Narrow Escape in \({\mathbb{R}}^{3}\)

  • Zeev Schuss
Chapter
Part of the Applied Mathematical Sciences book series (AMS, volume 186)

Abstract

The NET problem in three dimensions is more complicated than that in two dimension, primarily because the singularity of Neumann’s function for a regular domain is more complicated than (7.1).

Keywords

Brownian Particle Escape Time Regular Domain Spine Head Brownian Dynamic Simulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Alberts, B., D. Bray, J. Lewis, M. Raff, K. Roberts, and J.D. Watson (1994), Molecular Biology of the Cell, Garland, NY.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, G.E., R. Askey, and R. Roy (2001), Special Functions, Cambridge University Press, NY.Google Scholar
  3. Arrieta, J.M. (1995), “Rates of eigenvalues on a dumbbell domain. Simple eigenvalue case,” Trans. AMS, 347 (9), 3503–3531.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bénichou, O. and R. Voituriez (2008), “Narrow-escape time problem: Time needed for a particle to exit a confining domain through a small window,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 100, 168105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheviakov, A., M.J. Ward, and R. Straube (2010), “An asymptotic analysis of the mean first passage time for narrow escape problems: Part II: The sphere,” SIAM Multiscale Modeling and Simulation, 8 (3), 836–870.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins, W.D. (1961a), “Note on an electrified circular disk situated inside an earthed coaxial infinite hollow cylinder,” Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 57, 623–627.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collins, W.D. (1961b), “On some dual series equations and their application to electrostatic problems for spheroidal caps,” Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 57, 367–384.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corry, B., M. Hoyle, T.W. Allen, M. Walker, S. Kuyucak, and S.H. Chung (2002), “Reservoir boundaries in Brownian dynamics simulations of ion channels,” Biophys. J. 82 (5), 1975–1984.Google Scholar
  9. Courant, R. and D. Hilbert (1989), Methods of Mathematical Physics, Wiley-Interscience, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dagdug, L., A.M. Berezhkovskii, S.Y. Shvartsman, and G.H. Weiss (2003), “Equilibration in two chambers connected by a capillary,” J. Chem. Phys., 119 (23), 12473–12478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dauge, M.R. (1988), Elliptic Boundary Value Problems on Corner Domains: Smoothness and Asymptotics of Solutions, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1341. Springer-Verlag, NY.Google Scholar
  12. Dembo, A. and O. Zeitouni (1993), Large Deviations Techniques and Applications, Jones and Bartlett.Google Scholar
  13. Fabrikant, V.I. (1989), Applications of Potential Theory in Mechanics, Kluwer, Dordrecht.MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Fabrikant, V.I. (1991), Mixed Boundary Value Problems of Potential Theory and Their Applications in Engineering, Kluwer, Dordrecht.MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Freidlin, M. (2002), Markov processes and Differential Equations, Birkhäuser Boston.Google Scholar
  16. Garabedian, P.R. (1964), Partial Differential Equations, Wiley, NY.Google Scholar
  17. Grigoriev, I.V., Y.A. Makhnovskii, A.M. Berezhkovskii, and V.Y. Zitserman (2002), “Kinetics of escape through a small hole,” J. Chem. Phys., 116, (22), 9574–9577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hänggi, P., P. Talkner, and M. Borkovec (1990), “50 years after Kramers,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 62, 251–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holcman, D. and Z. Schuss (2004), “Escape through a small opening: receptor trafficking in a synaptic membrane,” J. Stat. Phys., 117 (5/6), 191–230.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. Holcman, D. and Z. Schuss (2005), “Stochastic chemical reactions in microdomains,” J. Chem. Phys., 122, 114710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holcman, D. and Z. Schuss (2011), “Diffusion laws in dendritic spines,” The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, 1, 10.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holcman, D., N. Hoze, Z. Schuss (2011), “Narrow escape through a funnel and effective diffusion on a crowded membrane,” Phys. Rev. E, 84, 021906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Im, W. and B. Roux (2002a), “Ion permeation and selectivity of OMPF porin: a theoretical study based on molecular dynamics, Brownian dynamics, and continuum electrodiffusion theory,” J. Mol. Bio., 322 (4), 851–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Im, W. and B. Roux (2002b), “Ions and counterions in a biological channel: a molecular dynamics simulation of OMPF porin from Escherichia coli in an explicit membrane with 1 m KCl aqueous salt solution,” J. Mol. Bio., 319 (5), 1177–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jackson, J.D. (1975), Classical Electrodymnics, 2nd Ed., Wiley, NY.Google Scholar
  26. Jimbo, S. and S. Kosugi (2009), “Spectra of domains with partial degeneration,” J. Math. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, 16, pp. 269–414.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Kellog, O.D. (1954), Foundations of Potential Theory, Dover Publications, NY.Google Scholar
  28. Kelman, R.B. (1965), “Steady-state diffusion through a finite pore into an infinite reservoir: an exact solution,” Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 27, 57–65.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kolmogorov, A.N., E.F. Mishchenko, and L.S. Pontryagin (1962), “On one probability optimal control problems,” Dokl. Acad. Nauk SSSR, 14 (5), 993–995.Google Scholar
  30. Korkotian, E., D. Holcman and M. Segal (2004), “Dynamic regulation of spine-dendrite coupling in cultured hippocampal neurons,” Euro. J. of Neuroscience, 20 (10), 2649–2663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kozlov, V.A., J. Rossmann, and V.G. Mazya (2001), Spectral Problems Associated with Corner Singularities of Solutions of Elliptic Equations, volume 85. American Mathematical Society, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs.Google Scholar
  32. Kozlov, V.A., V.G. Mazya, and J. Rossmann (1997), Elliptic Boundary Value Problems in Domains with Point Singularities, volume 52. American Mathematical Society, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 2nd edition.Google Scholar
  33. Lurie, A.I. (1964), Three-Dimensional Problems of the Theory of Elasticity, Interscience Publishers, NY.Google Scholar
  34. Malenka, R.C., J.A. Kauer, D.J. Perkel, and R.A. Nicoll (1989), “The impact of postsynaptic calcium on synaptic transmission—its role in long-term potentiation,” Trends Neurosci., 12 (11), 444–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Matkowsky, B.J. and Z. Schuss (1977), “The exit problem for randomly perturbed dynamical systems,” SIAM J. Appl. Math., 33, 365–382.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matkowsky, B.J. and Z. Schuss (1981), “Eigenvalues of the Fokker-Planck operator and the approach to equilibrium in potential fields,” SIAM J. Appl. Math., 40, 242–252.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Matkowsky, B.J., Z. Schuss, and C. Tier (1984), “Uniform expansion of the transition rate in Kramers’ problem.” J. Stat. Phys., 35 (3,4), 443–456.Google Scholar
  38. Pinsky, R.G. (2003), “Asymptotics of the principal eigenvalue and expected hitting time for positive recurrent elliptic operators in a domain with a small puncture,” Journal of Functional Analysis, 200, (1), 177–197.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pontryagin, L.S., V.G. Boltyanskii, R.V. Gamkrelidze, and E.F. Mishchenko (1962), The Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes, John Wiley, NY.MATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Popov, I.Yu. (1992), “Extension theory and localization of resonances for domains of trap type,” Math. USSR Sbornik, 71 (1), 209–234.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rayleigh, J.W.S. (1945), The Theory of Sound, volume 2. Dover, NY, 2nd edition.Google Scholar
  42. Schuss, Z., A. Singer, and D. Holcman (2007), “The narrow escape problem for diffusion in cellular microdomains,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 16098–16103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schuss, Z. (2010b), Theory and Applications of Stochastic Processes, and Analytical Approach, Springer series on Applied Mathematical Sciences 170, NY.Google Scholar
  44. Silbergleit, A., I. Mandel, I. Nemenman (2003), “Potential and field singularity at a surface point charge,” J. Math. Phys., 44 (10), 4460–4466.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Singer, A., Z. Schuss, and D. Holcman (2006c), “Narrow escape, Part III: Non-smooth domains and Riemann surfaces,” J. Stat. Phys., 122 (3), 491–509.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sneddon, I.N. (1966), Mixed Boundary Value Problems in Potential Theory, Wiley, NY.MATHGoogle Scholar
  47. Toresson, H. and S.G.N. Grant (2005), “Dynamic distribution of endoplasmic reticulum in hippocampal neuron dendritic spines,” European Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 1793–1798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. van der Straaten, T.A., J. Tang, R.S. Eisenberg, U. Ravaioli, and N.R. Aluru (2002), “Three-dimensional continuum simulations of ion transport through biological ion channels: effects of charge distribution in the constriction region of porin,” J. Computational Electronics, 1, 335–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vinogradov, S.S., P.D. Smith, and E.D. Vinogradova (2002), Canonical Problems in Scattering and Potential Theory, Parts I and II, Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
  50. Helmholtz, H.L.F. von (1860), “Theorie der Luftschwingungen in Röhren mit offenen Enden”, Crelle Bn., 57, 1–72.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ward, M.J. and D. Stafford (1999), “Metastable dynamics and spatially inhomogeneous equilibria in dumbell-shaped domains,” Stud. Appl. Math., 103 (1), 51–73.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ward, M.J. and J.B. Keller (1993), “Strong localized perturbations of eigenvalue problems,” SIAM J. Appl. Math., 53, 770–798.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weber, H. (1873), “Über die Besselschen functionen und ihre anwendung auf die theorie der elektrischen ströme,” Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 75, 75–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wigger-Aboud, S., M. Saraniti, and R.S. Eisenberg (2003), “Self-consistent particle based simulations of three dimensional ionic solutions,” Nanotech, 3, 443.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Author 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zeev Schuss
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mathematical SciencesTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations