Advertisement

A Simple Specification Procedure for the Transition Function in Persistent Nonlinear Time Series Models

  • Hendrik Kaufmann
  • Robinson Kruse
  • Philipp SibbertsenEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

A simple procedure for the specification of the transition function describing the regime switch in nonlinear autoregressive models is proposed. This procedure is based on auxiliary regressions of unit root tests and is applicable to a variety of transition functions. In contrast to other procedures, complicated and computer-intense estimation of the candidate models is not necessary. Our approach entirely relies on OLS estimation of auxiliary regressions instead. We use standard information criteria for the selection of the unknown transition function. Our Monte Carlo simulations reveal that the approach works well in practice. Empirical applications to the S&P500 price-earnings ratio and the US interest spread highlight the merits of our suggested procedure.

Keywords

Nonlinearity Smooth transition Threshold model Model selection Unit root 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Editors of the volume for their comments and suggestions and thankful to the participants of the 20th Symposium of the Society for Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics in Istanbul for discussions on an earlier draft. Financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (http://www.dfg.de/index.jspDFG) is gratefully acknowledged. Robinson Kruse gratefully acknowledges financial support from CREATES funded by the Danish National Research Foundation.

References

  1. Anderson, H. M. (1997): “Transaction Costs and non-linear Adjustment towards Equilibrium in the US Treasury Bill Market,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 59, 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balke, N. S. and T. B. Fomby (1997): “Threshold cointegration,” International Economic Review, 38, 627–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell, J. Y. and R. J. Shiller (1998): “Valuation Ratios and the Long-Run Stock Market Outlook,” The Journal of Portfolio Management, 24, 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caner, M. and B. E. Hansen (2001): “Threshold Autoregression with a Unit Root,” Econometrica, 69, 1555–1596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Choi, C.-Y. and Y.-K. Moh (2007): “How useful are tests for unit-root in distinguishing unit-root processes from stationary but non-linear processes?” Econometrics Journal, 10, 82–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haldrup, N., R. Kruse, T. Teräsvirta, and R. T. Varneskov (2013): “Unit roots, non-linearities and structural breaks,” in Handbook on Empirical Macroeconomics, ed. by N. Hashimzade and M. Thornton, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Handbook of Research Methods and Applications series, 61–94.Google Scholar
  7. Hansen, B. E. (1997): “Inference in TAR Models,” Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 2, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harvey, D. I. and S. J. Leybourne (2007): “Testing for time series linearity,” Econometrics Journal, 10, 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kapetanios, G., Y. Shin, and A. Snell (2003): “Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework,” Journal of Econometrics, 112, 359–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kilian, L. (1999): “Exchange rates and monetary fundamentals: what do we learn from long-horizon regressions?” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 14, 491–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kilian, L. and M. P. Taylor (2003): “Why is it so difficult to beat the random walk for exchange rates?” Journal of International Economics, 60, 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kiliç, R. (2004): “Linearity tests and stationarity,” Econometrics Journal, 7, 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim, H. and Y.-K. Moh (2010): “A century of purchasing power parity confirmed: The role of nonlinearity,” Journal of International Money and Finance, 29, 1398–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kruse, R. and R. Sandberg (2013): “Essays in Nonlinear Time Series Econometrics: A Festschrift for Timo Terasvirta”, edited by Mika Meitz, Pentti Saikkonen and Niels Haldrup, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lettau, M. and S. V. Nieuwerburgh (2008): “Reconciling the return predictability evidence,” Review of Financial Studies, 21, 1607–1652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lundbergh, S., T. Tersvirta, and D. van Dijk (2003): “Time-Varying Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 21, 104–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McMillan, D. G. (2007): “Bubbles in the dividend-price ratio? Evidence from an asymmetric exponential smooth-transition model,” Journal of Banking & Finance, 31, 787–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Norman, S. and K. L. Phillips (2009): “What is the Shape of Real Exchange Rate Nonlinearity?” Working Paper.Google Scholar
  19. Park, J. Y. and M. Shintani (2009): “Testing for a Unit Root against Transitional Autoregressive Models,” Working Paper.Google Scholar
  20. Pfann, G. A., P. C. Schotman, and R. Tschernig (1996): “Nonlinear interest rate dynamics and implications for the term structure,” Journal of Econometrics, 74, 149–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Psaradakis, Z., M. Sola, F. Spagnolo, and N. Spagnolo (2009): “Selecting Nonlinear Time Series Models using Information Criteria,” Journal of Time Series Analysis, 30, 369–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rapach, D. E. and M. E. Wohar (2005): “Valuation Ratios and long-horizon Stock Price Predictability,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 20, 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rapach, D. E. and M. E. Wohar (2006): “The out-of-sample forecasting performance on nonlinear models of real exchange rate behavior,” International Journal of Forecasting, 22, 341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rech, G., T. Teräsvirta, and R. Tschernig (2001): “A simple variable selection technique for nonlinear models,” Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 30, 1227–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sollis, R. (2009): “A simple unit root test against asymmetric STAR nonlinearity with an application to real exchange rates in Nordic countries,” Economic Modelling, 26, 118–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stock, J. H. and M. W. Watson (1988): “Testing for Common Trends,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1097–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Teräsvirta, T. (1994): “Specification, Estimation, and Evaluation of Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 208–218.Google Scholar
  28. Teräsvirta, T. (1994): “Estimation, and Evaluation of Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 208–218.Google Scholar
  29. Tong, H. (1990): Non-linear time series - A dynamical system approach, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Tong, H. (2011): “Threshold models in time series analysis–30 years on,” Statistics and its Interface, 4, 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. van Dijk, D., T. Teräsvirta, and P. H. Franses (2002): “Smooth transition autoregressive models – A survey of recent developments,” Econometric Reviews, 21, 1–47.Google Scholar
  32. Yoon, G. (2010): “Do real exchange rates really follow threshold autoregressive or exponential smooth transition autoregressive models?” Economic Modelling, 27, 605–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hendrik Kaufmann
    • 1
  • Robinson Kruse
    • 1
    • 2
  • Philipp Sibbertsen
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Economics and Management, Institute of StatisticsLeibniz University HannoverHannoverGermany
  2. 2.Department of Economics and Business, CREATESAarhus University, Business and Social SciencesAarhus VDenmark

Personalised recommendations