Advertisement

The Applicability of the Five-Factor Model in a Sub-Saharan Culture

The NEO-PI-R in Shona
  • Ralph L. Piedmont
  • Elaine Bain
  • Robert R. McCrae
  • Paul T. CostaJr.
Part of the International and Cultural Psychology Series book series (ICUP)

Abstract

This chapter examines the Five-Factor Model of personality in Shona, a native tongue of Zimbabwe. One hundred and sixty-five women and 193 men participated in this study; all were bilingual in English and Shona. The Shona version of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and the English version of the Adjective Check List (ACL) were completed by 199 participants. The remaining 159 participants took English or Shona versions of the NEO-PI-R on two occasions, with a mean retest interval of seven days. Alpha reliabilities for the facet scales were quite low, but retest reliabilities and cross-language correlations were considerably higher. Targeted factor analyses showed that the factors and most of the specific facets had a structure similar to that found in Americans, and correlations with the ACL generally supported the construct validity of the new translation. The Openness (O) factor proved weakest in translation. The viability of trait approaches in collectivistic societies and the possible role of sociological context on personality development are discussed.

Keywords

traits Africa collectivistic culture 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. P. (2000). Toward the development of quasi-indigenous personality constructs: Measuring Los Cinco Grandes in Spain with indigenous Castilian markers. American Behavioral Scientist, 141–157.Google Scholar
  2. Benjafield, J., & Muckenheim, R. (1989). A further historicodevelopmental study of the interpersonal circumplex. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 21, 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berne, S. L. (1961). Transactional analysis in psychotherapy. NY: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bond, M. H. (1979). Dimensions used in perceiving peers: Cross-cultural comparisons of Hong Kong, Japanese, American, and Filipino university students. International Journal of Psychology, 14, 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bond, M. H., Makazato, H., & Shiraishi, D. (1975). Universality and distinctiveness in dimensions of Japanese person perception. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6, 346–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1990). Comparing exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: A study on the 5-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 515–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Capara, B. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Perugini, M. (1993). The “Big Five Questionnaire”: A new questionnaire to assess the Five-Factor Model. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Church, A. T. (2000). Culture and personality: Toward an integrated cultural trait psychology. Journal of Personality, 68, 651–703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1989). Personality, stress, and coping: Some lessons from a decade of research. In K. S. Markides & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Aging, stress, and health (pp. 267–283). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Costa, P.T., Jr., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  11. Costa, P. T., Jr., McCrae, R. R., & Dye, D. A. (1991). Facet scales for Agreeableness and Conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 887–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Costa, P. T., Jr., McCrae, R. R., & Jónsson, F. H. (in press). Validity and utility of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Examples from Europe. In B. DeRaad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big Five assessment. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar
  13. Costa, P. T., Jr., McCrae, R. R., Martin, T. A., Oryol, V. E., Senin, I. G., Rukavishnikov, A. A., Shimonaka, Y., Nakazato, K., Gondo, Y., Takayama, M., Allik, J., Kallasmaa, T., & Realo, A. (2000). Personality development from adolescence through adulthood: Further cross-cultural comparisons of age differences. In V. J. Molfese & D. Molfese (Eds.), Temperament and personality development across the life span (pp. 235–252). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Costa, P. T., Jr., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322–331.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cross, S. E., & Markus, H. R.. (1999). The cultural constitution of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd. ed., pp. 378–396). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  16. Diener, E., Diener, M., & Diener, C. (1995). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 851–864.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Everett, J. E. (1983). Factor comparability as a means of determining the number of factors and their rotation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gough, H. G., & Heilbrun, A. B. (1983). The Adjective Check List manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  21. Heaven, P. C. L., Connors, J., Stones, C. R. (1994). Three or five personality dimensions? An analysis of natural language terms in two cultures. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heuchert, J. W. P., Parker, W. D., Stumpf, H., & Myburgh, C. P. H. (2000). The Five-Factor Model in South African college students. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 112–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Horn, B. S. (2000). A Xhosa translation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: A pilot study. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Port Elizabeth.Google Scholar
  24. Jackson, D. N. (1974). Personality Research Form manual. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  25. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1995). Positive and negative valence within the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Research in Personality, 20, 443–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1999). A Five-Factor Theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139–153). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  29. McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., del Pilar, G. H., Rolland, J.-P., & Parker, W. D. (1998). Cross-cultural assessment of the Five-Factor Model: The Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., Pedroso de Lima, M., Simões, A., Ostendorf, F., Angleitner, A., Marušić, I, Bratko, D., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C, Chae, J-H, & Piedmont, R.L. (1999). Age differences in personality across the adult life span: Parallels in five cultures. Developmental Psychology, 35, 466–411.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the Five-Factor Model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McCrae, R. R., Yik, M. S. M., Trapnell, P. D., Bond, M. H., & Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Interpreting personality profiles across cultures: Bilingual, acculturation, and peer rating studies of Chinese undergraduates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1041–1055.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McCrae, R. R., Zonderman, A. B., Costa, P. T., Jr., Bond, M. H., & Paunonen, S. B. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291–310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Okeke, B. I., Draguns, J. G., Sheku, B., & Allen, W. (1999). Culture, self, and personality in Africa. In Y-H. Lee, C. R. McCauley, & J. G. Draguns (Eds.), Personality and person perception across cultures (pp. 139–162). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  37. Ozer, D. J., & Riese, S. P. (1994). Personality assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 357–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Parin, P., & Parin-Mathèy, G. (1964). Ego and orality in the analysis of West Africans. Psychoanalytic Study of Society, 3, 197–203.Google Scholar
  39. Patel, V., Simunyu, E., Gwanzura, F., Lewis, G., & Mann, A. (1997). The Shona Symptom Questionnaire: The development of an indigenous measure of common mental disorders in Harare. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 95, 469–475.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Paunonen, S. V., Jackson, D. N., Trzebinski, J., Forsterling, F. (1992). Personality structure across cultures: A multi-method evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Piedmont, R. L. (1993). A longitudinal analysis of burnout in the health care setting: The role of personal dispositions. Journanl of Personality Assessment, 61, 457–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Piedmont, R. L., & Chae, J-H. (1997). Cross-cultural generalizability of the Five-Factor Model of personality: Development and validation of the NEO-PI-R for Koreans. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 131–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Piedmont, R. L., & Ciarrocchi, J. W. (1999). The utility of the NEO-PI-R in an outpatient, drug rehabilitation context. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 13, 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Piedmont, R. L., McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1991). Adjective Check List scales and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 630–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Piedmont, R. L., & Weinstein, H. P. (1993). A psychometric evaluation of the new NEO-PI-R facet scales for Agreeableness and Conscientiousness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 60, 302–318.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Strelau, J. (1997). Genetic and environmental influences on personality: A study of twins reared together using the self-and peer report NEO-FFI scales. Journal of Personality, 65, 449–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  48. Schöneman, P. H. (1966). A generalized solution of the orthogonal Procrustes problem. Psychometrica, 31, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shweder, R. A., & Sullivan, M. A. (1993). Cultural psychology: Who needs it? Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 497–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van de Vijver, F., & Leung, K. (2001). Personality in cultural context: Methodological issues. Journal of Personality, 69, 1005–1031.Google Scholar
  51. Welsh, G. S. (1975). Creativity and intelligence: A personality approach. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina, Institute for Research in Social Issues.Google Scholar
  52. Wiggins, J. S. (1996). The Five-Factor Model of personality: Theoretical perspectives. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  53. Wilson, D., Doolabh, A., Cooney, J., Khalpey, M., & Siddiqui, S. (1990). A cross-cultural validation of the Personality Research Form in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Witkin, H. A., & Berry, J. W. (1975). Psychological differentiation in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6, 4–87.Google Scholar
  55. Yang, K-S., & Bond, M. H. (1990). Exploring implicit personality theories with indigenous or imported constructs: The Chinese case. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1087–1095.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zimbabwe. (1993). In The new encyclopedia Britannica (Vol. 12, pp. 916–917). Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.Google Scholar
  57. Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ralph L. Piedmont
    • 1
  • Elaine Bain
    • 1
  • Robert R. McCrae
    • 2
  • Paul T. CostaJr.
    • 2
  1. 1.Loyola College in MarylandUSA
  2. 2.National Institute on AgingUSA

Personalised recommendations