Advertisement

The Effectiveness of Marriage as an “Intervention” in the Life Course: Evidence from the Netherlands

  • Bianca E. BersaniEmail author
  • Marieke van Schellen
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

Twenty years ago, Sampson and Laub (1993:Crime in the making: pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press) formally presented their age-graded theory of informal social control highlighting the importance of social bonds across the entire life course in understanding pathways into and out of crime. Since then, a large body of research has appeared testing key facets of their theory. One particularly important and well-studied tenet is the notion that key life events hold the potential to redirect lives and foster desistance from crime. In this chapter, we focus on the role of marriage in the life course and review the empirical body of work examining the generalizability of the marriage effect in understanding patterns of persistence and desistance from crime the Netherlands. For a number of substantive and analytic reasons, the Netherlands provides an interesting context to test the generalizability of the marriage effect cross-culturally including its progressive social and political climate. Despite notable differences when compared to the USA, overall results demonstrate that the “good marriage effect” holds in the Netherlands. Men and women, across sociohistorical context and crime type, are less likely to offend when married compared to when not married. The effect is especially pronounced for men who marry a noncriminal spouse though interestingly marriage, irrespective of spousal criminality, is beneficial for female offenders. In short, marriage is an important factor when thinking about pathways out of crime. We conclude this chapter by identifying how the marriage effect can inform criminal justice policy and practice as well as offering up what we see as fruitful avenues for future research.

Keywords

Criminal Behavior Criminal History Crime Type Informal Social Control Marital Dissolution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank John H. Laub and Paul Nieuwbeerta for their helpful comments on this paper. Any errors or omissions are our own.

References

  1. Alwin, D. F., & McCammon, R. J. (2004). Generations, cohorts, and social change. In J. T. Mortimer & M. J. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the Life Course (pp. 23–49). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Amato, P. R., Booth, A., Johnson, D. R., & Rogers, S. J. (2007). Along together: How marriage in America is changing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Apel, R., Blokland, A. J., Nieuwbeerta, P., & Schellen, M. (2010). The impact of imprisonment on marriage and divorce: A risk set matching approach. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(2), 269–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bales, W. D., & Mears, D. P. (2008). Inmate social ties and the transition to society: Does visitation reduce recidivism? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45(3), 287–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baskin, D. R., & Sommers, I. B. (1998). Casualties of community disorder: Women’s careers in violent crime. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  6. Beijers, J., Bijleveld, C., & van Poppel, F. (2012). ‘Man’s best possession’: Period effects in the association between marriage and offending. European Journal of Criminology, 9(4), 425–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bersani, B., & Dipietro, S. M. (2013). An examination of the “marriage effect” on desistance from crime among U.S. immigrants. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  8. Bersani, B., & Doherty, E. E. (2013). When the ties that bind unwind: Examining the enduring and situational processes of change behind the marriage effect. Criminology, 51(2), 399–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bersani, B., Laub, J., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2009). Marriage and desistance from crime in the Netherlands: Do gender and socio-historical context matter? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bianchi, S., Casper, L. M., & King, R. B. (2005). Work, family, health, and well-being. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  11. Blokland, A. A. J., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2005). The effects of life circumstances on longitudinal trajectories of offending. Criminology, 43(4), 1203–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Capaldi, D. M., Kim, H. K., & Owen, L. D. (2008). Romantic partners’ influence on men's likelihood of arrest in early adulthood. Criminology, 46(2), 267–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elder, G. H. (1975). Age differentiation and the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 1, 165–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elder, G. H. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  15. Elder, G. H., Jr. (1985). Perspectives on the life course. In G. H. Elder (Ed.), Life course dynamics: trajectories and transitions, 1968–1980. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Farrington, D. P., & Maughan, B. (1999). Criminal careers of two London cohorts. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 9(1), 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farrington, D. P., & West, D. J. (1995). Effects of marriage, separation, and children on offending by adult males. In Z. S. Blau & J. Hagan (Eds.), Current perspectives on aging and the life cycle: Delinquency and disrepute in the life course (Vol. 4, pp. 249–81). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 990–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Giordano, P. C., Schroeder, R. D., & Cernkovich, S. A. (2007). Emotions and crime over the life course: A neo meadian perspective on criminal continuity and change. American Journal of Sociology, 112(6), 1603–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. (1950). Unraveling juvenile delinquency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gottfredson, M. R. (2005). Offender classifications and treatment effects in developmental criminology: A propensity/event consideration. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 602(1), 46–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Graham, J., & Bowling, B. (1996). Young people and crime (p. 145). London, UK: Home Office Research Study.Google Scholar
  23. Hagestad, G. O., & Call, V. R. A. (2007). Pathways to childlessness: A life course perspective. Journal of Family Issues, 28(10), 1338–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haynie, D. L., Giordano, P. C., Manning, W. D., & Longmore, M. A. (2005). Adolescent romantic relationships and delinquency involvement. Criminology, 43(1), 177–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heckman, J. J., & Hotz, V. J. (1989). Choosing among alternative nonexperimental methods for estimating the impact of social programs: The case of manpower training. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84(408), 862–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hogan, D. P., & Astone, N. M. (1986). The transition to adulthood. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 109–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Horney, J., Osgood, D. W., & Marshall, I. H. (1995). Criminal careers in the short-term: Intra-individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances. American Sociological Review, 60, 655–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kalmijn, M. (2002). Sociologische analyses van levensloopeffecten: een overzicht van economische, sociale en culturele gevolgen. [Sociological analyses of life course effects: an overview of economic, social, and cultural consequences]. Bevolking en Gezin, 31, 3–46.Google Scholar
  30. King, R. D., Massoglia, M., & Macmillan, R. (2007). The context of marriage and crime: Gender, the propensity to marry, and offending in early adulthood. Criminology, 45(1), 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kirk, D. S. (2012). Residential change as a turning point in the life course of crime: Desistance or temporary cessation? Criminology, 50(2), 329–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Knight, B. J., Osborn, S. G., & West, D. J. (1977). Early marriage and criminal tendency in males. British Journal of Criminology, 17(4), 348–60.Google Scholar
  33. Laub, J. H. (1999). Alteration in the opportunity structure: A criminological perspective. In A. Booth, A. Crouter, & M. Shanahan (Eds.), Transitions to adulthood in a changing economy: No work, no family, no future (pp. 48–55). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Laub, J. H., Nagin, D. S., & Sampson, R. J. (1998). Trajectories of change in criminal offending: Good marriages and the desistance process. American Sociological Review, 63(2), 225–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (1995). Crime and context in the lives of 1,000 Boston men, circa 1925–1955. In Z. S. Blau & J. Hagan (Eds.), Current perspectives on aging and the life cycle: Delinquency and disrepute in the life course (Vol. 4, pp. 119–39). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.Google Scholar
  36. Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Laub, J. H., Sampson, R. J., Corbett, R. P., Jr., & Smith, J. S. (1995). The public policy implications of a life-course perspective on crime. In H. D. Barlow (Ed.), Crime and public policy: Putting theory to work (pp. 91–106). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  38. Leverentz, A. M. (2006). The love of a good man? Romantic relationships as a source of support or hindrance for female ex-offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43(4), 459–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Liefbroer, A. C., & Dykstra, P. A. (2000). Samenleven met een partner [Living together with a partner]. In A. C. Liefbroer & P. A. Dykstra (Eds.), Levenslopen in Verandering. Een studie naar ontwikkelingen in de levenslopen van Nederlanders geboren tussen 1900 and 1970. [Changes over the life course. A study of the developments in life courses of the Dutch between 1900 and 1970.]. The Hague: SDU Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. Lyngstad, T. H., & Skardhamar, T. (2010). Does research on marriage and crime have policy implications? European Journal of Criminology, 7(3), 235–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mannheim, K. (1952). Essays on the sociology of knowledge. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul LTD.Google Scholar
  42. Manting, D. (1996). The changing meaning of cohabitation and marriage. European Sociology Review, 12, 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Massoglia, M., & Warner, C. (2011). The consequences of incarceration. Criminology & Public Policy, 10(3), 851–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McGloin, J. M., Sullivan, C. J., Piquero, A. R., Blokland, A., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2011). Marriage and offending specialization: Expanding the impact of turning points and the process of desistance. European Journal of Criminology, 8(5), 361–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mensch, B., Singh, S., & Casterline, J. B. (2005). Trends in the timing of first marriage among men and women in the developing world. New York, NY: The Population Research Council, Inc.Google Scholar
  47. Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Rutter, M., & Silva, P. A. (2001). Sex differences in antisocial behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nieuwbeerta, P., & Blokland, A. A. J. (2003). Criminal careers and adult Dutch offenders (codebook and documentation). Leinden: Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement.Google Scholar
  49. Oppenheimer, V. K. (1994). Women’s rising employment and the future of the family in industrial societies. Population and Development Review, 20(2), 293–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Osgood, D. W., & Lee, H. (1993). Leisure activities, age, and adult roles across the lifespan. Society and Leisure, 16(1), 181–208.Google Scholar
  51. Ouimet, M., & Le Blanc, M. (1996). The role of life experiences in the continuation of the adult criminal career. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 6(1), 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Petras, H., Nieuwbeerta, P., & Piquero, A. R. (2010). Participation and frequency during criminal careers across the life span. Criminology, 48(2), 607–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rhule-Louie, D. M., & McMahon, R. J. (2007). Problem behavior and romantic relationships: Assortative mating, behavior contagion, and desistance. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 10(1), 53–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Riley, M. W. (1973). Aging and cohort succession: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(1), 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rocque, M., Bierie, D. M., Posick, C., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2013). Unraveling change: Social bonds and recidivism among released offenders. Victims & Offenders, 8(2), 209–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Sampson, R. J., Laub, J. H., & Wimer, C. (2006). Does marriage reduce crime? A counterfactual approach to within-individual causal effects. Criminology, 44(3), 465–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Simons, R. L., Stewart, E., Gordon, L. C., Conger, R. D., & Elder, G. H. (2002). A test of life-course explanations for stability and change in antisocial behavior from adolescence to young adulthood. Criminology, 40(2), 401–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smock, P. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Taxman, F. (1998). Reducing recidivism through a seamless system of care: Components of effective treatment, supervision, and transition services in the community: Report to the Office of National Drug Control Policy, Treatment and Criminal Justice System Conference.Google Scholar
  62. Theobald, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2009). Effects of getting married on offending. European Journal of Criminology, 6(6), 496–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Theobald, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2010). Should policy implications be drawn from research on the effects of getting married on offending?: A response to Lyngstad and Skardhamar. European Journal of Criminology, 7(3), 239–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Uggen, C., & Kruttschnitt, C. (1998). Crime in the breaking: Gender differences in desistance. Law & Society Review, 32(2), 339–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. van Schellen, M. (2012). Marriage and crime over the life course. The criminal careers of convicts and their spouses. Dissertation: Utrecht University.Google Scholar
  66. van Schellen, M., Apel, R., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2012). “Because You’re Mine, I Walk the Line”? Marriage, spousal criminality, and criminal offending over the life course. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28(4), 701–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. van Schellen, M., Poortman, A.R., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2011). Partners in Crime? Criminal Offending, Marriage Formation, and Partner Selection. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49(4), 545–71.Google Scholar
  68. van Zanden, J. L. (1998). The economic history of the Netherlands 1914–1995: A small open economy in the ‘long’ twentieth century. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Visher, C. A., Knight, C. R., Chalfin, A., & Roman, J. K. (2009). The impact of marital and relationship status on social outcomes for returning prisoners. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  70. Waite, L. J. (1995). Does marriage matter? Demography, 32, 483–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. New York, NY: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
  72. Wakefield, S., & Wildeman, C. (2011). Mass imprisonment and racial disparities in childhood behavioral problems. Criminology & Public Policy, 10(3), 793–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Warr, M. (1998). Life-course transitions and desistance from crime. Criminology, 36(2), 183–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  75. Woodward, L. J., Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, L. J. (2002). Deviant partner involvement and offending risk in early adulthood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43(2), 177–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wright, B. R., Entner, C., Avshalom, M., Terrie, E., & Silva, P. A. (2001). The effects of social ties on crime vary by criminal propensity: A life course model of interdependence. Criminology, 39(2), 321–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zoutewelle-Terovan, M., van der Geest, V., Liefbroer, A., & Bijleveld, C. (2012). Criminality and family formation: Effects of marriage and parenthood on criminal behavior for men and women. crime & Delinquency.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of Massachusetts BostonBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options