Advertisement

Removal Roulette: Secure Communities and Immigration Enforcement in the United States (2008–2012)

  • Juan Manuel Pedroza
Chapter

Abstract

Secure Communities (SComm) is a federal immigration enforcement program in the United States. The program enjoys support as a nationwide, neutral, and rational vehicle for enforcement. Yet place may make a difference in SComm enforcement outcomes. SComm figures reveal a divergence between places where removals target serious criminals versus places where removals cast a more universal net. Moreover, rates of removals vary greatly by location. Such divergence suggests that stated SComm priorities function less as a dam (as intended) and more as a water mill, whereby federal authorities place as many removable immigrants into removal proceedings as capacity allows. Uneven enforcement can propel a “removal roulette” whereby deportation can hinge on an immigrant detainee’s location and the type of offense committed. The resulting life as provisional existence means trying to stay out of trouble by erring on the side of caution at all times.

References

  1. American Community Survey (ACS), U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). Five-year estimates (2006–2010): Citizenship status in the United States. Retrieved August 15,2012, from http://factfinder2.census.gov
  2. Armenta, A. (2012). From sheriff’s deputies to immigration officers: Screening immigrant status in a Tennessee jail. Law and Policy, 34(2), 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bosniak, L. (2012). Arguing for amnesty. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 1–11. doi:10.1177/1743872111423181. Online First version.Google Scholar
  4. Brotherton, D., & Kretsedemas, P. (Eds.). (2008). Keeping out the other: A critical introduction to immigration enforcement today. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Calavita, K. (2007). Immigration, social control, and punishment in the industrial era. In M. Bosworth & J. Flavin (Eds.), Race, gender, and punishment: From colonialism to the War on Terror (pp. 117–133). Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Capps, R., Rosenblum, M. R., Rodríguez, C., & Chishti, M. (2011). Delegation and divergence: A study of 287(g) state and local immigration enforcement. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  7. Coleman, M. (2007). Immigration geopolitics beyond the Mexico-US border. Antipode, 39(1), 54–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coleman, M. (2012a). Immigrant Il-legality: Geopolitical and legal borders in the US, 1882-Present. Geopolitics, 17(2), 402–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coleman, M. (2012b). The ‘local’ migration state: The site-specific devolution of immigration enforcement in the U.S. south. Law and Policy, 34(2), 159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coutin, S. B. (1998). From refugees to immigrants: The legalization strategies of Salvadoran immigrants and activists. International Migration Review, 32(4), 901–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coutin, S. B. (2000). Legalizing moves: Salvadoran immigrants’ struggle for U.S. residency. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  12. De Genova, N. P. (2002). Migrant ‘illegality’ and deportability in everyday life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31(1), 419–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Decker, S. H., Lewis, P. G., Provine, D. M., & Varsanyi, M. W. (2009). On the frontier of local law enforcement: Local police and federal immigration law. Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance, 13, 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellermann, A. (2009). States against migrants: Deportation in Germany and the United States. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ellermann, A. (2010). Undocumented migrants and resistance in the liberal state. Politics and Society, 38(3), 408–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farrell, A., & McDevitt, J. (2010). Identifying and measuring racial profiling by the police. Sociology Compass, 4(1), 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Filindra, A., Blanding, D., & Coll, C. G. (2011). The power of context: State-level policies and politics and the educational performance of the children of immigrants in the United States. Harvard Educational Review, 81(3), 407–438.Google Scholar
  18. Fix, M. (Ed.). (1991). The paper curtain: Employer sanctions’ implementation, impact, and reform. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  19. Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (2nd Vintage Books ed.). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  20. García, A. S. (2012). Return to sender? A comparative analysis of immigrant communities in ‘attrition through enforcement’ destinations. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35 1–22. doi:10.1080/01419870.2012.692801. Online First version.Google Scholar
  21. Goldsmith, P., Romero, M., Rubio-Goldsmith, R., Escobedo, M., & Khoury, L. (2009). Ethno-racial profiling and state violence in a Southwest Barrio. Aztlan: A Journal of Chicano Studies, 34(1), 93–123.Google Scholar
  22. Guterbock, T. M., Vickerman, M., Walker, K. E., Koper, C. S., Taylor, B., & Carter, T. (2010). Evaluation of Prince William County’s illegal immigration enforcement policy. Charlottesville, VA: Center for Survey Research, University of Virginia.Google Scholar
  23. Hagan, J. M. (1994). Deciding to be legal: A Maya community in Houston. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hagan, J., & Phillips, S. (2008). Border blunders: The unanticipated human and economic costs of the U.S. approach to immigration control, 1986–2007. Criminology and Public Policy, 7(1), 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hagan, J. M., Rodriguez, N., & Castro, B. (2011). Social effects of mass deportations by the United States government, 2000–10. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(8), 1374–1391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harrison, J. L., & Lloyd, S. E. (2012). Illegality at work: Deportability and the productive new era of immigration enforcement. Antipode, 44(2), 365–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heyman, J. M. (1998). State effects on labor exploitation: The INS and undocumented immigrants at the Mexico-United States border. Critique of Anthropology, 18(2), 157–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hopkins, D. J. (2010). Politicized places: Explaining where and when immigrants provoke local opposition. American Political Science Review, 104(01), 40–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Inda, J. X. (2006a). Targeting immigrants: Government, technology, and ethics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Inda, J. X. (2006b). Border prophylaxis: Technology, illegality, and the government of immigration. Cultural Dynamics, 18(2), 115–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson, K. R. (2010). How racial profiling in America became the law of the land: United States v. Brignoni-Ponce and Whren v. United States and the need for truly rebellious lawyering. Georgetown Law Journal, 98(4), 1005–1077.Google Scholar
  32. Kanstroom, D. (2000). Deportation, social control, and punishment: Some thoughts about why hard laws make bad cases. Harvard Law Review, 113(8), 1890–1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kanstroom, D. (2007). Deportation nation: Outsiders in American history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Keith, L. C., & Holmes, J. S. (2009). A rare examination of typically unobservable factors in US asylum decisions. Journal of Refugee Studies, 22(2), 224–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kohli, A., Markowitz, P. L., & Chavez, L. (2011). Secure communities by the numbers: An analysis of demographics and due process. Berkeley, CA: The Chief Justice Earl Warren Institute of Law and Social Policy.Google Scholar
  36. Leerkes, A., Leach, M., & Bachmeier, J. (2011). Borders behind the border: An exploration of state-level differences in migration control and their effects on US migration patterns. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(1), 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lofstrom, M., Bohn, S., & Raphael, S. (2011). Lessons from the 2007 Legal Arizona Workers Act. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.Google Scholar
  38. Mauer, M., & Chesney-Lind, M. (Eds.). (2002). Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  39. Menjívar, C., & Abrego, L. J. (2012). Legal violence: Immigration law and the lives of Central American immigrants. The American Journal of Sociology, 117(5), 1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Money, J. (1999). Fences and neighbors: The political geography of immigration control. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Motomura, H. (2011). The discretion that matters: Federal immigration enforcement, state and local Arrests, and the civil-criminal line. UCLA Law Review, 58(6), 1819.Google Scholar
  42. Ngai, M. M. (2004). Impossible subjects: Illegal aliens and the making of modern America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  43. O’Neil, K. (2011, March). Do local anti-immigrant laws slow demographic change? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  44. Parrado, E. A. (2012). Immigration enforcement policies, the economic recession, and the size of local Mexican immigrant populations. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 641(1), 16–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Passel, J. S., & Cohn, D. V. (2011). Unauthorized immigrant population: National and state trends, 2010. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center. Online First version.Google Scholar
  46. Pedroza, J. (2012). Mass exodus from Oklahoma? Immigrants and Latinos stay and weather a state of capture. The Journal of Latino-Latin American Studies, 4(1), 27–41.Google Scholar
  47. Pham, H., & Pham, V. (2012). Measuring the climate for immigrants: A state-by-state analysis. In G. J. Chin & C. Hessick (Eds.), Illegals in the backyard: State and local regulation of immigration policy. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  48. Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  49. Ramji-Nogales, J., Schoenholtz, A. I., & Schrag, P. G. (2007). Refugee roulette: Disparities in asylum adjudication. Stanford Law Review, 60(2), 295–411.Google Scholar
  50. Ridgeway, G., & Riley, K. J. (2004). Assessing racial profiling more credibly. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  51. Rodríguez, C. M. (2008). The significance of the local in immigration regulation. Michigan Law Review, 106(4), 567–642.Google Scholar
  52. Romero, M. (2006). Racial profiling and immigration law enforcement: Rounding up of usual suspects in the Latino community. Critical Sociology, 32(2–3), 447–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rosenblum, M. R., & Kandel, W. A. (2011). Interior immigration enforcement: Programs targeting criminal aliens. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  54. Rottman, A. J., Fariss, C. J., & Poe, S. C. (2009). The path to asylum in the US and the determinants for who gets in and why. International Migration Review, 43(1), 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Scott, J. C. (2009). The art of not being governed: An anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Stumpf, J. P. (2011). Doing time: Crimmigration and the perils of haste. UCLA Law Review, 58(6), 1705.Google Scholar
  58. United States Department of Homeland Security (USDHS), Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (2012). Secure Communities statistics (through June 2012). Washington, DC: Department of Homeland Security.Google Scholar
  59. USDHS, Office of Inspector General. (2011). Supervision of aliens commensurate with risk, OIG-1181 (Revised). Washington, DC: Department of Homeland Security.Google Scholar
  60. Welch, M. (2002). Detained: Immigration laws and the expanding I.N.S. jail complex. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Wong, T. K. (2012). 287(g) and the politics of interior immigration control in the United States: Explaining local cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(5), 737–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wuthnow, R. W. (2010). Remaking the heartland: Middle America since the 1950s. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sociology Department MC2047Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations