Google Scholar
- 13.S. Takagi, Progr.Theor.Phys. 7 (1952) 123.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.P. Ciok, T. Coghen, J. Gierula, R. Holyński, A. Jurak, M. Miesowicz, T. Saniewska, O. Stanisz and J. Pernegr, Nuovo Cimento 8 (1958) 166 and 10 (1958) 741 [the second without O. Stanisz].Google Scholar
- 15.J. Gierula, Fortschr.d.Physik 11 (1963) 109.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.N. Bohr, Nature 137 (1936) 344.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.V.F. Weisskopf, Phys.Rev. 52 (1937) 295.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.I. Frenkel, Soviet Phys. 9 (1936) 533.Google Scholar
- 19.H. Koppe, Phys.Rev. 76 (1949) 688.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.H. Koppe, Zs.f.Naturforschung 3a (1948) 251.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 21.E. Fermi, Progr.Theor.Phys. 5 (1950) 570.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.E. Fermi, Phys.Rev. 81 (1951) 683.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.W. Heisenberg, Naturwissenschaften 39 (1952) 69.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.E. Beth and C.E. Uhlenbeck, Physica 4 (1937) 915.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, “Statistical Physics” (MIR, Moscow, 1967).Google Scholar
- 26.R. Hagedorn, in Cargèse Lectures, Vol. 6 (1973), p. 643, ed. E. Schatzmann (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1973).Google Scholar
- 27.K. Huang, “Statistical Mechanics” (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1963).Google Scholar
- 28.J. Bernstein, R. Dashen and S. Ma, Phys.Rev. 187 (1969) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.S.Z. Belenkij, Nucl.Phys. 2 (1956) 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.L. Sertorio, Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 2 (1979) No 2.Google Scholar
- 31.E Cerulus and R. Hagedorn, Suppl.Nuovo Cimento 9 (1958) 646, 659.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.F. Cerulus, Nuovo Cimento 19 (1961) 528.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.F. Cerulus, Nuovo Cimento 22 (1961) 958.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.R. Hagedorn, Nuovo Cimento 15 (1960) 434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.a)S.Z. Belenkij, V.M. Maksimenko, A.I. Nikisov and I.L. Rozental, Usp.Fiz.Nauk 62 (1957) 1, in Russian.Google Scholar
- b).S.Z. Belenkij, V.M. Maksimenko, A.I. Nikisov and I.L. Rozental Fortschr.d.Physik 6 (1958) 524, same in German.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.G. Cocconi, Nuovo Cimento 33 (1964) 643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.J. Orear, Phys.Lett. 13 (1964) 190.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 38.G. Fast, R. Hagedorn and L.W. Jones, Nuovo Cimento 27 (1963) 856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- G. Fast and R. Hagedorn, Nuovo Cimento 27 (1963) 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.T.E.O. Ericson, Phys.Lett. 4 (1963) 258.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.A. Bialas and V.F. Weisskopf, Nuovo Cimento 35 (1965) 1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.G. Auberson and B. Escoubès, Nuovo Cimento 36 (1965) 628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.H. Satz, Nuovo Cimento 37 (1965) 1407.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.J. Vandermeulen, Bull.Soc.Roy.Sci.Liège (Belgium) 34 (1965) Nos 1–2.Google Scholar
- 44.I. Pomeranchuk, Dokl.Akad.Nauk SSSR 78 (1951) 889.Google Scholar
- 45.R. Hagedorn, Suppl. Nuovo Cimento 3 (1965) 147.Google Scholar
- 46.R. Carreras, “Picked up for you this week”, No 26 (CERN, Geneva, 1993).Google Scholar
- 47.Particle Data Group, Phys.Rev. D50 (1994) No 3, Part I.Google Scholar
- 48.W. Nahm, Nucl.Phys. B45 (1972) 525.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 49.S. Frautschi, Phys.Rev. D3 (1971) 2821.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 50.R. Hagedorn and J. Ranft, Suppl. Nuovo Cimento 6 (1968) 169.Google Scholar
- H. Grote, R. Hagedorn and J. Ranft, “Particle Spectra” (CERN, Geneva, 1970).Google Scholar
- 51.J. Yellin, Nucl.Phys. B52 (1973) 583.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 52.E. Schröder, Z.Math.Phys. 15 (1870) 361.MATHGoogle Scholar
- 53.G.J.H. Burgers, C. Fuglesang, R. Hagedorn and V. Kuvshinov, ZPhys. C46 (1990) 465.Google Scholar
- 54.H. Satz, Phys.Rev. D20 (1979) 582.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 55.K. Redlich and L. Turko, Z.Phys. C5 (1980) 201.MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
- 56.R. Hagedorn, I. Montvay and J. Rafelski, Proc. Workshop on Hadronic Matter at Extreme Energy Density, Erice, 1978, p. 49 eds. N. Cabibbo and L. Sertorio (Springer Science+Business Media New York, 1980).Google Scholar
- 57.R. Hagedorn and J. Rafelski, Phys.Lett. 97B (1980) 136.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 58.B. Touschek, Nuovo Cimento B58 (1968) 295.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 59.A. Chodos, R.L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, C.B. Thorn and V.F. Weisskopf, Phys.Rev. D19 (1974) 3471.MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
- 60.J.I. Kapusta, Nucl.Phys. B196 (1982) 1.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 61.K. Redlich, Z.Phys. C21 (1983) 69.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 62.N. Cabibbo and G. Parisi, Phys.Lett. 59B (1975) 67.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 63.R. Hagedorn and J. Rafelski, Bielefeld Symposium on “Statistical Mechanics of Quarks and Hadrons”, p. 237, ed. H. Satz (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1981).Google Scholar
- 64.J. Rafelski and R. Hagedorn, as in Ref. (63), p. 253.Google Scholar
- 65.M.I. Gorenstein, Yad.Fiz. 31 (1980) 1630.Google Scholar
- 66.M.I. Gorenstein, V.K. Petrov and G.M. Zinovjev, Phys.Lett. 106B (1981) 327.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 67.M.I. Gorenstein, G.M. Zinovjev, V.K. Petrov and V.P. Shelest, Teor.Mat.Fiz. 52 (1982) 346.Google Scholar
- 68.R. Hagedorn, Z.Phys. C17 (1983) 265.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 69.M.I. Gorenstein, S.I. Lipskikh and G.M. Zinovjev, Z.Phys. C22 (1984) 189.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 70.E.A. Guggenheim, J.Chem.Phys. 7 (1939) 103.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 71.J. Baacke, Acta Phys.Pol. B8 (1977) 625.Google Scholar
- 72.J. Letessier and A. Tounsi, Nuovo Cimento 99A (1988) 521.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 73.J. Letessier and A. Tounsi, Phys.Rev. D40 (1989) 2914.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 74.J. Letessier and A. Tounsi, Preprint PAR/LPTHE 90-17, Univ. Paris VII (1990) presented at IInd Internat. Bodrum Physics School, 1989, University of Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
- 75.K. Fabricius and U. Wambach, Nucl.Phys. B62 (1973) 212.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 76.M. Chaichian, R. Hagedorn and M. Hayashi, Nucl.Phys. B92 (1975) 445.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 77.J. Engels, K. Fabricius and K. Schilling, Phys.Lett. 59B (1975) 477.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 78.J. Kripfganz, Nucl.Phys. B100 (1975) 302.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 79.M. Chaichian and M. Hayashi, Phys.Rev. D15 (1977) 402.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 80.M. Levinson, Kgl.Danske Vid.Selsk.Mat.Fys.Med. 25 (1949) No 9.Google Scholar
- 81.R. Hagedorn and I. Montvay, Nucl.Phys. B59 (1973) 45.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 82.GJ. Hamer and S. Frautschi, Phys.Rev. D4 (1971) 2125.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 83.F. Karsch, in “QCD 20 Years Later”, Aachen Symposium, 1992, Vol. 2, p. 717, eds. P.M. Zerwas and H.A. Kastrup, (World Scientific, Singapore, 1993).Google Scholar
- 84.J. Fingberg, U. Heller and F. Karsch, Nucl.Phys. B392 (1993) 493.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 85.R. Hagedorn and J. Ranft, Nucl.Phys. B48 (1972) 157.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 86.J. Letessier and A. Tounsi, Nuovo Cimento 13A (1973) 557.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 87.R. Hagedorn, Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 6 (1983) No 10.Google Scholar
- 88.A.T. Laasanen, C. Ezell, L.J. Gutay, W.N. Schreiner, P. Schublin, L. von Lindern and F. Tlirkot, Phys.Rev.Lett. 38 (1977) 1.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 89.A. Bussière et al., Nucl.Phys. B174 (1980) 1.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 90.J. Letessier and A. Tounsi, Nuovo Cimento 99A (1988) 521.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 91.R. Hagedorn and J. Rafelski, Phys.Lett. 97B (1980) 136.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 92.L.D. Landau, “Collected Papers”, ed. D. Ter Haar (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1965).Google Scholar
- 93.Yu.B. Rumer, Soviet Phys. (JETP) 11 (1960) 1365 [Translation from original: JETP 38 (1960) 1899].MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 94.G.F. Chew, Science 161 (1968) 762.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 95.G.F. Chew, Physics Today 23 (1970) 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 96.G.F. Chew and S. Mandelstam, Nuovo Cimento 19 (1961) 752.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 97.F. Zachariasen, Phys.Rev.Lett. 7 (1961) 112.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 98.Laurence Sterne, “The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy Gentleman” (London, 1761), Book IV, Ch. 27.Google Scholar
- 99.E.L. Feinberg, Sov. Phys. Usp 18 (1976) 624 [Translation from original: Usp. Fiz. Nauk 116 (1975) 709].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar