Advertisement

What’s Queer About Queer Criminology?

  • Matthew BallEmail author

Abstract

The term “queer criminology” is increasingly being used in criminological discussions, though there remains little consistency with regard to how it is used and to what it refers. It has been used broadly to describe criminological research on LGBTQ people and their interactions with the justice system, more specifically to describe those analyses that identify and critique the heteronormative knowledges or binarized understandings of gender and sexuality within criminal justice research, and also to label theoretical and conceptual pieces that argue for a greater connection between queer theory and criminology. However, there are some important distinctions between “queer criminology” and “queer theory” more widely, particularly the deconstructive approaches of the latter. This chapter explores the engagements between queer theory and “queer criminology,” specifically focusing on whether “queer criminology” adopts an understanding of “queer” as an attitude, and as signifying a deconstructive project—a position that features in many strands of queer theoretical work. It will argue that while there are different ways of engaging with “queer” as a concept, and that each of these engagements produces different kinds of “queer” projects, “queer criminology” does not always engage with the deconstructive approaches drawn from queer theory. Ultimately, this can limit the ways that “queer criminologists” are able to address injustice.

Keywords

Queer theory Queer Criminology Crime and justice LGBT people Critique Poststructural theory 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the following people for their insightful comments on this chapter: Christian Callisen, Belinda Carpenter, Jo Phoenix, Jordan Blair Woods, Juan Tauri, Liz Morrish, Peter O’Brien, Angela Dwyer, Sharon Hayes, Vanessa R. Panfil, and Dana Peterson.

References

  1. Backus, M. G. (2009). “Things that have the potential to go terribly wrong”: Homosexuality, pedophilia and the Kincora Boys' Home scandal. In N. Giffney & M. O’Rourke (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to queer theory (pp. 237–253). Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, M. (2013a). Heteronormativity, homonormativity and violence. In K. Carrington, M. Ball, E. O’Brien, & J. Tauri (Eds.), Crime, justice and social democracy: International perspectives (pp. 186–199). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, M. (2013b). The use of “queer” in criminal justice discourses. In K. Richards & J. Tauri (Eds.), Crime, justice and social democracy: Proceedings of the 2 nd international conference, 2013 (Vol. 1, pp. 1–9). Brisbane, QLD: Crime and Justice Research Center, QUT.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, M. (2014). Queer criminology, critique, and the ‘art of not being governed’. Critical Criminology: An International Journal, 22.Google Scholar
  5. Berlant, L., & Warner, M. (1995). What does queer theory teach us about X? PMLA, 110, 343–349.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, W. (1995). States of injury: Power and freedom in late modernity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Browne, K. (2008). Selling my queer soul or queerying quantitative research? Sociological Research Online, 13(1), 11. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/13/1/11.html.
  8. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Carlen, P. (2011). Against evangelism in academic criminology: For criminology as a scientific art. In M. Bosworth & C. Hoyle (Eds.), What is criminology? (pp. 95–108). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carline, A. (2006). Resignifications and subversive transformations: Judith Butler’s queer theory and women who kill. Liverpool Law Review, 27, 303–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carrington, K. (2002). Feminism and critical criminology: Confronting genealogies. In K. Carrington & R. Hogg (Eds.), Critical criminology: Issues, debates, challenges (pp. 114–142). Devon, UK: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Chakraborti, N., & Garland, J. (2009). Hate crime: Impact, causes, and responses. London, UK: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Conrad, K. (2009). Nothing to hide… nothing to fear: Discriminatory surveillance and queer visibility in Great Britain and Northern Ireland. In N. Giffney & M. O’Rourke (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to queer theory (pp. 329–346). Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Corber, R., & Valocchi, S. (2003). Introduction. In R. Corber & S. Valocchi (Eds.), Queer studies: An interdisciplinary reader (pp. 1–19). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Crenshaw, K. (2000). Demarginalizing the intersections of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. In J. James & T. Sharpley-Whiting (Eds.), The black feminist reader (pp. 208–238). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Cunneen, C. (2011). Postcolonial perspectives for criminology. In M. Bosworth & C. Hoyle (Eds.), What is criminology? (pp. 249–266). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dalton, D. (2006). Surveying deviance, figuring disgust: Locating the homocriminal body in time and space. Social and Legal Studies, 15(2), 277–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dalton, D. (2007). Genealogy of the Australian homocriminal subject: A study of two explanatory models of deviance. Griffith Law Review, 16(1), 83–106.Google Scholar
  21. Douglas, S., Jivraj, S., & Lamble, S. (2011). Liabilities of queer anti-racist critique. Feminist Legal Studies, 19, 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duggan, L. (1993). The trials of Alice Mitchell: Sensationalism, sexology, and the lesbian subject in turn-of-the-century America. In R. Corber & S. Valocchi (Eds.), Queer studies: An interdisciplinary reader (pp. 73–87). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Duggan, L. (2001). Making it perfectly queer. In A. Herrmann & A. J. Stewart (Eds.), Theorising feminism: Parallel trends in the humanities and social sciences (2nd ed., pp. 215–231). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  24. Duggan, L. (2003). The twilight of equality? Neoliberalism, cultural politics, and the attack on democracy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  25. Duggan, M. (2012). Queering conflict: Examining lesbian and gay experiences of homophobia in Northern Ireland. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Dwyer, A. (2008). Policing queer bodies: Focusing on queer embodiment in policing research as an ethical question. Queensland University of Technology Law and Justice Journal, 8(2), 414–428.Google Scholar
  27. Dwyer, A. (2011). Policing lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender young people: A gap in the research literature. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 22(3), 415–433.Google Scholar
  28. Dwyer, A. (2012). Policing visible sexual/gender diversity as a program of governance. International Journal for Crime and Justice, 1(1), 17–34.Google Scholar
  29. Eng, D., Halberstam, J., & Muñoz, J. E. (2005). Introduction: What’s queer about queer studies now? Social Text, 23(3–4), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ferrell, J., & Sanders, C. R. (1995). Toward a cultural criminology. In J. Ferrell & C. R. Sanders (Eds.), Cultural criminology (pp. 297–326). Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Foucault, M. (1983). On the genealogy of ethics: An overview of work in progress. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth. essential works of Foucault 19541984: Volume 1 (2000) (pp. 253–280). London, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  32. Foucault, M. (1998). The will to knowledge: The history of sexuality volume 1. London, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  33. Giffney, N. (2004). Denormatizing queer theory: More than (simply) lesbian and gay studies. Feminist Theory, 5(1), 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Giffney, N. (2009). Introduction: The “q” word. In N. Giffney & M. O’Rourke (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to queer theory (pp. 1–13). Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Groombridge, N. (1998). Letter to the editor. Theoretical Criminology, 2, 119–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Groombridge, N. (1999). Perverse criminologies: The closet of Doctor Lombroso. Social and Legal Studies, 8, 531–548.Google Scholar
  37. Halperin, D. (1995). Saint Foucault: Towards a gay hagiography. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Himmelstein, K., & Brückner, H. (2011). Criminal-justice and school sanctions against nonheterosexual youth: A national longitudinal study. Pediatrics, 127(1), 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jagose, A. (1996). Queer theory. Melbourne, VIC: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Johnson, P., & Dalton, D. (Eds.). (2012). Policing sex. Oxon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Kemp, J. (2009). Queer past, queer present, queer future. Graduate Journal of Social Science, 6(1), 3–23.Google Scholar
  42. Lamble, S. (2008). Retelling racialized violence, remaking white innocence: The politics of interlocking oppressions in transgender day of remembrance. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 5(1), 24–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lamble, S. (2009). Unknowable bodies, unthinkable sexualities: Lesbian and transgender legal invisibility in the Toronto women’s bathhouse raid. Social and Legal Studies, 18(1), 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lance, M. N., & Tanesini, A. (2000). Identity judgments, queer politics. In I. Morland & A. Willox (Eds.), Queer theory (2005) (pp. 171–186). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. Mason, G. (2001a). Body maps: Envisaging homophobia, violence, and safety. Social and Legal Studies, 10(1), 23–44.Google Scholar
  46. Mason, G. (2001b). Not our kind of hate crime. Law and Critique, 12, 253–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McLaughlin, J. (2006). The return of the material: Cycles of theoretical fashion in Lesbian, Gay and Queer Studies. In D. Richardson, J. McLaughlin, & M. E. Casey (Eds.), Intersections between feminism and queer theory (pp. 59–77). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  48. Mogul, J. L., Ritchie, A. J., & Whitlock, K. (2011). Queer (in)justice: The criminalization of LGBT people in the United States. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  49. Moran, L. J. (2009). What kind of field is “law, gender and sexuality”? Achievements, concerns and possible futures. Feminist Legal Studies, 17, 309–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Moran, L. J., Monk, D., & Beresford, S. (1998). Legal queeries: Lesbian, gay, and transgender legal studies. London, UK: Cassell.Google Scholar
  51. Narrain, A. (2008). “That despicable specimen of humanity”: Policing of homosexuality in India. In K. Kananbiran & R. Singh (Eds.), Challenging the rule(s) of law: Colonialism, criminology, and human rights in India (pp. 48–77). New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  52. Puar, J. K. (2007). Terrorist assemblages: Homonationalism in queer times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ristock, J. (Ed.). (2011). Intimate partner violence in LGBTQ lives. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Robson, R. (Ed.). (2011). Sexuality and law. Volume II: Crime and punishment. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  55. Sedgwick, E. K. (2011). The weather in Proust. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sorainen, A. (2003). Queering criminology. Paper presented at Crime and Control in an Integrating Europe: 3 rd Annual Conference of the European Society of Criminology, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  57. Stychin, C. (1995). Law’s desire: Sexuality and the limits of justice. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Sullivan, N. (2003). A critical introduction to queer theory. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Tomsen, S. (1997). Was Lombroso a queer? Criminology, criminal justice, and the heterosexual imaginary. In G. Mason & S. Tomsen (Eds.), Homophobic violence (pp. 33–45). Annandale, NSW: Hawkins Press.Google Scholar
  60. Tomsen, S. (2006). Homophobic violence, cultural essentialism and shifting sexual identities. Social and Legal Studies, 15, 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tomsen, S. (2009). Violence, prejudice, and sexuality. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Umphrey, M. (1995). The trouble with Harry Thaw. In R. Corber & S. Valocchi (Eds.), Queer studies: An interdisciplinary reader (pp. 21–30). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  63. Walklate, S. (2011). Gender, crime and criminal justice (3rd ed.). Oxon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Warner, M. (1999). The trouble with normal: Sex, politics, and the ethics of queer life. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Wiegman, R. (2012). Object lessons. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Sex, Gender, and SexualitiesDurham UniversityDurhamUK
  2. 2.School of JusticeQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations