Advertisement

New Directions in Gender Role Conflict Research

  • Cormac Ó. BeaglaoichEmail author
  • Kiran M. Sarma
  • Todd G. Morrison
Chapter
Part of the International and Cultural Psychology book series (ICUP, volume 4)

Abstract

Gender role conflict theory has made a significant contribution to the area of men’s health (O’Neil 2008). However, despite its popularity, numerous criticisms have been directed against the GRCS – both theoretical and psychometric. For example, items have been critiqued for not directly measuring conflict “as it is generally understood (i.e., the result of two competing response tendencies)” (Betz & Fitzgerald. Annual Review of Psychology, 4(1), 360, 1993). Recently, an attempt was made to develop an adolescent version of the GRCS (Blazina et al. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 6(1), 39–45, 2005). None of the psychometric concerns that had been raised about this scale were addressed and only nominal changes were made to item content (e.g., “When I am sexually involved with others, I do not express my strong feelings” was modified to “When I am personally involved with others, I do not express my strong feelings”). A vital omission was that, in the development of this scale, adolescents did not inform item generation, and no contact was made with adolescents to see if they considered factors, traditionally used with men, to possess personal relevance (i.e., there is no reference to face or content validity). A psychometrically sound measure which targets adolescent boys should be “grounded in and relevant to [their] experiences” (Chu et al. Men and Masculinities, 8(1), 99, 2005) as there may be factors used in adult scales that are not salient to younger individuals. Conversely, there may be latent factors left unexplored or unrealized when researchers do not involve adolescents in the formulation of scale items. This chapter outlines critiques of gender role conflict theory and of the psychometric properties of the adult and adolescent versions of the GRCS. Advancements in psychometric theory and in masculinity research have occurred since the GRCS was created in 1986. Thus, the chapter argues that this measure needs to be updated. Using data obtained from focus groups and personal interviews of adolescent males residing in the Republic of Ireland, the authors contend that modifications to GRC, as it pertains to adolescents, are required. Such modifications will ensure that resultant measures are culturally nuanced and cohort specific. It is anticipated that this chapter will make an important advance in social scientists’ understanding of gender role conflict theory as adolescents experience it.

Keywords

Focus Group Gender Role Individual Interview Situational Context Hegemonic Masculinity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 78–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger, J. M., Levant, R. F., McMillan, K. K., Kelleher, W., & Sellers, A. (2005). Impact of gender role conflict, traditional masculinity ideology, alexithymia, and age on men’s attitudes toward psychological help seeking. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 6, 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Betz, N. E., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1993). Individuality and diversity: Theory and research in counseling psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 4(1), 343–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blazina, C., Pisecco, S., & O’Neil, J. M. (2005). An adaption of the gender role conflict scale for adolescents: Psychometric issues and correlates with psychological distress. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 6(1), 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blazina, C., Cordova, M. A., Pisecco, S., & Settle, A. G. (2007). Gender role conflict scale for adolescents: Correlates with masculinity ideology. Thymos Journal of Boyhood Studies, 1(2), 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brannon, R., & Juni, S. (1984). A scale for measuring attitudes toward masculinity. Psychological Documents, 14(6), 12–20.Google Scholar
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, J. L., & Snow, B. M. (1992). Gender role conflict and family environment as predictors of men’s marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 6(1), 84–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Choi, H., Kim, J., Hwang, M., & Heppner, M. (2010). Self-esteem as a mediator between instrumentality, gender role conflict and depression in male Korean high school students. Sex Roles, 63(5–6), 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chu, J. Y., Porche, M. V., & Tolman, D. L. (2005). The adolescent masculinity ideology in relationships scale: Development and validation of a new measure for boys. Men and Masculinities, 8(1), 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Connell, R. W. (2005). Growing up masculine: Rethinking the significance of adolescence in the making of masculinities. Irish Journal of Sociology, 14(2), 11–28.Google Scholar
  12. Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society, 19(6), 829–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Conners, C. K., & Wells, K. C. (1997). Conners–Wells’ Adolescent Self-Report Scales (CASS). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  14. Cournoyer, R. J., & Mahalik, J. R. (1995). Cross-sectional study of gender role conflict examining college-aged and middle-aged men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42(1), 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dolnicar, S., & Rossiter, J. R. (2009). Not offering don’t know options in brand image surveys contaminates data. In Australia and New Zealand Marketing Academy (ANZMAC) Conference (pp. 1–7). Melbourne: Australian & New Zealand Marketing Academy.Google Scholar
  16. Eisler, R. M., & Skidmore, J. R. (1987). Masculine gender role stress: Scale development and component factors in the appraisal of stressful situations. Behavior Modification, 1, 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fischer, A. R., & Good, G. E. (1997). Men and psychotherapy: An investigation of alexithymia, intimacy, and masculine gender roles. Psychotherapy, 34, 160–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Galligan, S. B., Barnett, R. V., Brennan, M. A., & Israel, G. D. (2010). The effects of gender role conflict on adolescent and emerging adult male resiliency. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 18(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Good, G. E., Borst, T. S., & Wallace, D. L. (1994). Masculinity research: A review and critique. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 3(1), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Good, G. E., Robertson, J. M., O’Neil, J. M., Fitzgerald, L. F., Stevens, M., DeBord, K., et al. (1995). Male gender role conflict: Psychometric issues and relations to psychological distress. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 3–10.Google Scholar
  21. Hardesty, D. M., & Bearden, W. O. (2004). The use of expert judges in scale development: Implications for improving face validity of measures of unobservable constructs. Journal of Business Research, 57, 98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hearn, J., Pringle, K., Müller, U., Oleksy, E., Lattu, E., Chernova, J., & Kolga, V. (2002). Critical studies on men in ten European countries: (1) The state of academic research. Men and Masculinities, 4, 380–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heppner, P. P., & Heppner, M. J. (2008). The gender role conflict literature: Fruits of sustained commitment. The Counseling Psychologist, 35, 455–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kahn, J. S. (2009). An introduction to masculinities. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Kim, J., Choi, H., Kim, H., & Park, K. (2009). Validation of the Korean version of the gender role conflict scale. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(2), 215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Levant, R. F. (2011). Award for distinguished professional contributions to applied research. American Psychologist, 66(8), 763–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levant, R. F., Hirsch, L., Celentano, E., Cozza, T., Hill, S., MacRachorn, M., et al. (1992). The male role: An investigation of contemporary norms. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 14, 325–337.Google Scholar
  28. Levant, R. F., Smalley, K. B., Aupont, M., House, A. T., Richmond, K., & Noronha, D. (2007). Initial validation of the Male Role Norms Inventory-Revised (MRNI-R). Journal of Men’s Studies, 15(1), 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu, W. M., Rochlen, A., & Mohr, J. J. (2005). Real and ideal gender-role conflict: Exploring psychological distress among men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 6, 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mahalik, J. R., Locke, B. D., Ludlow, L. H., Diemer, M. A., Scott, L., Gottfried, M., & Freitas, G. (2003). Development of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4(1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McGinness, C. (2011). Twenty-five years of change in men’s gender role strain as measured by the gender role conflict scale. Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
  32. Messner, M. A. (1992). Power at play: Sports and the problem of masculinity. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  33. Moradi, B., Tokar, D. M., Schaub, M., Jome, L. M., & Serna, G. S. (2000). Revisiting the Structural Validity of the Gender Role Conflict Scale. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 1(1), 62–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Norwalk, K. E., Vandiver, B. J., White, A. M., & Englar-Carlson, M. (2011). Factor Structure of the Gender Role Conflict Scale in African American and European American Men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 12(2), 128–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Neil, J. M. (1981a). Male sex role conflicts, sexism, and masculinity: Psychological implications for men, women, and the counseling psychologist. The Counseling Psychologist, 9(2), 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. O’Neil, J. M. (1981b). Patterns of gender role conflict and strain: Sexism and fear of femininity in men’s lives. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 60, 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. O’Neil, J. M. (1982). Gender role conflict and strain in men’s lives: Implications for psychiatrists, psychologists, and other human service providers. In K. Solomon & N. B. Levy (Eds.), Men in transition: Changing male roles, theory, and therapy (pp. 5–44). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. O’Neil, J. M. (1990). Assessing men’s gender role conflict. In D. Moore & F. Leafgren (Eds.), Men in conflict: Problem solving strategies and interventions (pp. 23–38). Alexandria: American Association for Counseling and Development.Google Scholar
  39. O’Neil, J. M. (2008a). Summarizing 25 years of research on men’s gender role conflict using the gender role conflict scale: New research paradigms and clinical implications. The Counseling Psychologist, 36(3), 358–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. O’Neil, J. M. (2008b). Complexity, contextualism, and multiculturalism: Responses to the critiques and future directions for the gender role conflict research program. The Counseling Psychologist, 36(3), 469–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. O’Neil, J.M. (2011) Exploring the psychology of Russian men with Russian psychologists during my Fulbright scholarship in the former soviet union. In C. Blazina & D. Shen-Miller (Eds.), An international psychology of men: Theoretical advances, case studies, and clinical innovations (pp. 361–383). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. O’Neil, J. M., Helm, B., Gable, R., David, L., & Wrightsman, L. (1986). Gender Role Conflict Scale (GRCS): College men’s fears of femininity. Sex Roles, 14, 335–350.Google Scholar
  43. O’Neil, J. M., Good, G. E., & Holmes, S. (1995). Fifteen years of theory and research on men’s gender role conflict: New paradigms for empirical research. In R. Levant & W. Pollack (Eds.), The new psychology of men (pp. 164–206). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  44. Oransky, M., & Fisher, C. (2009). The development and validation of the meanings of adolescent masculinity scale. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 10(1), 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pleck, J. H. (1995). The gender role strain paradigm: An update. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 11–32). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  46. Rogers, J. R., Abbey-Hines, J., & Rando, R. A. (1997). Confirmatory factor analysis of the gender role conflict scale: A cross validation of Good et al. 1995. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30, 137–145.Google Scholar
  47. Ryan, C., & Gartland, R. (1999). The use of a specific non-response option on likert-type scales. Tourism Management, 20(1), 107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Steinfeldt, J. A., Wong, Y. J., Hagan, A. R., & Hoag, J. M. (2011). A contextual examination of gender role conflict among college football players. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 12(4), 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thompson, E. H., & Pleck, J. H. (1986). The structure of the male norms. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 531–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thompson, E. H., Pleck, J. H., & Ferrera, D. L. (1992). Men and masculinity: Scales for masculinity ideology and masculinity-related constructs. Sex Roles, 27, 573–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Walker, D. F., Tokar, D. M., & Fischer, A. R. (2000). What are eight popular masculinity-related instruments measuring? Underlying dimensions and their relations to sociosexuality. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 1(2), 98–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Watts, R. H., & Borders, L. D. (2005). Boys’ perceptions of the male role: Understanding gender role conflict in adolescent males. Journal of Men’s Studies, 13, 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wester, S. R. (2008). Thinking complexly about men, gender role conflict, and counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 36(3), 462–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wester, S. R., Pionke, D. R., & Vogel, D. L. (2005). Male gender role conflict, gay men, and same-sex romantic relationships. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 6, 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wester, S. R., Vogel, D. L., Wei, M., & McLain, R. (2006b). African American men, gender role conflict, and psychological distress: The role of racial identity. Journal of Counseling and Development, 84, 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wester, S. R., Kuo, B., & Vogel, D. L. (2006a). Multicultural coping: Chinese-Canadian adolescents, male gender role conflict, and psychological distress. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 7, 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wester, S. R., Christianson, H. F., Vogel, D. L., & Wei, M. (2007). Male gender role conflict and psychological distress: The role of social support. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 8, 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wester, S. R., Vogel, D. L., O’Neil, J. M., & Danforth, L. (2012). Development and evaluation of the Gender Role Conflict Scale Short Form (GRCS-SF). Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 13(2), 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Whorley, M. R., & Addis, M. E. (2006). Ten years of psychological research on men and masculinity in the United States: Dominant methodological trends. Sex Roles, 55, 649–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zamarripa, M. X., Wampold, B. E., & Gregory, E. (2003). Male gender role conflict, depression, and anxiety: Clarification and generalizability to women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 333–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cormac Ó. Beaglaoich
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kiran M. Sarma
    • 1
  • Todd G. Morrison
    • 2
  1. 1.School of PsychologyNational University of IrelandGalwayIreland
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations