The Values of Volunteering pp 71-90 | Cite as
Institutional Roots of Volunteering
Abstract
The “legitimation crisis” (Habermas, 1975) that has enveloped the state and large-scale corporate enterprise in recent years has prompted a search for alternatives among political leaders and community activists in many parts of the world. A useful byproduct of this search has been the discovery, or rediscovery, of an alternative social force (Touraine, 1988), the spontaneous self-organization of individuals in pursuit of collective goals, epitomized by the growth of nonprofit organizations and by the popular social movements that have characterized the 20th century, including the suffragists, Gandhism, Liberation Theology, the Civil Rights movement, the antiapartheid, antiwar, feminist, and environmental movements, “Solidarnnosc,” and recently the protest movement against the negative aspects of globalization.
Keywords
Voluntary Action Nonprofit Sector Interdependence Theory Institutional Path Informal VolunteerPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Archambauk, E. (1997). The nonprofit sector in France. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
- Arrow, K. (1975). Gifts and exchanges. In: E.S. Phelps (Ed.), Altruism, money and economic theory. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
- Davies, J. (1969). The J-curve of rising and declining satisfactions as a cause of some great revolutions and a contained rebellion. In: H.D. Graham & T.R. Gurr (Eds.), Violence in America. New York: Signet Books.Google Scholar
- DeLaat, J. (1987). Volunteering as linkage in three sectors, Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16, 97–111.Google Scholar
- Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Gamson, W. (1990). The strategy of social protest. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
- Gronbjerg, K. (1987). Patterns of institutional relations in the welfare State, Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16, 64–80.Google Scholar
- Haberman, J. (1975). Legitimation crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
- James, E. (1987). The independent sector in comparative perspective. In W. Powell (Ed.), The independent sector (pp. 27–42). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Johnson, Ch. (1964). Revolution and the social system. Stanford, CA: The Hoover Institution.Google Scholar
- Kramer, R.M. (1981). Voluntary agencies in the welfare state. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Lune, H., & Oberstem, H. (2001). Embedded systems. Voluntas, 12, 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McAdam, D. (1986). Recruitment to high-risk activism. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 64–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McAdam, D. (1988). Micromobilization contexts and recruitment to activism. International Social Movement Research, 1, 125–154.Google Scholar
- Monroe, P.B. (1991). John Donne’s people. Journal of Politics, 53, 2, 394–533).Google Scholar
- Piliavin, J.A. (1994). Feeling good by doing good. American Sociological Association paper. Google Scholar
- Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Quadagno, J. (1987). Theories of the welfare state. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Salamon, L.M. (1987). Partners in public service. In W.W Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector (pp. 99–117). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Salamon, L.M. (1995). Partners in public service. Baltimore: Johns Llopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Salamon, L.M., & Anheier, H.K. (1998). Social origins of civil society Voluntas, 9, 3, 213–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Salamon, L.M., Anheier, H.K., List, R., Toepler, S., Sokolowski, S.W, and Associates (1999). Global Civil Society. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project.Google Scholar
- Salamon, L.M., Hems, L., & Chinnock, K. (2000). The nonprofit sector (Working papers of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector project, no. 37). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.Google Scholar
- Salamon, L.M., Sokolowski, S.W., & Anheier, H.K. (2000). Social origins of the nonprofit sector. Paper presented at the 29th Annual Conference of ARNOVA, New Orleans, November 16–18.Google Scholar
- Schervish, P.G. (1999). The citizenship of care. American Sociological Association paper. Google Scholar
- Seibel, W. (1989). The function of mellow weakness. In E. James (Ed.), The nonprofit sector in international perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Skocpol, Th. (1979). States and social revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, D.H. (1997). Grassroots associations are important. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26, 3, 269–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Snow, D.A., Zurcher, L.A., & Ekland-Olson, S. (1980). Social networks and social movements. American Sociological Review, 45, 787–801.Google Scholar
- Sokolowski, S.W (1996). Show me the way to the next worthy deed. Voluntas, 7, 3, 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tilly Ch. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Touraine, A. (1988). Return of the actor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Veldheer, V., & Burger, A. (1999). History of the nonprofit sector in the Netherlands (Working papers of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector project, no. 35). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.Google Scholar
- Weisbrod, B. (1978). The voluntary independent sector. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1998). The contribution of social resources to volunteering. Social Science Quarterly, 79, 4, 799–814.Google Scholar
- Zald, M.N., & McCarthy, J.D. (Eds.) (1987). Social movements in an organizational society. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar