Advertisement

Strong Coupling between Clusters and Radiation

  • Y. Kishimoto
  • T. Tajima

Abstract

The interaction of clusters with a laser is studied theoretically and computationally both in linear and nonlinear regimes. The enhanced interaction of laser with clustered matter over conventional unclustered one arises first from the uncancelled transverse polarization induced on clusters by the laser and further in a nonlinear regime from the nonharmonic orbits of electrons that are detached from their original cluster. In the nonlinear regime when the electron excursion length becomes greater than the size of the cluster, the orbit of the detached electron becomes highly chaotic and unable to come back to its original position upon periodic cycles of the optical oscillations. This effect is capable of sharply increasing the efficiency of laser absorption. As many or most of electrons are removed from the cluster, ions of the cluster are subject to Coulomb explode, gaining much of the energy of the electrons and thus that of laser. This efficient energy conversion to ions is favorable for high energy components that are useful for a variety of applications, including thermonuclear fusion reactions.

Keywords

Nonlinear Regime Laser Absorption High Harmonic Generation Coulomb Explosion Original Cluster 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. N.G. Gotts, D.G. Lethbridge, and A.J. Stase, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 408 (1962).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. J. Purnell, E.M. Snyder, S. Wei, and A.W. Caslemand, Chem. Phys. Lett. 229, 33e(1994).Google Scholar
  3. T. Ditmire, T. Donnelley, R.W. Falcone, and M.D. Perry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3122(1995).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Y.L. Shao, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3343 (1996).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. T. Ditmire, et al., Nature 386, 54 (1997).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. T. Ditmire, J. Zweiback, V.D. Yanovsky, T.E. Cowan, G. Hays, and K.B. Wharton,Nature 75, 398,489 (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. T. Ditmire, T. Donnelly, A.M. Rubenchick, R.W. Falcone, and M.D. Perry, Phys.Rev. A 53, 3379 (1996).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. T. Tajima, Y. Kishimoto, and M.C. Downer, Phys. Plasmas 6, No. 10 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. R.H. Doremus, J. Chem. Phys. 40, 2389 (1964).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Kawabata and R. Kubo, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 21, 1765 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. H.W. Kroto, J.R. Heath, S.C. O’Brien, R.F. Curl, and R.E. Smalley, Nature 318,162(1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. M.F. Becker, J.R. Brock, and J.W. Keto, US Patent #5,585,070 (1996). for example,Google Scholar
  13. T. Tajima Computational Plasma Physics (Addison Wesley, Reading,1989).Google Scholar
  14. S. Eliezer, T. Tajima, and M.N. Rosenbluth, Nucl. Fusion 27, 527 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. Kishimoto
    • 1
  • T. Tajima
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Naka Fusion Research EstablishmentJapan Atomic Energy Research InstituteNaka, IbarakiJapan
  2. 2.Department of Physics and Institute for Fusion StudiesThe University of TexasAustin
  3. 3.Lawrence Livermore National LabLivermore

Personalised recommendations