RAB in Commonplace but Complex Tasks

  • Harvey J. Langholtz
  • Antoinette T. Marty
  • Christopher T. Ball
  • Eric C. Nolan

Abstract

In Chapters 5 through 8, we examined people’s behavior in several specific resource-allocation situations. In Chapter 5, we examined resource-allocation behavior under conditions of Certainty, Risk, and Uncertainty, where fluctuations in resources were possible, finding that participants performed best under Certainty and worst under Uncertainty. We saw that people were capable of intuitively solving simple technical two-dimensional resource-allocation problems, initially finding solutions that were 80–90% of the optimal solution that could be obtained with LP. With practice many participants’ scores improved to 95% of the optimal LP solution. Chapter 5 also discussed the equal-scheduling tendency where participants would tend to schedule equal use of the two alternatives provided in the scenario of the problem, even when the optimal solution called for unequal scheduling. Participants also showed a tendency not to take precautions against losses but instead to react after a loss had occurred.

Keywords

Daily Minimum Symmetrical Problem Discrete Scale Constraint Line Euclidian Unit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harvey J. Langholtz
    • 1
  • Antoinette T. Marty
    • 1
  • Christopher T. Ball
    • 1
  • Eric C. Nolan
    • 2
  1. 1.The College of William and MaryWilliamsburgUSA
  2. 2.University of California, DavisDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations