Advertisement

Finite Element Model Updating of an Assembled Aero-Engine Casing

  • Chaoping Zang
  • Shuangchao Ma
  • M. I. Friswell
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

In this paper, the finite element model updating technique based on first-order optimization is investigated and applied to a jointed aero engine casing. Vibration modal testing is conducted and modal data, i.e. natural frequencies and mode shapes, are obtained to update the FE models of two aero engine casings and their jointed structure. A two-step strategy is proposed in the updating process. In the first step, model updating is carried out on the two single casings separately in order to validate the casing component models. In the second step, the assembled casing is updated with emphasis on updating joint parameters. The joints are modeled using a layer of continuous solid elements that have material properties to be adjusted. The final updated FE model for the aero-engine casing is able to predict natural frequencies and mode shapes close to the measured ones.

Keywords

Model updating Finite element modelling Modal test Sensitivity analysis Jointed casing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 51175244)C Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (Project No. 20093218110008) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) are gratefully acknowledged. SC Ma also acknowledges the support of Fundamental Research Fundsfor the Central Universities of China (Project No. kfjj20110204).

References

  1. 1.
    Boswald M, Link M, Schedlinski C (2005) Computation model updating and validation of aero-engine finite element models based on vibration test data. IFASD, MunichGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mottershead JE, Friswell MI (1993) Model updating in structure dynamics: a survey. J Sound Vib 167(2):347–375zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mares C, Mottershead JE, Friswell MI (2006) Stochastic model updating: part 1—theory and simulated example. Mech Syst Signal Process 20(7):1674–1695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baruch M, Bar-Itzhack Y (1978) Optimal weighted orthogonalisation of the measured modes. AIAA J 16:346–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berman A, Nagy EJ (1983) Improvement of a large analytical model using test data. AIAA J 21:927–928Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baruch M (1984) Methods of reference basis for identification of linear dynamic structures. AIAA J 22:561–564MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zang C, Ewins DJ (2009) Model validation of structural dynamics in the aero-engine design process. Front Energy Power Eng China 3(4):480–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ahmadian H, Mottershead JE, James S, Friswell MI, Reece CA (2006) Modelling and updating of largesurface-to-surface joints in theAWE-MACE structure. Mech Syst Signal Process 20:868–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mottershead JE, Friswell MI, Ng GHT, Brandon JA (1996) Geometric parameters for finite element model updating of jointsand constraints. Mech Syst Signal Process 10(2):171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li W-M, Hong J-Z (2011) New iterative method for model updating based on model reduction. Mech Syst Signal Process 25:180–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zapicoa JL, Gonzaleza MP, Friswell MI, Taylor CA, Crewe AJ (2003) Finite element model updating of a small scale bridge. J Sound Vib 268:993–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ibrahim RA, Pettit CL (2005) Uncertainties and dynamic problem of bolted joints and other fasteners. J Sound Vib 279:857–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ahmadian H, Jalali H (2007) Generic element formulation for modelling bolted lap joints. Mech Syst Signal Process 21:2318–2334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mayera MH, Gaul L (2007) Segment-to-segment contact elements for modelling joint interfaces in finite element analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 21:724–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bograd S, Reuss P, Schmidt A, Mayer M (2011) Modeling the dynamics of mechanical joints. Mech Syst Signal Process 25:2801–2826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ahmadian H, Ebrahimi M, Mottershead JE, Friswell MI (2002) Identification of bolted-joint interface models. In: 27th international seminar on modal analysis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, 16–18 Sept 2002, pp 1741–1747Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Imamovic N (1998) Validation of large structural dynamics models using modal test data. PhD thesis, Imperial College, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Swanson Analysis Systems Inc. (2004) ANSYS user’s manual version 8.0, HoustonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Energy and Power EngineeringNanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsNanjingChina
  2. 2.College of EngineeringSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK

Personalised recommendations