The Role of Research Orientation for Attracting Competitive Research Funding

  • Hanna HottenrottEmail author
Part of the International Studies in Entrepreneurship book series (ISEN, volume 28)


This article studies the role of research orientation for attracting research grants at higher education institutions in Germany. Traditionally, research activities were funded by the institutions’ core budget. More recently, extramural research funding has become increasingly important. Besides the public sector, industry provides a growing share of such funds. The results based on a sample of professors in science and engineering suggest that basic and applied research is complementarity for attracting research funding from industry. Thus, professors who conduct basic research in addition to research on the applicability of their results appear to be most successful in raising industry funds. For raising grants from public sources, it turns out that specialization is more important. Specialized research units on either basic or applied research obtain significantly more public grants which point to a substitutive relationship between basic and applied research for grants from public sources.


Applied Research Tobit Model Total Budget Technology Transfer Office Research Orientation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Auranen O, Nieminen M (2010) University research funding and publication performance – an international comparison. Res Policy 39:822–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anders Broström (2012) “Firms’ rationales for interaction with research universities and the principles for public co-funding. The Journal of Technology Transfer 37(3):313–329, JuneCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cassiman B, Veugelers R, Zuniga MP (2008) In search of performance effects of (in)direct ­industry science links. Ind Corp Change 17(4):611–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen W, Nelson R, Walsh J (2002) Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Manage Sci 48:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Czarnitzki D (2009) The virtue of industry-science collaborations. EIB Papers 14(1):121–143Google Scholar
  6. Greene WH (2000) Econometric analysis, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  7. Grimpe C (2010) Scientific excellence and extramural research grants: beggars can’t be choosers? ZEW discussion paper no. 10–031, MannheimGoogle Scholar
  8. Gulbrandsen M, Smeby JC (2005) Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Res Policy 34:932–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hall BH, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citations data file: lessons, insights, and methodological tools. NBER working paper no. 8498Google Scholar
  10. Henderson R, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (1998) Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988. Rev Econ Stat 80(1):119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Levin S, Stephan P (1991) Research productivity over the life cycle: evidence for academic scientists. Am Econ Rev 81(1):114–132Google Scholar
  12. Ljungberg D (2008) What industry funding and academic patents tell us about university-industry interaction: the case of Sweden. In: DRUID-DIME academy winter 2008 conference proceedings, Aalborg (Denmark)Google Scholar
  13. Mansfield E (1991) Academic research and industrial innovation. Res Policy 20:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mansfield E (1995) Academic research underlying industrial innovations: sources. Characteristics Financ Rev Econ Stat 77:55–65Google Scholar
  15. Mansfield E, Lee J-Y (1996) The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support. Res Policy 25:1047–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Murray F (2002) Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering. Res Policy 31:1389–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. OECD (2007) Science, technology and innovation indicators in a changing world responding to policy needs. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  18. OECD (2009) Business-funded R&D in the higher education and government sectors, in: OECD science, technology and industry scoreboard 2009. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. Sorenson O, Fleming L (2004) Science and the diffusion of knowledge. Res Policy 33:1615–1633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Thursby J, Thursby M (2004) Are faculty critical? Their role in university-industry licensing. Contemp Econ Policy 22(2):162–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Thursby J, Thursby M, Gupta-Mukherjee S (2007) Are there real effects of licensing on academic research? A life cycle view. J Econ Behav Organ 63:577–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Trajtenberg M, Henderson R, Jaffe A (1997) University versus corporate patents: a window on the basicness of invention. Econ Innov New Technol 5(1):19–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Viner N, Powell P, Green R (2004) Institutionalized biases in the award of research grants: a preliminary analysis revisiting the principle of accumulative advantage. Res Policy 33:443–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Managerial Economics, Strategy and Innovation, K.U.Leuven (FEB)University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW)MannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations