Desistance from Crime: A Review and Ideas for Moving Forward

Chapter

Abstract

The study of desistance, the process by which individuals stop offending, is a dynamic field of interest to both academics and policymakers. This chapter reviews the existing theoretical thinking about desistance, and presents a new perspective on the role of identity change in desistance. We begin by verifying empirically that there are in fact people who offend throughout their life-course, and that desistance is not “normative.” In a departure from usual practice, we discuss these models within the framework of formal time series processes. We then present an argument for why identity change is the most promising theoretical direction for criminologists interested in desistance. Finally, we present long-term hazard models as a “new” approach for studying desistance. We close with a challenge to the field to think not just about ways to cause desistance, but also about ways to identify offenders who are in fact at low risk of reoffending (i.e., people who have desisted).

Keywords

Desistance Identity Hazard Life-course persistent Life course 

References

  1. Abbott, A. (2001). Time matters: On theory and method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Agnew, R. (2005). Why do criminals offend? A general theory of crime and delinquency. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2010). Identity economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Akers, R. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Albert, D., & Steinberg, L. (2011). Judgment and decision making in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Apel, R., Bushway, S., Paternoster, R., Brame, R., & Sweeten, G. (2008). Using state child labor laws to identify the causal effect of youth employment on deviant behavior and academic achievement. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24, 337–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnett, A., Blumstein, A., & Farrington, D. P. (1989). A prospective test of a criminal career model. Criminology, 27, 373–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baskin, D., & Sommers, I. (1998). Casualties of community disorder: Women’s careers in violent crime. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  10. Blokland, A., Nagin, D., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2005). Life span offending trajectories of a Dutch conviction cohort. Criminology, 43, 919–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blokland, A., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2005). The effects of life circumstances on longitudinal trajectories of offending. Criminology, 43, 1203–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blumstein, A., & Cohen, J. (1987). Characterizing criminal careers. Science, 238, 985–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blumstein, A., & Nakamura, K. (2009). Redemption in the presence of widespread criminal background checks. Criminology, 47, 327–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brame, R., Bushway, S. D., & Paternoster, R. (2003). Examining the prevalence of criminal desistance. Criminology, 41, 423–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burke, P. J. (1980). The self: measurement requirements from an interactionist perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burke, P. J., & Reitzes, D. C. (1981). The link between identity and role performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burke, P. J., & Reitzes, D. C. (1991). An identity theory approach to commitment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 239–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bushway, S. (forthcoming). Chapter 10: Life course persisent offenders. In F. Cullen & P. Wilcox (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminological theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Bushway, S., & Apel, R. (2012). A signaling perspective on employment-based reentry programming: Training completion as a desistance signal. Criminology and Public Policy, 11(1), 21–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bushway, S. D., Nieuwbeerta, P., & Blokland, A. (2011). The predictive value of criminal background checks: Do age and criminal history affect time to redemption? Criminology, 49, 27–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bushway, S., & Paternoster, R. (2012). Understanding desistance: Theory testing with formal empirical models. In J. MacDonald (Ed.), Measuring crime and criminality: Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 17, pp. 299–333). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Bushway, S., Piquero, A., Broidy, L., Cauffman, E., & Mazerolle, P. (2001). An empirical framework for studying desistance as a process. Criminology, 39, 491–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bushway, S., & Reuter, P. (2002). Labor markets and crime. In J. Q. Wilson & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Crime (pp. 191–224). Oakland: ICS Press.Google Scholar
  24. Bushway, S. D., Sweeten, G., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2009). Measuring long term individual trajectories of offending using multiple methods. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25(3), 259–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribners.Google Scholar
  26. Doherty, E. E. (2006). Self-control, social bonds, and desistance: A test of life-course interdependence. Criminology, 44, 807–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ebaugh, H. R. F. (1988). Becoming an ex: The process of role exit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Eggleston, E. P., Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2004). Methodological sensitivities to latent class analysis of long-term criminal trajectories. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 20, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Elder, G. H. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69, 1–12.Google Scholar
  30. Fagan, J. (1989). Cessation of family violence: Deterrence and dissuasion. In L. Ohlin & M. Tonry (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 11, pp. 377–425). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Farrall, S. (2005). On the existential aspects of desistance from crime. Symbolic Interaction, 28, 367–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Farrall, S., & Maruna, S. (2004). Desistance-focused criminal justice policy research. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 358–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Farrington, D. P., Coid, J. W., Harnett, L., Jolliffe, D., Soteriou, N., & Turner, R. (2006). Criminal careers up to age 50 and life success up to age 48: New findings from the Cambridge Study in Delinquency Development. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  34. Foote, N. N. (1950). Identification as the basis for a theory of motivation. American Sociological Review, 16, 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. The American Journal of Sociology, 107, 990–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Schroeder, R. D. (2007). Emotions and crime over the life course: A neo-Median perspective on criminal continuity and change. The American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1603–1661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. (1974). Of delinquency and crime. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  38. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon and Schuester.Google Scholar
  39. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Gottfredson, S. D., & Moriarty, L. J. (2006). Statistical risk assessment: Old problems and new applications. Crime and Delinquency, 52, 178–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gove, W. R. (1985). The effect of age and gender on deviant behavior: A biopsychosocial perspective. In A. S. Rossi (Ed.), Gender and the life course (pp. 115–144). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  42. Hagan, J., & Palloni, A. (1988). Crimes as social events in the life course: Reconceiving a criminological controversy. Criminology, 26, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hansen, B. E. (2001). The new economics of structural change: Dating breaks in U.S. labor productivity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hay, C., & Forrest, W. (2008). Self-control theory and the concept of opportunity: Making the case for a more systematic union. Criminology, 46, 1039–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Horney, J. D., Osgood, W., & Marshall, I. H. (1995). Criminal careers in the short term: Intra-individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances. American Sociological Review, 60, 655–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hoyle, R. H., Kernis, M. H., Leary, M. R., & Baldwin, M. W. (1999). Selfhood: Identity, esteem and regulation. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  47. Hoyle, R. H., & Sherrill, M. R. (2006). Future orientation in the self-system: Possible selves, self-regulation, and behavior. Journal of Personality, 74, 1673–1696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kiecolt, K. J. (1994). Stress and the decision to change oneself: A theoretical model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kirk, D. S. (2012). Residential change as a turning point in the life course of crime: Desistance or temporary cessation? Criminology, 50, 329–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kurlychek, M. C., Brame, R., & Bushway, S. D. (2006). Scarlet letters and recidivism: Does an old criminal record predict future offending? Criminology and Public Policy, 5, 483–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kurlychek, M. C., Brame, R., & Bushway, S. D. (2007). Enduring risk? Old criminal records and predictions of future criminal involvement. Crime and Delinquency, 53, 64–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kurlychek, M., Bushway, S., & Brame, R. (2012). Long-term crime desistance and recidivism patterns: Evidence from the Essex County Convicted Felon Study. Criminology, 50(1), 71–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Laub, J. H., & Edwin, H. (2006). Sutherland and the Michael-Adler report: Searching for the soul of criminology seventy years later. Criminology, 44(2), 235–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 28, pp. 1–69). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  56. Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Le Blanc, M., & Fréchette, M. (1989). Male criminal activity from childhood through youth. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Maltz, M. D. (1984). Recidivism. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  59. Maltz, M. D., & McCleary, R. (1977). The mathematics of behavioral change. Evaluation Quarterly, 1, 421–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Markus, H. (1983). Self-knowledge: An expanded view. Journal of Personality, 51, 543–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Markus, H., & Kunda, Z. (1986). Stability and malleability of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 858–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1987). Possible selves: The interface between motivation and the self-concept. In K. Yardley & T. Honess (Eds.), Self and identity: Psychological perspectives. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  65. Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Maruna, S. (1999). Criminology, desistance, and the psychology of the stranger. In D. Cantor & L. Alison (Eds.), The sociology of crime: Groups, teams, and networks. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  67. Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and build their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Maruna, S. (2004). Desistance and explanatory style: A new direction in the psychology of reform. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 20, 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Maruna, S., & Roy, K. (2007). Amputation or reconstruction? Notes on the concept of “knifing off” and desistance from crime. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23, 104–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  71. Mischel, W., Ayduk, O., & Mendoza-Denton, R. (2003). Sustaining delay of gratification over time: A hot-cool systems perspective. In G. Loewenstein, D. Read, & R. Baumeister (Eds.), Time and decision: Economic and psychological perspectives on intemporal choice (pp. 175–200). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  72. Moffitt, T. (1993). Adolesence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Moffitt, T. (2006). Life-course persistent versus adolescence-limited antisocial behavior. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology, Vol. 3: Risk, disorder, and adaptation (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  74. Nagin, D. S. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Nagin, D. S., & Land, K. C. (1993). Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: Specification and estimation of a nonparametric mixed Poisson model. Criminology, 31, 327–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Nagin, D. S., & Paternoster, R. (1994). Personal capital and social control: The deterrence implications of a theory of individual differences in offending. Criminology, 32, 581–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Osgood, W. (2005). Making sense of crime and the life course. The Annals, 602, 196–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ousey, G. C., & Wilcox, P. (2007). Interactions between antisocial propensity and life-course varying correlates of delinquent behavior: Differences by method of estimation and implications for theory. Criminology, 45, 401–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Oyserman, D., Bybee, D., Terry, K., & Hart-Johnson, T. (2004). Possible selves as roadmaps. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 130–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Paternoster, R., & Bushway, S. (2009). Desistance and the “feared self”: Toward an identity theory of criminal desistance. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99, 1103–1155.Google Scholar
  81. Piquero, A. R. (2008). Taking stock of developmental trajectories of criminal activity over the life-course. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), The long view of crime: A synthesis of longitudinal research (pp. 23–78). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rhodes, W. (2011). Predicting criminal recidivism: A research note. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2003). Life-course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology, 41, 301–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2005). Seductions of method: Rejoinder to Nagin and Tremblay. Criminology, 43, 905–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sampson, R. J., Laub, J. H., & Wimer, C. (2006). Does marriage reduce crime? A counter-factual approach to within-individual causal effects. Criminology, 44, 465–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Schlenker, B. R. (1985). Identity and self-identification. In B. R. Schlenker (Ed.), The self and social life (pp. 65–100). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  88. Schmidt, P., & Witte, A. D. (1988). Predicting recidivism using survival models. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Shover, N. (1996). Great pretenders: Pursuits and careers of persistent thieves. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  90. Skardhamar, T. (2009). Reconsidering the theory of adolescent-limited and life-course persistent anti-social behaviour. British Journal of Criminology, 49, 863–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Soothill, K., & Francis, B. (2009). When do ex-offenders become like non-offenders? Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 48, 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Stryker, S. (1968). Identity salience and role performance: The relevance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 4, 558–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings.Google Scholar
  94. Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 284–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Thornberry, T. P. (1987). Toward an interactional theory of delinquency. Criminology, 25, 863–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Thornberry, T. P., Bushway, S. D., Lizotte, A. J., & Krohn, M. D. (2008). Accounting for behavioral change. (working paper).Google Scholar
  97. Uggen, C. (2000). Work as a turning point in the life course of criminals: A duration model of age, employment, and recidivism. American Sociological Review, 65, 529–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wilmoth, J. R., & Horiuchi, S. (1999). Rectangularization revisited: Variability of age at death within human populations. Demography, 36, 475–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wright, B. R. E., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., & Paternoster, R. (2004). Does the perceived risk of punishment deter criminally-prone individuals? Rational choice, self-control, and crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41(2), 180–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wright, B. R. E., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., & Silva, P. (2001). The effects of social ties on crime vary by criminal propensity: A life-course model of interdependence. Criminology, 39(2), 321–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Criminal JusticeUniversity at Albany, State University of New YorkAlbanyUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Criminal Justice & CriminologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations