Geologic Modeling and Simulation pp 45-69 | Cite as
Sedimentary Process Modeling: From Academia to Industry
Abstract
Sedimentary process modeling evolved from an academic exercise to practical applications from the 1970’s to this day. The SEDSIM model, developed at Stanford in the 1980’s under the direction of John Harbaugh, is an example of a model that underwent an early development in academia, and later was applied in industry, where it multiplied into several versions. It differed from other 3-D sedimentary models of that time in that it attempted to model strictly physical processes for extremely long periods of time. It initially was an ambitious project, necessitating more computer power than was available, despite substantial simplifications in the mathematical representation of the physical processes. Through the vision of John Harbaugh, the original model was completed just when computer power reached the model’s computational requirements for practical applications. The availability of three-dimensional animated computer graphics complemented SEDSIM’s numerical techniques to make it a useful tool for hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation, as is illustrated by two application examples presented in this paper. Future developments should be geared toward integration with other models, automatic inversion, integration with geostatistical methods, and better representing the nonlinear dynamics of flow and sedimentation.
Keywords
Debris Flow Chaotic Behavior Sedimentary Process Turbidity Current Salt DomePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Haq, B. U., Hardenbol, H., and Vail, P.R., 1987, Chronology of fluctuating sea levels since the Triassic: Science, v. 235, no. 4793, p. 1156–1167.Google Scholar
- Harbaugh, J.W., 1999, Stanford’s Geomath Program: Intern. Assoc. Math. Geology, Newsletters nos. 58 and 59.Google Scholar
- Harbaugh, J. W., and Bonham-Carter, G.F., 1970, Computer simulation in geology: John Wiley Interscience, New York, 575 p.Google Scholar
- Hockney, R. W., and Eastwood, J. W., 1981, Computer simulation using particles: McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 523 p.Google Scholar
- Perlmutter, M. A., and Matthews, M. D., 1992, Global cyclostratigraphy, in Niereberg, W. A., ed.,Encyclopedia of Earth Systems Science, v. 2: Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, California, p. 379–393.Google Scholar
- Schumm, S.A., 1993, River response to base level change: implications to sequence stratigraphy: Jour. Geology, v. 101, no. 2, p. 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Slingerland, R., 1989, Predictability and chaos in quantitative dynamic stratigraphy, in Cross T. A., ed.,Quantitative dynamic stratigraphy: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, p. 45–53.Google Scholar
- Tetzlaff, D. M., and Harbaugh, J.W., 1989, Simulating clastic sedimentation: Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 202 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tetzlaff, D. M., 1991, The combined use of sedimentary process modeling and statistical simulation in reservoir characterization: SPE Paper 22759, p. 937–942.Google Scholar