Filler Augmentation

  • Steven H. DayanEmail author
  • Tara E. Brennan
  • John P. Arkins


Soft tissue filler augmentation of the periorbital regions is a valuable tool in the plastic surgeon’s armamentarium. When performed correctly, periorbital rejuvenation pedestals the eyes and draws attention to this very expressive area and away from the lower third of the face that is most commonly associated with signs of aging. This chapter discusses the variety of fillers available, their advantages and disadvantages, proper technique, and how to recognize and avoid complications.


Hyaluronic Acid Retinal Artery Occlusion Dermal Filler Nasolabial Fold Filler Injection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material

Video 6.1

(WMV 46419 kb)


  1. 1.
    Hamel RF. Female subjective and pupillary reaction to nude male and female figures. J Psychol. 1974;87(2d Half):171–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aboyoun DCD, James M. The Hess pupil dilation findings: sex or novelty. Soc Behav Pers. 1998;26: 415–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Laeng B, Falkenberg L. Women’s pupillary responses to sexually significant others during the hormonal cycle. Horm Behav. 2007;52(4):520–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grammer K, Fink B, Moller AP, Thornhill R. Darwinian aesthetics: sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2003;78(3): 385–407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hickman L, Firestone AR, Beck FM, Speer S. Eye fixations when viewing faces. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141(1):40–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoehl S, Wiese L, Striano T. Young infants’ neural processing of objects is affected by eye gaze direction and emotional expression. PLoS One. 2008;3(6):e2389.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nguyen HT, Isaacowitz DM, Rubin PA. Age- and fatigue-related markers of human faces: an eye-tracking study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(2):355–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dayan SH, Arkins JP, Gal TJ. Blinded evaluation of the effects of hyaluronic acid filler injections on first impressions. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36 Suppl 3: 1866–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dayan SH, Lieberman ED, Thakkar NN, Larimer KA, Anstead A. Botulinum toxin a can positively impact first impression. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34 Suppl 1:S40–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dayan SH, Arkins JP, Vaswani D, Christopher K. An open-label, prospective study to assess altering self-esteem following calcium hydroxylapatite injections. Anglais. In Peer-review.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rzany B, Cartier H, Kestemont P, et al. Full-face rejuvenation using a range of hyaluronic acid fillers: efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction over 6 months. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(7 Pt 2):1153–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dayan SH, Arkins JP, Patel AB, Gal TJ. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled health-outcomes survey of the effect of botulinum toxin type A injections on quality of life and self-esteem. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36:2088–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Flint PW, Haughey BH, Lund VJ, Niparko JK, Richardson MA. Cummings otolaryngology: head & neck surgery review. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2010.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Czogala J, Goniewicz ML, Czubek A, Golabek K, Sobczak A. Effect of tobacco smoking on skin and mucosa appearance, ageing and pathological conditions. Przegl Lek. 2008;65(10):732–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Horoszkiewicz-Hassan M. Influence of natural active compounds on the skin in tobacco smokers. Przegl Lek. 2009;66(10):882–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jones D, Hill K. Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. Hum Nat. 1993;4(3):271–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dayan SH, Arkins JP. The subliminal difference: a new treatment philosophy. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012; 11(3):10–1.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tan K, Oh S-R, Priel A, Korn B, Kikkawa D. Surgical anatomy of the forehead, eyelids, and midface for the aesthetic surgeon. In: Massry GG, Murphy MR, Azizzadeh B, editors. Master techniques in blepharoplasty and periorbital rejuvenation. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rohrich RJ, Arbique GM, Wong C, Brown S, Pessa JE. The anatomy of suborbicularis fat: implications for periorbital rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(3):946–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2011 Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. ASPS National Clearinghouse of Plastic Surgery Procedural Statistics. 2012; Accessed April 19, 2012.
  21. 21.
    Buckingham ED, Bader B, Smith SP. Autologous fat and fillers in periocular rejuvenation. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2010;18(3):385–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yanoff M, Duker JS. Ophthalmology. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2008.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    The American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2010 Statistics from The American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2011; Accessed April 26, 2011.
  24. 24.
    Dayan SH, Arkins JP, Somenek M. Restylane persisting in lower eyelids for 5 years. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2012;11(3):237–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang F, Garza LA, Kang S, et al. In vivo stimulation of de novo collagen production caused by cross-linked hyaluronic acid dermal filler injections in photodamaged human skin. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(2):155–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Narins RS, Brandt FS, Dayan SH, Hornfeldt CS. Persistence of nasolabial fold correction with a hyaluronic acid dermal filler with retreatment: results of an 18-month extension study. Dermatol Surg. 2011;37(5):644–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Carruthers J, Cohen SR, Joseph JH, Narins RS, Rubin M. The science and art of dermal fillers for soft-tissue augmentation. J Drugs Dermatol. 2009;8(4):335–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kablik J, Monheit GD, Yu L, Chang G, Gershkovich J. Comparative physical properties of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35:302–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gold M. Aesthetic update: what’s new in fillers in 2010? J Clin Aesthetic Dermatol. 2010;3(8):36–45.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sundaram H, Voigts B, Beer K, Meland M. Comparison of the rheological properties of viscosity and elasticity in two categories of soft tissue fillers: calcium hydroxylapatite and hyaluronic acid. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36 Suppl 3:1859–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lemperle G, Morhenn V, Charrier U. Human histology and persistence of various injectable filler substances for soft tissue augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003;27(5):354–66; discussion 367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hamilton DG, Gauthier N, Robertson BF. Late-onset, recurrent facial nodules associated with injection of poly-l-lactic acid. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34(1):123–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mazzola RF, Cantarella G, Torretta S, Sbarbati A, Lazzari L, Pignataro L. Autologous fat injection to face and neck: from soft tissue augmentation to regenerative medicine. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2011;31(2):59–69.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dayan SH. What is beauty, and why do we care so much about it? Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2011;13(1):66–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schiller D, Freeman JB, Mitchell JP, Uleman JS, Phelps EA. A neural mechanism of first impressions. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12(4):508–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Willis J, Todorov A. First impressions: making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychol Sci. 2006;17(7):592–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bar M, Neta M, Linz H. Very first impressions. Emotion. 2006;6(2):269–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Winston JS, O’Doherty J, Kilner JM, Perrett DI, Dolan RJ. Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia. 2007;45(1):195–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Richetin J, Croizet J-C, Huguet P. Facial make-up elicits positive attitudes at the implicit level: evidence from the implicit association test. Curr Res Soc Psychol. 2004;9(11):145–65.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hickman L, Firestone AR, Beck FM, Speer S. Eye fixations when viewing faces. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141(1):40–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cunningham MR, Roberts AR, Barbee AP, Druen PB, Wu C-H. Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours: consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;68(2):261–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Grammer K, Fink B, Møller AP, Thornhill R. Darwinian aesthetics: sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2003;78(3): 385–407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Studer LH, Aylwin AS, Reddon JR. Testosterone, sexual offense recidivism, and treatment effect among adult male sex offenders. Sex Abuse. 2005;17(2): 171–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Dabbs JM, Jurkovic GJ, Frady RL. Salivary testosterone and cortisol among late adolescent male offenders. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1991;19(4):469–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Park SW, Woo SJ, Park KH, Huh JW, Jung C, Kwon OK. Iatrogenic retinal artery occlusion caused by cosmetic facial filler injections. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154(4):653–62. e651.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lazzeri D, Agostini T, Figus M, Nardi M, Pantaloni M, Lazzeri S. Blindness following cosmetic injections of the face. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(4):995–1012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven H. Dayan
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  • Tara E. Brennan
    • 3
  • John P. Arkins
    • 2
  1. 1.Chicago Center for Facial Plastic SurgeryChicagoUSA
  2. 2.DeNova ResearchChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  4. 4.School of New LearningDePaul UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations