Hydrophytes in the Mid-Atlantic Region: Ecology, Communities, Assessment, and Diversity

  • Sarah J. Chamberlain
  • Denice Heller Wardrop
  • M. Siobhan Fennessy
  • Doug DeBerry


Hydrophytes, or wetland plants, are the most conspicuous and perhaps most colorful element of wetland systems. In the mid-Atlantic region, hydrophytes have been the focus of many studies, resulting in a wealth of information on wetland classification, vegetation stressors, and plant-based assessment tools. For example, exploration of the relationship between hydrophytes and the physical aspects of wetlands has led to a new hydrogeomorphic classification of headwater systems that combines three previously distinct classes. Studies of stressors have shown that plants respond differentially to human-mediated disturbances in the surrounding landscape. Reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea), a native but highly invasive wetland grass in regional wetlands, exhibits increased establishment, growth, and biomass in response to nutrient additions, and surprisingly, in some instances, to increased sedimentation, while blue vervain (Verbena hastata), a denizen of freshwater wetland habitats, is intolerant of increased sediment loading. Hydrophtyes have also served as the foundation for some of the most powerful wetland assessment tools in the region. Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) and biotic indices have been developed by a number of states within the region and in the case of FQA, for the region as a whole. This chapter examines the role of hydrophytes in these studies, as well as spotlights invasive and special status wetland species found in wetland habitats in the region.


  1. Adamus PR, Danielson TJ, Gonyaw A (2001) Indicators for monitoring biological integrity of inland, freshwater wetlands: a survey of North American technical literature (1990–2000). EPA-843-R-01, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Alix MS, Scribailo RW (1998) Aquatic plant species diversity and floristic quality assessment of Saugany Lake, Indiana. Proc Indiana Acad Sci 107:123–139Google Scholar
  3. Anderson RC, Dhillion SS, Kelley TM (1996) Aspects of the ecology of an invasive plant, garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata), in central Illinois. Restor Ecol 4(2):181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andreas BK, Lichvar RW (1995) Floristic index for establishing assessment standards: a case study for Northern Ohio. Technical report WRP-DE-8, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Ash HB (ed. and transl.) (1941) Lucius Junius Moderatus Columella: On Agriculture I–IV. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (us)Google Scholar
  6. Atkinson RB, Perry JE, Smith E, Cairns J Jr (1993) Use of created wetland delineation and weighted averages as a component of assessment. Wetlands 13:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balcombe CK, Anderson JT, Fortney RH, Rentch JS, Grafton WN, Kordek WS (2005) A comparison of plant communities in mitigation and reference wetlands in the mid-Appalachians. Wetlands 25:130–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnes WJ (1999) The rapid growth of a population of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) and its impact on some riverbottom herbs. J Torrey Bot Soc 126:133–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beatty GH, Henderson H, Keener C, Gruver R (2002) Vascular plants of Centre County, Pennsylvania and their coefficients of conservatism: plants of Upper Penns Creek watershed, documented and probable plus appendix. Copyright © 2002 by Beatty, Henderson, Keener, directors; Gruver, producer. Used with permission by C. KeenerGoogle Scholar
  10. Bedford BL (1996) The need to define hydrologic equivalence at the landscape scale for freshwater wetland mitigation. Ecol Appl 6:57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bernthal TW (2003) Development of a floristic quality assessment methodology for Wisconsin. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Integrated Science Services PUB-SS-986 2003, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  12. Bigler RJ, Richardson JL (1984) Classification of soils in prairie pothole wetlands with deep marsh plant species in North Dakota. Soil Surv Horiz 25:16–24Google Scholar
  13. Billings WD (1952) The environmental complex in relation to plant growth and distribution. Q Rev Biol 27:251–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bowman’s Hill Wildflower Preserve (2009) Plant Stewardship Index. Retrieved from http://www.bhwp.org/psi/index.html
  15. Braun EL (1950) Deciduous forests of eastern North America. Hafner Publishing Company, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  16. Bried JT, Stout KL, Portante T (2012) Coefficients of conservatism for the vascular flora of New York and New England: Inter-state comparisons and expert opinion bias. Northeastern Naturalist 19(special issue 6):101–114Google Scholar
  17. Brinson MM (1993) A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands. Technical report WRP-DE-4. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Washington, DC, 79pp+appGoogle Scholar
  18. Brooks RR (1979) Indicator plants for mineral prospecting: a critique. J Geochem Explor 12:67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brooks RP, Wardrop DH, Perot JK (1999) Development and application of assessment protocols for determining the ecological condition of wetlands in the Juniata River watershed. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Western Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Laboratory, EPA/600/R-98/181, Corvallis, ORGoogle Scholar
  20. Brooks RM, McKenney-Easterling M, Brinson R, Rheinhardt K, Havens D, O’Brian J, Bishop J, Rubbo J, Armstrong B, Hite J (2009) A Stream-Wetland-Riparian (SWR) index for assessing condition of aquatic ecosystems in small watersheds along the Atlantic slope of the eastern U.S. Environ Monit Assess 150:101–117. doi: 10.1007/s10661-008-0673-z
  21. Burke MJW, Grime JP (1996) An experimental study of plant community invasibility. Ecology 77:776–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Byers EA, Vanderhorst JP, Streets BP (2007) Classification and conservation assessment of high elevation wetland communities in the Allegheny Mountains of West Virginia. West Virginia Natural Heritage Program. West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, Elkins, WVGoogle Scholar
  23. Cannon HL (1971) The use of plant indicators in ground water surveys, geologic mapping and mineral prospecting. Taxon 20(2/3):227–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chamberlain SJ, Ingram HM (in press) Developing coefficients of conservatism to advance floristic quality assessment in the mid-Atlantic region (MAR). J Torrey Bot SocGoogle Scholar
  25. Chapin III FS (1991) Integrated responses of plants to stress. Bioscience 41:29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chapin FS III, Bloom AJ, Field CB, Waring RH (1987) Plant responses to multiple environmental factors. Bioscience 37(1):49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chesapeake Bay Program Office (2004) Purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed: a regional management plan. Chesapeake Research Consortium, Chesapeake Bay Program OfficeGoogle Scholar
  28. Connell JH (1983) On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. Am Nat 122:661–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cook CDK (1993) Origin, autecology, and spread of some of the world’s most troublesome aquatic weeks. In: Pieterse AH, Murphy K (eds) Aquatic weeds: the ecology and management of nuisance aquatic vegetation. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  30. Cowardin LM, Carter V, Golet FC, LaRoe ET (1979) Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-79/31. Washington, DC, 131ppGoogle Scholar
  31. Craft CB, Richardson CJ (1998) Recent and long-term organic soil accretion and nutrient accumulation in the Everglades. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62:834–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Cronk JK, Fennessy MS (2001) Wetland plants: biology and ecology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 440ppGoogle Scholar
  33. D’Antonio CM (1993) Mechanisms controlling invasion of coastal plant communities by the alien succulent Carpobrotus edulis. Ecology 74(1):83–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. DeBerry DA (2006) Floristic Quality Index: ecological and management implications in created and natural wetlands. PhD dissertation, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VAGoogle Scholar
  35. DeBerry DA, Perry JE (2004) Primary succession in a created freshwater wetland. Castanea 63:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (2008) Delaware comprehensive assessment procedure: coastal plain region V 5.1. Available at http://www.wr.dnrec.delaware.gov/Information/OtherInfo/Pages/WetlandMonitoringandAssessment.aspx
  37. Dittmar LA, Neely RK (1999) Wetland seed bank response to sedimentation varying in loading rate and texture. Wetlands 19(2):341–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Drohan PJ, Ross CN, Anderson JT, Fortney RH, Rentch JS (2006) Soil and hydrological drivers of Typha latifolia encroachment in a marl wetland. Wetlands Ecol Manage 14:107–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ehrenfeld JG (2005) Vegetation of forested wetlands in urban and suburban landscapes in New Jersey. J Torrey Bot Soc 132(2):262–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ewel KC (1984) Effects of fire and wastewater on understory vegetation in cypress domes. In: Ewel KC, Odum HT (eds) Cypress swamps. University Presses of Florida, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
  41. Faber-Langendoen D, Masters L, Nichols J, Snow K, Tomaino A, Bittman R, Hammerson G, Heidel B, Ramsay L, Young B (2009) NatureServe conservation status assessments: methodology for assigning ranks. NatureServe, Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
  42. Fennessy MS, Elifritz B, Lopez R (1998) Testing the floristic quality assessment index as an indicator of riparian wetland disturbance. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Technical Bulletin, Division of Surface Water, Wetlands Ecology Unit, Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
  43. Fike J (1999) Terrestrial and palustrine plant communities of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Forestry, Harrisburg, PAGoogle Scholar
  44. Fowler N (1986) The role of competition in plant communities in arid and semiarid regions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:89–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Galatowitsch SM, Anderson NO, Ascher PD (1999) Invasiveness in wetland plants in temperate North America. Wetlands 19:733–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Goldberg DE, Miller TE (1990) Effects of different resource additions on species diversity in an annual plant community. Ecology 71(1):213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gordon RB (1940) The primeval forest types of Southwestern New York. New York State Museum Bull 321, The University of the State of New York, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  48. Goslee SC, Brooks RP, Cole CA (1997) Plants as indicators of wetland water source. Plant Ecol 131:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Gosselink JG, Turner RE (1978) The role of hydrology in freshwater wetland ecosystems. In: Good RE, Whigham DF, Simpson RL (eds) Freshwater wetlands: ecological processes and management potential. Academic, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  50. Grace JB, Wetzel RG (1982) Niche differentiation between two rhizomatous plant species: Typha latifolia and Typha angustifolia. Can J Bot 60:46–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Green EK, Galatowitsch SM (2001) Differences in wetland plant community establishment with additions of nitrate-N and invasive species (Phalaris arundinacea and Typha x glauca). Can J Bot 79:170–178Google Scholar
  52. Greller AM (2000) Vegetation in the floristic regions of North and Central America. In: Lentz D (ed) Imperfect balance: landscape transformations in the Precolumbian Americas (Ch. 3). Columbia University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  53. Gu B (2006) Environmental conditions and phosphorus removal in Florida lakes and wetlands inhabited by Hydrilla verticillata (Royle): implications for invasive species management. Biol Invasions 8(7):1569–1578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Harrison JW (2001) Herbaceous tidal wetland communities of Maryland’s eastern shore: identification, assessment, and monitoring. Maryland Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage Division, Annapolis, MDGoogle Scholar
  55. Herman KD, Masters LA, Penskar MR, Reznicek AA, Wilhelm GS, Brodowicz WW (1997) Floristic quality assessment: development and application in the state of Michigan (USA). Nat Area J 17:265–279Google Scholar
  56. Herman KD, Masters LA, Penskar MR, Reznicek AA, Wilhelm GS, Brodovich WW, Gardiner KP (2001) Floristic quality assessment with wetland categories and examples of computer applications for the state of Michigan—revised, 2nd edn. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife, Natural Heritage Program, Lansing, MIGoogle Scholar
  57. Hobbs RJ, Huenneke LF (1992) Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conserv Biol 6(3):324–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hodgson JG (1986) Commonness and rarity in plants with species reference to Sheffield flora. Biol Conserv 36:199–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Howard GW, Harley KLS (1998) How do floating aquatic weeds affect wetland conservation and development? How can these effects be minimised? Wetlands Ecol Manage 5:215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jacobs A (2010) Delaware rapid assessment procedure V 6.0. Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Dover, DEGoogle Scholar
  61. Jeglum JK (1971) Plant indicators of pH and water level in peatlands at Candle Lake, Saskatchewan. Can J Bot 49:1661–1676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Jones KB, Riitters KH, Wickham JD, Tankersley RD, O’Neill RV, Chaloud DJ, Smith ER, Neale AC (1997) An ecological assessment of the United States: mid-Atlantic region: a landscape atlas. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, EPA/600/R-97/130, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  63. Jurik TW, Wang S, van der Valk AG (1994) Effects of sediment load on seedling emergence from wetland seed banks. Wetlands 14(3):159–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kadlec RH, Bevis FB (1990) Wetlands and wastewater: Kinross, Michigan. Wetlands 10:77–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Karr JR, Chu EW (1999) Restoring Life in Running Waters: Better Biological Monitoring. Island Press, Washington, DC 206pp.Google Scholar
  66. Karr JR, Dudley DR (1981) Ecological perspective on water quality goals. Environ Manage 5:55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Langeland KA (1996) Hydrilla verticillata (L.F.) Royle (Hydrocharitaceae), “The Perfect Aquatic Weed”. Castanea 61:293–304Google Scholar
  68. Lopez RD, Fennessy MS (2002) Testing the floristic quality assessment index as an indicator of wetland condition. Ecol Appl 12:487–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mack JJ, Micacchion M, Augusta LD, Sablak GR (2000) Vegetation Indices of Biotic Integrity (VIBI) for wetlands and calibration of the Ohio rapid assessment method for wetlands v. 5.0. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Wetland Ecology Unit, Division of Surface Water, Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
  70. Mack JJ, Fennessy MS, Micacchion M, Porej D (2004) Standardized monitoring protocols, data analysis and reporting requirements for mitigation wetlands in Ohio, v. 1.0. Ohio EPA technical report WET/2004-6. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Surface Water, Wetland Ecology Group, Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
  71. Madeira PT, Jacono CC, Van TK (2000) Monitoring hydrilla using two RAPD procedures and the nonindigenous aquatic species database. J Aquat Plant Manage 28:33–40Google Scholar
  72. Magee TK, Kentula ME (2005) Response of wetland plant species to hydrologic conditions. Wetlands Ecol Manage 13:163–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Mahaney WM, Wardrop DH, Brooks RP (2004a) Impacts of stressors on the emergence and growth of wetland plant species in Pennsylvania, USA. Wetlands 24(3):538–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Mahaney WM, Wardrop DH, Brooks RP (2004b) Impacts of sedimentation and nitrogen enrichment on wetland plant community development. Plant Ecol 175:227–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Mal TK, Lovett-Doust J, Lovett-Doust L (1992) The biology of Canadian weeds. 100. Lythrum salicaria. Can J Plant Sci 72:1305–1331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Maryland Department of Natural Resources (2010) Rare, threatened and endangered plants of Maryland. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Maryland Wildlife and Heritage Service, Natural Heritage Program, Annapolis, MDGoogle Scholar
  77. Matters J, Bozon J (1989) Spotting soil salting—a Victorian guide to salt indicator plants. Dept of Conservation, Forests and Lands, Melbourne, VICGoogle Scholar
  78. Matthews JW (2003) Assessment of the floristic quality index for use in Illinois, USA, wetlands. Nat Area J 23:53–60Google Scholar
  79. McAvoy WA (2009) Botanist, Delaware Natural Heritage Program, personal communicationGoogle Scholar
  80. McAvoy WA (2010) An overview of the wetland flora of Delaware. Presentation made at the 2010 Delaware Wetlands Conference. Available at http://www.dnrec.delaware.gov/Admin/DelawareWetlands/Documents/Conference%20presentations/2010%20Delaware%20Wetland%20Conference%20Agenda%20and%20Links%20to%20Presentations.pdf
  81. McAvoy WA (2011) Rare and uncommon vascular plants of Delaware. Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife, Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, Dover, DEGoogle Scholar
  82. McAvoy WA, Bowman P (2002) The flora of Coastal Plain pond herbaceous communities on the Delmarva Peninsula. Bartonia 61:81–91Google Scholar
  83. McKenney-Easterling M, DeWalle DR, Iverson LR, Prasad AM, Buda AR (2000) The potential impacts of climate change and variability on forests and forestry in the mid-Atlantic region. Climate Res 14:195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Meffe GK, Carroll CR (1994) Principles of conservation biology. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  85. Mid-Atlantic Exotic Pest Plant Council (2011) Retrieved from http://www.ma-eppc.org/
  86. Miller SJ, Wardrop DH (2006) Adapting the floristic quality assessment index to indicate anthropogenic disturbance in central Pennsylvania wetlands. Ecol Indic 6:313–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Miller SJ, Wardrop DH, Mahaney WM, Brooks RP (2006) A plant-based index of biological integrity (IBI) for headwater wetlands in central Pennsylvania. Ecol Indic 6:290–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Mirsal IA (2008) Soil pollution: origin, monitoring and remediation, 2nd edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  89. Morrison SL, Molofsky J (1998) Effects of genotypes, soil moisture, and competition on the growth of an invasive grass, Phalaris arundinacea (reed canary grass). Can J Bot 76:1939–1946Google Scholar
  90. Mortellaro S, Barry M, Gann G, Zahina J, Channon S, Hilsenbeck C, Scofield D, Wilder G, Wilhelm G (2009) Coefficients of conservatism values and the floristic quality index for the vascular plants of South Florida. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, South Florida Ecological Services Field Office, Vero Beach, FLGoogle Scholar
  91. Mullin BH (1998) The biology and management of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). Weed Technol 12:397–401Google Scholar
  92. Mushet DM, Euliss NH Jr, Shaffer TL (2002) Floristic quality assessment of one natural and three restored wetland complexes in North Dakota, USA. Wetlands 22:126–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. NatureServe (2010) Retrieved from http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/
  94. Nichols SA (1999) Floristic quality assessment of Wisconsin lake plant communities with example applications. J Lake Reservoir Manage 15:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Nichols SA (2001) Long-term change in Wisconsin lake plant communities. J Freshwater Ecol 16:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Nichols JD, Perry JE, DeBerry DA (2006) Using a floristic quality assessment technique to evaluate plant community integrity of forested wetlands in southeastern Virginia, USA. Nat Area J 26:360–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Northern Great Plains Floristic Quality Assessment Panel (2001) Floristic quality assessment for plant communities of North Dakota, South Dakota (excluding the Black Hills), and adjacent grasslands. Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Jamestown, NDGoogle Scholar
  98. Noss RF (1985) On characterizing presettlement vegetation: how and why. Nat Area J 5:5–19Google Scholar
  99. Noss RF, Csuti B (1997) Habitat fragmentation. In: Meffe GK, Carroll CR (eds) Principles of conservation biology, 2nd edn. Sinauer, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  100. Odum EP (1985) Trends expected in stressed ecosystems. Bioscience 35:419–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program (2011) Species of special concern lists: plants. Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Harrisburg, PAGoogle Scholar
  102. Peterson-Smith J, Wardrop DH, Cole CA, Cirmo CP, Brooks RP (2008) Hydrogeomorphology, environment, and vegetation associations across a latitudinal gradient in highland wetlands of the northeastern USA. Plant Ecol 203:155–172. doi: 10.1007/s11258-008-9523-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Pip E (1984) Ecoregional tolerance range variation in aquatic macrophytes. Hydrobiologia 108:37–48Google Scholar
  104. Polsky C, Allard J, Currit N, Crane R, Yarnal B (2000) The mid-Atlantic region and its climate: past, present and future. Climate Res 14:161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Pyle LL (1995) Effects of disturbance on herbaceous exotic plant species on the floodplain of the Potomac River. Am Midl Nat 134:244–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Reed PB Jr (1988) National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: 1988 national summary. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biol Rep 88(24), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  107. Reed PB Jr (Compiler) (1997) Revision of the national list of plant species that occur in wetlands. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  108. Rentch JS, Anderson JT (2006) A floristic quality index for West Virginia wetland and riparian plant communities. West Virginia Agriculture and Forestry Experiment Station, Morgantown, WVGoogle Scholar
  109. Rey Benayas JM, Scheiner SM (1993) Diversity patterns of wet meadows along geochemical gradients in central Spain. J Veg Sci 4:103–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Rey Benayas JM, Bernaldez FG, Levassor C, Peco B (1990) Vegetation of groundwater discharge sites in the Douro basin, central Spain. J Veg Sci 1:461–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Reznicek AA (1994) The disjunct coastal plain flora in the Great Lakes region. Biol Conserv 68:203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Rice D, Rooth J, Stevenson JC (2000) Colonization and expansion of Phragmites australis in upper Chesapeake Bay tidal marshes. Wetlands 20(2):280–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Rogers CE, McCarty JP (2000) Climate change and ecosystems of the mid-Atlantic region. Climate Res 14:235–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Rooney TP, Rogers DA (2002) The modified floristic quality index. Nat Area J 22:340–344Google Scholar
  115. Rubbo JM (2004) The effects of the invasive species, reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea), on the germination and growth of native riparian tree species. MS thesis in Ecology. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PAGoogle Scholar
  116. Schoener TW (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am Nat 122:240–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Scott ML, Slauson WL, Segelquist CA, Auble GT (1989) Correspondence between vegetation and soils in wetlands and nearby uplands. Wetlands 9(1):41–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Segelquist CA, Slauson WL, Scott ML, Auble GT (1990) Synthesis of soil-plant correspondence data from twelve wetland studies throughout the United States. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biol Rep (90)19, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  119. Sinicrope TL, Hine PG, Warren RS, Niering WA (1990) Restoration of an impounded salt marsh in New England. Estuar Coasts 13(1):25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Sipple WS, Klockner WA (1984) Uncommon wetlands in the coastal plain of Maryland. In: Norden AW, Forester DC, Fenwick GH (eds) Threatened and endangered plants and animals of Maryland. Maryland Natural Heritage Program, Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, MD, pp 111–138Google Scholar
  121. Spence DHN (1982) The zonation of plants in freshwater lakes. Adv Ecol Res 12:37–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Squires L, van der Valk AG (1992) Water-depth tolerances of the dominant emergent macrophytes of the Delta Marsh, Manitoba. Can J Bot 70:1860–1867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Stalter R (1981) Some ecological observations of Taxodium distichum (L.) Richard, in Delaware. Castanea 46(2):154–161Google Scholar
  124. Stevenson RJ, Hauer FR (2002) Integrating hydrogeomorphic and Index of Biotic Integrity approaches for environmental assessment of wetlands. J N Am Benthol Soc 21:502–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Steward KK (1993) Seed production in monoecious and dioecious populations of Hydrilla. Aquat Bot 46:169–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Steward KK, Van TK, Carter C, Pieterse AH (1984) Hydrilla invades Washington, DC, and the Potomac. Am J Bot 71:162–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Stuckey R (1980) Distributional history of Lythrum salicaria (Purple Loosestrife) in North America. Bartonia 47:3–20Google Scholar
  128. Swink F, Wilhelm GS (1979) Plants of the Chicago region, 3rd edn. Morton Arboretum, Lisle, IL, 922ppGoogle Scholar
  129. Swink F, Wilhelm GS (1994) Plants of the Chicago region, 4th edn. Indiana Academy of Science, Indianapolis, INGoogle Scholar
  130. Taft JB, Wilhelm GS, Ladd DM, Masters LA (1997) Floristic quality assessment for vegetation in Illinois: a method for assessing vegetation integrity. Erigenia 15:3–95Google Scholar
  131. Templer P, Findlay S, Wigand C (1998) Sediment chemistry associated with native and non-native emergent macrophytes of a Hudson River marsh ecosystem. Wetlands 18:70–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. ter Braak CJ, Smilauer P (1997) Canoco for windows, version 4.5. Plant Research International, Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  133. Thompson JD (1991) The biology of an invasive plant: what makes Spartina anglica so successful? Bioscience 41(6):393–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Tiner RW Jr (1988) Field guide to nontidal wetland identification. Cooperative publication, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Newton Corner, MAGoogle Scholar
  135. Tiner RW (1999) Wetland indicators: a guide to wetland identification, delineation, classification, and mapping. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, 392ppGoogle Scholar
  136. USDA, NRCS (2011) The plants database (http://plants.usda.gov, 6 November 2011). National Plant Data Team, Greensboro, NC
  137. USEPA (2002a) Methods for evaluating wetland condition: introduction to wetland biological assessment. EPA-822-R-02-014, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  138. USEPA (2002b) Methods for evaluating wetland condition: developing metrics and indexes of biological integrity. EPA-822-R-02-016, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  139. USEPA (2002c) Methods for evaluating wetland condition: using vegetation to assess environmental conditions in wetlands. EPA-822-R-02-020, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  140. van der Valk AG (1981) Succession in wetlands: a Gleasonian approach. Ecology 62:688–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. van der Valk AG (1986) The impact of litter and annual plants on recruitment from the seed bank of a lacustrine wetlands. Aquat Bot 24:13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Vasquez EA, Glenn EP, Brown JJ, Guntenspergen GR, Nelson SG (2005) Salt tolerance underlies the cryptic invasion of North American salt marshes by an introduced haplotype of the common reed Phragmites australis (Poaceae). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 298:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Veneman PLM, Tiner RW (1990) Soil-vegetation correlations in the Connecticut River floodplain of western Massachusetts. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biol Rep 90(6), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  144. Veselka W, Anderson JT, Kordek W (2009) Using duel classifications in the development of avian wetland indices of biological integrity for wetlands in West Virginia, USA. Environ Monit Assess 164(1–4):533–548Google Scholar
  145. Veselka W, Kordek W, Krantz K (2010) IBI Using two classification schemes to develop vegetation indices of biological integrity for wetlands in West Virginia, USA. Environ Monit Assess 170:555–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation (2009) Natural heritage resources of Virginia: rare plants. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VAGoogle Scholar
  147. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation (2012) The natural communities of Virginia: classification of ecological community groups, second approximation. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VAGoogle Scholar
  148. Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (2004) Virginia wetland plants C-value list. Office of Wetlands, Water Protection Compliance, Richmond, VAGoogle Scholar
  149. Wardrop DH (1997) The occurrence and impact of sedimentation in central Pennsylvania ­wetlands. PhD dissertation in Ecology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PAGoogle Scholar
  150. Wardrop DH, Brooks RP (1998) The occurrence and impact of sedimentation in central Pennsylvania wetlands. Environ Monit Assess 51:119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Wardrop DH, Kentula ME, Jensen SF, Stevens DL, Hychka KC, Brooks RP (2007a) Assessment of wetlands in the upper Juniata watershed in Pennsylvania, USA using the hydrogeomorphic approach. Wetlands 27(3):432–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Wardrop DH, Kentula ME, Stevens DL, Jensen SF, Brooks RP (2007b) Assessment of wetland condition: an example from the upper Juniata Watershed in Pennsylvania, USA. Wetlands 27(3):416–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Watts BD, Bradshaw DS (2005) Evaluating partners in flight partnership lands in the mid-Atlantic region: Converting conservation plans into conservation actions. USDA Forest Service Gen Tech Rep PSW-GTR-191Google Scholar
  154. Weiher E, Keddy PA (1995) The assembly of experimental wetland plant communities. Oikos 73:323–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. West Virginia Natural Heritage Program (2007) Rare, threatened and endangered plants. West Virginia Department of Natural Resources, South Charleston, WV. Available at http://www.wvdnr.gov/Wildlife/documents/Plants2007_2_.pdf
  156. Wetzel PR, van der Valk AG (1998) Effects of nutrient and soil moisture on competition between Carex stricta, Phalaris arundinacea, and Typha latifolia. Plant Ecol 138:179–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Wilcox DA, Meeker JE, Hudson PL, Armitage BJ, Black MG, Uzarski DG (2002) Hydrologic variability and the application of Index of Biotic Integrity metrics to wetlands: a Great Lakes evaluation. Wetlands 22:588–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Wilhelm G, Ladd D (1988) Natural area assessment in the Chicago region. Trans North Am Wildl Nat Resour Conf 53:361–375Google Scholar
  159. Zedler JB, Rea N (1998) Introduction to the ecology and management of wetland plant invasions. Wetlands Ecol Manage 5:161–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah J. Chamberlain
    • 1
  • Denice Heller Wardrop
    • 1
  • M. Siobhan Fennessy
    • 2
  • Doug DeBerry
    • 3
  1. 1.Riparia, Department of GeographyPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyKenyon CollegeGambierUSA
  3. 3.VHB—Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.WilliamsburgUSA

Personalised recommendations