Systema Porifera. A Guide to the Classification of Sponges

  • John N. A. Hooper
  • Rob W. M. Van Soest

Abstract

Why write a book on sponge taxonomy; who would read such a book; what is the relevance of sponges; and what are sponges anyway?

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography of Introductions

  1. ACKERS, R.G., MOSS, D. & PICTON, B.E. 1992. Sponges of the British Isles (‘Sponges V’). A Colour Guide and Working Document. Marine Conservation Society: 1–175.Google Scholar
  2. ANONYMOUS. 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Fourth edition. (International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature; The Natural History Museum: London): 1–306.Google Scholar
  3. ARNDT, W. 1928. Kapitel 12, A. Glasschwämme. Pp. 1–8. In: Pax, F. & Arndt, W., Die Rohstoffe des Tierreichs. 1(Band 2, Kapitel 12). (Gebrüder Borntraeger: Berlin): 1–160, pls I-II.Google Scholar
  4. ARNDT, W. 1935. Porifera. In: Die Tierwelt der Nord-und Ostsee. 3a (27). (Leipzig): 1–140.Google Scholar
  5. BEKKER, I. 1829. Aristotelis De partibus animalium libri quatuor. Ex recensione Immanuelis Bekkeri. (Berolini: Berlin): 1–142.Google Scholar
  6. BERGQUIST, P.R. 1978. Sponges. (Hutchinson: London) & (University of California Press: Berkeley & Los Angeles): 1–268.Google Scholar
  7. BERGQUIST, P.R. 1985. Poriferan relationships. Pp. 14–27. In: Morris, S.C., George, J.D., Gibson, R. & Platt, H.M. (Eds), The Origins and Relationships of Lower Invertebrates. The Systematics Association, 28. (Clarendon Press: Oxford): i-ix, l-397.Google Scholar
  8. BOIKO, E.V., BELYAEVA, G.V. & ZHURAVLEVA, I.T. 1991. Phanerozoic sphinctozoans from the Territory of USSR. Academy of Sciences of USSR, Siberian Department, Institute of Geology and Geophysics: 1–223.Google Scholar
  9. BOND, C. 1992. Continuous Cell Movements Rearrange Anatomical Structures in Intact Sponges. Journal of Experimental Zoology 263: 284–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. BORCHIELLINI, C., MANUEL, M., ALIVON, E., BOURY-ESNAULT, N., VACELET, J. & LE PARCO, Y. 2001. Sponge paraphyly and the origin of Metazoa. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14(1): 171–179.Google Scholar
  11. BOURY-ESNAULT, N. & RÜTZLER, K. (Eds). 1997. Thesaurus of Sponge Morphology. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 596: 1–55.Google Scholar
  12. BOWERBANK, J.S. 1841. Description of three species of Sponge, containing some new forms of organization. Microscopical Journal of London 1: 161–162.Google Scholar
  13. BOWERBANK, J.S. 1864. A Monograph of the British Spongiadae.Volume 1. (Ray Society: London): i-xx, 1–290, pls I-XXXVII.Google Scholar
  14. BOWERBANK, J.S. 1866. A Monograph of the British Spongiadae. Volume 2. (Ray Society: London): i-xx, 1–388.Google Scholar
  15. BOWERBANK, J.S. 1874b. A Monograph of the British Spongiadae. Volume 3. (Ray Society: London): i-xvii, 1–367, pls I-XCII.Google Scholar
  16. BOWERBANK, J.S. & NORMAN, A.M. 1882. A Monograph of the British Spongiadae. Volume 4 (Supplement). (Ray Society: London): i-xvii, 1–250, pls I-XVII.Google Scholar
  17. BRIEN, P., LÉVi, C., SARÀ, M., TUZET, O. & VACELET, J. 1973. Spongiaires. Anatomie, Physiologie, Systématique, Écologie. In: Grassé, P.-P. (Ed.), Traité de Zoologie. Anatomie, Systématique, Biologie. Volume 3, fascicule 1. (Masson et Cie: Paris): 1–716.Google Scholar
  18. BURTON, M. 1963. A revision of the Classification of the Calcareous Sponges. With a Catalogue of the specimens in the British Museum (Natural History). (W. Clowes and Sons Ltd.: London): 1–693.Google Scholar
  19. CAVALIER-SMITH, T., CHAO, E.E., BOURY-ESNAULT, N. & VACELET, J. 1996. Sponge phylogeny, animal monophyly, and the origin of the nervous system: 18S rRNA evidence. Canadian Journal of Zoology 74(11): 2031–2045.Google Scholar
  20. CLARK, H.J. 1867. On the Spongiae Ciliatae as Infusoria Flagellata; or, Observations on the Structure, Animality, and Relationship of Leucosolenia botryoides, Bowerbank. Memoirs of the Boston Society of Natural History 1(3): 305–340, pls 9–10.Google Scholar
  21. DEBRENNE, F. & ZHURAVLEV, A. 1994. Archaeocyathan affinities: How deep can we go into the systematic affiliation of an extinct group? Pp. 3–12. In: van Soest, R.W.M., van Kempen, Th.M.G. & Braekman, J.-C. (Eds), Sponges in Time and Space. (Balkema: Rotterdam): 1–515.Google Scholar
  22. DELAGE, Y. & HÉROUARD, E. 1899. Spongiaires. Pp. 19–244. In: Traité de Zoologie concrète: Tome 2, lre Partie. Mésozoaires - Spongiaires. (Schleicher Frères: Paris): 1–244.Google Scholar
  23. DE LAUBENFELS, M.W.: See LAUBENFELS, M.W. DEGoogle Scholar
  24. DENDY, A. 1922b. Report on the Sigmatotetraxonida collected by H.M.S. ‘Sealark’ in the Indian Ocean. In: Reports of the Percy Sladen Trust Expedition to the Indian Ocean in 1905, Volume 7. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London (2), 18(1): 1–164, pls 1–18.Google Scholar
  25. DE VOS, L., RÜTZLER, K., BOURY-ESNAULT, N., DONADEY, C. & VACELET, J. 1991. Atlas of sponge morphology. Atlas de morphologie des éponges. (Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington & London).Google Scholar
  26. DUCHASSAING DE FONBRESSIN, P. & MICHELOTTI, G. 1864. Spongiaires de la mer Caraïbe. Natuurkundige verhandelingen van de Hollandsche maatschappij der wetenschappen te Haarlem 21(2): 1–124, pls I-XXV.Google Scholar
  27. ELLIS, J. 1755. An essay towards a natural history of the corallines and other marine products of the like kind, commonly found on the coasts of Great Britain and Ireland. (Millar: London): xvii, 1–103, pls 1–39.Google Scholar
  28. ELLIS, J. & SOLANDER, D. 1786. The Natural History of many curious and uncommon Zoophytes, collected from various parts of the Globe. Systematically arranged and described by the late Daniel Solander. 4. (Benjamin White & Son: London): 1–206, pls 1–63.Google Scholar
  29. ENTZEL, C. 1551. De re metallica, hoc est, de Origine, Varietate et Natura Corporum Metallicorum, Lapidum, Gemmarum, atq, aliarum, quae ex fodinis eruuntur, rerum ad Medicinae usum deseruientium. Auctore Christophoro Encelio. 3: 1–271.Google Scholar
  30. FINKS, R.M. 1960. Late Paleozoic Sponge Faunas of the Texas Region. The siliceous Sponges. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 120: 1–160, pls 1–50.Google Scholar
  31. FRY, W.G. 1970. The Sponge as a Population: a Biometric Approach. Pp. 135–162. In: Fry, W.G. (Ed.), The Biology of the Porifera. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 25. (Academic Press: London): i-xxviii, 1–512.Google Scholar
  32. GERARDE, J. 1597. The Herball, or Generall Historie of Plantes gathered by John Gerarde of London master in chirvrgerie; Very much enlarged and amended by Thomas Johnson citizen and apothecarye of London. (J. Norton: London).Google Scholar
  33. GRANT, R.E. 1826b. Observations and experiments on the structure and functions of the Sponge. Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal 14: 336–341.Google Scholar
  34. GRANT, R.E. 1836. Animal Kingdom. Pp. 107–118. In:Todd, R.B. (Ed.), The Cyclopaedia of Anatomy and Physiology. Volume 1. (Sherwood, Gilbert and Piper: London): 1–813.Google Scholar
  35. GRAY, J.E. 1867a. Notes on the Arrangement of Sponges, with the Descriptions of some New Genera. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1867(2): 492–558, pls XXVII-XXVIII.Google Scholar
  36. HAECKEL, E. 1872. Die Kalkschwämme. Eine Monographie in zwei Bänden Text und einem Atlas mit 60 Tafeln Abbildungen. (G. Reimer: Berlin): 1: 1–484; 2: 1–418; 3: pls 1–60.Google Scholar
  37. HALL, J. & CLARKE, J.M. 1898. A memoir on the Palaeozoic Reticulate Sponges Constituting the Family Dictyospongidae. Memoirs of the New York State Museum of Natural History 2: 1–350, pls i-ixx.Google Scholar
  38. HARRISON, F.W. & COWDEN, R.R. (Eds) 1976. Aspects of Sponge Biology. (Academic Press: New York & London): i-xiii, 1–354.Google Scholar
  39. HARTMAN, W.D. 1958b. Natural History of the Marine Sponges of Southern New England. Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History 12: 1–155.Google Scholar
  40. HARTMAN, W.D. 1969. New genera and species of coralline sponges (Porifera) from Jamaica. Postilla 137: 1–39.Google Scholar
  41. HARTMAN, W.D. 1979. A new sclerosponge from the Bahamas and its relationship to Mesozoic stromatoporoids. Pp. 467–474. In: Lévi, C. & BouryEsnault, N. (Eds), Biologie des Spongiaires - Sponge Biology. Colloques Internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 291. (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique: Paris): 1–533.Google Scholar
  42. HARTMAN, W.D. 1982. Porifera. Pp. 640–666. In: Parker, S.P. (Ed.), Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms. Volume 1. (McGraw-Hill: New York).Google Scholar
  43. HARTMAN, W.D., WENDT, J.W. & WIEDENMAYER, F. (Eds) 1980. Living and Fossil Sponges, Notes for a Short Course. Sedimenta, 8. (Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science: Miami). 1–274.Google Scholar
  44. HENTSCHEL, E. 1923. Erste Unterabteilung der Metazoa: Parazoa, Porifera-Schwämme. Pp. 307–418, figs 288–377. In: Kükenthal, W. & Krumbach, T. (Eds), Handbuch der Zoologie. Eine Naturgeschichte der Stämme des Tierreiches. Vol. 1, Protozoa, Porifera, Coelenterata, Mesozoa. (Walter de Gruyter und Co: Berlin and Leipzig).Google Scholar
  45. HILL, D. 1965. Archaeocyatha from Antarctica and a Review of the Phylum. Trans-Antarctic Expedition 1955–1958, Scientific Reports. 10(Geology, 3): 1–151, pls I-XII.Google Scholar
  46. HINDE, G.J. 1887–1893. A monograph of the British fossil sponges. 1. Sponges of the Palaeozoic and Jurassic strata. Part 1 (1887): 1–92, pls I-VIII; Part 2 (1888): 93–188, p1. IX; Part 3 (1893): 189–254, pls X-XIX. (Palaeontographical Society: London).Google Scholar
  47. HOLLAND, P. 1634. In: Couch, J. (Ed.), The Historie of the World, commonly called the Naturall Historie of C. Plinius Secundus. Translated into English by Philemon Holland. Volumes I-II. (Wernerian Club: London): 1–423.Google Scholar
  48. HOOPER, J.N.A. 1999. ‘Origin & Outlook’. Proceedings of the 5th International Sponge Symposium, Brisbane, 1998. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 44: 1–707.Google Scholar
  49. HOOPER, J.N.A. & LÉVi, C. 1994. Biogeography of Indo-west Pacific sponges: Microcionidae, Raspailiidae, Axinellidae. Pp. 191–212. In: van Soest, R.W.M., van Kempen, Th.M.G. & Braekman, J.-C. (Eds), Sponges in Time and Space. (Balkema: Rotterdam): 1–515.Google Scholar
  50. HOOPER, J.N.A. & WIEDENMAYER, F. 1994. Porifera. In: Wells, A. (Ed.), Zoological Catalogue of Australia. Volume 12. (CSIRO: Melbourne): 1–620.Google Scholar
  51. Hyman, L.H. 1940. The Invertebrates. Volume 1. (McGraw-Hill: New York).Google Scholar
  52. IJIMA, I. 1927. The Hexactinellida of the Siboga Expedition. In: Weber, M. (Ed.), Siboga-Expeditie. Uitkomsten op zoologisch, botanisch, oceanographisch en geologisch gebied verzameld in Nederlandsch Oostlndië 1899–1900 aan boord H.M. ‘Siboga’ onder commando van Luitenant ter zee le kl. G.F. Tydeman. 106(Monographie VI). (E.J. Brill: Leiden): i-viii, 1–383, pls I-XXVI.Google Scholar
  53. IMPERATO, F. 1599. Dell’ historia naturale di Ferrante Imperato Napolinato. 28(2): 1–791.Google Scholar
  54. JOHNSTON, G. 1842. A History of British Sponges and Lithophytes. (W.H. Lizars: Edinburgh): i-xii, 1–264, pls I-XXV.Google Scholar
  55. JONES, W.C. (Ed.) 1987. European contributions to the taxonomy of sponges. (1). (Sherkin Island Marine Station: Sherkin Island, County Cork): 1–140.Google Scholar
  56. KENT, W. SAVILLE 1880–1882. A Manual of the Infusoria: Including a Description of all known Flagellate, Ciliate, and Tentaculiferous Protozoa, British and Foreign, and an Account of the Organization and Affinities of the Sponges. 1–3. (David Bogue: London): i-x, 1–472, 473–913, pls LI.Google Scholar
  57. KOLTUN, V.M. 1955a. Phylum Spongia. Pp. 62–69. In: Pavlovskii, E.N. (Ed.), Atlas of invertebrates of the far eastern seas of the USSR [in Russian]. (Akaemii Nauk SSSR. Zoologicheskii Institut: Moskva-Leningrad): 1–244.Google Scholar
  58. KOLTUN, V.M. 1959. [Siliceous horny sponges of the northern and far-eastern seas of the U.S.S.R.] [In Russian]. Opredeliteli po faune SSR, izdavaemye Zoologicheskim muzeem Akademii nauk 67: 1–236.Google Scholar
  59. KOLTUN, V.M. 1964b. Sponges of the Antarctic. 1. Tetraxonida and Cornacuspongida. Pp. 6–133, 443–448. In: Pavlovskii, E.P., Andriyashev, A.P. & Ushakov, P.V. (Eds), Biological Reports of the Soviet Antarctic Expedition (1955–1958), Akademya Nauk SSSR [English translation, 1966, Israel Program for Scientific Translations]. 2(10). (S. Monson: Jerusalem): i-iii, 1–448.Google Scholar
  60. KOLTUN, V.M. 1967. Glass, or Hexactinellid sponges of the Northern and Far-Eastern Seas of the USSR (Class Hyalospongiae). [In Russian]. Opredeliteli po faune SSR, izdavaemye Zoologicheskim muzeem Akademii nauk 94: 1–124.Google Scholar
  61. LAFAY, B., BOURY ESNAULT, N., VACELET, J. & CHRISTEN, R. 1992. An analysis of partial 28S ribosomal RNA sequences suggests early radiations of sponges. BioSystems 28(1–3): 139–151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. LAUBENFELS, M.W. DE 1936a. A Discussion of the Sponge Fauna of the Dry Tortugas in Particular and the West Indies in General, with Material for a Revision of the Families and Orders of the Porifera. Carnegie Institute of Washington (Tortugas Laboratory Paper N° 467) 30: 1–225, pls 1–22.Google Scholar
  63. LAUBENFELS, M.W. DE 1948. The order Keratosa of the phylum Porifera - A monographic study. Occasional Papers of the Allan Hancock Foundation 3: 1–217.Google Scholar
  64. LAUBENFELS, M.W. DE 1954. The Sponges of the West-Central Pacific. Oregon State Monographs. Studies in Zoology 7: i-x, 1–306, pls I-XII.Google Scholar
  65. LENDENFELD, R. VON 1888. Descriptive Catalogue of the Sponges in the Australian Museum, Sidney. (Taylor & Francis: London): i-xiv, 1–260, pls 1–12.Google Scholar
  66. LENDENFELD, R. VON 1889a. A Monograph of the Horny Sponges. (Trübner and Co.: London): iii-iv, 1–936, pls 1–50.Google Scholar
  67. LENDENFELD, R. VON 1897a. Die Clavulina der Adria. Nova acta Academiae Caesareae Leopoldino Carolinae germanicae naturae curiosorum 69: 1–251, pls I-XII.Google Scholar
  68. LENDENFELD, R. VON 1907. Die Tetraxonia. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition auf der Dampfer ‘Valdivia’ 1898–1899 11(1–2): i-iv, 59–374, pls IX-XLVI.Google Scholar
  69. LENDENFELD, R. VON 1910a. The Sponges. 1. The Geodidae. In: Reports on the Scientific Results of the Expedition to the Eastern Tropical Pacific, in charge of Alexander Agassiz, by the U.S. Fish Commission Steamer ‘Albatross’, from October, 1904, to March, 1905, Lieut. Commander L.M. Garrett, U.S.N., Commanding, and of other Expeditions of the ‘Albatross’, 1888–1904. (21). Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College 41(1): 1–259, pls 1–48.Google Scholar
  70. LENDENFELD, R. VON 1910b. The Sponges. 2. The Erylidae. In: Reports on the Scientific Results of the Expedition to the Eastern Tropical Pacific, in charge of Alexander Agassiz, by the U.S. Fish Commission Steamer ‘Albatross’, from October, 1904, to March, 1905, Lieut. Commander L.M. Garrett, U.S.N., Commanding, and of other Expeditions of the ‘Albatross’, 1888–1904. (21). Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College 41(2): 261–324, pls 1–8.Google Scholar
  71. LENDENFELD, R. VON 1915. The Sponges. Hexactinellida. In: Reports on the Scientific Results of the Expedition to the Eastern Tropical Pacific, in charge of Alexander Agassiz, by the U.S. Fish Commission Steamer ‘Albatross’, from October, 1904, to March, 1905, Lieut. Commander L.M. Garrett, U.S.N., Commanding, and of other Expeditions of the ‘Albatross’, 1891–1899. (29). Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College 42(2): 1–396, pls 1–109.Google Scholar
  72. LÉVi, C. 1956a. Étude des Halisarca de Roscoff. Embryologie et systématique des démosponges. Archives de Zoologie expérimentale et générale 93(1): 1–181.Google Scholar
  73. LÉVi, C. 1970. Les Cellules des Eponges. Pp. 353–364. In: Fry, W.G. (Ed.), The Biology of the Porifera. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 25. (Academic Press: London): i-xxviii, 1–512.Google Scholar
  74. LÉVI, C. 1999. Sponge science, from origin to outlook. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 44: 1–7.Google Scholar
  75. LÉVI, C. & BOURY-ESNAULT, N. (Eds) 1979. Biologie des Spongiaires - Sponge Biology. Colloques Internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 291. (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique: Paris): 1–536.Google Scholar
  76. LÉVI, C. & VACELET, J. 1998. Sponges of the New Caledonian Lagoon: Class Demospongiae, Order Agelasida. Pp. 94–96. In: Lévi, C. (Ed.), Sponges of the New Caledonian Lagoon. (ORSTOM, Collection Faune et Flore tropicales. Volume 33: Paris): 1–214.Google Scholar
  77. LI, C.W., CHEN, J.Y. & HUA, T.E. 1998a. Precambrian Sponges with Cellular Structures. Science. 279: 879–882.Google Scholar
  78. LINNAEUS, C. 1759. Systems naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. 10th edition. 2. (Holmiae Salvii): 1–824.Google Scholar
  79. LINNAEUS, C. 1767. Systema Naturae. 12th edition revised. 1(2). (Holmiae, Laur. Salvii): 533–1327 [Spongia: 1296–1300].Google Scholar
  80. LUNDBECK, W. 1902. Porifera. (Part I.) Homorrhaphidae and Heterorrhaphidae. In: The Danish Ingolf-Expedition. 6(1). (Bianco Luno: Copenhagen): 1–108, pls I-XIX, 1 map.Google Scholar
  81. LUNDBECK, W. 1905. Porifera. (Part II.) Desmacidonidae (pars.). In: The Danish Ingolf-Expedition. 6(2). (Bianco Luno: Copenhagen): 1–219, pls I-XX.Google Scholar
  82. LUNDBECK, W. 1910. Porifera. (Part III.) Desmacidonidae (pars.). In: The Danish Ingolf-Expedition. 6(3). (Bianco Luno: Copenhagen): 1–124, pls I-XI, 1 table.Google Scholar
  83. MARSHALL, W. & MEYER, A.B. 1877. Über einige neue und wenig bekannte Philippinische Hexactinelliden. Mittielungen Zoologisches Museum Dreseden 2: 261–279, pls XXIV-XXV.Google Scholar
  84. MEDINA, M., COLLINS, A.G., SILBERMAN, J.D. & SOGIN, M.L. 2001. Evaluating hypotheses of basal animal phylogeny using complete sequences of large and small unit rRNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98(17): 9707–9712.Google Scholar
  85. MEHL, D. & REITNER, J. 1996. Observations on Astraeospongium meniscum (Roemer, 1848) from the Silurian of western Tennessee: constructional morphology and palaeobiology of the Astraeospongiidae (Calcarea, Heteractinellidae). Berliner geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen Reihe E (Paläobiologie)18: 243–255.Google Scholar
  86. MINCHIN, E.A. 1900. Chapter III. Sponges. Pp. 1–178. In: Lankester, E.R. (Ed.), A Treatise on Zoology. Part II. The Porifera and Coelenterata. 2. (Adam & Charles Black: London).Google Scholar
  87. MOORE, R.C. (Ed.). 1955. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part E, Archaeocyatha and Porifera. (Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press: New York & Lawrence, Kansas): i-xviii, E1–E122.Google Scholar
  88. PALLAS, P.S. 1766. Elenchus Zoophytorum sistens generum adumbrationes generaliores et specierum cognitarum succinctas descriptiones cum selectis auctorum synonymis. (P. van Cleef: The Hague): 1–451.Google Scholar
  89. PENNEY, J.T. & RACEK, A.A. 1968. Comprehensive revision of a worldwide collection of freshwater sponges (Porifera: Spongillidae). Bulletin of the United States National Museum 272: 1–184.Google Scholar
  90. PISERA, A. 1997. Upper Jurassic Siliceous Sponges from the Swabian Alb: Taxonomy and Paleoecology. Palaeontologia Polonica 57: 3–216.Google Scholar
  91. PolÉJAEFF, N. 1883. Report on the Calcarea dredged by H.M.S. ‘Challenger’, during the years 1873–1876. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. ‘Challenger’, 1873–1876. Zoology 8(2): 1–76, pls I-IX.Google Scholar
  92. PolÉJAEFF, N. 1884. Report on the Keratosa collected by H.M.S. ‘Challenger’ during the years 1873–1876. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. ‘Challenger’, 1873–1876. Zoology 11: 1–88, pls I-X.Google Scholar
  93. POMEL, A. 1872. Paléontologie ou Description des animaux fossiles de la province d’Oran. Zoophytes. 5è Fascicule, Spongiaires. (Perrier: Oran): 1–256, pls I-XXXVI.Google Scholar
  94. POMET, P. 1694. Histoire générale des drogues, traitant des plantes, des animaux et des minéraux, etc. 3 parts. (Paris).Google Scholar
  95. QUENSTEDT, F.A. 1878 [1877]. Schwämme. In: Petrefactenkunde Deutschlands. Der ersten Abtheilung fünfter Band… Der Schwämme. 8 ° Atlas. [According to Vosmaer (1928) this book appeared in five parts: 1877, Liefer. 1 (Dec. 1876), Pp. 1–96; Liefer. 2 (Apr. 1877) Pp. 97–224; Liefer. 3 (Aug. 1877) Pp. 225–320; Liefer. 4 (Sept. 1877) Pp. 321–448; 1878, Liefer. 5 (Feb. 1878) Pp. 449–612.]. (Leipzig).Google Scholar
  96. RAUFF, H. 1893–1894. Palaeospongiologie. Palaeontographica 40: i-vi, 1–346, pls I-XVII.Google Scholar
  97. REID, R.E.H. 1958a. A monograph of the Upper Cretaceous Hexactinellida of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Part I. Paleontographical Society. (Monographs) 111: i-xlvi.Google Scholar
  98. REISWIG, H.M. & MACKIE, G.O. 1983. Studies on Hexactinellid Sponges. III. The Taxonomic Status of Hexactinellida within the Porifera. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 301: 419–428.Google Scholar
  99. REITNER, J. 1992. ‘Coralline Spongien’ Der Versuch einer phylogenetisch-taxonomischen Analyse. Berliner geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen Reihe E (Paläobiologie) 1: 1–352, pls 1–62.Google Scholar
  100. REITNER, J. & KEUPP, H. (Eds) 1991a. Fossil and Recent Sponges. (Springer-Verlag: Berlin): 1–595.Google Scholar
  101. REITNER, J. & MEHL, D. 1996. Monophyly of the Porifera. Verhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg 36: 5–32.Google Scholar
  102. RIDLEY, S.O. 1884a. Spongiida. In: Report on the Zoological Collections made in the Indo-Pacific Ocean during the Voyage of H.M.S. ‘Alert’, 1881–2. [British Museum (Natural History): London]: 366–482, pls 39–43; 582–630, pls 53–54.Google Scholar
  103. RIDLEY, S.O. & DENDY, A. 1887. Report on the Monaxonida collected by H.M.S. ‘Challenger’ during the years 1873–1876. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. ‘Challenger’, 1873–1876. Zoology 20(59): i-lxviii, 1–275, pls I-LI. 1 map.Google Scholar
  104. RIGBY, J.K. 1986c. Sponges of the Burgess Shale (Middle Cambrian), British Columbia. Palaeontographica Canadiana 2: 1–105, pls 1–20.Google Scholar
  105. RIGBY, J.K., BUDD, G.E., WOOD, R.A. & DEBRENNE, E 1993. V. Porifera. Pp. 71–99. In:Benton, M.J. (Ed.), The Fossil Record 2. (Chapman & Hall: London): 1–845.Google Scholar
  106. RIGBY, J.K. & SENOWBARI-DARYAN, B. 1996. Upper Permian Inozoid, Demospongid, and Hexactinellid Sponges from Djebel Tebaga, Tunisia. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions (new series) (7): i-iv, 1–130, pls 1–81.Google Scholar
  107. RIGBY, J.K. & WEBBY, B.D. 1988. Late Ordovician Sponges from the Malongulli Formation of Central New South Wales, Australia. Palaeontographica Americana (56): 1–147.Google Scholar
  108. RÜTZLER, K. (Ed.) 1990. New Perspectives in Sponge Biology. (Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington, D.C.): 1–533.Google Scholar
  109. SCHMIDT, O. 1862. Die Spongien des adriatischen Meeres. (Wilhelm Engelmann: Leipzig): i-viii, 1–88, pls 1–7.Google Scholar
  110. SCHMIDT, O. 1864. Supplement der Spongien des adriatischen Meeres. Enthaltend die Histologie und systematische Ergänzungen. (Wilhelm Engelmann: Leipzig): i-vi, 1–48, pls 1–4.Google Scholar
  111. SCHMIDT, O. 1868. Die Spongien der Küste von Algier. Mit Nachträgen zu den Spongien des Adriatischen Meeres (Drittes Supplement). (Wilhelm Engelmann: Leipzig): i-iv, 1–44, pls I-V.Google Scholar
  112. SCHMIDT, O. 1870. Grundzüge einer Spongien-Fauna des atlantischen Gebietes. (Wilhelm Engelmann: Leipzig): iii-iv, 1–88, pls I-VI.Google Scholar
  113. SCHMIDT, O. 1879. Die Spongien des Meerbusen von Mexico (Und des caraibischen Meeres). Abtheilung I. Heft I. In: Reports on the dredging under the supervision of Alexander Agassiz, in the Gulf of Mexico, by the USCSS ‘Blake’. (Gustav Fischer: Jena): 1–32, pls I-IV.Google Scholar
  114. SCHMIDT, O. 1880b. Die Spongien des Meerbusen von Mexico (Und des caraibischen Meeres). Abtheilung II. Hexactinelliden. Heft II. In: Reports on the dredging under the supervision of Alexander Agassiz, in the Gulf of Mexico, by the USCSS ‘Blake’. (Gustav Fischer: Jena): 33–90, pls V-X.Google Scholar
  115. SCHRAMMEN, A. 1910. Die Kieselspongien der oberen Kreide von Nordwestdeutschland. I. Teil. Tetraxonia, Monaxonia und Silicea incertae redis. Palaeontographica 5 (supplement): 1–175, I-XXIV.Google Scholar
  116. SCHRAMMEN, A. 1937. Die Kieselspongien des oberen Jura von Süddeutschland. Palaeontographica 85Abt. A (1–4): 1–114, pls I-XVII.Google Scholar
  117. SCHULZE, F.E. 1904. Hexactinellida. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition auf der Dampfer ‘Valdivia’ 1898–1899 4: 1–266, separated atlas: pls I-LII, 1 map.Google Scholar
  118. SENOWBARI-DARYAN, B. 1990. Die Systematische Stellung der thalamiden Schwamme und ihre Bedeutung in der Erdgeschichte. Münchner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen Reihe A (Geologie und Palaontologie) 21: 1–325.Google Scholar
  119. SIDDALL, M.E., MARTIN, D.S., BRIDGE, D., CONE, D.K. & DESSER, S.S. 1995. The demise of a phylum of protists: phylogeny of Myxozoa and other parasitic cnidaria. Journal of Parasitology 81(6): 961–967.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. SIMPSON, T.L. 1984. The Cell Biology of Sponges. (Springer-Verlag: New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, etc.): 1–662.Google Scholar
  121. SOEST, R.W.M. VAN 1994. Demosponge distribution patterns. Pp. 213–223. In: van Soest, R.W.M., van Kempen, Th.M.G. & Braekman, J.-C. (Eds), Sponges in Time and Space. (Balkema: Rotterdam): 1–515.Google Scholar
  122. SOLLAS, W.J. 1888. Report on the Tetractinellida collected by H.M.S. ‘Challenger’, during the years 1873–1876. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. ‘Challenger’, 1873–1876. Zoology 25(63): 1–458, pls I-XLIV, 1 map.Google Scholar
  123. TEICHERT C. & MOORE, R.C. (Eds). 1972. Treatise on Invertebrate Palaeontology. Part E. Volume 1. Archaeocyatha. (The Geological Society of America, Inc. & the University of Kansas: Kansas. 2nd edition.): El-E158.Google Scholar
  124. TOPSENT, E. 1888. Contribution à l’étude des Clionides. Archives de Zoologie expérimentale et générale (2) 5 bis: 1–165, pls I-VII.Google Scholar
  125. TOPSENT, E. 1892a. Contribution à l’étude des Spongiaires de l’Atlantique Nord (Golfe de Gascogne, Terre-Neuve, Açores). Résultats des campagnes scientifiques accomplies par le Prince Albert I. Monaco 2: 1–165, pls I-XI.Google Scholar
  126. TOPSENT, E. 1900. Etude monographique des spongiaires de France. III. Monaxonida (Hadromerina). Archives de Zoologie expérimentale et générale (3) 8: 1–331, pls I-VIII.Google Scholar
  127. TOPSENT, E. 1901d. Spongiaires. Résultats du voyage du S.Y. ‘Belgica’ en 1897–99 sous le commandement de A. de Gerlache de Gomery. Expédition antarctique belge. Zoologie 4: 1–54, pls I-VI.Google Scholar
  128. TOPSENT, E. 1904b. Spongiaires des Açores. Résultats des campagnes scientifiques accomplies par le Prince Albert I. Monaco 25: 1–280, pls 1–18.Google Scholar
  129. TOPSENT, E. 1913a. Spongiaires provenant des campagnes scientifiques de la ‘Princesse Alice’ dans les Mers du Nord (1898–1899–1906–1907). Résultats des campagnes scientifiques accomplies par le Prince Albert I. Monaco 45: 1–67, pls I-V.Google Scholar
  130. TOPSENT, E. 1928c. Spongiaires de l’Atlantique et de la Méditerranée provenant des croisières du Prince Albert ler de Monaco. Résultats des campagnes scientifiques accomplies par le Prince Albert I. Monaco 74: 1–376, pls I-XI.Google Scholar
  131. TURNBULL, H.W., Scott, J.F. & Hall, A.R. (Eds) 1959. The Correspondence of Isaac Newton. Volume 1. 1661–1675. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge).Google Scholar
  132. URIZ, M.J. & RÜTzler, K. (Eds) 1993. Recent advances in ecology and systematics of Sponges. Scientia Marina 57(4): 273–441.Google Scholar
  133. VACELET, J. 1964. Étude monographique de l’éponge calcaire pharétronide de Mediterranée, Petrobiona massiliana Vacelet et Lévi. Les Pharétronides actuelles et fossiles. Recueil des Travaux de la Station marine d’Endoume 34(50): 1–125, pls I-III.Google Scholar
  134. VACELET, J. 1985. Coralline sponges and the evolution of Porifera. Pp. 1–13. In: MORRIS, S.C., GEORGE, J.D., GIBSON, R. & PLATT, H.M. (Eds), The Origins and Relationships of Lower Invertebrates. The Systematics Association, 28. (Clarendon Press: Oxford): i-ix, 1–397.Google Scholar
  135. VACELET, J. 1990. Storage cells of calcified relict sponges. Pp. 144–152. In: Rützler, K. (Ed.), New Perspectives in Sponge Biology. (Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington, D.C.): 1–533.Google Scholar
  136. VACELET, J. 1999a. Outlook to the future of sponges. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 44: 27–32.Google Scholar
  137. VACELET, J. 2000. Foreword/ Avant-propos. Zoosystema 22(2): 183–185Google Scholar
  138. VACELET, J. & BOURY-ESNAULT, N. (Eds) 1987. Taxonomy of Porifera from the N.E. Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea. NATO ASI Series G13.(Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg): 1–332.Google Scholar
  139. VACELET, J. & BOURY-ESNAULT, N. 1995a. Carnivorous sponges. Nature 373(6512): 333–335.Google Scholar
  140. Von Lendenfeld, R.: see Lendenfeld, R. Von.Google Scholar
  141. VOSMAER, G.C.J. 1928. In: Bidder, G.P. & Vosmaer-Röell, C.S. (Eds), Bibliography of Sponges. (Cambridge University Press: London): 1–234.Google Scholar
  142. WATANABE, Y. & FUSETANI, N. (Eds) 1998. Sponge Sciences: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. (Springer-Verlag: Tokyo, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York): 1–458.Google Scholar
  143. WIEDENMAYER, F. 1977b. Shallow-water sponges of the western Bahamas. Experientia Supplementum 28: 1–287, pls 1–43.Google Scholar
  144. WIEDENMAYER, F. 1994. Contributions to the knowledge of post-Palaeozoic neritic and archibenthal sponges (Porifera). The stratigraphie record, ecology, and global distribution of intermediate and higher taxa. Schweizerische Paläontologische Abhandlungen 116: 1–147.Google Scholar
  145. WILLENZ, PH. (Ed.) 1996. Recent Advances in Sponge Biodiversity Inventory and Documentation. Bulletin de l’Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, 66 (Supplément): 1–242.Google Scholar
  146. WILSON, H.V. 1925. Silicious and horny sponges collected by the U.S. Fisheries Steamer ‘Albatross’ during the Philippine Expedition, 1907–10. In: Contributions to the biology of the Philippine Archipelago and adjacent regions. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 100(2, part 4): 273–532, pls 37–52.Google Scholar
  147. WOOD, R.A. 1991a. Problematic reef-building sponges. Pp. 113–124. In: Simonetta, A.M. & Conway Morris, S. (Eds), The early evolution of Metazoa and the significance of problematic taxa. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, New York etc.): i-ix, 1–296.Google Scholar
  148. WOTTON, E. 1552. De differentiis animalium libri decem. (Lutetiae Parisiorum): 1–220.Google Scholar
  149. ZEA, S. 1987. Esponjas del Caribe Colombiano. (Catalogo Cientifico: Bogota, Colombia): 1–286.Google Scholar
  150. ZITTEL, K.A. 1877. Studien über fossile Spongien. I: Hexactinellidae. Abhandlungen der Mathematisch-Physikalischen Classe der Königlich-Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. München 13(1): 1–63.Google Scholar
  151. ZITTEL, K.A. 1879. Handbuch der Paläontologie. 1 Band, I Abtheilung (Paläozoologie: 1876–1880). (München - Oldenbourg).Google Scholar
  152. ZITTEL, K.A. 1915. 1. Unterstamm. Porifera. Pp. 52–84. In:Broili, F. (Ed.), Grundzüge der Paläontologie (Paläozoologie). I. Abteilung Invertebrata. 4th edition. (R. Oldenbourg: München & Berlin): 1–694.Google Scholar
  153. ZRZAVŸ, J., MIHULKA, S., KEPKA, P., BEZDEK, A. & TIETZ, D. 1998. Phylogeny of the Metazoa Based on Morphological and 18S Ribosomal DNA Evidence. Cladistics 14(3): 249–285.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • John N. A. Hooper
    • 1
  • Rob W. M. Van Soest
    • 2
  1. 1.Queensland MuseumSouth BrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Zoological MuseumUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands

Personalised recommendations