Mycorrhizal Fungi to Alleviate Drought Stress on Plant Growth

  • Francesca RappariniEmail author
  • Josep Peñuelas


Drought stress induces a range of metabolic responses in plants. Some of these responses are mediated by arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM), which occur almost ubiquitously in symbiotic associations. These changes are highly variable and depend on various factors related mainly to the diversity of plant and fungal species but are generally beneficial to the host plants. This chapter addresses the role of AM fungi in the amelioration and alleviation of drought stress in host plants and their positive effects on growth. We discuss the various biochemical, physiological, and molecular processes used by plants to alleviate drought stress. We provide an update of the recent progress in functional approaches for unraveling the mechanisms that promote resistance to drought stress and discuss their significance to the host plants. The positive aspects of AM are also discussed in the context of the ecosystem services provided by the symbiosis under environmental drought conditions.


Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis Drought resistance Plant growth Water relations Ecosystem services 


  1. Abbaspour H, Saeid-Sar S, Afshari H, Abdel-Wahhab MA (2012) Tolerance of mycorrhiza infected Pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) seedlings to drought stress under glasshouse conditions. J Plant Physiol 169:704–709PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alguacil MM, Hernández JA, Caravaca F, Portillo B, Roldán A (2003) Antioxidant enzyme activities in shoots from three mycorrhizal shrub species afforested in a degraded semi-arid soil. Plant Physiol 118:562–570Google Scholar
  3. Allen MF (1982) Influence of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae on water movement through Bouteloua gracilis Lag ex steud. New Phytol 91:191–196Google Scholar
  4. Apel K, Hirt H (2004) Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55:373–399PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Aroca R, Ruiz-Lozano JM (2009) Induction of plant tolerance to semi-arid environments by beneficial soil microorganisms—a review. Sustain Agr Rev 2:121–135Google Scholar
  6. Aroca R, Porcel R, Ruiz-Lozano JM (2007) How does arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis regulate root hydraulic properties and plasma membrane aquaporins in Phaseolus vulgaris under drought, cold or salinity stresses? New Phytol 173:808–816PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Aroca R, Vernieri P, Ruiz-Lozano JM (2008) Mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal Lactuca sativa plants exhibit contrasting responses to exogenous ABA during drought stress and recovery. J Exp Bot 59:2029–2041PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Aroca R, Bago A, Sutka M, Paz JA, Cano C, Amodeo G et al (2009) Expression analysis of the first arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi aquaporin described reveals concerted gene expression between salt-stressed and nonstressed mycelium. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 22:1169–1178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Aroca R, Ruiz-Lozano JM, Zamarreño AM, Paz JA, García-Mina JM, Pozo MJ et al (2013) Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis influences strigolactone production under salinity and alleviates salt stress in lettuce plants. J Plant Physiol 170:47–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Asensio D, Rapparini F, Peñuelas J (2012) AM fungi root colonization increases the production of essential isoprenoids vs nonessential isoprenoids especially under drought stress conditions or after jasmonic acid application. Phytochemistry 77:149–161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Asrar AA, Abdel-Fattah GM, Elhindi KM (2012) Improving growth, flower yield, and water relations of snapdragon (Antirhinum majus L.) plants grown under well-watered and water-stress conditions using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Photosynthetica 50:305–316Google Scholar
  12. Augé RM (2001) Water relations, drought and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Mycorrhiza 11:3–42Google Scholar
  13. Augé RM, Moore JL (2005) Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and plant drought resistance. In: Mehrotra VS (ed) Mycorrhiza: role and applications. Allied Publishers Limited, New Delhi, pp 136–157Google Scholar
  14. Augé RM, Stodola AJW, Tims JE, Saxton AM (2001) Moisture retention properties of a mycorrhizal soil. Plant Soil 230:87–97Google Scholar
  15. Azcón R, Gomez M, Tobar R (1996) Physiological and nutritional responses by Lactuca sativa to nitrogen sources and mycorrhizal fungi under drought. Biol Fertil Soils 22:156–161Google Scholar
  16. Barea JM, Palenzuela J, Cornejo P, Sánchez-Castro I, Navarro-Fernández C, Lopéz-García A et al (2011) Ecological and functional roles of mycorrhizas in semi-arid ecosystems of Southeast Spain. J Arid Environ 75:1292–1301Google Scholar
  17. Bárzana G, Aroca R, Paz JA, Chaumont F, Martinez-Ballest MC, Carvajal M et al (2012) Arbuscular mycorhhizal symbiosis increases relative apoplastic water flow in roots of the host plant under both well-watered and drought stress conditions. Ann Bot 109:1009–1017PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Baslam M, Goicoechea N (2012) Water deficit improved the capacity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) for inducing the accumulation of antioxidant compounds in lettuce leaves. Mycorrhiza 22:347–359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bezemer TM, van Dam NM (2005) Linking aboveground and belowground interactions via induced plant defenses. Trends Ecol Evol 20:617–624PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Bouwmeester HJ, Roux C, Lopez-Rae A, Becard G (2007) Rhizosphere communication of plants, parasitic plants and AM fungi. Trends Plant Sci 12:224–230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Bray EA (1997) Plant responses to water deficit. Trends Plant Sci 2:48–54Google Scholar
  22. Cazzonelli CI, Pogson BJ (2010) Source to sink: regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis in plants. Trends Plant Sci 15:266–274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Chaves M, Maroco J, Pereira J (2003) Understanding plant responses to drought- from genes to the whole plant. Func Plant Biol 30:239–264Google Scholar
  24. Conner AC, Bill RM, Conner MT (2013) An emerging consensus on aquaporin translocation as a regulatory mechanism. Mol Membr Biol 30:1–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Cooper KM, Tinker PB (1981) Translocation and transfer of nutrients in vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas. IV. Effect of environmental variables on movement of phosphorous. New Phytol 88:327–339Google Scholar
  26. Cui M, Nobel PS (1992) Nutrient status, water uptake and gas exchange for three succulents infected with mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 122:643–649Google Scholar
  27. Daily GC (1997) Introduction: what are ecosystem services? In: Daily GC (ed) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  28. De Bello F, Lavorel S, Díaz S, Harrington R, Cornelissen JHC, Bardgett RD et al (2010) Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits. Biodivers Conserv 19:2873–2893Google Scholar
  29. Demming-Adams B, Adams WW (2006) Photoprotection in an ecological context: the remarkable complexity of thermal energy dissipation. New Phytol 172:11–21Google Scholar
  30. Doidy J, Grace E, Kühn C, Simon-Plas F, Casieri L, Wipf D (2012) Sugar transporters in plants and in their interactions with fungi. Trends Plant Sci 17:413–422PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Doubková P, Vlasáková E, Sudová R (2013) Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis alleviates drought stress imposed on Knautia arvensis plants in serpentine soil. Plant Soil. DOI  10.1007/s11104-013-1610-7. Online publication date: 1 Jan 2013
  32. European Environmental Agency (EEA) (2011) Global and European temperature (CSI 012/CLIM 001), Assessment May 2011. Copenhagen, Accessed on 20 Aug 2012
  33. Faber BA, Zasoski RJ, Munns DN, Shackel K (1991) A method for measuring hyphal nutrient and water uptake in mycorrhizal plants. Can J Bot 69:87–94Google Scholar
  34. Fan QJ, Liu JH (2011) Colonization with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus affects growth, drought tolerance and expression of stress-responsive genes in Poncirus trifoliata. Acta Physiol Plant 33:1533–1542Google Scholar
  35. Fernández-Marín B, Balaquer L, Esteban R, Becerril JM, García-Plazaola JI (2009) Dark induction of the photoprotective xanthophyll cycle in response to dehydration. J Plant Physiol 166:1734–1744PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Fini A, Frangi P, Amoroso G, Piatti R, Faoro M, Bellasio C et al (2011) Effect of controlled inoculation with specific mycorrhizal fungi from the urban environment on growth and physiology of containerized shade tree species growing under different water regimes. Mycorrhiza 21:703–719PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Fitter AH (1985) Functioning of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizals under field conditions. New Phytol 99:257–265Google Scholar
  38. George E, Häussler GE, Vetterlein D, Grogus E, Marschner H (1992) Water and nutrient translocation by hyphae of Glomus mosseae. Can J Bot 70:2130–2137Google Scholar
  39. Gianinazzi S, Gollotte A, Binet M-N, van Tuinen D, Redecker D, Wipf D (2010) Agroecology: the key role of arbuscular mycorrhizas in ecosystem services. Mycorrhiza 20:519–530PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Goicoechea N, Szalai G, Antolín MC, Sánchez-Díaz M, Paldi E (1998) Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae and Rhizobium on free polyamines and proline levels in water-stressed alfalfa. J Plant Physiol 153:706–711Google Scholar
  41. Grigulis K, Lavorel S, Krainer U, Legay N, Baxendale C, Dumont M et al (2013) Relative contributions of plant traits and soil microbial properties to mountain grassland ecosystem services. J Ecol 101:47–57Google Scholar
  42. He XH, Critchley C, Bledsoe C (2003) Nitrogen transfer within and between plants through common mycorrhizal networks (CMNs). Crit Rev Plant Sci 22:531–567Google Scholar
  43. Hoekstra F, Golovina E, Buitink J (2001) Mechanisms of plant desiccation tolerance. Trends in Plant Sci 8:431–438Google Scholar
  44. IPCC (2007) IPCC Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt K, Tignor MMB, Miller HL (eds) Working group 1 contribution to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC). Chapters 3 (observations: surface and atmospheric climate change), 10 (global climate projections), 11 (regional climate projections). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Kesselmeier J, Staudt M (1999) Biogenic volatile organic compounds (VOC): an overview on emission, physiology and ecology. J Atmos Chem 33:23–88Google Scholar
  46. Khalvati MA, Hu Y, Mozafar A, Schmidhalter U (2005) Quantification of water uptake by arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae and its significance for leaf growth, water relations, and gas exchange of barley subjected to drought stress. Plant Biol 7:706–712PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Kishor PKB, Sangam S, Amrutha RN, Laxmi PS, Naidu KR, Rao KRSS et al (2005) Regulation of proline biosynthesis, degradation, uptake and transport in higher plants: its implications in plant growth and abiotic stress tolerance. Curr Sci 88:424–438Google Scholar
  48. Koide RT (1993) Physiology of the mycorrhizal plant. Adv Plant Pathol 9:33–35Google Scholar
  49. Kwak JM, Nguyen V, Shroeder JI (2006) The role of active oxygen species in hormonal responses. Plant Physiol 141:323–329PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Lavorel S (2013) Plant functional effects on ecosystem services. J Ecol 101:4–8Google Scholar
  51. Lee B-R, Muneer S, Avice J-C, Jin Jung W, Kim T-H (2012) Mycorrhizal colonisation and P-supplement effects on N uptake and N assimilation in perennial ryegrass under well-watered and drought-stressed conditions. Mycorrhiza 22:525–534PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Levitt J (1980) Responses of plants to environmental stress, 2nd edn. Academic Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  53. Li T, Hu YJ, Hao ZP, Li H, Wang YS, Chen BD (2012) First cloning and characterization of two functional aquaporin genes from an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices. New Phytol 197:617–630PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Lopez-Ráez JA, Charnikhova T, Gomez-Roldan V, Matusova R, Kohlen W, De Vos R et al (2008) Tomato strigolactones are derived from carotenoids and their biosynthesis is promoted by phosphate starvation. New Phytol 178:863–874PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Ludlow MM (1989) Strategies of response to water stress. In: Kreeb KH, Richter H, Hinckley TM (eds) Structural and functional responses to environmental stresses: water shortage. SPB Academic Publishing BV, The Haugue, pp 269–281Google Scholar
  56. Ludwig-Müller J (2010) Hormonal responses in host plants triggered by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. In: Koltai H, Kapulnik Y (eds) Arbuscular mycorrhizas: physiology and function. Springer, New York, pp 169–190Google Scholar
  57. Manoharan PT, Shanmugaiah V, Balasubramanian N, Gomathinayagam S, Sharma MP, Muthuchelian K (2010) Influence of AM fungi on the growth and physiological status of Erythrina variegata Linn. grown under different water stress conditions. Eur J Soil Biol 46:151–156Google Scholar
  58. Marulanda A, Azcón R, Ruiz-Lozano JM (2003) Contribution of six arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal isolates to water uptake by Lactuca sativa plants under drought stress. Physiol Plant 119:526–533Google Scholar
  59. Marulanda A, Porcel R, Barea JM, Azcón R (2007) Drought tolerance and antioxidant activities in lavender plants colonized by native drought tolerant or drought sensitive Glomus species. Microb Ecol 54:543–552PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Maurel C, Plassard C (2011) Aquaporins: for more than water at the plant-fungus interface? New Phytol 190:815–817PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Maurel C, Verdoucq L, Luu DT, Santoni V (2008) Plant aquaporins: membrane channels with multiple integrated functions. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:595–624PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Miransari M, Bahrami HA, Rejali F, Malakouti MJ, Torabi H (2007) Using arbuscular mycorrhiza to reduce the stressful effects of soil compaction on corn (Zea mays L.) growth. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2014–2026Google Scholar
  63. Mittler R (2002) Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 7:405–410PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Munns R (1988) Why measure osmotic adjustment. Aust J Plant Physiol 15:717–726Google Scholar
  65. Peñuelas J, Munné-Bosch S (2005) Isoprenoids: an evolutionary pool for photoprotection. Trends Plant Sci 10:166–169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Peñuelas J, Sardans J, Estiarte M, Ogaya R, Carnicer J, Coll M et al (2013) Evidence of current impact of climate change on life: a walk from genes to the biosphere. Glob Chan Biol 19:2303–2338Google Scholar
  67. Porcel R, Ruiz-Lozano JM (2004) Arbuscular mycorhhizal influence on leaf water potential, solute accumulation and oxidative stress in soybean plants subjected to drought stress. J Exp Bot 55:1743–1750PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Porcel R, Barea JM, Ruiz-Lozano JM (2003) Antioxidant activities in mycorrhizal soybean plants under drought stress and their possible relationship to the process of nodule senescence. New Phytol 157:135–143Google Scholar
  69. Porcel R, Aroca R, Azcón R, Ruiz-Lozano JM (2006) PIP aquaporin gene expression in arbuscular mycorrhizal Glycine max and Lactuca sativa in relation to drought stress tolerance. Plant Mol Biol 60:389–404PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Powles S (1984) Photoinhibition of photosynthesis induced by visible light. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 35:15–44Google Scholar
  71. Ramanjulu S, Bartels D (2002) Drought- and desiccation-induced modulation of gene expression in plants. Plant Cell Environ 25:141–151PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Rapparini F, Llusià J, Peñuelas J (2008) Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) colonization on terpene emission and content of Artemisia annua. Plant Biol 10:108–122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Rillig MC, Mummey DL (2006) Mycorrhizas and soil structure. New Phytol 171:41–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Roldán A, Díáz-Vivancos P, Herníndez JA, Carrasco L, Caravaca F (2008) Superoxide dismutase and total peroxidase activities in relation to drought recovery performance of mycorrhizal shrub seedlings grown in an amended semiarid soil. J Plant Physiol 165:715–722PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Ruiz-Lozano JM (2003) Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and alleviation of osmotic stress. New perspectives for molecular studies. Mycorrhiza 13:309–317PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Ruiz-Lozano JM, Aroca R (2010) Modulation of aquaporin genes by the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in relation to osmotic stress tolerance. In: Seckbach J, Grube M (eds) Symbioses and stress: joint ventures in biology, cellular origin, life in extreme habitats and astrobiology. Springer Science + Business Media, Dordrecht, pp 359–374Google Scholar
  77. Ruiz-Lozano JM, Azcon R (1995) Hyphal contribution to water uptake in mycorrhizal plants as affected by the fungal species and water status. Physiol Plant 95:472–478Google Scholar
  78. Ruiz-Lozano JM, Azcón R (1996) Mycorrhizal colonization and drought stress as factors affecting nitrate reductase activity in lettuce plants. Agric Ecosy Environ 60:175–181Google Scholar
  79. Ruiz-Lozano JM, Azcón R (1997) Effect of calcium application on the tolerance of mycorrhizal lettuce plants to polyethylene glycol-induced water stress. Symbiosis 23:9–21Google Scholar
  80. Ruiz-Lozano JM, Gómez M, Azcón R (1995) Influence of different Glomus species on the time-course of physiological plant responses of lettuce to progressive drought stress periods. Plant Sci 110:37–44Google Scholar
  81. Ruiz-Lozano J, Azcón R, Palma JM (1996) Superoxide dismutase activity in arbuscular-mycorrhizal Lactuca sativa L. plants subjected to drought stress. New Phytol 134:327–333Google Scholar
  82. Ruiz-Lozano JM, Collados C, Barea JM, Azcón R (2001) Clonig of cDNAs encoding SODs from lettuce plants which show differential regulation by arbuscular mycorhizal symbiosis and by drought stress. J Exp Bot 52:2241–2242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Ruiz-Lozano JM, Porcel R, Aroca R (2006) Does the enhanced tolerance of arbuscular mycorrhizal plants to water deficit involve modulation of drought-induced plant genes? New Phytol 171:693–698PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Ruiz-Lozano JM, del Mar Alguacil M, Bárzana G, Vernieri P, Aroca R (2009) Exogenous ABA accentuates the differences in root hydraulic properties between mycorrhizal and non mycorrhizal maize plants through regulation of PIP aquaporins. Plant Mol Biol 70:565–579Google Scholar
  85. Ruiz-Sánchez M, Aroca R, Muñoz Y, Armada E, Polón R, Ruiz-Lozano JM (2010) The arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis enhances the photosynthetic efficiency and the antioxidative response of rice plants subjected to drought stress. J Plant Physiol 167:862–869PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Ruiz-Sánchez M, Armada E, Muñoz Y, de Salamone IEG, Aroca R, Ruiz-Lozano JM et al (2011) Azospirillum and arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization enhanced rice growth and physiological traits under well-watered and drought conditions. J Plant Physiol 168:1031–1037PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Ruth B, Khalvati M, Schmidhalter U (2011) Quantification of mycorrhizal water uptake via high-resolution on-line water content sensors. Plant Soil 342:459–468Google Scholar
  88. Sánchez-Blanco MJ, Ferrández T, Morales MA, Morte A, Alarcón JJ (2004) Variations in water status, gas exchange, and growth in Rosmarinus officinalis plants infected with Glomus deserticola under drought conditions. J Plant Physiol 161:675–682PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Sardans J, Peñuelas J, Rivas-Ubach A (2011) Ecological metabolomics: overview of current developments and future challenges. Chemoecology 21:191–225Google Scholar
  90. Serraj R, Sinclair TR (2002) Osmolyte accumulation: can it really help increase crop yield under drought conditions? Plant Cell Environ 25:333–341PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Singh LP, Singh Gill S, Tuteja N (2011) Unraveling the role of fungal symbionts in plant abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Signal Behav 2:175–191Google Scholar
  92. Smirnoff N (1993) The role of active oxygen in the response of plants to water deficit and desiccation. New Phytol 125:27–58Google Scholar
  93. Smith SE, Read DJ (2008) Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 3rd edn. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  94. Smith SE, Smith FA (2011) Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas in plant nutrition and growth: new paradigms from cellular to ecosystem scales. Annu Rev Plant Biol 63:227–250Google Scholar
  95. Smith FA, Grace EJ, Smith SE (2009) More than a carbon economy: nutrient trade and ecological sustainability in facultative arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses. New Phytol 182:347–358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Smith SE, Facelli E, Pope S, Smith FA (2010) Plant performance in stressful environments: interpreting new and established knowledge of the roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal. Plant Soil 326:3–20Google Scholar
  97. Smith SE, Jakobsen I, Grønlund M, Smith FA (2011) Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas in plant phosphorus nutrition: interactions between pathways of phosphorus uptake in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots have important implications for understating and manipulating plant phosphorus acquisition. Plant Physiol 156:1050–1057PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Subramanian KS, Charest C, Dwyer LM, Hamilton RI (1995) Arbuscular mycorrhizas and water relations in maize under drought stress at tasseling. New Phytol 129:643–650Google Scholar
  99. Subramanian KS, Charest C (1999) Acquisition of N by external hyphae of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and its impact on physiological responses in maize under drought-stressed and well-watered conditions. Mycorrhiza 9:69–75Google Scholar
  100. Subramanian K, Santhanakrishnan P, Balasubramanian P (2006) Responses of field grown tomato plants to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization under varying intensities of drought stress. Sci Hortic 107:245–253Google Scholar
  101. Turner NC (1997) Further progress in crop water relations. Adv Agron 58:293–338Google Scholar
  102. Uehlein N, Fileschi K, Eckert M, Bienert G, Bertl A, Kaldenhoff R (2007) Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and plant aquaporin expression. Phytochemistry 68:122–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Vickers CE, Gershenzon J, Lerdau MT, Loreto F (2009) A unified mechanism of action for volatile isoprenoids in plant abiotic stress. Nature Chem Ecol 5:283–291Google Scholar
  104. Walter MH, Strack D (2011) Carotenoids and their cleavage products: biosynthesis and functions. Nat Prod Rep 28:663–692PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Wu QS, Xia RX (2006) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influence growth, osmotic adjustment and photosynthesis of citrus under well-watered and water stress conditions. J Plant Physiol 163:417–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Wu QS, Zou YN (2009) Mycorrhiza has a direct effect on reactive oxygen metabolism of drought-stressed citrus. Plant Soil Environ 55:436–442Google Scholar
  107. Wu QS, Xia RX, Zou YN (2006a) Reactive oxygen metabolism in mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal citrus (Poncirus trifoliata) seedlings subjected to water stress. J Plant Physiol 163:1101–1110PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Wu QS, Zou YN, Xia RX (2006b) Effects of water stress and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on reactive oxygen metabolism and antioxidant production by citrus (Citrus tangerine) roots. European J Soil Biol 42:166–172Google Scholar
  109. Yoneyama K, Xie X, Kusumoto D, Sekimoto H, Sugimoto Y, Takeuchi Y et al (2007) Nitrogen deficiency as well as phosphorous deficiency in sorghum promote the production and exudation of 5-deoxystrigol, the host recognition signal for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and root parasites. Planta 227:125–132PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Yooyongwech S, Phaukinsang N, Cha-Um S, Supaibulwatana K (2013) Arbuscular mycorrhiza improved growth performance in Macadamia tetraphylla L. grown under water deficit stress involves soluble sugar and proline accumulation. Plant Growth Regul 69:285–293Google Scholar
  111. Zhang Y, Zhong CL, Chen Y, Chen Z, Jiang QB, Wu C et al (2010) Improving drought tolerance of Casuarina equisetifolia seedlings by arbuscular mycorrhizas under glasshouse conditions. New Forest 40:261–271Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IBIMET-CNR, Institute of BiometeorologyNational Research CouncilBolognaItaly
  2. 2.CREAFCerdanyola del Valles, CataloniaSpain
  3. 3.CSICGlobal Ecology Unit CREAF-CEAB-CSIC-UABCerdanyola del Valles, CataloniaSpain

Personalised recommendations