Advertisement

Current Clinical Diagnostic Tests for Asthma

  • Shiwan Shah
  • Gulshan SharmaEmail author
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 795)

Abstract

Asthma involves variable airflow obstruction in both large and small airways. The physiological consequences of obstruction include increased airway resistance and decreased expiratory flow rates, which lead to air trapping and dynamic hyperinflation. This chapter reviews current methods for pulmonary function testing to detect these physiological changes for both diagnosis and monitoring.

Keywords

Spirometry Peak expiratory flow rate Airway hyperresponsiveness Bronchodilator reversibility Bronchoprovocation Methacholine 

References

  1. Adams RJ, Boath K, Homan S et al (2001) A randomized trial of peak-flow and symptom-based action plans in adults with moderate-to-severe asthma. Respirology 6:297–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberts WM, Ferris MC, Brooks SM et al (1994) The FEF25-75% and the clinical diagnosis of asthma. Ann Allergy 73:221–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Argyros GJ, Roach JM, Hurwitz KM et al (1996) Eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation as a bronchoprovocation technique: development of a standardized dosing schedule in asthmatics. Chest 109:1520–1524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buist AS, Vollmer WM, Wilson SR et al (2006) A randomized clinical trial of peak flow versus symptom monitoring in older adults with asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 174:1077–1087PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collard P, Njinou B, Nejadnik B et al (1994) Single breath diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide in stable asthma. Chest 105:1426–1429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Drewek R, Garber E, Stanclik S et al (2009) The FEF25-75 and its decline as a predictor of methacholine responsiveness in children. J Asthma 46:375–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferris BG (1978) Epidemiology standardization project (American Thoracic Society). Am Rev Respir Dis 118:1–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hansen JE, Sun XG, Wasserman K (2007) Spirometric criteria for airway obstruction: Use percentage of FEV1/FVC ratio below the fifth percentile, not < 70%. Chest 131:349–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Henderson JC, O’Connell F, Fuller RW (1993) Decrease of histamine induced bronchoconstriction by caffeine in mild asthma. Thorax 48:824–826PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holley AB, Cohee B, Walter RJ et al (2012) Eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation is superior to methacholine challenge testing for detecting airway hyperreactivity in nonathletes. J Asthma 49:614–619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Keens TG, Mansell A, Krastins IR et al (1979) Evaluation of the single-breath diffusing capacity in asthma and cystic fibrosis. Chest 76:41–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McGrath KW, Fahy JV (2011) Negative methacholine challenge tests in subjects who report physician-diagnosed asthma. Clin Exp Allergy 41:46–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. NAEPP (2007) National Asthma Education and Prevention Program TEPotDaMoA. Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar
  14. Russell NJ, Crichton NJ, Emerson PA et al (1986) Quantitative assessment of the value of spirometry. Thorax 41:360–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Scott S, Currie J, Albert P et al (2012) Risk of misdiagnosis, health-related quality of life, and BMI in patients who are overweight with doctor-diagnosed asthma. Chest 141:616–624PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Turner MO, Taylor D, Bennett R et al (1998) A randomized trial comparing peak expiratory flow and symptom self-management plans for patients with asthma attending a primary care clinic. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 157:540–546PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care MedicineUniversity of Texas Medical BranchGalvestonUSA

Personalised recommendations