Advertisement

Jokela: The Social Roots of a School Shooting Tragedy in Finland

  • Atte Oksanen
  • Johanna Nurmi
  • Miika Vuori
  • Pekka Räsänen
Chapter

Abstract

An analysis of a school shooting that took place in the small town of Jokela, Finland, in 2007. The perpetrator, Pekka-Eric Auvinen, pursued a clear and sophisticated media strategy and wrote a manifesto that underlined nihilism, hate, and disillusion with society and his peers. Auvinen was a shy, lonely young man who found his peer group in internet communities that glorify school shootings. The data used included investigation reports, a two-wave survey conducted in Jokela 6 and 18 months after the shooting, and interviews with local residents and involved professionals. Our analysis reveals the social roots of the tragedy. Auvinen was bullied and felt ostracized in the small community. Both school and family failed to integrate him socially. In the local community, young people became increasingly worried about his talk and behavior, especially in the year immediately preceding the shooting. Auvinen’s parents tried without success to get psychiatric help for their son, who became increasingly radical in his thoughts and obsessed with terrorist violence. A lack of meaningful social ties magnified the effect of online communities that indirectly encouraged Auvinen to carry out his “Main Strike.” The shooting was a traumatic event for the whole community since the perpetrator had lived there most of his life. Social support and solidarity enhanced the prospects for coping.

Keywords

Terrorist Attack Generalize Trust Institutional Trust Social Solidarity Severe Violence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Addington, L. A. (2009). Cops and cameras: Public school security as a policy response to Columbine. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(10), 1426–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bannenberg, B. (2010). Amok: Ursachen erkennen—Warnsignale verstehen—Katastrophen verhindern. Munich: Random House.Google Scholar
  3. Birkland, T. A., & Lawrence, R. G. (2009). Media framing and policy change after Columbine. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(10), 1405–1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Böckler, N., & Seeger, T. (2010). Schulamokläufer: eine Analyse medialer Täter-Eigendarstellungen und deren Aneignung durch jugendliche Rezipienten. Weinheim: Juventa.Google Scholar
  5. Böckler, N., Seeger, T., & Heitmeyer, W. (2011). School shooting: A double loss of control. In W. Heitmeyer, H.-G. Haupt, S. Malthaner, & A. Kirschner (Eds.), Control of violence: Historical and international perspectives on violence in modern societies (pp. 261–294). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Bondü, R., & Scheithauer, H. (2011a). Amoklauf und School Shooting: Bedeutung, Hintergründe und Prävention. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  7. Bondü, R., & Scheithauer, H. (2011b). Explaining and preventing school shootings: Chances and difficulties of control. In W. Heitmeyer, H-G. Haupt, S. Malthaner, & A. Kirschner (Eds.), Control of violence: Historical and international perspectives on violence in modern societies (pp. 295–314). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Borum, R., Cornell, D., Modzeleski, W., & Jimerson, S. R. (2010). What can be done about school shootings? A review of the evidence. Educational Researcher, 39(1), 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Currie, C., Gabhainn, S. N., Godeau, E., Roberts, C., Smith, R., Currie, D., & Barnekow, V. (Eds.). (2008). Inequalities in young people’s health: HBSC international report from the 2005/2006 survey. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
  11. Durkheim, Émile. (2007). Le suicide: étude de sociologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (Original work published 1897).Google Scholar
  12. Fast, J. (2008). Ceremonial violence: A psychological explanation of school shootings. Woodstock: Overlook.Google Scholar
  13. Gerdt, A. (2004). Petrin matka Myyrmanniin. Helsinki: Gummerus.Google Scholar
  14. Harding, D. J., Fox, C., & Mehta, J. D. (2002). Studying rare events through qualitative case studies. Sociological Methods & Research, 31(2), 174–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harju, J. (2012, February 15). Koko luokka näki puukotuksen. Helsingin Sanomat. Google Scholar
  16. Harju, J., & Markkanen, K. (2012, January 10). Koulupuukottaja kuoli kolarissa. Helsingin Sanomat. Google Scholar
  17. Hawdon, J., & Ryan, J. (2011). Social relations that generate and sustain solidarity after a mass tragedy. Social Forces, 89(4), 1363–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hawdon, J., Ryan, J., & Agnich, L. (2010). Crime as a source of solidarity: A research note testing Durkheim’s assertion. Deviant Behavior, 31(8), 679–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hawdon, J., Räsänen, P., Oksanen, A., & Ryan, J. (2012). Social solidarity and wellbeing after critical incidents: Three cases of mass shootings. Journal of Critical Incident Analysis 2 (in press).Google Scholar
  20. Helsingin Sanomat. (2001, April 5). Tukholman kouluampujalle yhdeksän vuoden tuomio. Helsingin Sanomat.Google Scholar
  21. Hoffmann, J., Roshdi, K., & Robertz, F. (2009). Zielgerichtete schwere Gewalt und Amok an Schulen: Eine empirische Studie zur Prävention schwerer Gewalttaten. Kriminalistik, 25(4), 196–204.Google Scholar
  22. Investigation Commission of the Jokela School Shooting [ICJ]. (2009). Jokela School Shooting on 7 November 2007: Report of the Investigation Commission (Publication 1:2009). Helsinki: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  23. Kääriäinen, J. (2008). Väkivalta rikoksena. In N. Ellonen, J. Kääriäinen, V. Salmi, & H. Sariola (Eds.), Lasten ja nuorten väkivaltakokemukset (pp. 41–51). Tampere and Helsinki: Police College of Finland and National Research Institute of Legal Policy.Google Scholar
  24. Kääriäinen, J., & Lehtonen, H. (2006). The variety of social capital in welfare state regimes—A comparative study of 21 countries. European Societies, 8(1), 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaczynski, T. (1995, September 22). Industrial society and its future. Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/unabomber/manifesto.text.htm.
  26. Kaltiala-Heino, R., Rimpela, M., Marttunen, M., Rimpelä, A., & Rantanen, P. (1999). Bullying, depression, and suicidal ideation in Finnish adolescents: School survey. British Medical Journal, 319, 348–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Poskiparta, E., Kaljonen, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: Grades 4–6. Child Development, 82(1), 311–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kiilakoski, T. (2009). Viiltoja: Analyysi kouluväkivallasta Jokelassa. Helsinki: Finnish Youth Research Network. Retrieved from http://www.nuorisotutkimusseura.fi/julkaisuja/viiltoja.pdf.
  29. Kiilakoski, T., & Oksanen, A. (2011a). Soundtrack of the school shootings: Cultural script, music and male rage. Young, 19(3), 247–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kiilakoski, T., & Oksanen, A. (2011b). Cultural and peer influences on homicidal violence: A Finnish Perspective. New Directions for Youth Development, 33(129), 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kimmel, M. S., & Mahler, M. (2003). Adolescent masculinity, homophobia, and violence. Random school shootings, 1982–2001. American Behavioral Scientist, 46(10), 1439–1458.Google Scholar
  32. Kullberg, A. (2011). Terrorismi ja Suomi. In A. Kullberg (Ed.), Suomi, terrorismi, Supo (pp. 10–44). Helsinki: WSOY.Google Scholar
  33. Lahti, A., Räsänen, P., Riala, K., Keränen, S., & Kakko, H. (2011). Youth suicide trends in Finland, 1969–2008. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(9), 984–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Larkin, R. (2009). The Columbine legacy: Rampage shootings as political acts. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(9), 1309–1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lawrence, R. A., & Birkland, T. A. (2004). Guns, Hollywood and criminal justice: Defining the school shootings problem across public arenas. Social Science Quarterly, 85(5), 1193–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee, J. (2009). Celebrity, pedophilia, and ideology in American culture. Amherst, NY: Cambria.Google Scholar
  37. Lee, M., & Farrall, S. (2009). Fear of crime: Critical voices in an age of anxiety. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish.Google Scholar
  38. Lindberg, N., Sailas, E., & Kaltiala-Heino, R. (2012). The copycat phenomenon after two Finnish school shootings: An adolescent psychiatric perspective. BMC Psychiatry, 12(1), 91 [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1186/1471-244X-12-91.Google Scholar
  39. Lindström, K., Räsänen, P., Oksanen, A., & Nurmi, J. (2011). Politiikkaprosessi ja aselainsäädännön uudistaminen Jokelan ja Kauhajoen koulusurmien jälkeen. In J. Saari & M. Niemelä (Eds.), Politiikan polut ja hyvinvointiyhteiskunnan muutos (pp. 254–271). Helsinki: Kela.Google Scholar
  40. Malkki, L. (2011). Suomessa ei ole terrorismia, koska “Suomessa ei ole terrorismia”? 2000-luvun väkivallanteot ja tulkintojen merkitys. In A. Kullberg (Ed.), Suomi, terrorismi, Supo (pp. 204–224). Helsinki: WSOY.Google Scholar
  41. MTV3. (2008). 45 Minuuttia, November 5, 2008. Interview with the parents of Pekka-Eric Auvinen. Retrieved from http://www.katsomo.fi/?progId=3650&itemId=1052.
  42. Muschert, G., & Peguero, A. A. (2010). Columbine effect and school anti-violence policy. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, 17, 117–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. National Bureau of Investigation [NBI]. (2008). Esitutkintapöytäkirja 2400/R/488/07. Vantaa: Finnish Police.Google Scholar
  44. National School Health Survey. (2009). Koulukiusaaminen. Retrieved from http://info.stakes.fi/kouluterveyskysely/FI/tulokset/taulukot2009/kiusaaminen2009.htm.
  45. Newman, K. S., Fox, C., Harding, D. J., Mehta, J., & Roth, W. (2004). Rampage: The social roots of school shootings. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  46. Nurmi, J. (2012). Making sense of school shootings: Comparing local narratives of solidarity and conflict in Finland. Traumatology. doi: 10.1177/1534765611426787.
  47. Nurmi, J., Räsänen, P., & Oksanen, A. (2012). The norm of solidarity: Experiencing negative aspects of community life after a school shooting tragedy. Journal of Social Work, 12(3), 300–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Oksanen, A., Räsänen, P., Nurmi, J., & Lindström, K. (2010). “This can’t happen here!” Community reactions to school shootings in Finland. Research on Finnish Society, 3, 19–27.Google Scholar
  49. Oksanen, A., Räsänen, P., & Nurmi, J. (2012). Jokela and Kauhajoki: Experiencing school shootings in a Nordic welfare society. In R. Schwester (Ed.), Handbook of critical incident analysis (pp. 252–264). New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  50. Partanen, P., & Nikula, A. (2010). Oppilaitosten turvallisuus: Työryhmän raportti (publication 40/2009). Helsinki: Ministry of the Interior.Google Scholar
  51. Pihlaja, J. (2003, August 26). Lukiolaispoika linnoittautui koulun katolle Haminassa. Helsingin Sanomat.Google Scholar
  52. Puustinen, M. (2008). 70 uhkausta kouluihin. Opettaja, 103(7), 8–12.Google Scholar
  53. Rauma Police Department. (1989). Esitutkintapöytäkirja 3603/RP/R/146/89. Rauma: Finnish Police.Google Scholar
  54. Robertz, F., & Wickenhäuser, R. (2010). Der Riss in der Tafel: Amoklauf und schwere Gewalt in der Schule (2dth ed.). Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  55. Ryan, J., & Hawdon, J. (2008). From individual to community: The “framing” of 4–16 and the display of social solidarity. Traumatology, 14(1), 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Saavalainen, H. (2003, August 26). Aseistuminen harvinaista Suomen kouluissa. Helsingin Sanomat. Google Scholar
  57. Sahlberg, P. (2010). Educational change in Finland. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change, part 1 (pp. 323–348). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Savage, I. (1993). Demographic influences on risk perceptions. Risk Analysis, 13(4), 413–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Semenov, A., Veijalainen, J., & Kyppö, J. (2010). Analyzing the presence of school-shooting related communities at social media sites. International Journal of Multimedia Intelligence and Security, 1(3), 232–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sourander, A., Jensen, P., Rönning, J. A., Niemelä, S., Helenius, H., Sillanmäki, L., & Almqvist, F. (2007). What is the early adulthood outcome of boys who bully or are bullied in childhood? The Finnish “From a Boy to a Man” study. Pediatrics, 120, 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. STT. (2011, October 19). Koulu-uhkausten määrä laskussa. Helsingin Sanomat . Retrieved from http://www.hs.fi/kotimaa/Koulu-uhkausten+m%C3%A4%C3%A4r%C3%A4+laskussa/a1305547480463.
  62. Suomalainen, L., Haravuori, H., Berg, N., Kiviruusu, O., & Marttunen, M. (2010). A controlled follow-up study of adolescents exposed to a school shooting—Psychological consequences after four months. European Psychiatry, 26(8), 490–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. THL. (2010). Peruskoulun yläluokkalaisten ja lukiolaisten hyvinvointi 2000/2001–2008/2009: Kouluterveyskysely 2009. Retrieved from http://info.stakes.fi/NR/rdonlyres/DC2944EE-0D93-49AB-BA6E-EB07CECB21AF/0/kokomaa_yhdistetty_2009.pdf.
  64. Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2003). Isn’t it fun to get the respect that we’re going to deserve? Narcissism, social rejection, and aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(2), 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. UNICEF. (2007). Child poverty in perspective: An overview of child well-being in rich countries.Florence: Innocenti Research Centre, Report Card 7.Google Scholar
  66. Uusitalo, T. (2007). Nuorten itsemurhat Suomessa. Helsinki: Office of the Ombudsman for Children in Finland, Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.Google Scholar
  67. Välimaa, R., Kannas, L., Lahtinen, E., Peltonen, H., Tynjälä, J., & Villberg, J. (2008). Finland: Innovative health education curriculum and other investments for promoting mental health and social cohesion among children and young people. In: Social cohesion for mental well-being among adolescents. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
  68. Verlinden, S., Hersen, M., & Thomas, J. (2000). Risk factors in school shootings. Clinical Psychology Review, 20(1), 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vossekuil, B., Reddy, M., & Fein, R. (2000). Safe school initiative: An interim report on the prevention of targeted violence in schools. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Secret Service National Threat Assessment Center.Google Scholar
  70. WHO. (2006). Country reports and charts on suicides. Retrieved October 12, 2011, from http://www.who.int/mental_health/prevention/suicide/country_reports/en/index.html.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Atte Oksanen
    • 1
  • Johanna Nurmi
    • 2
  • Miika Vuori
    • 2
  • Pekka Räsänen
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Turku & Finnish Youth Research SocietyHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Department of Social ResearchUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations