Advertisement

Perceptions of Female Perpetrators

  • Katherine R. White
  • Donald G. Dutton

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is often perceived as violence predominantly perpetrated by males against females. Reactions to hypothetical situations of identical acts of male and female IPV results in the perception of female violence as occurring less frequently, having less negative effect on the victim, and as being less problematic within a society. More generally, among professionals involved in providing legal and mental health services to couples, female violence is not viewed as a serious public issue compared to male-perpetrated IPV. Despite the prevalence of this perception of a gender asymmetry in IPV, a review of the available evidence suggests that females perpetrate IPV at least as often, if not more frequently, than males. Implications for current theories of IPV will be discussed.

Keywords

Intimate Partner Violence Intimate Partner Male Partner Female Partner Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 651–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer, J. (2002). Sex differences in physically aggressive acts between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7(4), 313–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bancroft, L., & Silverman, J. G. (2002). The batterer as parent: Addressing the impact of domestic violence on family dynamics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Basile, S. (2005). A measure of court response to requests for protection. Journal of Family Violence, 20(3), 171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bograd, M. (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse: An introduction. In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 11–26). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, G. A. (2004). Gender as a factor in the response of the law-enforcement system to violence against partners. Sexuality & Culture, 8(3–4), 3–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buzawa, E. S., & Hotaling, G. T. (2006). The impact of relationship status, gender, and minor status in the police response to domestic assaults. Victims and Offenders, 1, 323–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caetano, R., Vaeth, P. A. C., & Ramisetty-Mikler, S. (2008). Intimate partner violence victim and perpetrator characteristics among couples in the United States. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 507–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Capaldi, D. M., Wu Shortt, J., Kim, H. K., Wilson, J., Crosby, L., & Tucci, S. (2009). Official incidents of domestic violence: Types, injury and associations with nonofficial couple aggression. Violence and Victims, 24(4), 502–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cordova, J. V., Jacobson, N. S., Gottman, J. M., Rushe, R., & Cox, G. (1993). Negative reciprocity and communication in couples with a violent husband. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102(4), 559–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cormier, N. S., & Woodworth, M. T. (2008). Do you see what I see? The influence of gender stereotypes of student and Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) perceptions of violent same-sex and opposite-sex relationships. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 17(4), 478–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Daly, K., & Bordt, R. L. (1995). Sex effects and sentencing: An analysis of the statistical literature. Justice Quarterly, 12(1), 141–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeKeseredy, W. S. (1988). Woman abuse in dating relationships: The role of male peer support. Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars’ Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dekeseredy, W. S. (2011). Feminist contributions to understanding woman abuse: Myths, controversies, and realities. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(4), 297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Desmarais, S. L., Reeves, K. A., Nicholls, T. L., Telford, R. P., & Fiebert, M. S. (2012a). Prevalence of physical violence in intimate relationships, Part 1: Rates of male and female victimization. Partner Abuse, 3(2), 140–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Desmarais, S. L., Reeves, K. A., Nicholls, T. L., Telford, R. P., & Fiebert, M. S. (2012b). Prevalence of physical violence in intimate relationships, Part 2: Rates of male and female perpetration. Partner Abuse, 3(2), 170–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dragiewicz, M., & Lindgren, Y. (2009). The gendered nature of domestic violence: Statistical data for lawyers considering equal protection analysis. American Journal of Gender, Social Policy and the Law, 17(2), 229–268.Google Scholar
  20. Dutton, D. G., & Corvo, K. (2006). Transforming a flawed policy: A call to revive psychology and science in domestic violence research and practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(5), 457–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dutton, D. G., Hamel, J., & Aaronson, J. (2010). The gender paradigm in family court processes: Re-balancing the scales of justice from biased social science. Journal of Child Custody, 7(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dutton, D. G., & Nicholls, T. L. (2005). The gender paradigm in domestic violence research and theory: Part 1—The conflict of theory and data. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(6), 680–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Feather, N. T. (1996). Domestic violence, gender, and perceptions of justice. Sex Roles, 35(7), 507–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Follingstad, D. R., Brennan, A. F., Hause, E. S., Polek, D. S., & Rutledge, L. L. (1991). Factors moderating physical and psychological symptoms of battered women. Journal of Family Violence, 6(1), 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Follingstad, D. R., DeHart, D. D., & Green, E. P. (2004). Psychologists’ judgments of psychologically aggressive actions when perpetrated by a husband versus a wife. Violence and Victims, 19(4), 435–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gaudiosi, J. A. (2006). Child maltreatment 2006. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Children’s Bureau.Google Scholar
  27. Gruenewald, J., Pizarro, J., & Chermak, S. M. (2009). Race, gender, and the newsworthiness of homicide incidents. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(3), 262–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hamby, S., & Jackson, A. (2010). Size does matter: The effects of gender on perceptions of dating violence. Sex Roles, 63(5–6), 324–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harris, R. J., & Cook, C. A. (1994). Attributions about spouse abuse: It matters who the batterers and victims are. Sex Roles, 30(7–8), 553–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Henning, K., Jones, A. R., & Holdford, R. (2005). “I didn’t do it, but if I did I had a good reason”: Minimization, denial, and attributions of blame among male and female domestic violence offenders. Journal of Family Violence, 20(3), 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Henning, K., & Renauer, B. (2005). Prosecution of women arrested for intimate partner abuse. Violence and Victims, 20(3), 361–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hines, D. A., & Douglas, E. M. (2010). A closer look at men who sustain intimate terrorism by women. Partner Abuse, 1(3), 286–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jaffe, P. G., Lemon, N. K. D., & Poisson, S. E. (2003). Child custody and domestic violence: A call for safety and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. London, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kernsmith, P. (2005). Exerting power or striking back: A genders comparison of motivations for domestic violence perpetration. Violence and Victims, 20(2), 173–185.Google Scholar
  36. Laroche, D. (2005). Aspects of the context and consequences of domestic violence—Situational couple violence and intimate terrorism in Canada in 1999. Quebec City, QC: Government of Quebec.Google Scholar
  37. Lundman, R. J. (2003). The newsworthiness and selection bias in news about murder: Comparative and relative effects of novelty and race and gender typifications on newspaper coverage of homicide. Sociological Forum, 18(3), 357–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MacKinnon, C. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Marshall, L. L. (1992a). Development of the severity of violence against women scales. Journal of Family Violence, 7(2), 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marshall, L. L. (1992b). The severity of violence against men scales. Journal of Family Violence, 7(3), 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McDonald, R., Jouriles, E. N., Ramliseety-Mikler, S., Caetano, R., & Green, C. E. (2006). Estimating the number of children living in partner-violent families. Journal of Family Psychology, 20(1), 137–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miller, F. G., & Lazowski, L. E. (1999). The substance abuse subtle screening inventory-3 (SASSI-3) manual. Springville, IN: The SASSI Institute.Google Scholar
  43. Morse, B. (1995). Beyond the conflict tactics scale: Assessing gender differences in partner violence. Violence and Victims, 10(4), 251–272.Google Scholar
  44. Newby, R. E. (2011). Evil women and innocent victims: The effect of gender on California sentences for domestic homicide. Hastings Women’s Law Journal, 22(1), 113–156.Google Scholar
  45. Pimlott-Kubiak, S., & Cortina, L. M. (2003). Gender, victimization, and outcomes: Reconceptualizing risk. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(3), 528–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rhatigan, D., Stewart, C., & Moore, T. (2011). Effects of gender and confrontation on attributions of female-perpetrated intimate partner violence. Sex Roles, 64(11–12), 875–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Russell, B. (in press). Effectiveness, victim safety, characteristics, and enforcement of protection order. Partner Abuse. Google Scholar
  48. Seelau, S., & Seelau, E. (2005). Gender-role stereotypes and perceptions of heterosexual, gay and lesbian domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 20(6), 363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Simon, T. R., Anderson, M., Thompson, M. P., Crosby, A. E., Shelley, G., & Sacks, J. J. (2001). Attitudinal acceptance of intimate partner violence among U.S. adults. Violence and Victims, 16(2), 115–126.Google Scholar
  50. Sorenson, S. B., & Thomas, K. A. (2009). Views of intimate partner violence in same- and opposite-sex relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(2), 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stets, J., & Straus, M. A. (1989). The marriage license as a hitting license: A comparison of dating, cohabiting and married couples. Journal of Family Violence, 4(1), 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Straus, M. A., Kaufman Kantor, G., & Moore, D. W. (1997). Change in cultural norms approving of marital violence from 1968 to 1994. In G. Kaufman Kantor & J. L. Jasinski (Eds.), Out of the darkness: Contemporary perspectives on family violence (pp. 3–16). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Taylor, K. (2009). Cruelty: Human evil and the human brain. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Taylor, C. A., & Sorenson, S. B. (2005). Community-based norms about intimate partner violence: Putting attributions of fault and responsibility into context. Sex Roles, 53(7–8), 573–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measure by the national violence against women survey. Violence Against Women, 6(2), 142–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Trocmé, N., MacLaurin, B., Fallon, B., Daciuk, J., Billingsley, D., Tourigny, M., et al. (2001). Canadian incidence survey of reported child abuse and neglect. Ottawa, ON: Health Canada.Google Scholar
  58. Whitaker, D. J., Haileyesus, T., Swahn, M., & Saltzman, L. (2007). Differences in frequency of violence and reported injury between relationships with reciprocal and non-reciprocal intimate partner violence. American Journal of Public Health, 97(5), 941–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Williams, S. L., & Frieze, I. H. (2005). Patterns of violent relationships, psychological distress, and marital satisfaction in a national sample of men and women. Sex Roles, 52, 771–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations