Fecal Incontinence

  • Tracy L. HullEmail author


Fecal incontinence is a complex chronic disease. Determining an optimal treatment plan begins with a thorough history and directed physical examination. Further testing is individualized, and the exact role of anal physiology testing remains unclear. However, anal endosonography is useful to provide a road map for treatment and surgery. Most treatment begins with conservative measures. Nonsurgical options such as biofeedback also may improve patients. Other nonsurgical options to consider include the anal plug, radiofrequency treatment, and injectable agents. For patients with an anterior sphincter defect, an overlapping sphincter repair has been advocated, but the poor long-term results have led investigators to seek superior surgical treatments. The artificial bowel sphincter and sacral nerve stimulation both are complex procedures, which when successful can improve patient’s quality of life.

New treatments are also being investigated that may prove superior to currently available choices, but the key premise of an individual treatment plan may include a combination of treatments, which is important to remember when caring for these patients.


Fecal Incontinence Internal Sphincter Sacral Nerve Stimulation Incontinent Episode Sphincter Defect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material

Video 13.1

Sacral nerve stimulation stages I and II (Video by Tracy Hull, MD The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland, Ohio) (MPG 289602 kb)


  1. 1.
    Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, et al. Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42(12):1525–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    O’Donnell LJD, Heaton KW. Pseudo-diarrhea in the irritable bowel syndrome: patients’ records of stool form reflect transit time while stool frequency does not. Gut. 1988;29:A1455.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bohle B, Belvis F, Vial M, Maestre Y, Pera M, Castillo M, Grande L, Parés D. Menopause and obstetric history as risk factors for fecal incontinence in women. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(8):975–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Qureshi MS, Rao MM, Sasapu KK, Casey J, Qureshi MU, Sadat U, et al. Male faecal incontinence presents as two separate entities with implications for management. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(12):1589–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Seong MK, Jung SI, Kim TW, Joh HK. Comparative analysis of summary scoring systems in measuring fecal incontinence. J Korean Surg Soc. 2011;81(5):326–31.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bols EM, Hendriks HJ, Berghmans LC, Baeten CG, de Bie RA. Responsiveness and interpretability of incontinence severity scores and FIQL in patients with fecal incontinence: a secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(3):469–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang JY, Varma MG. Measures for fecal incontinence, constipation, and associated quality of life. Semin Colon Rectal Surg. 2010;21:22–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zutshi M, Salcedo L, Hammel J, Hull T. Anal physiology testing in fecal incontinence: is it of any value? Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010;25(2):277–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pehl C, Seidl H, Scalercio N, Gundling F, Schmidt T, Schepp W, Labermeyer S. Accuracy of anorectal manometry in patients with fecal incontinence. Digestion. 2012;86(2):78–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dudding TC, Vaizey CJ. Current concepts in evaluation and testing of posterior pelvic floor disorders. Semin Colon Rectal Surg. 2010;21:6–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Norton C, Cody JD. Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(7):CD002111.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deutekom M, Dobben AC. Plugs for containing faecal incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(4):CD005086.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ruiz D, Pinto RA, Hull TL, Efron JE, Wexner SD. Does the radiofrequency procedure for fecal incontinence improve quality of life and incontinence at 1-year follow-up? Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(7):1041–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abbas MA, Tam MS, Chun LJ. Radiofrequency treatment for fecal incontinence: is it effective long-term? Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(5):605–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maeda Y, Laurberg S, Norton C. Perianal injectable bulking agents as treatment for faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(5):CD007959.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Luo C, Samaranayake CB, Plank LD, Bissett IP. Systematic review on the efficacy and safety of injectable bulking agents for passive faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(4):296–303.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Graf W, Mellgren A, Matzel KE, Hull T, Johansson C, Bernstein M, NASHA Dx Study Group. Efficacy of dextranomer in stabilised hyaluronic acid for treatment of faecal incontinence: a randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9770):997–1003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Melgren A, Matzel KE, Pollack J, Hull T, Bernstein M, Graf W, forthe Solesta Study Groups. Long term efficacy of NASATM Dx injection therapy (Solesta R) for treatment of fecal incontinence. Podium presentation American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, San Antonio, Texas. June 5, 2012.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zutshi M, Hull TL, Bast J, Halverson A, Na J. Ten-year outcome after anal sphincter repair for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(6):1089–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Glasgow SC, Lowry AC. Long-term outcomes of anal sphincter repair for fecal incontinence: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(4):482–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zutshi M, Ferreira P, Hull T, Gurland B. Biological implants in sphincter augmentation offer a good short-term outcome after a sphincter repair. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(7):866–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tjandra JJ, Han WR, Goh J, Carey M, Dwyer P. Direct repair vs. overlapping sphincter repair: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(7):937–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Farrell SA, Flowerdew G, Gilmour D, Turnbull GK, Schmidt MH, Baskett TF, et al. Overlapping compared with end-to-end repair of complete third-degree or fourth-degree obstetric tears: three-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(4):803–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wexner SD, Jin HY, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Li VK. Factors associated with failure of the artificial bowel sphincter: a study of over 50 cases from Cleveland Clinic Florida. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(9):1550–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wong MT, Meurette G, Wyart V, Glemain P, Lehur PA. The artificial bowel sphincter: a single institution experience over a decade. Ann Surg. 2011;254(6):951–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Michot F, Costaglioli B, Leroi AM, Denis P. Artificial anal sphincter in severe fecal incontinence: outcome of prospective experience with 37 patients in one institution. Ann Surg. 2003;237(1):52–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Michot F, Lefebure B, Bridoux V, Gourcerol G, Kianifard B, Leroi AM, Tuech JJ. Artificial anal sphincter for severe fecal incontinence implanted by a transvaginal approach: experience with 32 patients treated at one institution. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(8):1155–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ruiz Carmona MD, Alós Company R, Roig Vila JV, Solana Bueno A, Pla MV. Long-term results of artificial bowel sphincter for the treatment of severe faecal incontinence. Are they what we hoped for? Colorectal Dis. 2009;11(8):831–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gallas S, Leroi AM, Bridoux V, Lefebure B, Tuech JJ, Michot F. Constipation in 44 patients implanted with an artificial bowel sphincter. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24(8):969–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wexner SD, Hull T, Edden Y, Coller JA, Devroede G, McCallum R, et al. Infection rates in a large investigational trial of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(7):1081–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wexner SD, Coller JA, Devroede G, Hull T, McCallum R, Chan M, et al. Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: results of a 120-patient prospective multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2010;251(3):441–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mellgren A, Wexner SD, Coller JA, Devroede G, Lerew DR, Madoff RD, Hull T, SNS Study Group, Collaborators. Long-term efficacy and safety of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(9):1065–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hull T, Giese C, Wexner SD, Mellgren A, Devroede G, Madoff R, et al. Long-term durability of SNS therapy for chronic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(2):234–45. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318276b24c.PMID: 23303153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Devroede G, Giese C, Wexner SD, Mellgren A, Coller JA, Madoff RD, et al. Quality of life is markedly improved in patients with fecal incontinence after sacral nerve stimulation. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012;18(2):103–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Matzel KE, Lux P, Heuer S, Besendörfer M, Zhang W. Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: long-term outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11(6):636–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Altomare DF, Ratto C, Ganio E, Lolli P, Masin A, Villani RD. Long-term outcome of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(1):11–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    George AT, Kalmar K, Panarese A, Dudding TC, Nicholls RJ, Vaizey CJ. Long-term outcomes of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(3):302–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Damon H, Barth X, Roman S, Mion F. Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence improves symptoms, quality of life and patients’ satisfaction: results of a monocentric series of 119 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28(2):227–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chan MK, Tjandra JJ. Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: external anal sphincter defect vs. intact anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(7):1015–24; discussion 1024–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Leroi AM, Damon H, Faucheron JL, Lehur PA, Siproudhis L, Slim K, et al. Sacral nerve stimulation in faecal incontinence: position statement based on a collective experience. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11(6):572–83. Epub 2009 Apr 15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Warner MW, Jones OM, Lindsey I, Cunningham C, Mortensen NJ. Long-term follow-up after anterior sphincter repair: influence of age on functional outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(11):1380–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lundby L, Møller A, Buntzen S, Krogh K, Vang K, Gjedde A, et al. Relief of fecal incontinence by sacral nerve stimulation linked to focal brain activation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(3):318–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Halverson AL, Hull TL, Paraiso MF, Floruta C. Outcome of sphincteroplasty combined with surgery for urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(10):1421–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hull TL, Floruta C, Halverson AL. Improvement in fecal incontinence scores is the same for sphincteroplasty combined with major urogynecologic procedures versus sphincteroplasty alone. J Pelvic Surg. 2001;7(4):201–4.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lehur PA, McNevin S, Buntzen S, Mellgren AF, Laurberg S, Madoff RD. Magnetic anal sphincter augmentation for the treatment of fecal incontinence: a preliminary report from a feasibility study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(12):1604–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wong MT, Meurette G, Stangherlin P, Lehur PA. The magnetic anal sphincter versus the artificial bowel sphincter: a comparison of 2 treatments for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(7):773–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wong MT, Meurette G, Wyart V, Lehur PA. Does the magnetic anal sphincter device compare favourably with sacral nerve stimulation in the management of faecal incontinence? Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(6):e323–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mantoo S, Meurette G, Podevin J, Lehur PA. The magnetic anal sphincter: a new device in the management of severe fecal incontinence. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2012;9(5):483–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Findlay JM, Maxwell-Armstrong C. Posterior tibial nerve stimulation and faecal incontinence: a review. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(3):265–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Leroi AM, Siproudhis L, Etienney I, Damon H, Zerbib F, Amarenco G, et al. Transcutaneous electrical tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence: a randomized trial (Consort 1a). Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(12):1888–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Brown SR, Wadhawan H, Nelson RL. Surgery for faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(9):CD001757.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lewis SJ, Heaton KW. Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;32(9):920–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryDigestive Disease Institute, The Cleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations