Business Value of IT in Healthcare

  • Peter Haddad
  • Mark Gregory
  • Nilmini Wickramasinghe
Part of the Healthcare Delivery in the Information Age book series (Healthcare Delivery Inform. Age)


With the rapid increase of healthcare expenditures and the parallel increase of doubts about the efficiency of current healthcare systems, due to increasing number of medical incidents and problems, decision- and policy-makers in healthcare industry have started looking for adopting new management practices and strategies to reduce costs and increase healthcare quality, in other words, maximizing the value and minimizing waste. Investing more on information technology has been one of these new strategies. At the same time, lean thinking and Lean Six Sigma promises have been appealing for healthcare, after achieving good results in different industries. However, due to its uniqueness, healthcare industry should have its own definition of “value” as it extends this concept beyond the operational level to cover sociotechnical aspects. Thus, the role that information technology can play to facilitate business value, and later value, in healthcare is discussed in this chapter. Also, lean and Lean Six Sigma in healthcare and their link to business value of IT are to be discussed, on a quest to draw a road map to better IT investments in healthcare to improve value generating in this industry.


Information technology Value Business value of IT Healthcare quality Lean thinking Lean Six Sigma 


  1. Al-Qirim, N. (2007). Championing telemedicine adoption and utilization healthcare organizations in New Zealand. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76, 42–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2.—McMillan. (2009). Two-tier health care. Retrieved November 20, 2011, from
  3. American Telemedicine Association. (2009). What is telemedicine? Available online on: Cited 23 June 2012.
  4. Australian Government – Department of Health and Ageing. (2010). Private health insurance. Cited 15 November 2011.
  5. Berghout, B. M., Eminovic, N., de Keizer, N. F., & Birnie, E. (2007). Evaluation of general practitioner’s time investment during a store-and-forward teledermatology consultation. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76, 384–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation? MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169–196.Google Scholar
  7. Biermann, E., Dietrich, W., Rihl, J., & Standl, E. (2002). Are there time and cost savings by using telemanagement for patients on intensified insulin therapy: A randomised, controlled trial. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 69, 137–146.Google Scholar
  8. Bruun, P., & Mefford, R. (2003). Lean production and the Internet. International Journal of Production Economics, 89, 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruun, P., & Mefford, R. (2004). Lean production and the Internet. International Journal of Production Economics, 89, 247–260. ISSN: 0925–5273.Google Scholar
  10. Bryujolfsson, E. (1993). The productivity paradox of information technology. Communications of the ACM, 36(12), 66–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. (1996). Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science, 42(4), 541–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brynjolfsson, E., & Yang, S. (1996). Information technology and productivity: A review of literature. Advances in Computers, 43, 179–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burke, D., & Menachemi, N. (2004). Opening the black box: Measuring hospital information technology capacity. Healthcare Management Review, 29(3), 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chae, W., et al. (2001). Patient satisfaction with telemedicine in home health services for the elderly. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 61(2–3), 167–173. ISSN: 1386-5056.Google Scholar
  15. Chandler, A., Jr. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American Industrial Enterprise. MIT.Google Scholar
  16. Chen, I. J., Yang, K. F., & Tang, F. I. (2008). Applying the technology acceptance model to explore public health nurses’ intentions towards web-based learning: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45, 869–878.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cheng, C. Y., & Chang, P. Y. (2012). Implantation of the Lean Six Sigma framework in non-profit organisations: A case study. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 23(3–4), 431–447.Google Scholar
  18. Collis, D. J., & Rukstad, M. G. (2008). Can you say what your strategy is? Harvard Business Review, 86(4), 82–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Das, S., Yaylacicegi, U., & Menon, N. M. (2010). The effect of information technology investments in healthcare: A longitudinal study of its lag, duration, and economic value. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58(1), 124–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Treville, S., & Antonakis, J. (2006). Could lean production job design be intrinsically motivating? Contextual, configurational and levels-of-analysis issues. Journal of Operations Management, 24, 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dehning, B., & Richardson, V. J. (2002). Returns on investments in information technology: A research synthesis? Journal of Information Systems Management, 16(1), 7–30.Google Scholar
  22. Devaraj, S., & Kohli, R. (2003). Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link. Management Science, 49(3), 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Devaraj, S., & Kohli, R. (2003). Information technology payoff in the healthcare industry: A longitudinal study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(4), 41–67.Google Scholar
  24. DeVol, R., Bedroussian, A., Charuworn, A., Chatterjee, A., Kim, I., Kim, S., et al. (2007). An unhealthy America: The economic burden of chronic disease. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Fuchs, V. R. (1996). Economics, values, and health care reform. American Economic Review, 86(1), 1–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gagnona, M. P., Godinb, G., Gagnéb, C., Fortina, J. P., Lamothec, L., Reinharza, D., et al. (2003). An adaptation of the theory of interpersonal behaviour to the study of telemedicine adoption by physicians. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 71, 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. George, M. L. (2003). Lean Six Sigma for services. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  28. Glaser, J. P., & Salzberg, C. (2011). The strategic application of information technology in healthcare organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Greener, I. (2009). Healthcare in the UK: Understanding continuity and change. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hammer, M. (2001). The superefficient company. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 82–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Henderson J., & Venkatraman N. (1993). Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1).Google Scholar
  32. Hines, P., Holweg, M., & Rich, N. (2004). Learning to evolve: A review of contemporary lean thinking. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(10), 994–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hitt, L., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1997). Information technology and internal firm organization: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(2), 81–101.Google Scholar
  34. Institute of Medicine. (2005). Building a better delivery system: A new engineering/health care partnership. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  35. Institute of Medicine—Committee on Quality of Healthcare in America. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  36. Jones, D., & Mitchell, A. (2006). Lean thinking for the NHS. London: NHS Confederation.Google Scholar
  37. Joosten, T., Bongers, I., & Janssen, R. (2009). Application of lean thinking to healthcare: Issues and observations. International Journal for Quality in Healthcare, 21(5), 341–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Katz-Navon, T., Naveh, E., & Stern, Z. (2007). The moderate success of quality of care improvement efforts: Three observations on the situation. International Journal for Quality in Healthcare, 19, 4–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kettelhut, M. C. (1992). Strategic requirements for IS in the turbulent healthcare environment. Journal of Systems Management, 43(6), 6–9.Google Scholar
  40. Kling, R. (1980). Social analysis of computing: Theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research. Computing Surveys, 12(1), 61–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Koning, H. D., Verver, J. P. S., van den Heuvel, J., Bisgaard, S., & Does, R. J. M. M. (2006). Lean Six Sigma in healthcare. Journal for Healthcare Quality, 28(2), 4–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kostova, A., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kriebel, C., & Kauffman, R. (1988). Measuring and modeling the business value of information technologies. Washington, DC: ICIT Press.Google Scholar
  44. Lawrence (2005). National Academy of Engineering (US) and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Engineering and the Health Care System; Reid PP, Compton WD, Grossman JH, et al., editors. Building a Better Delivery System: A New Engineering/Health Care Partnership. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2005. Bridging the Quality Chasm. Available from:
  45. Markus, M. L., & Robey, D. (1987). Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34(5), 583–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurmaxani, V. (2004). Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 283–322.Google Scholar
  47. Memon, N. M., Lee, B., & Eldenburg, L. (2000). Productivity of information technology in the healthcare delivery. Information Systems Research, 11(1), 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mukhopadhyay, T., Kekre, S., & Kalathur, S. (1995). Business value of information technology: A study of electronic data interchange. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. OECD. (2010b). OECD health data 2010. Cited 27 September 2011.
  50. OECD. (2010c). OECD-Gesundheitsdaten 2010: Deutschland im Vergleich. Cited and translated into English 3 October 2011.
  51. Osono, E., Shimizu, N., Takeuchi, H., et al. (2008). Extreme Toyota: Radical contradictions that drive success at the world’s best manufacturer. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  52. Picker Institute. (2000). Eye on patients: A report by the Picker Institute for the American Hospital Association. Boston, MA: Picker Institute.Google Scholar
  53. Piszczalski, M. (2000). Lean vs. information systems. Automotive Manufacturing & Production, 112(8), 26–28.Google Scholar
  54. Porter, M., & Teisberg, E. (2006). Redefining health care: Creating value-based competition on results. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  55. Reid, P. P., & Compton, W. D. (2010). Handbook of healthcare delivery system, Chapter 2. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  56. Ross, J. W., Beath, C. M., and Goodhue, D. L. (1996). Develop long-term competitiveness through IT assets? Sloan Management Review, 38(1), 31–42.Google Scholar
  57. Rouse, W. B. (2009). Engineering perspectives on healthcare delivery: Can we afford technological innovation in healthcare? Journal of Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 26(2009), 1–10.Google Scholar
  58. Rouse, W. B., & Cortese, D. A. (2010). Engineering the system on healthcare delivery. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  59. Saaty, T. L. (1996). The analytic hierarchy process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.Google Scholar
  60. Saaty, T. L. (1997). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Savary, L., & Crawford-Mason, C. (2006). The Nun and the Bureaucrat: How they found an unlikely cure for America’s Sick Hospitals. Washington, DC: CC-M Productions.Google Scholar
  62. Soh, C., and Markus, M.L. (1995). How IT creates business value: A process theory synthesis. Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 29–41). Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  63. The Commonwealth Fund. (2010). International profiles of health care systems. Cited 3 April 2012.
  64. Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 22–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. van den Brink, J. L., Moorman, P. W., de Boer, M. F., Pruyn, J. F. A., Verwoerd, C. D. A., & van Bemmel, J. H. (2005). Involving the patient: A prospective study on use, appreciation and effectiveness of an information system in head and neck cancer care. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 74, 839–849.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Weill, P. (1992). The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: A study of valve manufacturing sector. Information Systems Research, 3(4), 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Weill, P., & Broadbent, M. (1998). Levering the new infrastructure: How market leaders capitalize on information technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  68. Womack, J., & Jones, D. T. (1996). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth for your corporation. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  69. Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (2003). Lean thinking (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  70. Young, T., & McClean, S. (2008). A critical look at lean thinking in healthcare. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 17, 382–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Haddad
    • 1
  • Mark Gregory
    • 2
  • Nilmini Wickramasinghe
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Business IT and LogisticsRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.School of Electrical and Computer EngineeringRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Epworth HealthCare & Department of BITL & HIRiRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations