MRI-Guided Biopsy

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

Most image-guided biopsies are performed under CT or ultrasound guidance. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has advantages over these imaging modalities in terms of lesion localization, multiplanar imaging capabilities, and real-time imaging without the radiation risk of computed tomography. The tradeoffs include limited availability of interventional MRI systems and MRI-compatible needles and devices. In addition, MRI-guided biopsies are currently more expensive. This chapter outlines the basic principles of MRI-guided biopsies.

Keywords

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging System Magnetic Resonance Imaging Unit Magnetic Resonance Imaging Control Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guidance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Weiss CR, Nour SG, Lewin JS. MR-guided biopsy: a review of current techniques and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27:311–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kuhl CK, Morakkabati N, Leutner CC, Schmiedel A, Wardelmann E, Schild HH. MR imaging–guided large-core (14-gauge) needle biopsy of small lesions visible at breast MR imaging alone. Radiology. 2001;220:31–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Perlet C, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, Sittek H, Casselman J, Anderson I, et al. Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions. Cancer. 2006;106:982–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Langen HJ, Kugel H, Landwehr P. MR-guided core biopsies using a closed 1.0 T imager. First clinical results. Eur J Radiol. 2002;41:19–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lewin JS, Petersilge CA, Hatem SF, Duerk JL, Lenz G, Clampitt ME, et al. Interactive MR imaging-guided biopsy and aspiration with a modified clinical C-arm system. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170:1593–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Silverman SG, Collick BD, Figueira MR, Khorasani R, Adams DF, Newman RW, et al. Interactive MR-guided biopsy in an open-configuration MR imaging system. Radiology. 1995;197:175–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mueller PR, Stark DD, Simeone JF, Saini S, Butch RJ, Edelman RR, et al. MR-guided aspiration biopsy: needle design and clinical trials. Radiology. 1986;161:605–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stattaus J, Maderwald S, Baba HA, Gerken G, Barkhausen J, Forsting M, et al. MR-guided liver biopsy within a short, wide-bore 1.5 Tesla MR system. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:2865–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Keeler EK, Casey FX, Engels H, Lauder E, Pirto CA, Reisker T, et al. Accessory equipment considerations with respect to MRI compatibility. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;8:12–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frahm C, Gehl HB, Melchert UH, Weiss HD. Visualization of magnetic resonance-compatible needles at 1.5 and 0.2 Tesla. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1996;19:335–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lewin JS, Duerk JL, Jain VR, Petersilge CA, Chao CP, Haaga JR. Needle localization in MR-guided biopsy and aspiration: effects of field strength, sequence design, and magnetic field orientation. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:1337–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lufkin R, Teresi L, Hanafee W. New needle for MR-guided aspiration cytology of the head and neck. Am J Roentgenol. 1987;149:380–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rofsky NM, Yang BM, Schlossberg P, Goldenberg A, Teperman LW, Weinreb JC. MR-guided needle aspiration biopsies of hepatic masses using a closed bore magnet. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998;22:633–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schmidt AJ, Kee ST, Sze DY, Daniel BL, Razavi MK, Semba CP, et al. Diagnostic yield of MR-guided liver biopsies compared with CT- and US-guided liver biopsies. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10:1323–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith KA, Carrino J. MRI-guided interventions of the musculoskeletal system. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27:339–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Adam G, Bucker A, Nolte-Ernsting C, Tacke J, Gunther RW. Interventional MR imaging: percutaneous abdominal and skeletal biopsies and drainages of the abdomen. Eur Radiol. 1999;9:1471–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zangos S, Eichler K, Wetter A, Lehnert T, Hammerstingl R, Diebold T, et al. MR-guided biopsies of lesions in the retroperitoneal space: technique and results. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:307–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Genant JW, Vandevenne JE, Bergman AG, Beaulieu CF, Kee ST, Norbash AM, et al. Interventional musculoskeletal procedures performed by using MR imaging guidance with a vertically open MR unit: assessment of techniques and applicability. Radiology. 2002;223:127–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ueno S, Yokoyama S, Hirakawa H, Yabe H, Suzuki Y, Atsumi H, et al. Use of real-time magnetic resonance guidance to assist bone biopsy in pediatric malignancy. Pediatrics. 2002;109:E18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lu DS, Lee H, Farahani K, Sinha S, Lufkin R. Biopsy of hepatic dome lesions: semi-real-time coronal MR guidance technique. Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:737–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hathout G, Lufkin RB, Jabour B, Andrews J, Castro D. MR-guided aspiration cytology in the head and neck at high field strength. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1992;2:93–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    He Y, Zhang Z, Tian Z, Zhang C, Zhu H. The application of magnetic resonance imaging-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of deep lesions in the head and neck. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:953–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lewin JS. Interventional MR, imaging: concepts, systems, and applications in neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20:735–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lewin JS, Nour SG, Duerk JL. Magnetic resonance image-guided biopsy and aspiration. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;11:173–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lawrentschuk N, Fleshner N. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in targeting prostate cancer in patients with previous negative biopsies and elevated prostate-specific antigen levels. BJU Int. 2009;103:730–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stattaus J, Maderwald S, Forsting M, Barkhausen J, Ladd ME. MR-guided core biopsy with MR fluoroscopy using a short, wide-bore 1.5-Tesla scanner: feasibility and initial results. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27:1181–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Interventional Radiology, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Imaging PhysicsThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations