In-Situ Field Emission of Carbon Nanotubes

  • Z. L. Wang
Chapter

Abstract

Carbon nanotubes possess various superior properties for use as field emitters, such as sharp tips with a nanometer-scale radius of curvature [1], high mechanical stiffness [2, 3, 4], high chemical stability [5], and unique electrical properties [6, 7]. Due to the unique tip geometry of the carbon nanotubes, their field emission property is one of the most attractive application [8], which has been extensively studied using the classical technique. In this chapter, we introduce a few novel applications of TEM in characterizing the field emission properties of carbon nanotubes, with a focus on the characteristics of individual carbon nanotubes.

Keywords

Carbon Nanotubes Work Function Field Emission Property Electron Holography Individual Carbon Nanotubes 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. Iijima and T. Ichihashi, Nature 363 (1993) 603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. M. J. Treacy, T. W. Ebbesen, and J. M. Gibson, Nature 381 (1996) 678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. W. Wong, P. E. Sheehan, and C. M. Lieber, Science 277 (1997) 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Poncharal, Z. L. Wang, D. Ugarte, and W. A. de Heer, Science 283 (1999) 1513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. W Ebbesen, P. M. Ajayanj, H. Hiura, and K. Tanigaki, Nature 367 (1994) 519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. W. Ebbesen, H. J. Lezec, H. Hiura, J. W. Bennett, H. F. Ghaemi, and T. Thio, Nature 382 (1996) 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Frank, P. Poncharal, Z. L. Wang, and W. A. de Heer, Science 280 (1998) 1744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. A. de Heer, A. Chatelain, and D. Ugarte, Science 270 (1995) 1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. H. Fowler and L. Nordheim, Proc. of Roy. Soc. London A 119 (1928) 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. Z. Li, S. S. Xie, L. X. Qian, B. H. Chang, B. S. Zou, W. Y. Zhou, R. A. Zhao, and G. Wang, Science 274 (1996) 1701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. S. Fan, M. G. Chapline, N. R. Franklin, T. W. Tombler, A. M. Cassell, and H. J. Dai, Science 283 (1999) 512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Z. W. Pan, S. S. Xie, B. H. Chang, C. Y. Wang, L. Lu, W. Liu, W. Y Zhou, W. Z. Li, and L. X. Qian, Nature 394 (1998) 631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Z. W. Pan, F. C. K. Au, H. L. Lai, W. Y. Zhou, L. F. Sun, Z. Q. Liu, D. S. Tang, C. S. Lee, S. T. Lee, and S. S. Xie, J. Phys. Chem. B 105 (2001) 1519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. M. Bonard, J. P. Salvetat, T. Stockli, W. A. de Heer, L. Forro, and A. Chatelain, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73 (1998) 918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    W. Zhu, C. Bower, O. Zhou, G. Kochanski, and S. Jin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 75 (1999) 873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    W. A. de Heer, J. M. Bonard, K. Fauth, A. Chatelain, L. Forro, and D. Ugarte, Adv. Mater. 9 (1997) 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. M. Bonard, J. P. Salvetat, T. Stockli, L. Forro, and A. Chatelain, Appl. Phys. A 69 (1999) 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    X. P. Xu and G. R. Brandes, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74 (1999) 2549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    W. Zhu, G. Kochanski, S. Jin, and L. Seibles, J. Appl. Phys. 78 (1995) 2707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. W. Geis, J. C. Twichell, J. Macaulay, and K. Okano, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67 (1995) 1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Wisitsora-at, W. P. Kang, J. L. Davidson, and D. V. Kerns, Appl. Phys. Lett. 71 (1997) 3394.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    K. Okano, S. Koizumi, S. R. P. Silva, and G. A. J. Amaratunga, Nature 381 (1996) 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    W. Zhu, G. P. Kochanski, and S. Jin, Science 282 (1998) 1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    R. P. Gao, Z. W. Pan, and Z. L. Wang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78 (2001) 1757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Z. L. Wang, Adv. Mater. 12 (2000) 1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    D. Gabor, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 197 (1949) 454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    G. Mollenstedt, Adv. Optical and Electrons 12 (1991) 1.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. Tonomura, Microsc. Soc. America Bulletin 24 (1994) 501.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    H. Lichte, Adv. Optical and Electron Microsc. 12 (1991) 25.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    B. G. Frost, L. F. Allard, E. Volkl, and D. C. Joy, in Electron Holography, A. Tonomura, L. F. Allard, G. Pozzi, D. C. Joy and Y A. Ono (Eds.) (Dordrecht: Elsevier Science, 1995), p. 169.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    J. Cumming, A. Zettl, M. R. McCartney, and J. C. H. Spence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 56804–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Z. L. Wang, R. P. Gao, W. A. de Heer, and P. Poncharal, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80 (2002) 856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    A. G. Rinzler, J. H. Hafner, P. Nikolaev, L. Lou, S. G. Kim, D. Tomanek, P. Nordlander, D. T. Colbert, and R. E. Smalley, Science 269 (1995) 1550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    J. Cumings, P. G. Collins, and A. Zettle, Nature 406 (2000) 586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    P. G. Collins and P. Avouris, Nanoletters 1 (2001) 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Y. H. Gao and Y. Bando, Nature 415 (2002) 599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    J. Cumings and A. Zettl, Science 289, (2000) 602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Pulishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Z. L. Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.Georgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations