Investment in Stochastic Electricity-Production Facilities

Chapter
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 199)

Abstract

This chapter considers a profit-oriented private investor interested in building stochastic electricity-production facilities, such as solar and wind power plants. This investor sells its production in a competitive pool-based electricity market and faces uncertainties related to demand growth, its production level, and its investment cost. Adopting a multistage approach, a stochastic complementarity model is formulated to determine the optimal capacity to be built by the investor to maximize its expected profit while minimizing its profit volatility. An example considering a wind power investor is presented to illustrate the working of the proposed model.

Keywords

Wind Power Planning Horizon Investment Cost Expected Profit Demand Growth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Murphy FH, Smeers Y (2005) Generation capacity expansion in imperfectly competitive restructure electricity markets. Oper Res 53(4):646–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kazempour J, Conejo AJ, Ruiz C (2011) Strategic generation investment using a complementarity approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 26(2):940–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang J, Shahidehpour M, Li Z, Botterud A (2009) Strategic generation capacity expansion planning with incomplete information. IEEE Trans Power Syst 24(2):1002–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Botterud A, Ilic MD, Wangensteen I (2005) Optimal investment in power generation under centralized and decentralized decision making. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(1):254–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oliveira F (2008) The value of information in electricity investment games. Energy Pol 36(7):2364–2375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kamyaz P, Valenzuela J, Park CS (2007) Transmission congestion and competition on power generation expansion. IEEE Trans Power Syst 28(1):401–411Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chuang AS, Wu F, Varaiya P (2001) A game-theoretic model for generation expansion planning: problem formulation and numerical comparisons. IEEE Trans Power Syst 16(4):885–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baringo L, Conejo AJ (2011) Wind power investment within a market environment. App Energy 88(9):3239–3247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baringo L, Conejo AJ (2013) Risk-constrained multi-stage wind power investment. IEEE Trans Power Syst 28(1):401–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Birge JR, Louveaux F (1997) Introduction to stochastic programming. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Conejo AJ, Carrión M, Morales JM (2010) Decision making under uncertainty in electricity markets. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J Risk 2:21–41Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2002) Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J. Bank Financ 26:1443–1471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoppner F, Klawonn F, Kruse R, Rumkler T. (1999) Fuzzy cluster analysis. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baringo L, Conejo AJ (2013) Correlated wind-power production and electric load scenarios for investment decisions. App Energy 101:475–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hyndman RJ, Shu Fan (2010) Density forecasting for long-term peak electricity demand. IEEE Trans Power Syst 25(2):1142–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wiesenthal T, Mercier A, Schade B, Petric H, Szabó (2010) Quantitative assessment of the impact of the strategic energy technology plan on the European power sector. JCR Scientific and Technical ReportsGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Iberian Electricity Pool, OMEL, Spain and Portugal (2013) http://www.omel.es/. Accessed 12 Feb 2013
  19. 19.
    Espejo A, Minguez R, Tomas A, Menendez M, Mendez FJ, Losada IJ (2011) Directional calibrated wind and wave reanalysis databases using instrumental data for optimal design of off-shore wind farms. Paper presented in OCEANS, 2011 IEEE - Spain, pp 1–9, 6–9 June 2011Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Menendez M, Tomas A, Camus P, Garcia-Diez M, Fita L, Fernandez J, Mendez FJ, Losada IJ (2011) A methodology to evaluate regional-scale offshore wind energy resources. Paper presented in OCEANS, 2011 IEEE - Spain, pp 1–8, 6–9 June 2011Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nordex (2013) http://www.nordex-online.com/. Accessed 12 Feb 2013
  22. 22.
    Eichhorn A, Heitsch H, Romisch (2010) Stochastic optimization of electricity portfolios: scenario tree modeling and risk management. In: Handbook of power systems I. Springer, New York, pp 405–432Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gómez-Expósito A, Conejo AJ, Cañizares C (2008) Electric energy systems: analysis and operation. Taylor and Francis, Boca RatónCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Luenberger DG (1973) Introduction to linear and nonlinear programming. Addison-Wesley publishing company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ruiz C, Conejo AJ (2009) Pool strategy of a producer with endogenous formation of locational marginal prices. IEEE Trans Power Syst 24(4):1855–1866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fortuny-Amat J, McCarl B (1981) A representation and economic interpretation of a two-level programming problem. J Oper Res Soc 32(9):783–792Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    The ILOG CPLEX (2013) http://www.ilog.com/products/cplex/. Accessed 12 Feb 2013
  28. 28.
    Rosenthal RE (2012) GAMS, A user’s guide. GAMS Development Corporation, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Baringo L, Conejo AJ (2012) Wind power investment: a benders decomposition approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 27(1):433–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Castilla-La ManchaCiudad RealSpain

Personalised recommendations