The Impact of Tobacco Policies on Trends in Tobacco Consumption

  • Murray Laugesen

Abstract

Aim:To review effectiveness of (1) government policies (2) public health programmes (3) personal health services, in reducing tobacco use.

Method:English language search of economic, tobacco control, public health and medical journals for econometric analyses and controlled trials.

Results: (1) Econometric evidence for price effects on sales is strong. Advertising affects total market sales, but ban effects are difficult to isolate. Publicity campaigns, health advertising and authoritative reports on health risks can lower sales. Cigarette packet warnings inform smokers but cannot be relied on to lower sales. (2) Laws against sales to young people can work, but require systematic enforcement. (3) Assisted cessation is integral to personal health care, but requires wide systematic application before it can decrease smoking prevalence.

Keywords

Smoking Cessation Tobacco Control Health Warning Tobacco Advertising Personal Health Care 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Andrews RL and Franke GR. The determinants of cigarette consumption: a meta-analysis. J. Public Policy and Marketing. 1991;10:81–100.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Simister and Brodie RJ The effect of advertising on brand and industry demand for tobacco: a meta-analysis of econometric studies. NZ Business, in press 1994.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Toxic Substances Board. Health or Tobacco, an end to tobacco advertising and promotion. Wellington: Department of Health. 1989.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Simonich WL, Government antismoking policies. American University Studies. New York: Peter Lang. 1991;253.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alchin TM. Determinants of demand for tobacco products and government policy implications. Symposium on the Economics of drug and alcohol abuse. Australian National University, Canberra, 1993.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Economic and Operational Research Division. Effect of tobacco advertising on tobacco consumption: a discussion document reviewing the evidence. London:Department of Health. 1992;15.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hastings GB, Ryan H, Teer P, MacKintosh AM. Cigarette advertising and children’s smoking: why Reg was withdrawn. Brit Med J 1994;309:933–937.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Witt SF and Pass CL. The effect of health warnings and advertising on the demand for cigarettes. Scottish J Political Economy 1981;28:86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer. Health warnings and contents labelling on tobacco products. Melbourne: Anti Cancer Council of Victoria, 1992;79–84.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jason LA, Ji PY, Anes MD, Birkhead SH. Active enforcement of cigarette control laws in the prevention of sales to minors. JAMA 1991;266:3159–3161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    DiFranza JR, Carlson RP, Caisse RE. Reducing youth access to tobacco. Letter. Tobacco Control 1992;1:58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fiore MC, Novotny TE, Pierce JP et al. Methods used to quit smoking in the United States. Do cessation programmes help? JAMA 1990;263:2760–2765.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mattick RP and Baillie A. An outline of approaches to smoking cessation. Quality assurance in the treatment of drug dependence project. National Campaign against drug abuse. Monograph series no. 19. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1992, 26–35.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Viswesvaran C. and Schmidt FL. A meta-analytic comparison of the effectiveness of smoking cessation methods. J. Applied Psychology 1992; 77:554–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Flay BR. Mass media and smoking cessation: a critical review. Am. J Public Health. 1987;77:153–160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fisher KJ. A meta-analysis of controlled studies of worksite smoking cessation. The Global War. 7th World Conference on Tobacco and Health. Perth: Western Australian Department of Health, 1990; 617–626.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Silagy C, Mant D, Fowler G, Lodge M. Meta-analysis of efficacy of nicotine replacement therapies in smoking cessation. Lancet 1994;343:139–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lewit EM, Coate D, and Grossman M. The effect of government regulations on teenage smoking. J. Law and Economics 1981;14:545–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Flay BR, Koepke D, Thomson SJ, et al. Six-year follow-up of the first Waterloo School Smoking Prevention Trial. Am J Public Health 1989;79:1371–1376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shean RE, deKlerk NH, Armstrong BK et al. Seven-year follow-up of a smoking-prevention program for children. Australian J Public Health 1994;18:205–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Special report. Preventing tobacco use among young people. A report of the Surgeon General, 1994, executive summary. Tobacco Control 1994;3:176–184.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peto R, Lopez A, Boreham J, Thun M, Clark H Jr. Mortality from Smoking in developed countries 1950–2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1994; p.A10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Murray Laugesen
    • 1
  1. 1.Public Health CommissionWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations