A Comparative Approach to Reconstructing the Socioecology of Extinct Primates

  • Charles L. Nunn
  • Carel P. Van Schaik
Part of the Advances in Primatology book series (AIPR)

Abstract

Some aspects of behavior can be reconstructed in the fossil record because structure and function (i.e., behavior) are directly linked. For instance, one may be able to reconstruct the diet of an extinct taxon based on a variety of morphological features that are known to have certain functions among extant species. Many chapters in this book follow this approach, which, for all its limitations (Kay and Cartmill, 1977; Kay, 1984), may produce the most reliable reconstructions of the behavior and ecology of extinct species.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiello, L. C. and Wheeler, P. 1995. The expensive tissue hypothesis. Curr. Anthropol. 36: 199–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andelman, S. J. 1986. Ecological and social determinants of cercopithecine mating patterns. In:D. I. Rubenstein and R. W. Wrangham (eds.) Ecological Aspects of Social Evolution: Birds andMammals pp. 201–216. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, P. 1996. Palaeoecology and hominoid palaeoenvironments. Biol. Rev. 71: 257–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrews, P., and van Couvering, J. A. H. 1975. Palaeoenvironments in the East African Miocene.In: F. Szalay (ed.) Contributions to Primatology. pp. 62–103. Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
  5. Antonovics, J., and van Tienderen, P. H. 1991. Ontoecogenophyloconstraints? The chaos of constraint terminology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6: 166–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barton, R. A., and Purvis, A. 1994. Primate brains and ecology: looking beneath the surface. In: B. Thierry, J. R. Anderson, J. J. Roeder, and N. Herrenschmidt (eds.) Current Primatology pp. 1–9. Universite Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg.Google Scholar
  7. Barton, R. A., Purvis, A., and Harvey, P. H. 1995. Evolutionary radiation of visual and olfactory brain systems in primates, bats and insectivores. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 348: 381–392.Google Scholar
  8. Bleisch, W., Cheng Ao-Song, Ren Xiao-Dong, and Xie Jia-Hua 1993. Preliminary results from a field study of wild guizhou snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus brelichi). Folia Primatol. 60: 7282.Google Scholar
  9. Cartmill, M. 1980. Morphology, function, and evolution of the anthropoid postorbital septum. In: R. L. Ciochon and A. B. Chiarelli (eds.) Evolutionary Biology of New World Monkeys and Continental Drift pp. 243–274. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Chapman, C. A., Walker, S., and Lefebvre, L. 1990. Reproductive strategies of primates: the influence of body size and diet on litter size. Primates 31: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Charnov, E. L. 1993. Life History Invariants. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  12. Cheney, D. L., and Wrangham, R. W. 1987. Predation. In: B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, and T. T. Struhsaker (eds.), Primate Societies, pp. 227–239. Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  13. Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Harvey, P. H., 1977a. Primate ecology and social organization. J. Zool. 183: 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Harvey, P. H. 1977b. Species differences in feeding and ranging behaviour in primates. In: T.H.Clutton-Brock (ed.), Primate Ecology, pp. 557–579. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  15. Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Harvey, P. H. 1980. Primates, brains and ecology. J Zool. 190: 309–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Harvey, P. H. 1984. Comparative approaches to investigating adapta-tion. In:J.R. Krebs and N. B. Davies (eds.), Behavioural Ecology, pp. 7–29.Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  18. Corbet, G. B., and Hill, J. E. 1991. A World List of Mammalian Species. Oxford University Press,Oxford.Google Scholar
  19. Crockett, C. M., and Wilson, W. L. 1980. The ecological separation of Macaca nemestrina and Macaca fascicularis in Sumatra. In: D. G. Lindburg (ed.), The Macaques: Studies in Ecology, Behavior and Evolution, pp. 148–181. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Cunningham, C., Omland, K., and Oakley, T. 1998. Reconstructing ancestral character states. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 361–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dagosto, M., and Terranova, C. J. 1992. Estimating the body size of Eocene primates: acomparison of results from dental and postcranial variables. Int. J. Primatol. 13: 307–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davies, A. G., and Oates, J. F. 1994. Colobine Monkeys: Their Ecology Behaviour and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  23. Di Fiori, A., and Rendall, D. 1994. Evolution of social organization: a reappraisal for primates by using phylogenetic methods. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 9941–9945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dunbar, R. I. M. 1991. Functional significance of social grooming in primates. Folia Primatol. 57: 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dunbar, R. I. M. 1992a. Behavioural ecology of the extinct papionines. J. Hum. Evol. 22: 407–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dunbar, R. I. M. 1992b. Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. J. Hum. Evol. 20: 469–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dunbar, R. I. M. 1993. Socioecology of the extinct theropiths: a modelling approach. In:N. G. Jablonski (ed.) Theropithecus: The Rise and Fall of a Primate Genus pp. 465–486. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Emlen, S. T., and Oring, L. W. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197: 215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Farris J.S. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5: 417–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125: 1–15. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fleagle, J. G. 1984. Primate locomotion and diet In:D.J. Chivers, B. A. Wood, and A. Bilsborough(eds.), Food Acquisition and Processing in Primates. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Fleagle, J. G. 1988. Primate Adaptation and Evolution. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Fleagle, J. G., and Kay, 1985. The paleobiology of catarrhines. In: E. Delson (ed.) Ancestors: The Hard Evidence pp. 23–36. A. R. Liss, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Fleagle, J. G., and Reed, K. E. 1996. Comparing primate communities: a multivariate approach. J. Hum. Evol. 30: 489–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Frumhoff, P. C., and Reeve, H. K. 1994. Using phylogenies to test hypotheses of adaptation: a critique of some current proposals. Evolution 48: 172–180. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Garland, T., Jr., Dickerman, A. W., Janis, C. M., and Jones, J. A. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Syst. Biol. 42: 265–292.Google Scholar
  37. Garland, T., Jr., Martin, K. L. M., and Diaz-Uriarte, R. 1997. Reconstructing ancestral trait values using squared-change parsimony: plasma osmolarity at the origin of amniotes. In: S. S. Sumida and K. L. M. Martin (eds.) Amniote Origins pp. 425–501. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gautier-Hion, A., Bourlière, F., Guatier, J.-P., and Kingdon, J. 1988. A Primate Radiation: Evolutionary Biology of the African Guenons. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  39. Gibson, K. R. 1986. Cognition, brain size and the extraction of embedded food resources. In: G. Else and P. C. Lee (eds.) Primate Ontogeny Cognitive and Social Behavior pp. 93–105. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  40. Gingerich, P. D., Smith, B. H., and Rosenberg, K. 1982. Allometric scaling in the dentition of primates and prediction of body weight from tooth size in fossils. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 58: 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gittleman, J. L., and Luh, 1992. On comparing comparative methods. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gittleman, J. L., and Luh, H. K. 1994. Phylogeny, evolutionary models, and comparative methods: a simulation study. In: P. Eggleton and R. I. Vane-Wright (eds.) Phylogenetics and Ecology pp. 103–122. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  43. Harvey, P. H., and Pagel, M. D. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  44. Harvey, P. H., Read, A. F., and Promislow, D. E. L. 1989. Life history variation in placental mammals: unifying the data with theory. In: P. H. H. Partridge (ed.) Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology pp. 13–31. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  45. Hawkes, K. 1992. Sharing and collective action. In: E. A. Smith and B. Winterhalder (eds.) Evolutionary Ecology and Human Behavior pp. 269–300. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
  46. Hladik, C. M. 1975. Ecology, diet, and social patterning in Old and New World primates. In: R. H. Tuttle (ed.) Socioecology and Psychology of Primates pp. 3–35. Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  47. Janson, C. H., and Goldsmith, M. 1995. Predicting group size in primates: foraging costs and predation risk. Behay. Ecol. 6: 326–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kappeler, P. M., and Heymann, E. W. 1996. Nonconvergence in the evolution of primate life history and socio-ecology. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 59: 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kay, R. F. 1984. On the use of anatomical features to infer foraging behavior in extinct primates. In: P. Rodman, and J. Cant (eds.) Adaptations for Foraging in Nonhuman Primates. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  50. Kay, R. F. 1994. “Giant” tamarin from the Miocene of Columbia. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 95: 333–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kay, R. F., and Cartmill, M. 1977. Cranial morphology and adaptations of Palaecthon nacimienti and other Paromomyidae (Plesiadapoidea, ?Primates), with a description of a new genus and species. J. Hum. Evol. 6: 19–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kay, R. F., and Williams, B.A. this volume. The adaptations of Branisella boliviana, the earliest South American monkey.Google Scholar
  53. Kleiber, M. 1961. The Fire of Life: An Introduction to Animal Energetics. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  54. Kummer, H. 1968. Social Organization of Hamadryas Baboons. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  55. Leigh, S. R. 1994. Ontogenetic correlates of diet in anthropoid primates. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 94: 499–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Maddison, W. P., and Maddison, D. R. 1992. MacClade. Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  57. Martins, E. P., and Garland, T., Jr. 1991. Phylogenetic analyses of the correlated evolution of continuous characters: a simulation study. Evolution 45: 534–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Martins, E. P., and Hansen, T. F. 1996. The statistical analysis of interspecific data: a review and evaluation of phylogenetic comparative methods. In: E. Martins (ed.) Phylogenies and the Comparative Method in Animal Behavior pp. 22–75. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  59. McNab, B. K. 1963. Bioenergetics and the determination of home range size. Am. Nat. 97: 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Milton, K., and May, M. L. 1976. Body weight, diet and home range area in primates. Nature 259: 459–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mitani, J. C., and Rodman, P. S. 1979. Territoriality: the relation of ranging pattern and home range size to defendability, with an analysis of territoriality among primate species. Behay. Ecol. Sociobiol. 5: 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mitani, J. C., Gros-Louis, J., and Richards, A. F. 1996. Sexual dimorphism, the operational sexratio, and the intensity of male competition in polygynous primates. Am. Nat. 147: 966–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nunn, C. L. 1995. A simulation test of Smith’s “degrees of freedom” correction for comparativestudies. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 98: 355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nunn, C. L. (2000). Collective action, free-riders, and male extragroup conflict. In: P. Kappeler (ed.) Primate Males pp. 192–204. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  65. Nunn, C. L., and Smith, K. K. 1998. Statistical analyses of developmental sequences: the craniofacial region in marsupial and placental mammals. Am. Nat. 152: 82–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Omland, K. 1997. Examining two standard assumptions of ancestral reconstructions: repeated loss of dichromatism in dabbling ducks (Anatini). Evolution 51: 1636–1646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pagel, M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 255: 37–45.Google Scholar
  68. Plavcan, J. M. this volume. Reconstructing social behavior from dimorphism in the fossil record.Google Scholar
  69. Plavcan, J. M., and van Schaik, C. P. 1997. Intrasexual competition and body weight dimorphismin anthropoid primates. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 103: 37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pm-vis, A. 1995. A composite estimate of primate phylogeny. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 348: 405–421.Google Scholar
  71. Purvis, A., and Rambaut, A. 1995. Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data. Computer Applications in the Biosciences (CABIOS) 11: 247–251.Google Scholar
  72. Purvis, A., Gittleman, J. L., and Luh, H. 1994. Truth or consequences: effects of phylogenetic accuracy on two comparative methods. J. Theor. Biol. 167: 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Purvis, A., Nee, S., and Harvey, P. H. 1995. Macroevolutionary inferences from primate phylogeny. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 260: 329–333.Google Scholar
  74. Robinson, J. G., and Janson, C. H. 1987. Capuchins, squirrel monkeys, and atelines: socioecological convergence with Old World primates. In: B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, and T. T. Struhsaker (eds.) Primate Societies. Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  75. Ross, C. 1988. The intrinsic rate of natural increase and reproductive effort in primates. J. Zool. 214:199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rowe, N. 1996. The Pictorial Guide to the Living Primates. Pogonias Press, East Hampton, NY. Rylands, A. B. 1993. Marmosets and Tamarins: Systematics, Behaviour, and Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  77. Sawaguchi, T. 1990. Relative brain size, stratification, and social structure in anthropoids. Primates 31: 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schluter, D., Price, T., Mooers, A. O., and Ludwig, D. 1998. Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51: 1699–1711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schmidt-Nielsen, K. 1984. Scaling: Why is Animal Size So Important? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Smith, R. J. 1996. Biology and body size in human evolution. Curr. Anthropol. 37: 451–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Smuts, B. B. and Smuts, R. W. 1993. Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: evidence and theoretical implications. Adv. Study Behay. 22: 1–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W., and Struhsaker, T. T. 1987. Primate Societies. Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  83. Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. 1995. Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.Google Scholar
  84. Tattersall, I. 1987. Cathemeral activity in primates: a definition. Folia Primatol. 49: 200–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Thomas, L., and Juanes, F. 1996. The importance of statistical power analysis: an example from Animal Behaviour. Anim. Behay. 52: 856–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tooby, J., and DeVore, I. 1987. The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. In: W. G. Kinzey (ed.) The Evolution of Human Behavior: Primate Models pp. 183–237. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
  87. van Schaik, C. P. 1996. Social evolution in primates: the role of ecological factors and male behavior. Proc. Br. Acad. 88: 9–31.Google Scholar
  88. van Schaik, C. P., and Kappeler, P. M. 1996. The social systems of gregarious lemurs: lack of convergence or evolutionary disequilibrium? Ethology 102: 915–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. van Schaik, C. P., and van Noordwijk, M. A. 1988. Scramble and contest in feeding competitionamong female long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Behaviour 105: 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Waser, P. M. 1976. Cercocebus albigena: site attachment, avoidance, and intergroup spacing. Am.Nat. 110: 911–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Williams, B. A., and Covert, H. H. 1994. New Early Eocene anaptomorphine primate (Omomyidae) from the Washakie Basin, Wyoming, with comments on the phylogeny and paleobiology of anaptomorphines. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 93: 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wrangham, R. W. 1977. Feeding behaviour of chimpanzees in Gombe National Park, Tanzania. In: T. H. Glutton-Brock (ed.) Primate Ecology: Studies of Feeding and Ranging Behaviour in Lemurs Monkeys and Apes pp. 503–538. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  93. Wrangham, R. W. 1979. On the evolution of ape social systems. Soc. Sci. Inf. 18: 335–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wrangham, R. W. 1987. The significance of African apes for reconstructing human socialevolution. In: W. G. Kinzey (ed.) The Evolution of Human Behavior: Primate Models pp. 51–71.State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles L. Nunn
    • 1
  • Carel P. Van Schaik
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological Anthropology and AnatomyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations