Periorbital Fat Grafting: The 3D Lift

  • Mark BermanEmail author


The eyes are probably the most intimate aspect of anyone’s appearance. As cosmetic and plastic surgeons, we have mainly focused on the vertical dimensions of the upper eyelid and aspects of redundant fat or skin in the lower eyelid. By now, it should be apparent that there is an important three-dimensional element to the periorbital area—something that has largely been neglected until recently. Now, we understand the importance of not just lifting the tissues upward or removing “unwanted” fat, but rather of lifting the skin in a specific anterior direction away from the underlying skeleton and soft tissue structures it covers.


Hyaluronic Acid Entry Wound Frontalis Muscle Orbital Septum Periorbital Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material

Video 7.1

(M4V 181030 kb)


  1. 1.
    Berman M. The aging face: a different perspective on pathology and treatment. Am J Cosmetic Surg. 1998;15(2):167–72.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Millard DR, Yuan RTW, Devine JW. Challenge to the undefeated nasolabial folds. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;80(1):37–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Riefkohl R. The nasolabial fold lift. Ann Plast Surg. 1985;15(1):1–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yousif NJ, Gousain A, Matlojub HS, et al. The nasolabial fold: an anatomic and histologic reappraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93(1):60–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Robbins LB, Brothers DB, Marshall DM. Anterior SMAS plication for the treatment of prominent nasomandibular folds and restoration of normal cheek contour. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96(6): 1279–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Knize DM. An anatomically based study of the mechanism of eyebrow ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;97(7):1321–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De la Plaza R, de la Cruz L. A new concept in blepharoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1996;20:221–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    De la Plaza R, de la Cruz L. Can some facial rejuvenation techniques cause iatrogenia? Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1994;18:205–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gosain AK, Amarant MTJ, Hyde JS, Yousif NJ. A dynamic analysis of changes in the nasolabial fold using magnetic resonance imaging: implication for facial rejuvenation and facial animation surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98(4):622–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stuzin JM, Wagstrom L, Kawamoto HK, Baker TJ, Wolfe SA. The anatomy and clinical application of the buccal fat pad. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;85(1): 29–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paul MD. Subperiosteal transblepharoplasty forehead lift. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1996;20:129–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Freund RM, Nolan WB. Correlation between brow lift outcomes and aesthetic ideals for eyebrow height and shape in females. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;97(7):1343–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yoshimura K, Eto H, Harunosuke K, Kentaro D, Noriyuki A. In vivo manipulation of stem cells for adipose tissue repair/reconstruction. Regen Med. 2011;6(6 Suppl):33–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Coleman SR. Structural fat grafting. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical; 2004.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rohrich RJ, Sorokin ES, Brown SA. In search of improved fat transfer viability: a quantitative analysis of the role of centrifugation and harvest site. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(1):391–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facial Plastic SurgeryUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations