Advertisement

Human Intelligence Interviewing and Interrogation: Assessing the Challenges of Developing an Ethical, Evidence-based Approach

  • Maria Hartwig
  • Christian A. Meissner
  • Matthew D. Semel

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to review the available research on Human Intelligence (HUMINT) interrogations. The chapter describes a paradigm shift in the approach to HUMINT interrogations, and discusses the conceptual, methodological and practical implications of this paradigm shift. First, the defining characteristics of HUMINT interrogations are described, followed by a discussion of how the challenges of HUMINT interrogations may be similar as well as different compared to interrogations in criminal settings. Second, in order to provide a context for the claim of a paradigm shift, the chapter provides a historical overview of practice and research on HUMINT interrogation. Third, the current state of knowledge about the psychology of HUMINT interrogations is reviewed, with a particular focus on methods that have been shown to be effective. Finally, several challenges for future research in this domain are outlined, followed by a discussion of how research on HUMINT may proceed to fill the gap in current knowledge.

Keywords

Interviewing Interrogations Human intelligence gathering 

References

  1. Abeles, N. (2010). Ethics and the interrogation of prisoners: An update. Ethics & Behavior, 20, 243–249. doi:10.1080/10508421003798976.Google Scholar
  2. Beune, K., Giebels, E., & Sanders, K. (2009). Are you talking to me? Influencing behaviour and culture in police interviews. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15, 597–617. doi:10.1080/10683160802442835Google Scholar
  3. Bexton, W. H., Heron, W., & Scott, T. H. (1954). Effects of decreased variation in the sensory environment. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 8, 70–76.Google Scholar
  4. Biderman, A. D. (1957). Communist attempts to elicit false confessions from Air Force prisoners of war. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 33, 616–625.Google Scholar
  5. Biderman, A. D. (1959). Effects of Communist indoctrination attempts: Some comments based on an Air Force prisoner-of-war study. Social Problems, 6, 304–313. doi:10.1525/sp.1959.6.4.03a00040.Google Scholar
  6. Biderman, A. D. (1960). Social-psychological needs and “involuntary” behavior as illustrated by compliance in interrogations. Sociometry, 23, 120–147. doi:10.2307/2785678.Google Scholar
  7. Biderman, A. D., & Zimmer, H. (Eds.). (1961). The manipulation of human behavior. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Boehm, D. (2009). Waterboarding, counter-resistance, and the law of torture: Articulating the legal underpinnings of U.S. interrogation policy. University of Toledo Law Review, 41, 1–41.Google Scholar
  9. Bond, C. F. Jr., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 10, 214–234. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2.Google Scholar
  10. Bond, C. F. Jr., & DePaulo, B. M. (2008). Individual differences in judging deception: Accuracy and bias. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 477–492. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.134.4.477.Google Scholar
  11. Bond, C.F., Jr., & Rao, S.R. (2004). Lies travel: Mendacity in a mobile world. In P.A. Granhag, & L.A. Strömwall (Eds.), The detection of deception in forensic contexts (pp. 127–147). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2005). The science of false memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Brandon, S. (2011). Impacts of psychological science on national security agencies post-9/11. American Psychologist, 66, 495–506.Google Scholar
  14. Brandon, S., Bhatt, S., Justice, B. P., & Kleinman, S. M. (2011). Army field manual 2-22.3 interrogation methods: A scientific review. (FOUO).Google Scholar
  15. Buene, K., Giebels, E., & Sanders, K. (2009). Are you talking to me? Influencing behaviour and culture in police interviews. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15, 597–617. doi:10.1080/10683160802442835.Google Scholar
  16. Buene, K., Giebels, E., & Taylor, P. J. (2010). Patterns of interaction in police interviews: The role of cultural dependency. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 904–925. doi:10.1177/0093854810369623.Google Scholar
  17. Buene, K., Giebels, E., Adair, W. L., Fennis, B. M., & Van Der Zee, K. I. (2011). Strategic sequences in police interviews and the importance of order and cultural fit. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38 (9), 934–954.Google Scholar
  18. Bull, R. (1999). Police investigative interviewing. In A. Memon & R. Bull (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of interviewing (pp. 279–292). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Bull, R., & Milne, B. (2004). Attempts to improve the police interviewing of suspects. In G. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 181–196). New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  20. Bull, R. & Soukara, S. (2010). What really happens in police interviews. In G.D. Lassiter & C.A. Meissner (Eds.), Police interrogations and false confessions: Current research, practice, and policy recommendations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  21. Buller, D. B., Burgoon, J. K., White, C. H., & Ebesu, A. S. (1994). Interpersonal deception: VII. Behavioral profiles of falsification, equivocation, and concealment. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 13, 366–395. doi:10.1177/0261927X94134002.Google Scholar
  22. Carlson, L. H. (2002). Remembered prisoners of a forgotten war. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ceci SJ, Bruck M. 1995. Jeopardy in the Courtroom: A Scientific Analysis of Children's Testimony. Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc. Google Scholar
  24. Castillo, P. A., & Mallard, D. (2012). Preventing cross-cultural bias in deception judgments: The role of expectancies about nonverbal behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43 (6), 967–978.Google Scholar
  25. Costanzo, M. A., & Gerrity, E. (2009). The effects and effectiveness of using torture as an interrogation device: Using research to inform the policy debate. Social Issues and Policy Review, 3, 179–210. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-2409.2009.01014.x.Google Scholar
  26. Cutler, B. L. (2012). Conviction of the innocent: Lessons from psychological research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/13085–000.Google Scholar
  27. DePaulo, B. M., & Bell, K. L. (1990). Rapport is not so soft anymore. Psychological Inquiry, 1(4), 305–308. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0104_6Google Scholar
  28. DePaulo, B. M., & Pfeifer, R. L. (1986). On-the-job experience and skill at detecting deception. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 249–267.Google Scholar
  29. DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.129.1.74.Google Scholar
  30. Drizin, S. A., & Leo, R. A. (2004). The problem of false confessions in the post-DNA world. North Carolina Law Review, 82, 891–1007.Google Scholar
  31. Evans, J. R., Meissner, C. A., Brandon, S. E., Russano, M. B., & Kleinman, S. M. (2010). Criminal versus HUMINT interrogations: The importance of psychological science to improving interrogative practice. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 38, 215–249.Google Scholar
  32. Evans, J. R., Michael, S. W., Meissner, C. A., & Brandon, S. E. (2013). Validating a new assessment method for deception detection: Introducing a Psychologically Based Credibility Assessment Tool. Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition, 2, 33–41.Google Scholar
  33. Farber, I. E., Harlow, H., & West, L. (1957). Brainwashing, conditioning, and DDD (Debility, Dependency, and Dread). Sociometry, 20, 271–285.Google Scholar
  34. Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL, England: Charles C Thomas, Publisher.Google Scholar
  35. Frank, M. G. (2005). Research methods in detecting deception research. In J. A. Harrigan, R. Rosenthal, K. R. Scherer, R. Rosenthal, & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), The new handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 341–368). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Allan, K. (2003). Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other's memories for an event? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(5), 533–543.Google Scholar
  37. Garrido, E., Masip, J., & Herrero, C. (2004). Police officers’ credibility judgments: Accuracy and estimated ability. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 254–275. doi:10.1080/00207590344000411.Google Scholar
  38. Giebels, E., & Taylor, P. J. (2009). Interaction patterns in crisis negotiations: Persuasive arguments and cultural differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 5–19. doi:10.1037/a0012953.Google Scholar
  39. Goldberger, L. (1982). Sensory deprivation and overload. In L. Goldberger & S. Bretznitz (Eds.), Handbook on stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (pp. 410–418). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  40. Gottschalk, L. A. (1961). The use of drugs in interrogation. In O. Biderman & H. Zimmer (Eds.), The manipulation of human behavior (pp. 96–141). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  41. Granhag, P. A., & Hartwig, M. (2008). A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mind reading. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14, 189–200.Google Scholar
  42. Granhag, P. A., Cancino Montecinos, S., & Oleszkiewicz, S. (in press). Eliciting intelligence from informants: The first scientific test of the Scharff-technique. Legal & Criminological Psychology.Google Scholar
  43. Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., Willén, R., & Hartwig, M. (2012). Eliciting cues to deception by tactical disclosure of evidence: The first test of the Evidence Framing Matrix. Legal & Criminological Psychology.Google Scholar
  44. Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. Hartwig, M. (2011). Methods in deception research. In R. Barry & P. Steven (Eds.), Research methods in forensic psychology. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  46. Hartwig, M., & Granhag, P. A. (in press). Strategic use of evidence. In T. R. Levine & J. G. Golson (Eds), Encyclopedia of lying and deception. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  47. Hartwig, M., & Bond, C. F. Jr. (2011). Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 643–659.Google Scholar
  48. Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Vrij, A. (2004). Police officers’ lie detection accuracy: Interrogating freely versus observing video. Police Quarterly, 7, 429–456.Google Scholar
  49. Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Kronkvist, O. (2006). Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: When training to detect deception work. Law & Human Behavior, 30, 603–619.Google Scholar
  50. Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., Wolf, A., Vrij, A., Roos af Hjelmsäter, E. (2011). Detecting deception in suspects: Verbal cues as a function of interview strategy. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 17, 643–656.Google Scholar
  51. Hersh, S. M. (2004). Chain of command. New Yorker, 80(12), 38–43.Google Scholar
  52. Hinkle, J. E. (1961). The physiological state of the interrogation subject as it affects brain function. In O. Biderman & H. Zimmer (Eds.), The manipulation of human behavior (pp. 19–50). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  53. Home Office (2003). Police and criminal evidence act 1984. Codes of practice A-E revised edition. HMSO: London, UK.Google Scholar
  54. Kassin, S. M. (1997). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52, 221–233.Google Scholar
  55. Kassin, S. M., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 33–67. doi:10.1111/j.1529–1006.2004.00016.x.Google Scholar
  56. Kassin, S. M., Meissner, C. A., & Norwick, R. J. (2005). ‘I’d know a false confession if I saw one’: A comparative study of college students and police investigators. Law & Human Behavior, 29, 211–227. doi:10.1007/s10979–005-2416–9.Google Scholar
  57. Kassin, S. M., Leo, R. A., Meissner, C. A., Richman, K. D., Colwell, L. H., Leach, A., & La Fon, D. (2007). Police interviewing and interrogation: A self-report survey of police practices and beliefs. Law & Human Behavior, 31, 381–400.Google Scholar
  58. Kassin, S. M., Drizin, S. A., Grisso, T., Gudjonsson, G. H., Leo, R. A., & Redlich, A. D. (2010). Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Law & Human Behavior, 34, 3–38. doi:10.1007/s10979–009-9188–6.Google Scholar
  59. Kelly, C. E., Miller, J. C., Redlich, A. D., & Kleinman, S. M. (2013). A taxonomy of interrogation methods. Psychology, Public Policy, And Law, 19(2), 165–178. doi:10.1037/a0030310Google Scholar
  60. Kleinman, S. M. (2006). KUBARK counterintelligence interrogation review: Observations of an interrogator. In R. A. Fein, P. Lehner, & B. Vossekuil’s (Eds.), Educing information: Interrogation art and science (pp. 95–139). Washington, DC: National Defense Intelligence College.Google Scholar
  61. Kraut, R.E., & Poe, D. (1980). Behavioral roots of person perception: The deception judgements of customs inspectors and laymen. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 784–98.Google Scholar
  62. Kubzansky, P. E. (1961). The effects of reduced environmental stimulation on human behavior: A review. In O. Biderman & H. Zimmer (Eds.), The manipulation of human behavior (pp. 51–95). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  63. Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., & Esplin, P. W. (2008). Tell me what happened: Structured Investigative Interviews of Child Victims and Witnesses. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  64. Lancaster, G. L. J., Vrij, A., Hope, L., & Waller, B. (2013). Sorting the liars from the truth tellers: The benefits of asking unanticipated questions on lie detection. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 107–114. doi:10.1002/acp.2879.Google Scholar
  65. Leach, A., Lindsay, R. L., Koehler, R., Beaudry, J. L., Bala, N. C., Lee, K., & Talwar, V. (2009). The reliability of lie detection performance. Law & Human Behavior, 33, 96–109. doi:10.1007/s10979–008-9137–9.Google Scholar
  66. Leo, R. A. (2001). False confessions: Causes, consequences, and solutions. In S. D. Westervelt & J. A. Humphrey (Eds.), Wrongly convicted: Perspectives on failed justice. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Leo, R. A., & Davis, D. (2010). From false confession to wrongful conviction: Seven psychological processes. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 38, 9–56.Google Scholar
  68. Leo, R. A., & Drizin, S. A. (2010). The three errors: Pathways to false confession and wrongful conviction. In G. Lassiter & C. A. Meissner (Eds.), Police interrogations and false confessions: Current research, practice, and policy recommendations (pp. 9–30). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12085–001.Google Scholar
  69. Levine, T. R., Shaw, A., & Shulman, H. C. (2010). Increasing deception detection accuracy with strategic questioning. Human Communication Research, 36, 216–231. doi:10.1111/j.1468–2958.2010.01374.x.Google Scholar
  70. Lai, M., & Mulayim, S. (in press). Interpreter linguistic intervention in the strategies employed by police investigative interviews. Police Practice and Research Google Scholar
  71. Loftus, E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, 12, 361–366. doi:10.1101/lm.94705.Google Scholar
  72. Loftus, E. F. (2011) Intelligence gathering post 9/11. American Psychologist. 66, 532-541Google Scholar
  73. Mann, S., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2004). Detecting true lies: Police officers’ ability to detect suspects’ lies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 137–149.Google Scholar
  74. Margulies, J. (2006, October 2). The more subtle kind of torment. The Washington Post.Google Scholar
  75. McCoy, A. W. (2005). Cruel science: CIA torture and U.S. foreign policy. The New England Journal of Public Policy, 209–262.Google Scholar
  76. McCoy, A. W. (2006). A question of torture: CIA interrogation from the cold war to the war on terror. New York: Owl Books.Google Scholar
  77. Meissner, C. A., & Kassin, S. M. (2002). ”He’s guilty!”: Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law & Human Behavior, 26, 469–480.Google Scholar
  78. Meissner, C. A., & Kassin, S. M. (2004). “You’re guilty, so just confess!”: Cognitive and behavioral confirmation biases in the interrogation room. In D. Lassiter’s (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 85–106). Kluwer Academic: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  79. Meissner, C. A., Russano, M. B., & Narchet, F. M. (2010). The importance of a laboratory science for improving the diagnostic value of confession evidence. In G. D. Lassiter & C. Meissner’s (Eds.), Police Interrogations and False Confessions: Current Research, Practice, and Policy Recommendations (pp. 111–126). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
  80. Meissner, C. A., Redlich, A. D., Bhatt, S., & Brandon, S. (2012). Interview and interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 13, 1–53. doi:10.4073/csr.2012.13.Google Scholar
  81. Memon, A., Meissner, C. A., & Fraser, J. (2010). The Cognitive Interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, And Law, 16(4), 340–372. doi:10.1037/a0020518.Google Scholar
  82. Narchet, F. M., Meissner, C. A., & Russano, M. B. (2011). Modeling the influence of investigator bias on the elicitation of true and false confessions. Law & Human Behavior,35, 452–465.Google Scholar
  83. Otterman, M. (2007). American torture: From the cold war to Abu Ghraib and beyond. Michigan: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  84. Payne, D. G., Toglia, M. P., & Anastasi, J. S. (1994). Recognition performance level and the magnitude of the misinformation effect in eyewitness memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 376–382.Google Scholar
  85. Pribbenow, N. (n.d.) The man in the snow white cell. Center for the Study of Intelligence. http://www.cia.gov.
  86. Scharff, H. J. (1950). Without torture. Argosy, 39, 87–91.Google Scholar
  87. Scheck, B., Neufeld, P., & Dwyer, J. (2000). Actual innocence: Five days to execution and other dispatches from the wrongly convicted. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  88. Scheuer, M. (2007). Imperial hubris: Why the West is losing the war on terror. Dulles: Potomac Books, Inc.Google Scholar
  89. Shoemaker, D. P. (2008). Unveiling Charlie: U.S. Interrogator’s creative success against insurgents. In National Defense Intelligence College (Ed.), Interrogation: World war II, Vietnam and Iraq (pp. 77–146). Washington DC: NDIC Press.Google Scholar
  90. Skerker, M. (2012). An ethics of interrogation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  91. Sooniste, T., Granhag, P. A., Knieps, M., & Vrij, A. (in press). True and false intentions: Asking about the past to detect lies about the future. Psychology, Crime & Law.Google Scholar
  92. St. Yves, M. (2006). Psychology of rapport: Five basic rules. In T. Williamson et al (Eds) Investigative Interviewing: Rights, Research, and Regulation (pp. 87-106). Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  93. Strömwall, L. A., Granhag, P. A., & Hartwig, M. (2004). Practitioners’ beliefs about deception. In P. A. Granhag & L. A. Strömwall (Eds.), The detection of deception in forensic contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Tickle-Degnen, L., & Rosenthal, R. (1990). The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 285–293.Google Scholar
  95. The Global Deception Research Team. (2006). A world of lies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 60–74.Google Scholar
  96. Thomas, J. (1977, September 13). CIA says it found more secret papers on mind control. The New York Times. http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F70C1EFA385A167493C1A91782D85F438785F9&scp=10&sq=cia%20says%20it%20found%20more%20secret%20papers%20on%20mind%20control&st=cse. Accessed 27 March 2013.
  97. Toliver, R. (1997). The interrogator. Pennsylvania: Schiffer Publishing.Google Scholar
  98. Vallan, J. P., & Schreiber Compo, N. (2011). A comfortable witness is a good witness: Rapport-building and susceptibility to misinformation in an investigative mock-crime interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25 (6), 960–970.Google Scholar
  99. Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  100. Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2001a). Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation: The case of a convicted murderer. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 187–203.Google Scholar
  101. Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2001b). Who killed my relative? Police officers’ ability to detect real-life high-stake lies. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 7, 119–132.Google Scholar
  102. Vrij, A., & Granhag, P. A. (2012). Eliciting cues to deception and truth: What matters are the questions asked. Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition, 1, 110–117.Google Scholar
  103. Vrij, A., Fisher, R. P., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2006). Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 141–142. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.003.Google Scholar
  104. Vrij, A., Fisher, R. P., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2008). A cognitive load approach to lie detection. Journal of Investigative Psychology & Offender Profiling, 5, 39–43. doi:10.1002/jip.82.Google Scholar
  105. Vrij, A., Leal, S., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., Fisher, R. P., Hillman, J., & Sperry, K. (2009). Outsmarting the liars: The benefit of asking unanticipated questions. Law & Human Behavior, 33, 159–166. doi:10.1007/s10979–008-9143-y.Google Scholar
  106. Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., & Fisher, R. P. (2012a). Imposing cognitive load to elicit cues to deceit: Inducing the reverse order technique naturally. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18, 579–594. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2010.515987.Google Scholar
  107. Vrij, A., Mann, S., Leal, S., & Fisher, R. (2012b). Is anyone there? Drawings as a tool to detect deceit in occupation interviews. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18, 377–388. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2010.498422.Google Scholar
  108. Walsh, D., & Bull, R. (2012). Examining rapport in investigative interviews with suspects: Does its building and maintenance work? Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 27, 73–84.Google Scholar
  109. Warmelink, L., Vrij, A., Mann, S., Jundi, S., & Granhag, P. A. (in press). The effect of question expectedness and experience on lying about intentions. Acta Psychologica.Google Scholar
  110. Weiner, T. (2007). Legacy of ashes: The history of the CIA. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  111. Zimbardo, P. G. (2007). Thoughts on psychologists, ethics, and the use of torture in interrogations: Don’t ignore varying roles and complexities. Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy, 7, 65–73. doi:10.1111/j.1530–2415.2007.00122.x.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Hartwig
    • 1
  • Christian A. Meissner
    • 2
  • Matthew D. Semel
    • 3
  1. 1.John Jay College of Criminal JusticeNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Iowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  3. 3.New YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations