Advertisement

Littlewood Problem for a Singular Subquadratic Potential

  • Xiong Li
  • Yingfei Yi
Chapter
Part of the Fields Institute Communications book series (FIC, volume 64)

Abstract

We consider a periodically forced singular oscillator in which the potential has subquadratic growth at infinity and admits a singularity. Using Moser’s twist theorem of invariant curves, we show the existence of quasiperiodic solutions. This solves the Littlewood problem on the boundedness of all solutions for such a system.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Xiong Li was supported in part by NSFC(11031002), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and SRF for ROCS, SEM Yingfei Yi was supported in part by NSF grant DMS0708331, NSFC Grant 10428101, and a Changjiang Scholarship from Jilin University.

Received 9/20/2009; Accepted 8/1/2010

References

  1. [1].
    A. Capietto, W. Dambrosio, B. Liu, On the boundedness of solutions to a nonlinear singular oscillator. Z. angew. Math. Phys. 60, 1007–1034 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2].
    R. Dieckerhoff, E. Zehnder, Boundedness of solutions via the twist theorem. Ann. Scuola. Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. 14, 79–95 (1987)Google Scholar
  3. [3].
    T. Küpper, J. You, Existence of quasiperiodic solutions and Littlewood’s boundedness problem of Duffing equations with subquadratic potentials. Nonlinear Anal. 35, 549–559 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4].
    M. Levi, Quasi-periodic motions in superquadratic time-periodic potentials. Comm. Math. Phys. 143, 43–83(1991)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5].
    X. Li, Boundedness of solutions for Duffings equations with semilinear potentials. J. Differ. Equat. 176, 248–268 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6].
    J. Littlewood, Some Problems in Real and Complex Analysis (Heath, Lexington, 1968)Google Scholar
  7. [7].
    B. Liu, Boundedness for solutions of nonlinear Hill’s equations with periodic forcing terms via Moser’s twist theorem. J. Differ. Equat. 79, 304–315 (1989)Google Scholar
  8. [8].
    B. Liu, On Littlewood’s boundedness problem for sublinear Duffing equations. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc 353, 1567–1585 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. [9].
    B. Liu, Quasi-periodic solutions of forced isochronous oscillators at resonance. J. Differ. Equat. 246, 3471–3495 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10].
    J. Mather, Existence of quasi-periodic orbits for twist homeomorphisms of the annulus. Topology 21, 457–467 (1982)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11].
    G. Morris, A case of boundedness of Littlewood’s problem on oscillatory differential equations. Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 14, 71–93 (1976)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12].
    J. Moser, On invariant curves of area-preserving mappings of annulus. Nachr. Akad. Wiss. Gottingen Math. Phys. kl. II, 1–20 (1962)Google Scholar
  13. [13].
    M. Pei, Aubry-Mather sets for finite-twist maps of a cylinder and semilinear Duffing equations. J. Diff. Eqs. 113, 106–127 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14].
    H. Rüssman, On the existence of invariant curves of twist mappings of an annulus, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1007 (Springer, Berlin, 1981), pp. 677–718Google Scholar
  15. [15].
    Y. Yi, On almost automorphic oscillations. Fields Inst. Commun. 42, 75–99 (2004)Google Scholar
  16. [16].
    J. You, Boundedness for solutions of superlinear Duffing’s equations via twist curves theorems. Scientia sinica 35, 399–412 (1992)Google Scholar
  17. [17].
    X. Yuan, Invariant tori of Duffing-type equations. J. Differ. Equat. 142, 231–262 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mathematical SciencesBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingPR China
  2. 2.School of MathematicsGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations