Gender Matters in Intimate Partner Violence

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

This chapter addresses the gender symmetry debate concerning intimate partner violence (IPV). I argue that: (1) gender matters at the individual psyche, micro-everyday, institutional, structural, and cultural levels of peoples’ lives; (2) gender symmetry arguments have been captured by individualistic and binary models of gender that conflate sex and gender, ignore theoretical analyses of both gender and violence and neglect the importance of intersectionality; and (3) symmetry arguments fail to incorporate sustained analyses of forms of IPV that are uniquely gendered. I include in this category rape and sexual coercion, reproductive control, and violence during pregnancy, as well as behaviors that are highly correlated with lethal outcomes, such as strangulation. I illustrate my argument about the importance of intersectionality with a brief case profile of a battered man. I also review narratives from women and men who have been subjected to coercive control and IPV and US national level data reflecting the ongoing significance of gender in people’s lives. I conclude with recommendations for research and policy that take seriously the gendered nature of intimate partner violence.

Keywords

Intimate Partner Violence Intimate Partner Sexual Coercion General Social Survey Batter Woman 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Allen-Collinson, J. (2009). A marked man: Female-perpetrated intimate partner abuse. International Journal of Men’s Health, 8(1), 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen-Collinson, J. (2011). Assault on self: Intimate partner abuse and the contestation of identity. Symbolic Interaction, 34(1), 108–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, K. L. (2005). Theorizing gender in intimate partner violence research. Sex Roles, 52(11/12), 853–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Black, M., Basile, K., Breiding, M., Smith, S., Walters, M., Merrick, M., et al. (2011, December 14). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2010 Summary Report. Retrieved July 13, 2012, from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISV_Report2010-a.pdf.
  6. Budig, M., & Hodges, M. (2010). Differences in disadvantage: Variation in the motherhood penalty across white women’s earnings distribution. American Sociological Review, 75(5), 705–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2012). Homicide trends in the U.S. Retrieved June 6, 2012 from Bureau of Justice Statistics: http//www.bjs.gov/content/homicide/intimates.crm#intimates.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, J., Woods, A., Couaf, K., & Parker, B. (2000). Reproductive health consequences of intimate partner violence: A nursing research review. Clinical Nursing Research, 9(3), 217–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang, V. N. (1996). I just lost myself: Psychological abuse of women. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  10. Cook, P. W. (1997). Abused men: The hidden side of domestic violence. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  11. Crenshaw, K. (1993). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dasgupta, S. D. (2002). A framework for understanding women’s use of nonlethal violence in intimate heterosexual relationships. Violence Against Women, 8(11), 1364–1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence against wives. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dobash, R. P., & Dobash, R. E. (2004). Women’s violence to men in intimate relationships. British Journal of Criminology, 44(3), 324–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39(1), 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dutton, D. (2006). Rethinking domestic violence. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  17. Felson, R. B., & Lane, K. J. (2010). Does violence involving women and intimate partners have a special etiology? Criminology, 48(1), 321–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferraro, K. J. (2006). Neither angels nor demons: Women, crime, and victimization. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ferraro, K. J., & Johnson, J. M. (1983). How women experience battering: The process of victimization. Social Problems, 30(3), 575–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Finkelhor, D., & Yllo, K. (1987). License to rape. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  21. Flinck, A., & Paavilainen, E. (2010). Women’s experiences of their violent behavior in an intimate partner relationship. Qualitative Health Research, 20(3), 306–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glauber, R. (2007). Marriage and the motherhood wage penalty among African Americans, Hispanics, and whites. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(4), 951–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Graham-Kevan, N. (2007). Domestic violence: Research and implications for batterer programmes in Europe. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 13(3/4), 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hanmer, J. (1996). Women and violence: Commonalities and diversities. In B. F. B. Fawecett (Ed.), Violence and gender relations: Theories and interventions (pp. 7–21). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Hayes, J. (2011, March 7). Women’s median earnings as a percent of men’s median earnings, 1960–2009 (full-time, year-round workers) with projections for equity in 2056. Retrieved March 7, 2011, from Institute for Women’s Policy Research: http://www.iwpr.org/publications/pubs/women2019s-median-earnings-as-a-percent-of-men2019s-median-earnings-1969-2009-full-time-year-round-workers-with-projection-for-pay-equity-in-2056.
  26. Hays, S. (2003). Flat broke with children. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hines, D. A., & Douglas, E. M. (2010). Intimate terrorism by women toward men: Does it exist? Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 2(3), 36–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Island, D., & Letellier, P. (1991). Men who beat the men who love them. Binghamton, NY: Hawthorne.Google Scholar
  29. Iversen, T., & Rosenbluth, F. (2010). Women, work, and politics: The political economy of gender inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University.Google Scholar
  30. Johnson, M. P. (2008). A typology of domestic violence. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Johnson, M. P. (2010). Langhinrichsen-Rolling’s confirmation of the feminist analysis of intimate partner violence: Comment on ‘controversies involving gender and intimate partner violence in the United States’. Sex Roles, 62, 212–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kane, E. W. (2006). “No way my boys are going to be like that!”: Parents responses to children’s gender nonconformity. Gender & Society, 20(2), 149–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kimmel, M. S. (2002). ‘Gender symmetry’ in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 8(11), 1332–1363.Google Scholar
  34. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2010). Controversies involving gender and intimate partner violence in the United States. Sex Roles, 62, 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. LaRoche, D. (2005). Aspects of the context and consequences of domestic violence: Situational couple violence and intimate terrorism in Canada, 1999. Montreal: Institute de la statistique du Quebec.Google Scholar
  36. Lemert, L. B. (1994). A narrative analysis of abuse: Connecting the personal, the rhetorical, and the structural. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22, 411–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martin, D. (1979). Battered wives. San Francisco: Glide.Google Scholar
  38. McKay, J., Messner, M., & Sabo, D. (2000). Masculinities, gender relations, and sport. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Messner, M. A. (2000). Barbie girls versus sea monsters: Children constructing gender. Gender & Society, 14(6), 765–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Migliaccio, T. A. (2002). Abused husbands: A narrative analysis. Journal of Family Issues, 23(1), 26–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miller, S. L. (2005). Victims as offenders: The paradox of women’s violence in relationships. New Brunswick: Rutgers.Google Scholar
  42. Mills, L. (2003). Insults to injury: Rethinking our response to intimate abuse. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Minaker, J. & Snider, L. (2006). Husband abuse: Equality with a vengeance. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice. September: 753–780.Google Scholar
  44. Mohr, T. S. (2012, February 27). Dear Oscar: Women have stories too. Retrieved July 13, 2012, from Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tara-sophia-mohr/women-oscars-2012_b_1304302.html.
  45. Moore, A. M., Frohwirth, L., & Miller, E. (2010). Male reproductive control of women who have experienced intimate partner violence in the United States. Social Science and Medicine, 70, 1737–1744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Muraco, A. (2012). Odd couples: Friendships at the intersections of gender and sexual ­orientation. Durham, NC: Duke University.Google Scholar
  47. National Network to End Domestic Violence. (2012). Retrieved July 14, 2012 from Census: Domestic Violence Counts: http://nnedv.org/resources/census.html.
  48. Padavic, I., & Reskin, B. (2002). Women and men at work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Pagelow, M. (1981). Woman battering: Victims and their experiences. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Pence, E. M., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  51. Raphael, J. (2000). Saving Bernice. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Richie, B. (2000). A black feminist reflection on the antiviolence movement. Signs, 25(4), 1133–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Richie, B. (2012). Arrested justice: Black women, justice, and America’s Prison Nation. New York: New York University.Google Scholar
  54. Rose, S. J., & Hartmann, H. I. (2004). Still a Man’s labor market: The long-term earnings gap. Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research.Google Scholar
  55. Rubin, L. (1984). Intimate strangers: Men and women together. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  56. Russell, D. H. (1990). Rape in marriage. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Schechter, S. (1982). Women and male violence. Boston: South End.Google Scholar
  58. Schulz, A. J., & Mullings, L. (2005). Gender, race, class and health: Intersectional approaches. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.Google Scholar
  59. Scott, J. (1986). Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. American Historical Review, 91(5), 1053–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith, A. (2003). Not an Indian tradition: The sexual colonization of native peoples. Hypatia, 18(2), 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Smith, A. (2005). Conquest: Sexual violence and American Indian genocide. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
  62. Sokoloff, N. J. (2005). Domestic violence at the margins. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Stark, E. (2010). Do violent acts equal abuse? Resolving the gender parity/asymmetry dilemma. Sex Roles, 62, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Strack, G. B., McClane, G. E., & Hawley, D. (2001). A review of 300 attempted strangulation cases. Part I: Criminal legal issues. Journal of Emergency Medicine, 21(2), 303–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Straus, M. A. (1976). Sexual inequality cultural norms and wife beating. Victimology, 1(Spring), 54–76.Google Scholar
  67. Straus, M. A. (1977). Wife beating: How common and why? Victimology, 2(3–4), 443–458.Google Scholar
  68. Straus, M. A. (1980). Victims and aggressors in marital violence. American Behavioral Scientist, 23, 681–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Straus, M. A. (2008). Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(3), 252–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Straus, M. A. (2011). Gender symmetry and mutuality in perpetration of clinical-level partner violence: Empirical evidence and implications for prevention and treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature and consequences of intimate partner violence. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice and Center for Disease Control.Google Scholar
  72. Villalon, R. (2010). Violence against Latina immigrants: Citizenship, inequality, and community. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Walker, L. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  74. Websdale, N. (1998). Rural woman battering and the justice system. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  75. Wilbur, L., Hugley, M., Harfield, J., Suprenant, Z., Taliaferro, E., Smith, J., et al. (2001). Survey results of women who have been strangled while in an abusive relationships. Journal of Emergency Medicine, 21(3), 297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yi, R. H., & Dearfield, C. T. (2012). The status of women in the U.S. media. Retrieved July 13, 2012, from Women’s Media Center: http://wmc.3cdn.net/a6b2dc282c824e903a_arm6b0hk8.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA

Personalised recommendations