Modeling Plume Responses To Source Treatment
Source zone remediation at a site may be undertaken for a number of reasons. The plume response to source remediation is a complex function of many variables, including the fraction of mass remaining in the source compared to the plume, source concentration compared to regulatory limits, ratio of plume decay rates to groundwater velocity, relationship between source mass removal and source discharge, and local diffusive effects in the plume. As discussed in this chapter, models are tools that allow practitioners to quantify plume response to source remediation. This insight, gained from modeling, can then allow the practitioner to establish reasonable goals and expectations for what can be achieved through source remediation.
KeywordsVinyl Chloride Source Zone Retardation Factor Source Mass Reductive Dechlorination
- Abriola LM, Jang J, Rathfelder K. 1997. Michigan Soil-Vapor Extraction Remediation (MISER) Model – A computer program to model bioventing of organic chemicals in unsaturated geological material. EPA/600R-97/099. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
- Alvarez PJJ, Illman WA. 2006. Bioremediation and Natural Attenuation. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
- Aziz CE, Newell CJ, Gonzales JR, Hass P, Clement TP, Sun Y. 2000. BIOCHLOR Natural Attenuation Decision Support System User’s Manual Version 1.0. EPA/600/R-00/008. Office of Research and Development, U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
- Aziz CE, Newell CJ, Gonzales JR. 2002. BIOCHLOR Natural Attenuation Decision Support System Version 2.2 User’s Manual Addendum. http://www.epa.gov/ada/download/models/biochlor22.pdf. Accessed November 20, 2012.
- Chapelle FH, Widdowson MA, Brauner JS, Mendez E, Casey C. 2003. Methodology for Estimating Times of Remediation Associated with Monitored Natural Attenuation. Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4057. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA.Google Scholar
- Christ JA, Ramsburg CA, Pennell KD, Abriola LM. 2006. Estimating mass discharge from dense nonaqueous phase liquid source zones using upscaled mass transfer coefficients: An evaluation using multiphase numerical simulations. Water Resour Res 4:W11420.Google Scholar
- Clement TP. 1997. RT3D – A modular computer code for simulating reactive multi-species transport in 3-dimensional groundwater aquifers. PNNL-11720. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.Google Scholar
- Falta RW. 2003. Modeling sub-grid block scale DNAPL pool dissolution using a dual domain approach. Water Resour Res 39:1360–1368.Google Scholar
- Falta RW, Pruess K, Finsterle S, Battistelli A. 1995. T2VOC User’s Guide, Report LBL-36400. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.Google Scholar
- Falta RW, Stacy MB, Ahsanuzzman ANM, Wang M, Earle RC. 2007. REMChlor Remediation Evaluation Model for Chlorinated Solvents User’s Manual Version 1.0. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/ada/csmos/models/remchlor.html. Accessed November 20, 2012.
- Grant GP, Gerhard JI. 2007. Simulating the dissolution of a complex dense nonaqueous phase liquid source zone: 2. Experimental validation of an interfacial area-based mass transfer model. Water Resour Res 43:W12409.Google Scholar
- Helmig R, Braun C, Emmert M. 1994, MUFTE – A numerical model for simulation of multiphase flow processes in porous and fractured porous media, program documentation (HGK-208). Technical Report 94/3. Institut fur Wasserbau, Universitat Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
- Liang H. 2009. Probabilistic Remediation Evaluation Model for Chlorinated Solvents Considering Uncertainty. PhD thesis. Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.Google Scholar
- Liang H, Falta RW, Newell CJ, Farhat SK, Rao PSC, Basu N. 2010a. Decision & Management Tools for DNAPL Sites: Optimization of chlorinated solvent source and plume remediation considering uncertainty, environmental security testing and certification program. ESTCP Project Final Report ER-0704. Alexandria, VA, USA.Google Scholar
- Newell CJ, McLeod RK, Gonzales JR. 1996. BIOSCREEN Natural Attenuation Decision Support System User’s Manual, Version 1.3. EPA/600/R-96/087. USEPA National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
- Nitao J. 1996. Reference Manual for the NUFT Flow and Transport Code. Report UCRL-ID-113520. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.Google Scholar
- NRC (National Research Council). 2000. Natural Attenuation for Groundwater Remediation, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
- Pankow JF, Cherry JA. 1996. Dense Chlorinated Solvents and Other DNAPLs in Groundwater, Waterloo Press, Waterloo, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
- Parker JC, Park E. 2004. Modeling field-scale dense nonaqueous phase liquid dissolution kinetics in heterogeneous aquifers. Water Resour Res 40:W05109.Google Scholar
- Pruess K, Battistelli A. 2002. TMVOC, A Numerical Simulator for Three-Phase Non-isothermal Flows of Multicomponent Hydrocarbon Mixtures in Saturated-Unsaturated Heterogeneous Media. Report LBNL-49375. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.Google Scholar
- Rao PSC, Jawitz JW. 2003. Comment on “Steady state mass transfer from single-component dense non-aqueous phase liquids in uniform flow fields” by Sale TC, McWhorter DB. Water Resour Res 39:1068.Google Scholar
- Rao PSC, Jawitz JW, Enfield CG, Falta R, Annabel MD, Wood AL. 2001. Technology integration for contaminated site remediation: Cleanup goals and performance metrics. Ground Water Quality, Sheffield, UK. pp 410–412.Google Scholar
- Stroo HF, Ward CH, eds. 2010. In Situ Remediation of Chlorinated Solvent Plumes. Springer, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
- Unger AJA, Forsyth PA, Sudicky EA. 1996. Variable spatial and temporal weighting schemes for use in multi-phase compositional problems. Adv Water Resour 19:1–27.Google Scholar
- USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2003. The DNAPL Remediation Challenge: Is there a case for source depletion? EPA/600/R-03/143. EPA Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
- Waddill DW, Widdowson MA. 2000. SEAM3D – A numerical model for three dimensional solute transport and sequential electron acceptor-based bioremediation in groundwater. ERDC/EL TR-00-18. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, USA.Google Scholar
- West M, Kueper BH. 2007. Plume detachment and recession times following source treatment in bedded fractured rock. Proceedings, USEPA/NGWA Fractured Rock Conference: State of the Science and Measuring Success in Remediation. Portland, ME, USA, September 24–26, pp 343–356. http://www.clu-in.org/products/siteprof/2007fracrock/000tableofcontents-2_.pdf. Accessed January 30, 2014.
- Widdowson MA. 2003. SEAM3D: A numerical model for three-dimensional solute transport and sequential electron acceptor-based biodegradation in ground water. Final Report to the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, USA.Google Scholar
- Widdowson MA, Mendez E, Chapelle F, Casey CC. 2004. Natural Attenuation Software User’s Manual, Version 2. http://www.nas.cee.vt.edu/index.php. Accessed November 20, 2012.
- Wood AL, Falta RW. 2003. SERDP and NRMRL Sponsor Field Test of Cosolvent-Enhanced DNAPL Removal. EPA 542-N-03-003. Technology News and Trends, Issue 6. USEPA, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
- Zhang K, Yamamoto H, Pruess K. 2007. TMVOC-MP: A parallel numerical simulator for three-phase non-isothermal flows of multicomponent hydrocarbon mixtures in porous/fractured media. Report LBNL-63827. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.Google Scholar
- Zheng C, Wang PP. 1999. MT3DMS: A modular three-dimensional multispecies transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion and chemical reactions of contaminants in groundwater systems; documentation and user’s guide. Contract Report SERDP-99-1. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, USA.Google Scholar