Work as a Service

  • Daniel V. Oppenheim
  • Lav R. Varshney
  • Yi-Min Chee
Chapter

Abstract

Improving work within and among enterprises is of pressing importance. In this chapter we take a services-oriented view of both the doing and the coordinating of work by treating work as a service. We discuss how large work engagements can be decomposed into a set of smaller interconnected service requests and conversely how they can be built up. Encapsulation of work into a service request enables its assignment to any qualified work organization. As such, the encapsulation naturally lends itself to ongoing optimization of the overall engagement. A service request contains two distinct parts: coordination information for coordinating work and payload information for doing work. Coordination information deals with business concerns such as risk, cost, schedule, and value co-creation. Contrarily, payload information defines the deliverables and provides what is needed to do the work, such as designs or use-cases. This general two-part decomposition leads to a paradigm of work as a two-way information flow between service systems, rather than as a business process to be implemented. Treating work as information flow allows us to leverage extant web services technology using mainstream service-oriented architectures (SOA). Milestone structures may be used to formalize coordination and establish measurable outcomes. Benefits from the work-as-a-service approach include agility, visibility, responsiveness, and ongoing optimization.

References

  1. 1.
    Auerswald, P., Kauffman, S., Lobo, J., Shell, K.: The production recipes approach to modeling technological innovation: An application to learning by doing. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 24(3), 389–450 (Mar 2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bacon, D.F., Bokelberg, E., Chen, Y., Kash, I.A., Parkes, D.C., Rao, M., Sridharan, M.: Software economies. In: Proceedings of the FSE/SDP Workshop on Future of Software Engineering Research (FoSER 2010). pp. 7–12 (Nov 2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bagheri, S., Oppenheim, D.V.: Optimizing cross enterprise collaboration using a coordination hub. In: Proceedings of the SRII Global Conference 2011. pp. 565–571 (Mar 2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Becker, G.S., Murphy, K.M.: The division of labor, coordination costs, and knowledge. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107(4), 1137–1160 (Nov 1992)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benkler, Y.: The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bollier, D.: The Future of Work: What It Means for Individuals, Businesses, Markets and Governments. The Aspen Institute, Washington, DC (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cantor, D.G., Gerla, M.: Optimal routing in a packet-switched computer network. IEEE Transactions on Computers C-23(10), 1062–1069 (Oct 1974)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chaar, J.K., Hamid, A.A., Harishankar, R., Huchel, J.P., Jobson, Jr., T.A., Oppenheim, D.V., Ratakonda, K.: Work packet delegation in a software factory (Feb 2010) This is United States Patent Application Publication 2010/0031226Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cover, T.M., Thomas, J.A.: Elements of Information Theory. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dixit, A.: Incentives and organizations in the public sector: An interpretative review. The Journal of Human Resources 37(4), 696–727 (Autumn 2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dorn, C., Taylor, R.N., Dustdar, S.: Flexible social workflows: Collaborations as human architecture. IEEE Internet Computing 16(2), 72–77 (March-April 2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ehret, M., Wirtz, J.: Division of labor between firms: Business services, non-ownership-value and the rise of the service economy. Service Science 2(3), 136–145 (Fall 2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goldratt, E.M.: Critical Chain. North River Press (1997)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gumm, D.C.: Distribution dimensions in software development projects: A taxonomy. IEEE Software 23(5), 45–51 (September-October 2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hull, R., Damaggio, E., Fournier, F., Gupta, M., III, Fenno, T.H., Hobson, S., Linehan, M., Maradugu, S., Nigam, A., Sukaviriya, P., Vaculin, R.: Introducing the guard-stage-milestone approach for specifying business entity lifecycles. In: Bravetti, M., Bultan, T. (eds.) Web Services and Formal Methods, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6551, pp. 1–24. Springer, Berlin (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    IBM Global Business Services: Application assembly optimization: A new approach to global delivery (Aug 2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    IBM Global Business Services: Application assembly optimization: A distinct approach to global delivery (Mar 2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Limonad, L., Varshney, L.R., Oppenheim, D.V., Fein, E., Soffer, P., Wand, Y., Gavish, M., Anaby-Tavor, A.: The WaaSaBE model: Marrying WaaS and business-entities to support cross-organization collaboration. In: Proceedings of the SRII Global Conference 2012. pp. 303–312 (Jul 2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Malone, T.W.: The Future of Work. Harvard Business School Press (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Malone, T.W., Laubacher, R.J., Johns, T.: The age of hyperspecialization. Harvard Business Review 89(7/8), 56–65 (July-August 2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mehandjiev, N., Grefen, P.: Dynamic Business Process Formation for Instant Virtual Enterprises. Springer, London (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mintzberg, H.: Mintzberg on Management. Free Press, New York (1989)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Norta, A.H.: Exploring Dynamic Inter-Organizational Business Process Collaboration. Ph.D. thesis, TU-Eindhoven (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Oppenheim, D., Bagheri, S., Ratakonda, K., Chee, Y.M.: Coordinating distributed operations. In: Maximilien, E.M., Rossi, G., Yuan, S.T., Ludwig, H., Fantinato, M. (eds.) Service-Oriented Computing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6568, pp. 213–224. Springer, Berlin (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Oppenheim, D.V., Bagheri, S., Ratakonda, K., Chee, Y.M.: Agility of enterprise operations across distributed organizations: A model of cross enterprise collaboration. In: Proceedings of the SRII Global Conference 2011. pp. 154–162 (Mar 2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Oppenheim, D.V., Chee, Y.M., Varshney, L.R.: Allegro: A metrics framework for globally distributed service delivery. In: Proceedings of the SRII Global Conference 2012. pp. 461–469 (Jul 2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Palmisano, S.J.: The globally integrated enterprise. Foreign Affairs 85(3), 127–136 (May-June 2006)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tang, C.S.: Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications 9(1), 33–45 (Mar 2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tapscott, D., Williams, A.D.: Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. Portfolio Penguin, New York, expanded edn. (2006)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tiwana, A.: Does technological modularity substitute for control? A study of alliance performance in software outsourcing. Strategic Management Journal 29(7), 769–780 (Jul 2008)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ullman, J.D.: NP-complete scheduling problems. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 10(3), 384–393 (Jun 1975)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vaculin, R., Chee, Y.M., Oppenheim, D.V., Varshney, L.R.: Work as a service meta-model and protocol for adjustable visibility, coordination, and control. In: Proceedings of the SRII Global Conference 2012. pp. 90–99 (Jul 2012)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing 68(1), 1–17 (Jan 2004)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vargo, S.L., Maglio, P.P., Akaka, M.A.: On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal 26(3), 145–152 (Jun 2008)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Varshney, L.R., Oppenheim, D.V.: Coordinating global service delivery in the presence of uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Research Symposium on Service Excellence in Management (QUIS12). pp. 1004–1014 (Jun 2011)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Varshney, L.R., Oppenheim, D.V.: On cross-enterprise collaboration. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F., Wolf, K. (eds.) Business Process Management, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6896, pp. 29–37. Springer, Berlin (2011)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vergidis, K., Tiwari, A., Majeed, B.: Business process analysis and optimization: Beyond reengineering. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics–Part C: Applications and Reviews 38(1), 69–82 (Jan 2008)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Willems, J.C.: The behavioral approach to open and interconnected systems. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 27(6), 46–99 (Dec 2007)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wiredu, G.O.: A framework for the analysis of coordination in global software development. In: Proceedings of the 2006 International Workshop on Global Software Development for, the Practitioner. pp. 38–44 (May 2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel V. Oppenheim
    • 1
  • Lav R. Varshney
    • 1
  • Yi-Min Chee
    • 1
  1. 1.IBM Thomas J. Watson Research CenterYorktown HeightsUSA

Personalised recommendations