Advertisement

Receiver Techniques

  • Robert Bains
  • Ralf MüllerEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores a concept for deploying parasitic elements at the receiver site to achieve a multiplexing gain in MIMO systems. The concept is based on a virtually fast rotating directional receiver antenna, which rotates once or several times per symbol interval. The antenna rotation is obtained by using a single active antenna element and multiple parasitic elements. The antenna rotation results in the same spatial multiplexing, which is also obtained by conventional MIMO receivers with multiple active elements.It is shown that the rotating receiver antenna provides a much higher capacity than a single receiver antenna. It is also shown that the virtual rotation idea can suffer from problems due to adjacent channel interference.

Keywords

Mutual Information Additive White Gaussian Noise Fourier Component Antenna Element Mutual Coupling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    R. Ngamjanyaporn, A. Krairikshi, Switched-beam single patch antenna. Electron. Lett. 38(1), 7–8 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Wennstrom, T. Svantesson, An antenna solution for MIMO channels: using a switched parasitic antenna, in Proceedings of IEEE PIMRC’01, vol. 1, Sept 2001, pp. 159–163Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.R. Müller, R. Bains, J.A. Aas, A compact MIMO receiver antenna, in In Proceedings of 43rd Annual Allerton Conference on Communications, Control and Computing, Monticello, IL, Sept 2005Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.D. Migliore, D. Pinchera, F. Schettino, Improving channel capacity using adaptive MIMO antennas. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 54(11), 3481–3488 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    L.M. Correia, Wireless Flexible Personalised Communications (Wiley, New York, 2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Vaughan, Switched parasitic elements for antenna diversity. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 47(2), 399–405 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Gyoda, T. Ohira, Design of electronically steerable passive array radiator (ESPAR) antennas, in Proceedings of IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, vol. 2, Jul 2000, pp. 922–925Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. Schaer, K. Rambabu, J. Borneman, R. Vahldieck, Design of reactive parasitic elements in electronic beam steering arrays. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 53(6), 1998–2003 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N.L. Scott, M.O. Leonard-Taylor, R.G. Vaughan, Diversity gain from a single-port adaptive antenna using switched parasitic elements illustrated with a wire and monopole prototype. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 47(6), 1066–1070 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y. Nakane, T. Noguchi, Y. Kuwahara, Trial model of adaptive antenna equipped with switched loads on parasitic elements. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 53(10), 3398–3402 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    B.M. Kolundz̆, J.S. Ognjanoveć, T.K. Sarkar, WIPL-D Electromagnetic Modeling of Composite Metallic and Dielectric Structures (Artech House, Boston, 2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    C.A. Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, 2nd edn. (Wiley, New York, 1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R.F. Harrington, Reactively controlled directive arrays. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 26(3), 390–395 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Kirkpatrick, C.D. Gelatt, M.P. Vecchi, Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220, 671–680 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D.V. Thiel, S. Smith, Switched Parasitic Antennas for Cellular Communications (Artech House, Boston, 2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Orfanidis, Electromagnetic waves and antennas (2004), http://www.ece.rutgers.edu/~orfanidi/ewa
  17. 17.
    R.C. Hansen, Fundamental limits in antennas. Proc. IEEE 69(2), 170–182 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R.R. Müller, A random matrix model for communication via antenna arrays. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 48(9), 2495–2506 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    T.M. Cover, J.A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory (Wiley, New York, 1991)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J.W. Wallace, M.A. Jensen, Termination-dependent diversity performance of coupled antennas: network theory analysis. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 52(3), 1317–1325 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    M.J. Gans, Channel capacity between antenna arrays - part I: sky noise dominates. IEEE Trans. Commun. 54(9), 1586–1592 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    N.W. Bikhazi, M.A. Jensen, The relationship between antenna loss and superdirectivity in MIMO systems. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 6(5), 1796–1802 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SINTEFTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), FAU Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations